FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Just stop oil protesters

Jump to newest
 

By *tylebender03 OP   Man
over a year ago

Manchester

So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation?

Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
over a year ago

Bournemouth

I shouldn't speak on this matter

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

Roadhouse

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rumpyMcFuckNuggetMan
over a year ago

Den of Iniquity


"I shouldn't speak on this matter "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yeah I’d probably be causing more collateral damage

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *UGGYBEAR2015Man
over a year ago

BRIDPORT

I’d be gathering the necessary information regarding name and contact details and also canvassing witnesses for the same, with a view to pursuing the culprit for reimbursement.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Doesn’t sound like the fault of the protesters. So why would I be mad at them?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation?

Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?"

Driving a car? You bastard.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation?

Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?"

What do you crash into?

Why is it the fault of the protesters?

If you don't know why your responsibilities are as a driver, maybe get some advice before you do drive?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *tylebender03 OP   Man
over a year ago

Manchester

Let’s say for arguments sake it’s the fault of the protesters because they have halted traffic and stepped out in front of vehicles causing confusion and a crash. There’s a video online where this appears to have happened

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *tylebender03 OP   Man
over a year ago

Manchester


"Doesn’t sound like the fault of the protesters. So why would I be mad at them? "

There’s a video online of just oil protestors appearing to cause a pregnant women to crash her car. Her partner then gets out of the passenger seat and beats up one of the protestors

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *odgerMooreMan
over a year ago

Nowhere

Id be using a crowbar to remove oil protesters from the front grill, wheel arches and underside of my 8.2 litre Humvee

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 20/07/23 21:14:20]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I wouldn't crash into someone elses car causing them the same misery.

I'd brake hard but if that wasn't successful I'd run the fucker over instead, not my fault if they decided to rush into the road in front of a car weighing nearly 2 tonne.

Proving a point isn't always clever in the long run!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *opetop4UMan
over a year ago

Aberdeen

Interesting question OP!

I'm a cyclist but for work I drive an electric van.

When it's raining, I could drive over numerous people who cross the road in front of me with an umbrella over their head and can't hear me!

I reckon that if I just ploughed into them, they'd come and shake my hand and praise me on having an EV!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rumpyMcFuckNuggetMan
over a year ago

Den of Iniquity


"I wouldn't crash into someone elses car causing them the same misery.

I'd brake hard but if that wasn't successful I'd run the fucker over instead, not my fault if they decided to rush into the road in front of a car weighing nearly 2 tonne.

Proving a point isn't always clever in the long run! "

And you have heated bum seats so I'd be angry too tbf

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ust RachelTV/TS
over a year ago

Horsham

Pray that the anti protest group, Just Stop Pissing People Off show up before you have the crash.

They a herding the JSO lot off the road, and into a huddle on the pavement by peacefully surrounding them.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli

Fill their mouth with some of that orange powder they like to use and wash it down with a litre of used motor oil

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,

Love the video of the JSO protester falling flat on her face after slipping on oil she had poured across the road.Brilliant.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"Love the video of the JSO protester falling flat on her face after slipping on oil she had poured across the road.Brilliant."

I'm trying to find that

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"Love the video of the JSO protester falling flat on her face after slipping on oil she had poured across the road.Brilliant.

I'm trying to find that "

It's been shown on Talk TV (independent republic of Mike Graham)

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *929Man
over a year ago

bedlington

Sooner flatten the useless cunts than crash because of them

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"Sooner flatten the useless cunts than crash because of them "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *asycouple1971Couple
over a year ago

midlands


"Love the video of the JSO protester falling flat on her face after slipping on oil she had poured across the road.Brilliant."

Just seen this. Funny.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

JSO protesters move at snail speed. That's the point - so cannot see how a car can crash because of them?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *aGaGagging for itCouple
over a year ago

Newcastle upon Tyne


"Doesn’t sound like the fault of the protesters. So why would I be mad at them?

There’s a video online of just oil protestors appearing to cause a pregnant women to crash her car. Her partner then gets out of the passenger seat and beats up one of the protestors"

That still doesn't justify violence.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
over a year ago

Leeds

Put its body at the side of the road, drive on just like an other road kill.

The mr

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *tylebender03 OP   Man
over a year ago

Manchester

[Removed by poster at 21/07/23 08:03:11]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
over a year ago

Leeds

What if the pregnant woman who crashed as a result of the protest loses her baby ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entleman_spyMan
over a year ago

nearby

He fucked around and he found out. More of this will end these pricks nice and quick.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *wisted999Man
over a year ago

North Bucks

See they were counter protested yesterday. I quite liked the tactics they used.

Say one thing for JSO at least when they protest they don’t smash up their own community

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
over a year ago

Leeds


"

Say one thing for JSO at least when they protest they don’t smash up their own community "

Who do you think would win in a fight between JSO and JLS ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *mf123Man
over a year ago

with one foot out the door

What would i use as lube without veg oil

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *TG3Man
over a year ago

Dorchester


"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation?

Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?"
its happened put in a claim and out of interest how did they make you crash?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
over a year ago

Leeds


"What would i use as lube without veg oil"

Palm oil

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ust RachelTV/TS
over a year ago

Horsham


"

Say one thing for JSO at least when they protest they don’t smash up their own community

Who do you think would win in a fight between JSO and JLS ?"

JLS, as JSO have been trained not to use violence

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"See they were counter protested yesterday. I quite liked the tactics they used.

Say one thing for JSO at least when they protest they don’t smash up their own community "

No,they damage other communities,spraying orange paint on windows and walls,throwing soup over paintings in at galleries etc

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation?

Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?"

That are a bloody pain, Id run the fuckers over.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Doesn’t sound like the fault of the protesters. So why would I be mad at them?

There’s a video online of just oil protestors appearing to cause a pregnant women to crash her car. Her partner then gets out of the passenger seat and beats up one of the protestors"

I watched that, while I dont support jso methods, I'm not clear how the accident was caused. Either way, her partners reaction was shocking.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read.

I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
over a year ago

Bournemouth


"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read.

I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this?"

I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road.

If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read.

I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this?

I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road.

If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes. "

Protesters were in the lanes going the other direction walking very slowly. Again - how is this the fault of protesters? Have you watched the video before commenting even?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *heekyDemandCouple
over a year ago

Leicester

If they glue themselves to the road, just leave them there. But prevent anyone from assisting them. Nobody allowed to give them food, water and if they sleep play really loud music at them. After nearly 3 days of no sleep at sitting in their own piss & shit, allow their own people to clean up the mess and free them.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read.

I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this?

I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road.

If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes. "

I feel like the drivers are at fault here and people are just justifying booting someone on the floor in the head. Which is grim imo.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
over a year ago

Bournemouth


"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read.

I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this?

I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road.

If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes.

Protesters were in the lanes going the other direction walking very slowly. Again - how is this the fault of protesters? Have you watched the video before commenting even?"

Yes I've seen the video. We have no idea what caused the crash, there may have been another vehicle who had pulled round the protestors onto the other side and the crashed cars had to avoid that.

Don't question me on whether I've seen something, I wouldn't be commenting had I not

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *umalotagainMan
over a year ago

a town called malice

The answer to most question like this can be solved with a 7.62mm attitude adjuster

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The answer to most question like this can be solved with a 7.62mm attitude adjuster "

Can't be bringing The General (GPMG) to a protest

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"See they were counter protested yesterday. I quite liked the tactics they used.

Say one thing for JSO at least when they protest they don’t smash up their own community

No,they damage other communities,spraying orange paint on windows and walls,throwing soup over paintings in at galleries etc"

Would it be acceptable to counter their JSO protest of vandalism by going to their houses and spraying their property orange? Their addresses are all readily available as most of the ringleaders have been doxxed.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read.

I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this?

I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road.

If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes.

Protesters were in the lanes going the other direction walking very slowly. Again - how is this the fault of protesters? Have you watched the video before commenting even?

Yes I've seen the video. We have no idea what caused the crash, there may have been another vehicle who had pulled round the protestors onto the other side and the crashed cars had to avoid that.

Don't question me on whether I've seen something, I wouldn't be commenting had I not "

Oh I didn't realise I wasn't allowed to even ask a question of you. Noted.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
over a year ago

Bournemouth


"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read.

I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this?

I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road.

If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes.

I feel like the drivers are at fault here and people are just justifying booting someone on the floor in the head. Which is grim imo. "

The drivers may be at fault. I don't think anyone is 'justifying booting someone on the floor'.

I hope you were as vocal a couple of weeks ago when it was the young Tory kicked.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read.

I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this?

I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road.

If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes.

I feel like the drivers are at fault here and people are just justifying booting someone on the floor in the head. Which is grim imo. "

And more violence promoted in the thread. Does that solve anything at all?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
over a year ago

Bournemouth


"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read.

I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this?

I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road.

If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes.

Protesters were in the lanes going the other direction walking very slowly. Again - how is this the fault of protesters? Have you watched the video before commenting even?

Yes I've seen the video. We have no idea what caused the crash, there may have been another vehicle who had pulled round the protestors onto the other side and the crashed cars had to avoid that.

Don't question me on whether I've seen something, I wouldn't be commenting had I not

Oh I didn't realise I wasn't allowed to even ask a question of you. Noted."

You can ask any question you like if you lose the patronising tone

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"The answer to most question like this can be solved with a 7.62mm attitude adjuster

Can't be bringing The General (GPMG) to a protest "

Of course you can,cleans up any the RPG 7 missed.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *host63Man
over a year ago

Bedfont Feltham


"I wouldn't crash into someone elses car causing them the same misery.

I'd brake hard but if that wasn't successful I'd run the fucker over instead, not my fault if they decided to rush into the road in front of a car weighing nearly 2 tonne.

Proving a point isn't always clever in the long run! "
This

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read.

I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this?

I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road.

If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes.

Protesters were in the lanes going the other direction walking very slowly. Again - how is this the fault of protesters? Have you watched the video before commenting even?

Yes I've seen the video. We have no idea what caused the crash, there may have been another vehicle who had pulled round the protestors onto the other side and the crashed cars had to avoid that.

Don't question me on whether I've seen something, I wouldn't be commenting had I not

Oh I didn't realise I wasn't allowed to even ask a question of you. Noted.

You can ask any question you like if you lose the patronising tone "

I'd rather just not interact with you, ta.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
over a year ago

Bournemouth


"The violence promoted on this thread by some towards non-violent protesters is hard to read.

I've seen the video where there is a supposed car crash - traffic moving a very slow pace. The car is in the opposite lane to the protesters and moving lanes. How can they be blamed for this?

I don't know the full details but I'd say they wouldn't have had to switch lanes if dickheads weren't in the road.

If there's people out there who can not see where these protests lead, they really need to open their eyes.

Protesters were in the lanes going the other direction walking very slowly. Again - how is this the fault of protesters? Have you watched the video before commenting even?

Yes I've seen the video. We have no idea what caused the crash, there may have been another vehicle who had pulled round the protestors onto the other side and the crashed cars had to avoid that.

Don't question me on whether I've seen something, I wouldn't be commenting had I not

Oh I didn't realise I wasn't allowed to even ask a question of you. Noted.

You can ask any question you like if you lose the patronising tone

I'd rather just not interact with you, ta. "

Another one? Oh no, I'm devastated

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"JSO protesters move at snail speed. That's the point - so cannot see how a car can crash because of them? "

They shouldn’t be on the road. End of.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,

If any of these jso clowns get hurt they should only be taken to hospital in an electric ambulance charged only by non fossil fuel generated electricity,on a huge detour around Nightmayor of London khan's LTN.Once there they can only be treated with equipment/medicine which is not produced by petrochemicals at any stage of its manufacture.No syringe bodies (plastic),no surgical steel,no wound dressings etc.Basically only treat them with the methods available to Doctors on the field at Waterloo.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Irrespective of who they were, where they were or what they were doing, kicking someone in the head is wrong. A guy drove into my car causing 2k of damage. Would I have been right to knock him on the road and kick him in the head?

I get peoples frustration with this crowd but the guy was out of order.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entleman_spyMan
over a year ago

nearby


"The answer to most question like this can be solved with a 7.62mm attitude adjuster

Can't be bringing The General (GPMG) to a protest

Of course you can,cleans up any the RPG 7 missed."

It's far more fun to bring the brrrrrt from above!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"The answer to most question like this can be solved with a 7.62mm attitude adjuster

Can't be bringing The General (GPMG) to a protest

Of course you can,cleans up any the RPG 7 missed.

It's far more fun to bring the brrrrrt from above!"

Any "Ugly"call signs? Mr Warthog?

Puff the Magic Dragon?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Roadhouse "

Plenty of this, though balaclava up first.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *tooveMan
over a year ago

belfast

Some amount of clowns claiming they'd drive over protesters. You wouldn't. All mouth and trousers.

At least the protesters are doing something, not just posting rubbish on a swingers site.

If you feel so strongly against what they're doing then do something about it instead of fantasising.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames

They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation?

Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?

That are a bloody pain, Id run the fuckers over."

Yeah. Except you wouldn’t, would you?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *heekyDemandCouple
over a year ago

Leicester


"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation?

Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?

That are a bloody pain, Id run the fuckers over.

Yeah. Except you wouldn’t, would you? "

One day someone will though, and they'll never shut up about it

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entleman_spyMan
over a year ago

nearby


"

At least the protesters are doing something, not just posting rubbish on a swingers site.

"

All they are doing it passing people off and turning people against the cause. There are plenty of polls out there from independents to back this up. The majority of people see them as petulant children stamping their feet (at best) the only people that support them are the people already on their side. All in all they are a net negative in the whole thing.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"

At least the protesters are doing something, not just posting rubbish on a swingers site.

All they are doing it passing people off and turning people against the cause. There are plenty of polls out there from independents to back this up. The majority of people see them as petulant children stamping their feet (at best) the only people that support them are the people already on their side. All in all they are a net negative in the whole thing."

Completely agree.

They do more damage to their cause with every single stunt.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"Some amount of clowns claiming they'd drive over protesters. You wouldn't. All mouth and trousers.

At least the protesters are doing something, not just posting rubbish on a swingers site.

If you feel so strongly against what they're doing then do something about it instead of fantasising. "

Why don't JSO do something instead of fantasising and stand for election as an MP?If they are so convinced they are right stand for office.Three by elections yesterday,how many JSO candidates?

A clue,none.

And for the record yes I would drive over them.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"Some amount of clowns claiming they'd drive over protesters. You wouldn't. All mouth and trousers.

At least the protesters are doing something, not just posting rubbish on a swingers site.

If you feel so strongly against what they're doing then do something about it instead of fantasising.

Why don't JSO do something instead of fantasising and stand for election as an MP?If they are so convinced they are right stand for office.Three by elections yesterday,how many JSO candidates?

A clue,none.

And for the record yes I would drive over them."

The irony of forcing cars to sit there idling … adding to pollution levels.

And then try to ruin tennis, horse racing, art galleries, golf events, and even a recent wedding.

Scattergun, poorly thought out shambles of an organisation, doing massive damage to the cause that they think they are supporting.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

The buggers have attacked the golf

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The buggers have attacked the golf"
they’ve attacked it!!!!!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The buggers have attacked the golf they’ve attacked it!!!!!!"

NOT THE GOLF!!! Anything but that!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"The buggers have attacked the golf"

Damn those golfers and their environmentally unfriendly golfing

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation?

Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?"

Well.. Your crash your fault regardless of whatever politics is unfolding in front of you.

As for that group..i have no clue what they think they will achieve.... But i do admire folk who are passionate enough about a cause to get off their arse and do something rather than just moan on a website

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli

It's ironic they used a flare with is bad for the environment

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The buggers have attacked the golf

Damn those golfers and their environmentally unfriendly golfing "

I'd imagine the environmental impact of golf isn't small. Massive amounts of water, chemicals pesticides. Not to mention the impact of a world wide professional tour which is being bought up by *checks notes* middle Eastern money

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"The buggers have attacked the golf

Damn those golfers and their environmentally unfriendly golfing

I'd imagine the environmental impact of golf isn't small. Massive amounts of water, chemicals pesticides. Not to mention the impact of a world wide professional tour which is being bought up by *checks notes* middle Eastern money"

What chemicals and pesticides are you referring to?

From what I know, the use of pesticides of any sort have been heavily reduced in recent years. And I’m not sure what chemicals you are referring to.

I play golf. Active club with over 700 members and a huge junior programme. Pretty positive contribution to the local area rather than another housing estate

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"It's ironic they used a flare with is bad for the environment "

Probably used a car to get there too... Or the protest wagon.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"The buggers have attacked the golf

Damn those golfers and their environmentally unfriendly golfing

I'd imagine the environmental impact of golf isn't small. Massive amounts of water, chemicals pesticides. Not to mention the impact of a world wide professional tour which is being bought up by *checks notes* middle Eastern money"

Middle eastern money runs most things, if I had that sort of money I'd run most things myself

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"It's ironic they used a flare with is bad for the environment

Probably used a car to get there too... Or the protest wagon. "

Would have taken them a long time to walk at the speed they go if videos are anything to go by

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

"

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's ironic they used a flare with is bad for the environment

Probably used a car to get there too... Or the protest wagon.

Would have taken them a long time to walk at the speed they go if videos are anything to go by "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah? "

Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like. "

Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"It's ironic they used a flare with is bad for the environment

Probably used a car to get there too... Or the protest wagon.

Would have taken them a long time to walk at the speed they go if videos are anything to go by "

Fair point. And the protest took place at the 17th green. So presumably they worked their way back from the 18th rather than starting at the first, otherwise they would have had to start shuffling on about Tuesday.

Probably left the property a bit quicker though

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.

Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence. "

Inconvenience... Or terrorism... You decide..

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.

Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.

Inconvenience... Or terrorism... You decide.. "

I think I already did

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.

Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.

Inconvenience... Or terrorism... You decide.. "

Wait are the JSO protesters terrorists now?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.

Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence. "

I just carry a long piece of rope and I'll tie them all together and then to a lamppost or something after if I ever come across them

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.

Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.

Inconvenience... Or terrorism... You decide..

Wait are the JSO protesters terrorists now?"

Someone further up said their language was that of terrorists.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.

Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.

I just carry a long piece of rope and I'll tie them all together and then to a lamppost or something after if I ever come across them "

Are you handy with rope, then?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"It's ironic they used a flare with is bad for the environment

Probably used a car to get there too... Or the protest wagon.

Would have taken them a long time to walk at the speed they go if videos are anything to go by

Fair point. And the protest took place at the 17th green. So presumably they worked their way back from the 18th rather than starting at the first, otherwise they would have had to start shuffling on about Tuesday.

Probably left the property a bit quicker though "

They were going to do it at the 18th but they left a day later than planned so wouldn't have made it in time

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *astlincscoupleCouple
over a year ago

Tinsel Town

Someone will eventually end up seriously hurt or killed.

But they are obviously prepared to

pay the ultimate price for what they believe in.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.

Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.

Inconvenience... Or terrorism... You decide..

Wait are the JSO protesters terrorists now?

Someone further up said their language was that of terrorists. "

Hes a very naughty boy

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.

Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.

I just carry a long piece of rope and I'll tie them all together and then to a lamppost or something after if I ever come across them

Are you handy with rope, then? "

I am but not doing Shibari on them

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.

Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.

I just carry a long piece of rope and I'll tie them all together and then to a lamppost or something after if I ever come across them

Are you handy with rope, then?

I am but not doing Shibari on them "

Damn was about to join JSO!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.

Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.

I just carry a long piece of rope and I'll tie them all together and then to a lamppost or something after if I ever come across them

Are you handy with rope, then?

I am but not doing Shibari on them

Damn was about to join JSO! "

If you want your arse dragged across the road by someone then go ahead

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.

Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.

I just carry a long piece of rope and I'll tie them all together and then to a lamppost or something after if I ever come across them

Are you handy with rope, then?

I am but not doing Shibari on them

Damn was about to join JSO!

If you want your arse dragged across the road by someone then go ahead "

If there was a chance of Shibari, I bloody would!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah? "

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Completely normal for fab tbf for people to say they’d run people over and try and murder people they don’t like.

Well of course. Cos they're inconveniencing people. That deserves violence.

Inconvenience... Or terrorism... You decide..

Wait are the JSO protesters terrorists now?"

I said they use the language of terrorists.

They pretend that they have no alternative but to break the law, and justify their law-breaking in that basis.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence. "

I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
over a year ago

Bournemouth


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.

I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me. "

Come on bro....

You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.

Works both ways

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rigbyMan
over a year ago

Skelmersdale

So the orange vests they all wear are made of ethically sourced bean fibres then?,their idiotic message is printed with vegetable oil?

Their clothes,glasses,phones,all the items in their lives are not made out of oil?

Yea didn't think so

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.

I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.

Come on bro....

You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.

Works both ways "

Please go away

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.

I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me. "

Terrorists don't "threaten",they do it.Big difference.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.

I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.

Terrorists don't "threaten",they do it.Big difference."

Please clarify your point?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
over a year ago

Bournemouth


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.

I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.

Come on bro....

You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.

Works both ways

Please go away"

Isn't this an open forum?

You're free to ignore me.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Pirates Of The Caribbean

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Dammit. Soz. Wrong one.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.

I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.

Come on bro....

You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.

Works both ways

Please go away

Isn't this an open forum?

You're free to ignore me."

I'm asking politely for you to not interact with me on the forum.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Dammit. Soz. Wrong one."

Hate when that happens

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Dammit. Soz. Wrong one.

Hate when that happens "

My life is tragic

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"The buggers have attacked the golf

Damn those golfers and their environmentally unfriendly golfing

I'd imagine the environmental impact of golf isn't small. Massive amounts of water, chemicals pesticides. Not to mention the impact of a world wide professional tour which is being bought up by *checks notes* middle Eastern money"

Their main backer and funder owns a football club,wonder how much water,pesticides and chemicals his groundkepers use and where some of the sponsorship/advertising revenue comes from.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.

I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me. "

How can that be hypocritical?

Did I condone violence? No.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
over a year ago

Bournemouth


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.

I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.

Come on bro....

You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.

Works both ways

Please go away

Isn't this an open forum?

You're free to ignore me.

I'm asking politely for you to not interact with me on the forum. "

From the forum rules:

"Don't be personal

Personal attacks against other site users aren't allowed, even if you don't name them. If you've got a problem with someone on the site, block them. If you've got a problem with what someone writes on the forum just skip over their messages or report to admin if you think they need to take action."

I don't believe I've made a personal attack against you.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rigbyMan
over a year ago

Skelmersdale


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be a plowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.

I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.

Come on bro....

You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.

Works both ways

Please go away

Isn't this an open forum?

You're free to ignore me.

I'm asking politely for you to not interact with me on the forum. "

Seriously!!!

You think that's going to happen!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.

I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.

Terrorists don't "threaten",they do it.Big difference.

Please clarify your point?"

The terrorists of 9/11 didn't threaten to blow up the twin towers,nor 7/7,Charlie Hebdo,MEN arena etc.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be allowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.

I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.

Terrorists don't "threaten",they do it.Big difference."

Hence me saying “they use the language of terrorists”. Also their behaviours are escalating

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"There's some right imbeciles on this thread. Don't you people realise if it wasn't for people like these protesting you wouldn't have the vote let alone many other benefits! "

The people responsible for those things didn't sit in roads and disrupt sporting events

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol"

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
over a year ago

Bournemouth


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be a plowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.

I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.

Come on bro....

You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.

Works both ways

Please go away

Isn't this an open forum?

You're free to ignore me.

I'm asking politely for you to not interact with me on the forum.

Seriously!!!

You think that's going to happen! "

Why should I allow someone to tell me not to interact? As I've told that poster, they're free to ignore me as per the rules.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to. "

100%

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *TG3Man
over a year ago

Dorchester

I think as we are all getting on so well I'm going to have something to eat

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"There's some right imbeciles on this thread. Don't you people realise if it wasn't for people like these protesting you wouldn't have the vote let alone many other benefits! "

To compare the imbeciles of JSO to the Suffragettes is insulting.Those women had no say in anything until given the vote,they then put candidates forward for election to take the cause further.JSO have'nt got the brains to put anyone up for election.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"There's some right imbeciles on this thread. Don't you people realise if it wasn't for people like these protesting you wouldn't have the vote let alone many other benefits!

To compare the imbeciles of JSO to the Suffragettes is insulting.Those women had no say in anything until given the vote,they then put candidates forward for election to take the cause further.JSO have'nt got the brains to put anyone up for election."

They also wouldn't stand a chance of getting a seat

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to.

Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit. "

They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.

Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"There's some right imbeciles on this thread. Don't you people realise if it wasn't for people like these protesting you wouldn't have the vote let alone many other benefits!

To compare the imbeciles of JSO to the Suffragettes is insulting.Those women had no say in anything until given the vote,they then put candidates forward for election to take the cause further.JSO have'nt got the brains to put anyone up for election."

Agreed

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"There's some right imbeciles on this thread. Don't you people realise if it wasn't for people like these protesting you wouldn't have the vote let alone many other benefits!

To compare the imbeciles of JSO to the Suffragettes is insulting.Those women had no say in anything until given the vote,they then put candidates forward for election to take the cause further.JSO have'nt got the brains to put anyone up for election.

They also wouldn't stand a chance of getting a seat "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should not be on the road. They are breaking the law by blocking traffic. I should therefore be a plowed to use reasonable force to remove them. Simple.

Two more of the wankers arrested today, for trying to screw up the Open at hoylake.

The language they use to defend their law-breaking is the language of terrorists

They're using the language of terrorists? Ok. But people on this thread threatening violence - that's all good, yeah?

Did I say that?

No. But I did say that I should be allowed to use reasonable force if somebody is illegally blocking me. But different to simply advocating violence.

I think my point was clear tbh. You said they're using the language of terrorists. You've said nothing against the violent threats posted here. It seems...a little hypocritical to me.

Come on bro....

You've said plenty against the 'violent threats' but nothing against their use of language.

Works both ways

Please go away

Isn't this an open forum?

You're free to ignore me.

I'm asking politely for you to not interact with me on the forum.

Seriously!!!

You think that's going to happen! "

I can but ask

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *uer MalusMan
over a year ago

Narnia


"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation?

Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?"

First you see if you could reverse back about 20m and accelerate and hit another part of the protest. Repeat this until they move or the car gets stuck on body parts.

FFS, they are annoying and self-entitled!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to.

Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.

They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.

Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it "

Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.

Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.

Today’s one was particularly pathetic

If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives

… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *mf123Man
over a year ago

with one foot out the door


"What would i use as lube without veg oil

Palm oil"
thats more like sweat

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation?

Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?

First you see if you could reverse back about 20m and accelerate and hit another part of the protest. Repeat this until they move or the car gets stuck on body parts.

FFS, they are annoying and self-entitled!"

Totally normal.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation?

Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?

First you see if you could reverse back about 20m and accelerate and hit another part of the protest. Repeat this until they move or the car gets stuck on body parts.

FFS, they are annoying and self-entitled!"

Oh dear … you do realise that some clown is going to take this as an explicit threat of mass murder, don’t you!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"There's some right imbeciles on this thread. Don't you people realise if it wasn't for people like these protesting you wouldn't have the vote let alone many other benefits!

To compare the imbeciles of JSO to the Suffragettes is insulting.Those women had no say in anything until given the vote,they then put candidates forward for election to take the cause further.JSO have'nt got the brains to put anyone up for election."

But that's surely the point... None of the oyher political parties are going near the "get rid of oil" agenda. I quite like the jdea of stirring up the political landscape a bit. Not judging their political motives at all, nor any noble cause. But thinking you can have a world now without oil is like thinking we can have one without air travel. Deluded at best

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rumpyMcFuckNuggetMan
over a year ago

Den of Iniquity


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to.

Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.

They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.

Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it

Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.

Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.

Today’s one was particularly pathetic

If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives

… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or … "

Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation?

Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?

First you see if you could reverse back about 20m and accelerate and hit another part of the protest. Repeat this until they move or the car gets stuck on body parts.

FFS, they are annoying and self-entitled!

Oh dear … you do realise that some clown is going to take this as an explicit threat of mass murder, don’t you! "

No we all know none of the people in this thread are really about it. But it’s just not funny.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *atnip make me purrWoman
over a year ago

Reading


"Id be using a crowbar to remove oil protesters from the front grill, wheel arches and underside of my 8.2 litre Humvee "

Well that's how to go off a person

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to.

Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.

They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.

Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it

Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.

Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.

Today’s one was particularly pathetic

If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives

… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …

Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods "

The message is also deluded and Utopian.If you take just one example:- poor/developing countries,they need fossil fuels/oil to develop and grow their economies to the point where they can afford expensive green alternatives.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to.

Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.

They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.

Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it

Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.

Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.

Today’s one was particularly pathetic

If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives

… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …

Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods "

But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to.

Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.

They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.

Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it

Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.

Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.

Today’s one was particularly pathetic

If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives

… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …

Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods

But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it? "

Effective in turning people against them and making them the object of ridicule.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to.

Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.

They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.

Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it

Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.

Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.

Today’s one was particularly pathetic

If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives

… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …

Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods

But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it?

Effective in turning people against them and making them the object of ridicule."

You feel like that. Don't assume everyone does.

How do you think an organisation like that should garner public and government attention?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to.

Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.

They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.

Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it

Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.

Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.

Today’s one was particularly pathetic

If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives

… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …

Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods

But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it? "

Lots of bad things make the front page, if I ran through central London naked with a orange flare hanging out my butt I'm sure I'd make the front page

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to.

Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.

They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.

Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it

Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.

Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.

Today’s one was particularly pathetic

If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives

… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …

Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods

But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it?

Effective in turning people against them and making them the object of ridicule.

You feel like that. Don't assume everyone does.

How do you think an organisation like that should garner public and government attention? "

I don't assume everyone does.I know they have their supporters,therefore not everyone is against them.You have accused me of making assumptions before in other threads.If they want attention,do it the way other causes do it.Protest without disruption,lobby their MP's and candidates,organise a press/pr department,put themselves forward for TV interviews.When they get on TV don't start shouting,interrupting and shouting down other people,going off on incoherent tangents and making absurd incorrect claims like :- "Apples are cooking on the trees"

"Birds are falling out of the sky"

"You will boil in your own sweat"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"There's some right imbeciles on this thread. Don't you people realise if it wasn't for people like these protesting you wouldn't have the vote let alone many other benefits!

To compare the imbeciles of JSO to the Suffragettes is insulting.Those women had no say in anything until given the vote,they then put candidates forward for election to take the cause further.JSO have'nt got the brains to put anyone up for election.

But that's surely the point... None of the oyher political parties are going near the "get rid of oil" agenda. I quite like the jdea of stirring up the political landscape a bit. Not judging their political motives at all, nor any noble cause. But thinking you can have a world now without oil is like thinking we can have one without air travel. Deluded at best"

Jso aren’t suggesting immediate abolition of oil, just no new wells / fields

Not offering a viable alternative though, so would be useless in a political environment as they only have half of one policy.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to.

Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.

They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.

Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it

Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.

Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.

Today’s one was particularly pathetic

If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives

… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …

Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods

But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it?

Lots of bad things make the front page, if I ran through central London naked with a orange flare hanging out my butt I'm sure I'd make the front page "

Not if you had a rainbow bucket hat on and some comedy breasts

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to.

Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.

They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.

Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it

Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.

Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.

Today’s one was particularly pathetic

If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives

… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …

Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods

But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it? "

Not really. Has raised awareness of why they are fucking up sports events and art galleries, but is doing nothing to gather support

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to.

Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.

They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.

Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it

Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.

Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.

Today’s one was particularly pathetic

If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives

… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …

Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods

But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it?

Effective in turning people against them and making them the object of ridicule.

You feel like that. Don't assume everyone does.

How do you think an organisation like that should garner public and government attention? "

By coming up with smart ideas and attractive cost-effective, practical alternatives

At the moment; all they’ve got is “somebody should do something”

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ecadent_DevonMan
over a year ago

Okehampton

Aren’t they funded by an American group, who, in turn, are funded by the descendent of one of the largest oil companies in America?

A cynical man would say “hmm an oil producing country funds protestors in another oil producing country to stop finding new sources of oil to produce, that’s mildly odd”. Or perhaps they do slow marches through Houston, Texas too..

Right message, wrong target, wrong approach.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So your driving down the high street and you accidentally crash your car due to the just stop oil protesters. What is the correct etiquette in this situation?

Do you accept that your car is just collateral damage in a bigger a cause? Do you cause some collateral damage yourself? Or do you just sit in your car crying and put in a claim?"

Just road kill. You can't pick them up but the car behind can if they want.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If people can access this site it’s fair to assume they can access JSO ‘s website to find it explicitly their aims but instead they choose not to and come here spreading lies. lol

I think we all have a fair idea what their aims are. It’s their idiotic and moronic methods that many people object to.

Clearly not everyone have you seen people in this thread they can’t use mobile phones and shit.

They're trying to stop new licenses being given to dig more holes for oil but we need oil to run things strangely enough because we don't have enough other sources yet and it's going to take a long time to change everything over.

Do they have the money in their own pockets and enough people to do the work in their group? I very much doubt it

Yeah, like I said, I think we understand the aims. I haven’t seem any posts disagreeing with their aims.

Criticisms centre around their bullshit disruptions.

Today’s one was particularly pathetic

If they object to oil production, maybe hold a peaceful protest at an oil refinery. Or a positive protest highlighting alternative cost-effective energy source. Or even better, build and develop alternatives

… instead of throwing orange shit on a snooker table, or tennis court, or …

Yes this is the issue entirely, not the message merely the methods

But the methods see JSO on the front page and headline news. That's what they want and so far, it's effective isn't it?

Effective in turning people against them and making them the object of ridicule.

You feel like that. Don't assume everyone does.

How do you think an organisation like that should garner public and government attention?

I don't assume everyone does.I know they have their supporters,therefore not everyone is against them.You have accused me of making assumptions before in other threads.If they want attention,do it the way other causes do it.Protest without disruption,lobby their MP's and candidates,organise a press/pr department,put themselves forward for TV interviews.When they get on TV don't start shouting,interrupting and shouting down other people,going off on incoherent tangents and making absurd incorrect claims like :- "Apples are cooking on the trees"

"Birds are falling out of the sky"

"You will boil in your own sweat""

Not sure which threads you mean tbh.

I haven't seen that interview (interviews?)

"Protest without disruption" to me seems fairly pointless without a very large group. The other things you suggest - I don't think will be successful tbh. Not for this issue at this time. Political change is needed but JSO can't deliver that either. I don't know the answer.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects."

There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre.

It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely.

Bess x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects."

There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre.

It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely.

Bess x"

Do people need training for sitting in roads and throwing orange powder and stuff?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects."

There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre.

It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely.

Bess x

Do people need training for sitting in roads and throwing orange powder and stuff? "

Apparently they do The next exciting event they have planned is a Q&A with a member of the Yanomami tribe, but of course, you have to pay for tickets

Bess x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects."

There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre.

It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely.

Bess x"

Nailed it! Take a bow,, Bess

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects."

There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre.

It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely.

Bess x

Do people need training for sitting in roads and throwing orange powder and stuff? "

Depends how clueless they are to begin with!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *archelCouple
over a year ago

A field somewhere


"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects."

There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre.

It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely.

Bess x

Do people need training for sitting in roads and throwing orange powder and stuff?

Depends how clueless they are to begin with! "

Well, the hi-vis vests they wear are made from oil based products, as will be most of what they are wearing. Stones & glass houses?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects."

There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre.

It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely.

Bess x"

Total cult.With Christianity declining for the past thirty years eco causes are the new religion.When you see Alex de Koenig and all the other children on TV shouting at the interviewer for asking legitimate questions and generally being hysterical it looks just like the discord of a fanatical religion in a state of "rapture".We can hope they all do a "Jonestown".

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects."

There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre.

It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely.

Bess x

Do people need training for sitting in roads and throwing orange powder and stuff?

Depends how clueless they are to begin with! "

This is true and I think we've already established they aren't all that clever

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects."

There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre.

It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely.

Bess x

Do people need training for sitting in roads and throwing orange powder and stuff?

