FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

919 men

Jump to newest
 

By *parkle1974 OP   Woman
over a year ago

Leeds

Just read that a woman called Lisa Sparks had sex with 919 different men in less than 24 hours.....

I'd say good on her for giving it a go but I know I couldn't do it....

Could you????

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I am thinking friction burns and blisters!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensuallover1000Man
over a year ago

Somewhere In The Ether…

I’d rather not

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oh her poor vagina

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hunky GentMan
over a year ago

Maldon and Peterborough


"Oh her poor vagina "

I think her mouth and arse would be sore too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hunky GentMan
over a year ago

Maldon and Peterborough

I'm more a one woman man.

Well, one at a time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I mean can she really claim she had sex with that many men when there's less than 2 minutes of penetration?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oo..Woman
over a year ago

Boo's World

I'd rather keep my vagina how it is at present (or bum) depending on how she clocked those numbers up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loydyMan
over a year ago

British


"Just read that a woman called Lisa Sparks had sex with 919 different men in less than 24 hours.....

I'd say good on her for giving it a go but I know I couldn't do it.... in the time scale is it actually possible unless they are all just dip it in and straight out

Could you????"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ruceyyMan
over a year ago

London

I mean I don't usually go down the judgemental if I was her father route...

But if I was her father...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ealitybitesMan
over a year ago

Belfast

Apparently in an emergency she could do 999.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974 OP   Woman
over a year ago

Leeds


"I mean can she really claim she had sex with that many men when there's less than 2 minutes of penetration? "

Apparently it was recorded

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arker secrets 321Man
over a year ago

West Bromwich

Was she goin 4 a record of some sort ? X

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hunky GentMan
over a year ago

Maldon and Peterborough


"I'd rather keep my vagina how it is at present (or bum) depending on how she clocked those numbers up.

"

Foot jobs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just read that a woman called Lisa Sparks had sex with 919 different men in less than 24 hours.....

I'd say good on her for giving it a go but I know I couldn't do it.... in the time scale is it actually possible unless they are all just dip it in and straight out

Could you????"

Assuming 12 hours, it is just over 70 seconds each if going one at a time

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974 OP   Woman
over a year ago

Leeds


"I am thinking friction burns and blisters! "

I'm thinking ouchhhhhhh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asterR and slut mayaMan
over a year ago

Bradford

Cant see the point other than trying for a pointless world record.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I mean can she really claim she had sex with that many men when there's less than 2 minutes of penetration?

Apparently it was recorded "

Even if it were I feel that it's equivalent to saying you can say the whole alphabet in 2 seconds but you mumble everything between the letters C and X

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estinysswingersCouple
over a year ago

Worsley

Kudos to her but imagine she has a few days off after that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irexMan
over a year ago

Hertford

That’s more than a mouthful!! I often see some world records and just think - why??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lexanderSupertrampMan
over a year ago

Gourock


"Just read that a woman called Lisa Sparks had sex with 919 different men in less than 24 hours.....

I'd say good on her for giving it a go but I know I couldn't do it.... in the time scale is it actually possible unless they are all just dip it in and straight out

Could you????

Assuming 12 hours, it is just over 70 seconds each if going one at a time"

The mathematician in me started working overtime but you beat me to it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atnip make me purrWoman
over a year ago

Reading

Dear God no. Could she walk after?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just read that a woman called Lisa Sparks had sex with 919 different men in less than 24 hours.....

I'd say good on her for giving it a go but I know I couldn't do it.... in the time scale is it actually possible unless they are all just dip it in and straight out

Could you????

Assuming 12 hours, it is just over 70 seconds each if going one at a time"

just looked it up, and it was over a 7.5 hour period, so its 29.3 seconds each!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I mean I don't usually go down the judgemental if I was her father route...

But if I was her father... "

You'd get in line?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just read that a woman called Lisa Sparks had sex with 919 different men in less than 24 hours.....

I'd say good on her for giving it a go but I know I couldn't do it.... in the time scale is it actually possible unless they are all just dip it in and straight out

Could you????

Assuming 12 hours, it is just over 70 seconds each if going one at a time

just looked it up, and it was over a 7.5 hour period, so its 29.3 seconds each! "

What position?? That's gotta take some stamina keeping your legs open that long.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ruceyyMan
over a year ago

London


"I mean I don't usually go down the judgemental if I was her father route...

But if I was her father...

You'd get in line?"

Hopefully VIP access you would have thought!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oo..Woman
over a year ago

Boo's World

7.5 hours she completed it in.

21 more men than the lady next to her when the whistle blew to mark the end.

She was that bored she ordered a McDonalds whilst still fucking.

Says a lot about the sex involved I think.

In, hold for 2 seconds and out

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why though? Was she trying to break a record or something?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ruceyyMan
over a year ago

London


"7.5 hours she completed it in.

21 more men than the lady next to her when the whistle blew to mark the end.

She was that bored she ordered a McDonalds whilst still fucking.

Says a lot about the sex involved I think.

In, hold for 2 seconds and out "

Gals gotta eat boo

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rives930Man
over a year ago

Wiltshire

Goes by the nickname Thor

Tho Thor that the could hardly Pith..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *valanche1001Man
over a year ago

Leeds


"I mean can she really claim she had sex with that many men when there's less than 2 minutes of penetration?

Apparently it was recorded "

‘Apparently’ don’t pretend it’s not top of your bookmarks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just read that a woman called Lisa Sparks had sex with 919 different men in less than 24 hours.....

I'd say good on her for giving it a go but I know I couldn't do it.... in the time scale is it actually possible unless they are all just dip it in and straight out

Could you????

Assuming 12 hours, it is just over 70 seconds each if going one at a time

just looked it up, and it was over a 7.5 hour period, so its 29.3 seconds each! "

Wtaf? I'm sorry but nobody can claim they had sex with 919 men when there's all of 29 seconds of penetration. I'll be more impressed with a high number in a 24 period when she makes each man ejaculate WITHOUT him being primed beforehand

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imply DeeWoman
over a year ago

Wherever


"I am thinking friction burns and blisters! "

She brought an army!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oft_SensualTV/TS
over a year ago

Yorkshire

There were a few 'most sex in 24 hour' events in the late 90's early 2000s - Lisa Sparxx (former porn performer) hosted one of them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just read that a woman called Lisa Sparks had sex with 919 different men in less than 24 hours.....

I'd say good on her for giving it a go but I know I couldn't do it.... in the time scale is it actually possible unless they are all just dip it in and straight out

Could you????

Assuming 12 hours, it is just over 70 seconds each if going one at a time

just looked it up, and it was over a 7.5 hour period, so its 29.3 seconds each!

Wtaf? I'm sorry but nobody can claim they had sex with 919 men when there's all of 29 seconds of penetration. I'll be more impressed with a high number in a 24 period when she makes each man ejaculate WITHOUT him being primed beforehand"

Sex is sex no matter how short.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asterR and slut mayaMan
over a year ago

Bradford

[Removed by poster at 15/08/23 17:04:34]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *valanche1001Man
over a year ago

Leeds


"Just read that a woman called Lisa Sparks had sex with 919 different men in less than 24 hours.....

I'd say good on her for giving it a go but I know I couldn't do it.... in the time scale is it actually possible unless they are all just dip it in and straight out

Could you????

Assuming 12 hours, it is just over 70 seconds each if going one at a time

just looked it up, and it was over a 7.5 hour period, so its 29.3 seconds each!

Wtaf? I'm sorry but nobody can claim they had sex with 919 men when there's all of 29 seconds of penetration. I'll be more impressed with a high number in a 24 period when she makes each man ejaculate WITHOUT him being primed beforehand

Sex is sex no matter how short.

"

That’s what I told her but she still kicked me out

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asterR and slut mayaMan
over a year ago

Bradford

Am I in a parallel universe where this a good thing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm more a one woman man.

Well, one at a time. "

I am too but the other way around

One man woman.. Quality not quantitty

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

That would upset me. Would need rounding up to 920

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974 OP   Woman
over a year ago

Leeds


"That would upset me. Would need rounding up to 920 "

Me too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hunky GentMan
over a year ago

Maldon and Peterborough


"I'm more a one woman man.

Well, one at a time.

