Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've so far watched the 3-4 minute highlights of every match on the BBC app and whilst I've been impressed with some of the skill shown, the overall product is poor. Atrocious goalkeepers, weak shooting, many relatively easy chances missed. And remember I'm watching the highlights! The commentary is, understandably, biased too. Remember though, this is women's football, for it to succeed women need to support it #youdontneedmentosucceed Frank " I don't follow football (So I know nothing) But I've heard people say similar things to yourself. My brother loves football, but he says the game just isn't as entertaining to watch. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have watched the highlights but only watched the England game live. It's the Republic of Ireland's first world Cup " Unfortunately I think ROI have been knocked out. I'm not going to get into the whys and wherefores about women's footy because prior experience tells me that those who come here to deride its "quality" aren't interested in anything other than reinforcement of their view that women's football is shit. Just go and read about why professional women's football fell out of existence for 80 years and who made those decisions and who still makes decisions about women's football. If you still don't care or just want to shovel shit at them, then you're probably a [redacted]. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s a *different* game to the men’s game, it has a slightly different audience too, although with a significant overlap of people who like both. There’s also people on both sides that like to score “points” against the other - ie disparage either the men’s or women’s game in favour of the one they like. Why can’t they both exist and thrive in their own right? It’s not a competition about which is better. There are aspects of the women’s game I like more than the men’s, and aspects less so. It’s great that the popularity is growing and I hope increased coverage can inspire lots of young girls to take up the game. " Hurrah! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's really poor with little speed, quality or excitement & the level of accepted bias in funding the tournament at a loss should be seen as unfair but equal rights are forgotten. Added to that seeing players in their underwear last week was laughable, apparently empowering but in truth it was about the money. They sold themselves out when wanting the tournament to be taken seriously." And men's football is just a load of overpaid fuckboys prancing round and feigning injury. Feels good, doesn't it Punch down some more, please.......... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’ve watched all but a game or two so far. Loving it, seems a much more family friendly atmosphere than the mens games, definitely going to get myself to some WSL games this coming season too. With the Lionesses winning the Euros last year, a good run in a World Cup (who knows, maybe even win it..) will throw the game in to the spotlight even more Football is football, whether it’s Mens or Womens, Premier League or Non League - we all love the game, the drama and the passion. Lets go the girls " Yes, total agree | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m a huge WSL fan anyway, so I’m watching it. Unfortunately I don’t think it’s getting the coverage it deserves but, we’re moving in the right direction and we’ve only got the players, past and present, to thank for what the women’s game will be in the future. I’m also highly critical of the manufacturers not making the goalkeeper kit available! Mrs" 100%. Outrageous Nike won’t produce it, how many girls out there want to be the next Mary Earps and can’t even get an England kit with her name on. I’m pleased the games have been on the main BBC/ITV channels so far, rather than hidden away behind the red button - so that’s a plus I’d say | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m a huge WSL fan anyway, so I’m watching it. Unfortunately I don’t think it’s getting the coverage it deserves but, we’re moving in the right direction and we’ve only got the players, past and present, to thank for what the women’s game will be in the future. I’m also highly critical of the manufacturers not making the goalkeeper kit available! Mrs 100%. Outrageous Nike won’t produce it, how many girls out there want to be the next Mary Earps and can’t even get an England kit with her name on. I’m pleased the games have been on the main BBC/ITV channels so far, rather than hidden away behind the red button - so that’s a plus I’d say" What's stopping me are the timings from Australia mainly, working or travelling to work during the matches. I'll try to catch some at the weekend. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's really poor with little speed, quality or excitement & the level of accepted bias in funding the tournament at a loss should be seen as unfair but equal rights are forgotten. Added to that seeing players in their underwear last week was laughable, apparently empowering but in truth it was about the money. They sold themselves out when wanting the tournament to be taken seriously. And men's football is just a load of overpaid fuckboys prancing round and feigning injury. Feels good, doesn't it Punch down some more, please.........." Don't disagree on the poor morals of male footballers but unless you are reading in braille you are kidding yourself on quality. Honesty is not punching down. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's really poor with little speed, quality or excitement & the level of accepted bias in funding the tournament at a loss should be seen as unfair but equal rights are forgotten. Added to that seeing players in their underwear last week was laughable, apparently empowering but in truth it was about the money. They sold themselves out when wanting the tournament to be taken seriously. And men's football is just a load of overpaid fuckboys prancing round and feigning injury. Feels good, doesn't it Punch down some more, please.......... Don't disagree on the poor morals of male footballers but unless you are reading in braille you are kidding yourself on quality. Honesty is not punching down." I think the word you're seeking is "different". It's different. It's a bit like tennis. In the men's game, lots of points are won by someone smashing a serve without it being returned, because on average, men can hit the ball harder. Women serve fewer aces. It's still tennis. Tennis played on wheels is still tennis, but it's different. I would argue immeasurably better for being on wheels, but that's my own bias Trying to hold women's sport to be identical to men's sport is silly, unless they are sports where there's other factors that means less difference, e.g. equestrian sport and motorsports. And darts isn't a sport, so we can ignore that one | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's really poor with little speed, quality or excitement & the level of accepted bias in funding the tournament at a loss should be seen as unfair but equal rights are forgotten. Added to that seeing players in their underwear last week was laughable, apparently empowering but in truth it was about the money. They sold themselves out when wanting the tournament to be taken seriously. And men's football is just a load of overpaid fuckboys prancing round and feigning injury. Feels good, doesn't it Punch down some more, please.......... Don't disagree on the poor morals of male footballers but unless you are reading in braille you are kidding yourself on quality. Honesty is not punching down. I think the word you're seeking is "different". It's different. It's a bit like tennis. In the men's game, lots of points are won by someone smashing a serve without it being returned, because on average, men can hit the ball harder. Women serve fewer aces. It's still tennis. Tennis played on wheels is still tennis, but it's different. I would argue immeasurably better for being on wheels, but that's my own bias Trying to hold women's sport to be identical to men's sport is silly, unless they are sports where there's other factors that means less difference, e.g. equestrian sport and motorsports. And darts isn't a sport, so we can ignore that one " Not watching the world cup myself (due to the timings), but I agree. I'll just leave this here: https://youtu.be/D_HPiaAx_QA | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's really poor with little speed, quality or excitement & the level of accepted bias in funding the tournament at a loss should be seen as unfair but equal rights are forgotten. Added to that seeing players in their underwear last week was laughable, apparently empowering but in truth it was about the money. They sold themselves out when wanting the tournament to be taken seriously. And men's football is just a load of overpaid fuckboys prancing round and feigning injury. Feels good, doesn't it Punch down some more, please.......... Don't disagree on the poor morals of male footballers but unless you are reading in braille you are kidding yourself on quality. Honesty is not punching down. I think the word you're seeking is "different". It's different. It's a bit like tennis. In the men's game, lots of points are won by someone smashing a serve without it being returned, because on average, men can hit the ball harder. Women serve fewer aces. It's still tennis. Tennis played on wheels is still tennis, but it's different. I would argue immeasurably better for being on wheels, but that's my own bias Trying to hold women's sport to be identical to men's sport is silly, unless they are sports where there's other factors that means less difference, e.g. equestrian sport and motorsports. And darts isn't a sport, so we can ignore that one Not watching the world cup myself (due to the timings), but I agree. I'll just leave this here: https://youtu.be/D_HPiaAx_QA" Fuck, that's made me cry. The 11yo me wanted to see that so much. Thank you. Allez les Bleues and go England! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's really poor with little speed, quality or excitement & the level of accepted bias in funding the tournament at a loss should be seen as unfair but equal rights are forgotten. Added to that seeing players in their underwear last week was laughable, apparently empowering but in truth it was about the money. They sold themselves out when wanting the tournament to be taken seriously. And men's football is just a load of overpaid fuckboys prancing round and feigning injury. Feels good, doesn't it Punch down some more, please.......... Don't disagree on the poor morals of male footballers but unless you are reading in braille you are kidding yourself on quality. Honesty is not punching down. I think the word you're seeking is "different". It's different. It's a bit like tennis. In the men's game, lots of points are won by someone smashing a serve without it being returned, because on average, men can hit the ball harder. Women serve fewer aces. It's still tennis. Tennis played on wheels is still tennis, but it's different. I would argue immeasurably better for being on wheels, but that's my own bias Trying to hold women's sport to be identical to men's sport is silly, unless they are sports where there's other factors that means less difference, e.g. equestrian sport and motorsports. And darts isn't a sport, so we can ignore that one " Of course Darts is a sport if its people competing against each other with a skillset rather than luck, I can see I,m wasting my time given that line. I think womens tennis is better than men's as that's all about aces now in the mens tournament & motorsport is never going to see womenbeating men in F1 as its about strength too. Rose coloured spectacles won't make the poor quality football any better. Convince yourself you are right & say as you wish but I know the truth. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |