FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Where should Dick be buried?

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

York are claiming him because his son is buried there, he was married there and his family are from there.

Leicester counterclaim that they only allowed the dog to go ahead on the condition that if he was found he was to be reinterred, in Leicester, no later than one year after he was found.

A deal's a deal? Or should he go 'home' to York? Or maybe even to London where all the other Kings & Queens of England/Britain are sleeping?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

dog? .. GRRR *DIG

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Wrong thread........ Epic fail

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"York are claiming him because his son is buried there, he was married there and his family are from there.

Leicester counterclaim that they only allowed the dog to go ahead on the condition that if he was found he was to be reinterred, in Leicester, no later than one year after he was found.

A deal's a deal? Or should he go 'home' to York? Or maybe even to London where all the other Kings & Queens of England/Britain are sleeping?"

I think he should be buried in either York or london, York as that was his homeland and london because he deserves a royal burial

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Wrong thread........ Epic fail "

Huh?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"York are claiming him because his son is buried there, he was married there and his family are from there.

Leicester counterclaim that they only allowed the dog to go ahead on the condition that if he was found he was to be reinterred, in Leicester, no later than one year after he was found.

A deal's a deal? Or should he go 'home' to York? Or maybe even to London where all the other Kings & Queens of England/Britain are sleeping?

I think he should be buried in either York or london, York as that was his homeland and london because he deserves a royal burial "

I'm thinking York as I'm sure he would have made his wishes known about where he wanted to be buried and his connections are with that city.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

Now if he had left a will none of this would of been a problem

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"dog? .. GRRR *DIG"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Up to his balls

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London


"Up to his balls "

Yep

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *etillanteWoman
over a year ago

.


"Now if he had left a will none of this would of been a problem"

I'm sorry I did grin when I saw this comment

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I see a three way poker game between York, Leicester and Westminster abbey with the Archbishop of Canterbury as dealer.

Just to make it interesting they could put a long un on the side

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orset manMan
over a year ago

Bournemouth

should be buried in leicester- my home town

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust_for_laughsCouple
over a year ago

Hinckley


"I see a three way poker game between York, Leicester and Westminster abbey with the Archbishop of Canterbury as dealer.

Just to make it interesting they could put a long un on the side"

Fuck off, there's nothing interesting in Leicester, we're having him

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

They could hung draw and quarter him

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

Seemingly the York contingent failed to trap at Bosworth. I doubt he'd wish to be buried there.

Leicester's the place.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge

Stick him back under the car park. Seems to have lasted well there for centuries.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

In the ground is the best place to burry anyone I would have thought

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Westminster Abbey with the rest of the monarchs. State funeral and a day off work! yay!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Westminster Abbey with the rest of the monarchs. State funeral and a day off work! yay!"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *teveanddebsCouple
over a year ago

Norwich

Well there's lots of bones, can't they have some each?

I doubt if he cares whatever way it's decided.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Westminster Abbey with the rest of the monarchs. State funeral and a day off work! yay!"

Throw a sickie and save the nation millions.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I do actually believe he should be given a proper burial and one that's in keeping with his regal roots. (I'm not a Royalist!) I think a state funeral and a burial in Westminster is what is befitting of a king.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nuts deep up ya bum

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"I do actually believe he should be given a proper burial and one that's in keeping with his regal roots. (I'm not a Royalist!) I think a state funeral and a burial in Westminster is what is befitting of a king."

in agreement with that..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I do actually believe he should be given a proper burial and one that's in keeping with his regal roots. (I'm not a Royalist!) I think a state funeral and a burial in Westminster is what is befitting of a king.

in agreement with that..

"

So am I!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Stick him back under the car park. Seems to have lasted well there for centuries."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *yrdwomanWoman
over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

York!

Duh!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Given the misfortune of the young princes I'm surprised he hasn't been arrested by operation yewtree

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igSuki81Man
over a year ago

Retirement Village


"Stick him back under the car park. Seems to have lasted well there for centuries."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

In truth there is very little real evidence that he had the young princes murdered, much of it was Tudor propaganda

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"In truth there is very little real evidence that he had the young princes murdered, much of it was Tudor propaganda

"

They did disappear though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay


"In truth there is very little real evidence that he had the young princes murdered, much of it was Tudor propaganda

They did disappear though."

But did they?, over the years I have read all manner of accounts of how they died of common measles in London, were exiled and died abroad of malaria.....the truth is that there is lots of conjecture and no evidence of things either way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In truth there is very little real evidence that he had the young princes murdered, much of it was Tudor propaganda

They did disappear though.

But did they?, over the years I have read all manner of accounts of how they died of common measles in London, were exiled and died abroad of malaria.....the truth is that there is lots of conjecture and no evidence of things either way."

I understood that what was believed to be their bodies were found buried in the tower and are now in westminster abbey, if not i want my money back

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I do actually believe he should be given a proper burial and one that's in keeping with his regal roots. (I'm not a Royalist!) I think a state funeral and a burial in Westminster is what is befitting of a king."

what a waste of public money that would be!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

little interest in the past,present or future of the worlds sovereignty..apart from historic interest

thats about it, couldnt give a toss where when how they get buried

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I do actually believe he should be given a proper burial and one that's in keeping with his regal roots. (I'm not a Royalist!) I think a state funeral and a burial in Westminster is what is befitting of a king.

what a waste of public money that would be!"

I'd be in the crowd of pretend grievers..I knew him so well..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I do actually believe he should be given a proper burial and one that's in keeping with his regal roots. (I'm not a Royalist!) I think a state funeral and a burial in Westminster is what is befitting of a king.

what a waste of public money that would be!

I'd be in the crowd of pretend grievers..I knew him so well.."

were you with all the other sad sacks at Diana's planting?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I do actually believe he should be given a proper burial and one that's in keeping with his regal roots. (I'm not a Royalist!) I think a state funeral and a burial in Westminster is what is befitting of a king.

what a waste of public money that would be!

I'd be in the crowd of pretend grievers..I knew him so well..

were you with all the other sad sacks at Diana's planting? "

wait till u read my book about the princess and the paupers swinging parties

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!


"Given the misfortune of the young princes I'm surprised he hasn't been arrested by operation yewtree"

Ah....it is now thought that he didn't kill the princes in the tower. That it was Henry VII who started the rumor to blacken his name as Henrys claim to the throne was very weak. 'twas a dastardly Tudor plot, worthy of a Shakespearian play, mayhap.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

Infact, my fellow fabsters, methinx time is upon me to enter into the spirit of times gone by and with a flourish and adroitness which will hearken back to Bosworth fields, will henceforth be conversing only in Tudor style.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pecifically1Woman
over a year ago

Hull

Wherever his horse is...I heard he was looking for it..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

since he was the last of the kings from the "house of york" I think he should be buried at york minster.........

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *yrdwomanWoman
over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum


"since he was the last of the kings from the "house of york" I think he should be buried at york minster.........

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *UNKIEMan
over a year ago

south east

I understand the arguments for york and leicester and good arguments they are but I believe he should be given his riteful place at westminster abbey

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge

Whether he killed the princes or not he DID steal the throne from the oldest of them. As their uncle he was NOT the rightful heir to the throne.

Usurpation of the throne is treason. So, burial in Westminster? Nope. I still say chuck his bones back where they were found. Too much time, money and effort has gone into the old traitor as it is.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *xpresMan
over a year ago

Elland

York Minster

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Given the misfortune of the young princes I'm surprised he hasn't been arrested by operation yewtree

Ah....it is now thought that he didn't kill the princes in the tower. That it was Henry VII who started the rumor to blacken his name as Henrys claim to the throne was very weak. 'twas a dastardly Tudor plot, worthy of a Shakespearian play, mayhap. "

The timeline disputes that though as Edward (the eldest of the missing princes) was crowned Edward V on the 9th April 1483, with his uncle Richard (III) as protectorate. The boy King disappeared shortly after (he is officially listed as losing the crown on 25th June 1483) and Richard was crowned on 26th June 1483. Henry Tudor disputed his claim to the throne and two years after Richard became King, Henry killed him at Bosworth.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"were you with all the other sad sacks at Diana's planting? "

I lined up on the side of the M1 as she shot through. Very moving it was too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"were you with all the other sad sacks at Diana's planting?

I lined up on the side of the M1 as she shot through. Very moving it was too. "

As in bowel moving?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

It's all hypothetical really as Leicester Council only gave the go ahead on the condition that if he was found he would remain in Leicester. The Richard III Society agreed to that so must honour the deal they made.

Leicester it is then.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"York are claiming him because his son is buried there, he was married there and his family are from there.

Leicester counterclaim that they only allowed the dog to go ahead on the condition that if he was found he was to be reinterred, in Leicester, no later than one year after he was found.

A deal's a deal? Or should he go 'home' to York? Or maybe even to London where all the other Kings & Queens of England/Britain are sleeping?"

As in all things, a deal is definitely a deal.

Leicester agreed to the exhumation on the basis he'd be re-interred there. Welshing on such a deal will deter others from participating in genuine research.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Regardless of where he ends up being buried, someone is bound to get the hump Sorry couldn't resist!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What about cremating him...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"What about cremating him..."

Feck me, he's already been stabbed, lobbed into a hole in the ground, had various buildings parked on top of him, and then had a steamroller build a fookin car park on him, and now you wanna burn the poor sod. Give him a break eh?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Humpty dumpty sat on the wall.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aceytopWoman
over a year ago

from a town near you


"York are claiming him because his son is buried there, he was married there and his family are from there.

Leicester counterclaim that they only allowed the dog to go ahead on the condition that if he was found he was to be reinterred, in Leicester, no later than one year after he was found.

A deal's a deal? Or should he go 'home' to York? Or maybe even to London where all the other Kings & Queens of England/Britain are sleeping?

I think he should be buried in either York or london, York as that was his homeland and london because he deserves a royal burial "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

yes i know the Richard iii society funded the dig..

and yes they made a dealwith Leicester city council..

but, did they have any authority whatsoever to do so..?

they were not his kin, 'he' is not a vase or other artifact..

his remains are that of a King so precedent should be followed surely...?

have this cynical suspicion that York and Leicester both want him for reasons more to do with selling trinkets to tourists than anything else..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bbandflowCouple
over a year ago

South Devon

Burying someone in a car park is wrong on so many levels.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"Burying someone in a car park is wrong on so many levels."

Da dar..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ


"dog? .. GRRR *DIG"

Let sleeping dogs lie

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top