I am too but the other way around

One man woman.. Quality not quantitty "

'Quailty', damn, that's me out.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hunky GentMan
over a year ago

Maldon and Peterborough


"That would upset me. Would need rounding up to 920 "

One for the road.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

I saw something similar years ago on tv. It was a queue of men lined up with minders making sure they all kept to their alloted time of however many seconds. It was no different to any record attempt and like the record for number of people that can fit in a phone box, I couldn't see the point in it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agerMorganMan
over a year ago

Canvey Island

it’d be like stirring extra sticky porridge by the time bloke 437 got there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Apparently in an emergency she could do 999."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

That’s a complicated answer

Probably not as I all ready know my limits so to speak

But at the same time “4 letter bad word in me” would have to give it a try

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellinever70Woman
over a year ago

Ayrshire

As filled as she would have been, it doesn't sound very fulfilling

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asterR and slut mayaMan
over a year ago

Bradford


"As filled as she would have been, it doesn't sound very fulfilling "

Only for her bank balance

I can just see Roy castle on record breakers with this

One .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxesMan
over a year ago

Southend, Essex


"Just read that a woman called Lisa Sparks had sex with 919 different men in less than 24 hours.....

I'd say good on her for giving it a go but I know I couldn't do it....

Could you????"

Was this the wr gangbang attempt in Poland. Each man had like 30 seconds with her?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxesMan
over a year ago

Southend, Essex


"Cant see the point other than trying for a pointless world record.

"

The irony is. Is that the wr is not recognised and Guinness don't recognise wr that are associated with sex.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hunky GentMan
over a year ago

Maldon and Peterborough


"Cant see the point other than trying for a pointless world record.

The irony is. Is that the wr is not recognised and Guinness don't recognise wr that are associated with sex."

Maybe it's a WR for the amount of blisters acquired in 24 hours.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hePerkyPumpkinTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol

Well this begs the question... what's the minimum amount of time it takes for it to be classed as sex?

We all seem to be agreed that 30 seconds is too short (it is)

Is a minute of vigorous humping more sex than a minute of slow and gentle thrusts?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heekyDemandCouple
over a year ago

Leicester


"I mean can she really claim she had sex with that many men when there's less than 2 minutes of penetration? "

Well it's just over 4 and a half with one in the bum and mouth as well...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osmicraverMan
over a year ago

liverpool


"Oh her poor vagina "

I think after 919 it ceases to be a vagina, and gets reclassified as the dartford tunnel. Not judging but bloody hell

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellinever70Woman
over a year ago

Ayrshire


"Oh her poor vagina

I think after 919 it ceases to be a vagina, and gets reclassified as the dartford tunnel. Not judging but bloody hell "

I've had sex more than 919 times in my life

No cars have driven through my fanny yet

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lephantisMan
over a year ago

Oxford

I assume she stopped because cock 919 was The One and she needed to order the wedding cake?

Speedrunning your way to True Love is at least efficient.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By * and R cple4Couple
over a year ago

swansea

I can’t see it being very satisfying for her ..In then maybe a pump then onto the next .

.Wouldn’t be surprised if she went home after and satisfied herself I know I probably would regardless of how sore my minge was ..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just read that a woman called Lisa Sparks had sex with 919 different men in less than 24 hours.....

I'd say good on her for giving it a go but I know I couldn't do it.... in the time scale is it actually possible unless they are all just dip it in and straight out

Could you????

Assuming 12 hours, it is just over 70 seconds each if going one at a time"

Hands up if you just read the comments for this maths answer.

*Raises hand*

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eviant KnightMan
over a year ago

Norton

I think I would rather go first than be number 919

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orbidden eastMan
over a year ago

london dodging electric scooters


"I think I would rather go first than be number 919"

True, that’s sir

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ris GrayMan
over a year ago

Dorchester


"Just read that a woman called Lisa Sparks had sex with 919 different men in less than 24 hours.....

I'd say good on her for giving it a go but I know I couldn't do it.... in the time scale is it actually possible unless they are all just dip it in and straight out

Could you????

Assuming 12 hours, it is just over 70 seconds each if going one at a time

just looked it up, and it was over a 7.5 hour period, so its 29.3 seconds each!

Wtaf? I'm sorry but nobody can claim they had sex with 919 men when there's all of 29 seconds of penetration. I'll be more impressed with a high number in a 24 period when she makes each man ejaculate WITHOUT him being primed beforehand

Sex is sex no matter how short.

"

vanilla doesn't count

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *avexxMan
over a year ago

cheshire

my word some woman..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *asterR and slut mayaMan
over a year ago

Bradford


"I think I would rather go first than be number 919"

Go to be honest wouldn't want a go at all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top