Apparently they do The next exciting event they have planned is a Q&A with a member of the Yanomami tribe, but of course, you have to pay for tickets

Bess x"

You have to pay for tickets

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *idnight RamblerMan
over a year ago

Pershore

Print their names and addresses so motorists can pop around later for a chat

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects."

There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre.

It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely.

Bess x"

Did you miss the 20 page document on the research? The in-depth FAQ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects."

There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre.

It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely.

Bess x

Did you miss the 20 page document on the research? The in-depth FAQ? "

No, I didn't. Was it written by a 5 year old? Embarrassingly full of mistruths, grammatical errors, even a few spelling mistakes. I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was originally written in orange crayon, their favourite colour, on a piece of cardboard with no sharp edges.

I loved the bit that said "WHAT DO YOU DO WITH YOUR MONEY?"

Apart from tea and sandwiches we use the funds to organise, pay for accommodation and travel costs.

Tea and sandwiches!!!

Bess x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndycoinsMan
over a year ago

Whaley Bridge,Nr Buxton,


"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects."

There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre.

It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely.

Bess x

Did you miss the 20 page document on the research? The in-depth FAQ?

No, I didn't. Was it written by a 5 year old? Embarrassingly full of mistruths, grammatical errors, even a few spelling mistakes. I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was originally written in orange crayon, their favourite colour, on a piece of cardboard with no sharp edges.

I loved the bit that said "WHAT DO YOU DO WITH YOUR MONEY?"

Apart from tea and sandwiches we use the funds to organise, pay for accommodation and travel costs.

Tea and sandwiches!!!

Bess x"

No surprise there.Now they have Justin Rowlat (BBC) on their side,a man with a long history of mistruths,assumption leading to 2+2=7 and exaggeration.He has just returned from a jet flight to Spain to report how hot it is in errr....summer.Now we find out that the behavioural psychologists of the governments covid "nudge unit" are advising the BBC on climate change reporting,in other words Project Fear III.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects."

There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre.

It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely.

Bess x

Did you miss the 20 page document on the research? The in-depth FAQ?

No, I didn't. Was it written by a 5 year old? Embarrassingly full of mistruths, grammatical errors, even a few spelling mistakes. I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was originally written in orange crayon, their favourite colour, on a piece of cardboard with no sharp edges.

I loved the bit that said "WHAT DO YOU DO WITH YOUR MONEY?"

Apart from tea and sandwiches we use the funds to organise, pay for accommodation and travel costs.

Tea and sandwiches!!!

Bess x"

I am thinking that was possibly a joke. You've said there's nothing on the site about their aims and how they hope to achieve them. That's not true.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"Aren’t they funded by an American group, who, in turn, are funded by the descendent of one of the largest oil companies in America?

A cynical man would say “hmm an oil producing country funds protestors in another oil producing country to stop finding new sources of oil to produce, that’s mildly odd”. Or perhaps they do slow marches through Houston, Texas too..

Right message, wrong target, wrong approach. "

Yeah not sure theyd use the same methods in Houston. Can you imagine them breaking onto the nba stage!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"People really should have a look at JSO's website. All it says about their goals is - "Just Stop Oil is a nonviolent civil resistance group demanding the UK Government stop licensing all new oil, gas and coal projects."

There's nothing on there about how they're hoping to achieve this, and very little other information. There are invites to go to a meeting, or get "trained" - there's a section with all their press releases moaning about who of them has been arrested, but the biggest eye-drawing section is the "donate" page, front and centre.

It's nothing more than a cult that very easily manipulated people buy into, like all successful cults. You see the same dull, bovine expressions on the marcher's faces as you see on the faces of their supporters and those of infamous cult-adherents, like the Manson family. The vast majority of them either need to up their meds, or come off them completely.

Bess x

Did you miss the 20 page document on the research? The in-depth FAQ?

No, I didn't. Was it written by a 5 year old? Embarrassingly full of mistruths, grammatical errors, even a few spelling mistakes. I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was originally written in orange crayon, their favourite colour, on a piece of cardboard with no sharp edges.

I loved the bit that said "WHAT DO YOU DO WITH YOUR MONEY?"

Apart from tea and sandwiches we use the funds to organise, pay for accommodation and travel costs.

Tea and sandwiches!!!

Bess x"

Sounds very civilised. Sponsored by hovis and mr kipling

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli


"Print their names and addresses so motorists can pop around later for a chat "

We could all stand around their homes and stop them leaving when they have things to do

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"Print their names and addresses so motorists can pop around later for a chat "

Most of the ring leaders names and addresses are freely available on line.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entBarryUKMan
over a year ago

Ashford

If nobody is hurt by my car then I am happy to hurt someone....

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
over a year ago

Hastings


"Print their names and addresses so motorists can pop around later for a chat

We could all stand around their homes and stop them leaving when they have things to do "

Why do that pore petrol through ther letter box and keep them warm

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"Print their names and addresses so motorists can pop around later for a chat

We could all stand around their homes and stop them leaving when they have things to do

Why do that pore petrol through ther letter box and keep them warm "

A bit harsh don’t you think?

I was thinking more about blockading vehicles so they couldn’t go about their business and spraying their property orange.

What’s good for the goose….

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The thing is most of their trust funds that Mummy & Daddy set up are made up from petrol-chemical wealth. The hypocrites!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The End

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
back to top