Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"1850’s. Nowt sexier than a big pair of bloomers." ,,, there coming back | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"1850’s. Nowt sexier than a big pair of bloomers.,,, there coming back" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"1850’s. Nowt sexier than a big pair of bloomers." No, it's the 1540s. I went to the National Portrait Gallery once and the Tudor gallery is full of stunners. Boner central. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Which decade from the past do find the women the sexiest? For me it’s the 70s ! long hair, natural breast, an innocent but sexy look, also seem to be of a slimmer stature " Now that's an interesting point..... I don't recall there being so many larger people in the 70's .... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Which decade from the past do find the women the sexiest? For me it’s the 70s ! long hair, natural breast, an innocent but sexy look, also seem to be of a slimmer stature " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Which decade from the past do find the women the sexiest? For me it’s the 70s ! long hair, natural breast, an innocent but sexy look, also seem to be of a slimmer stature " Now! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"1850’s. Nowt sexier than a big pair of bloomers. No, it's the 1540s. I went to the National Portrait Gallery once and the Tudor gallery is full of stunners. Boner central. Yeah but toothpaste wasn’t invented until the 1820’s. I can’t deal with dog breath." You make a fair point, but the Victorians were hard work. Hardly ever put out | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"1850’s. Nowt sexier than a big pair of bloomers. No, it's the 1540s. I went to the National Portrait Gallery once and the Tudor gallery is full of stunners. Boner central. Yeah but toothpaste wasn’t invented until the 1820’s. I can’t deal with dog breath. You make a fair point, but the Victorians were hard work. Hardly ever put out " According to every painting I’ve ever seen, they never smiled either. Miserable bastards. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah to flowers in hair and that fashion Maybe 60s for me. Minus the eye make up of that era. Mod dress with knee high boots or fitted jumpers with mini skirt. Nice Tones" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |