Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s scum. He’s made a lot of money throwing accusations about and ruining peoples lives but karma always catches up with people." Bout time karma gave him a good walloping! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not much cover by the media about Dan Wooton paying thousands for indecent photos." It's "all over" the BBC new site. Referenced on the front page, the UK page and the culture/entertainment page. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not much cover by the media about Dan Wooton paying thousands for indecent photos. It's "all over" the BBC new site. Referenced on the front page, the UK page and the culture/entertainment page. " I accidentally came across it youtube. But what a difference in this and the Huw Edward coverage. I suppose because if the different channels they worked for. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not much cover by the media about Dan Wooton paying thousands for indecent photos. It's "all over" the BBC new site. Referenced on the front page, the UK page and the culture/entertainment page. I accidentally came across it youtube. But what a difference in this and the Huw Edward coverage. I suppose because if the different channels they worked for." More to do with the clean cut image of High and the fact he is a leading presenter in everyone's homes on Auntie! Wooton is some limp dick twat in a red tab that is losing sales | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do people that start these types of threads care about the harm they cause or the lies they spread or about finding out facts ...... " Pretty much sums up Woottons approach throughout his career | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do people that start these types of threads care about the harm they cause or the lies they spread or about finding out facts ...... So far Dan Wootton has not been charged with anything illegal and there is , as yet, nothing to say that any of the accusations are true. " We are discussing something that is in news and why 2 similar stories have had such different amounts of coverage. The fact you have already called it a lie before any conclusion to the story sounds like you know more facts about this than the rest of us..? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do people that start these types of threads care about the harm they cause or the lies they spread or about finding out facts ...... So far Dan Wootton has not been charged with anything illegal and there is , as yet, nothing to say that any of the accusations are true. We are discussing something that is in news and why 2 similar stories have had such different amounts of coverage. The fact you have already called it a lie before any conclusion to the story sounds like you know more facts about this than the rest of us..? " I think the difference here is the age of the 'Huw' guy. This is a guess tbf because I don't know much about the Wooton people. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do people that start these types of threads care about the harm they cause or the lies they spread or about finding out facts ...... So far Dan Wootton has not been charged with anything illegal and there is , as yet, nothing to say that any of the accusations are true. " People love a witch hunt! X | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do people that start these types of threads care about the harm they cause or the lies they spread or about finding out facts ...... So far Dan Wootton has not been charged with anything illegal and there is , as yet, nothing to say that any of the accusations are true. " Because it’s his MO!!! A bully, liar, con man | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not much cover by the media about Dan Wooton paying thousands for indecent photos. It's "all over" the BBC new site. Referenced on the front page, the UK page and the culture/entertainment page. I accidentally came across it youtube. But what a difference in this and the Huw Edward coverage. I suppose because if the different channels they worked for." Irony being wooton worked for the sun…. And maybe other papers were taking the high road in not opening Pandora’s box But yes the way that both schofield and Edwards have been treated compared to wooton is an interesting one  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not much cover by the media about Dan Wooton paying thousands for indecent photos. It's "all over" the BBC new site. Referenced on the front page, the UK page and the culture/entertainment page. I accidentally came across it youtube. But what a difference in this and the Huw Edward coverage. I suppose because if the different channels they worked for. Irony being wooton worked for the sun…. And maybe other papers were taking the high road in not opening Pandora’s box But yes the way that both schofield and Edwards have been treated compared to wooton is an interesting one "You could argue the wooton again made his case a public interest story, in regards to tweets he made about schofield and Edwards… and that it would show hypocrisy! Which is why he probably deleted all the tweets he made, not before people made screenshots of them so he can’t deny anything  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not much cover by the media about Dan Wooton paying thousands for indecent photos." Is it because people don't know who he is? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not much cover by the media about Dan Wooton paying thousands for indecent photos. Is it because people don't know who he is? " Maybe not well known has Huw Edward or Philip Schoefield. But he's well know enough for the media to take a interest in it. I actually didn't know Hugh Edward was by name until the story blew up. Knew by face, has had seen him enough times. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not a fan of this guy at all but I think his claims that his ex abused him should be taken seriously and I respect him for taking some accountability and speaking honestly on tv. What surprised me was how the left used Wooton to turn the conversation away from Huw Edwards without much info/evidence. It was like the left had received a memo and were firing back at the right" Are you saying the Dan Wooton story shouldn't have been reported..? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not a fan of this guy at all but I think his claims that his ex abused him should be taken seriously and I respect him for taking some accountability and speaking honestly on tv. What surprised me was how the left used Wooton to turn the conversation away from Huw Edwards without much info/evidence. It was like the left had received a memo and were firing back at the right Are you saying the Dan Wooton story shouldn't have been reported..?" No not necessarily, I just found the timing of it convenient. Wooton has said the source was a ex who had abused him and tried to ruin his life, I’m honestly not sure what to make of it and if there’s legs to the story. It was the behaviour of the left that stuck out to me | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not a fan of this guy at all but I think his claims that his ex abused him should be taken seriously and I respect him for taking some accountability and speaking honestly on tv. What surprised me was how the left used Wooton to turn the conversation away from Huw Edwards without much info/evidence. It was like the left had received a memo and were firing back at the right Are you saying the Dan Wooton story shouldn't have been reported..? No not necessarily, I just found the timing of it convenient. Wooton has said the source was a ex who had abused him and tried to ruin his life, I’m honestly not sure what to make of it and if there’s legs to the story. It was the behaviour of the left that stuck out to me " What behaviour..? Who represents the left that displayed this behaviour..? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not a fan of this guy at all but I think his claims that his ex abused him should be taken seriously and I respect him for taking some accountability and speaking honestly on tv. What surprised me was how the left used Wooton to turn the conversation away from Huw Edwards without much info/evidence. It was like the left had received a memo and were firing back at the right Are you saying the Dan Wooton story shouldn't have been reported..? No not necessarily, I just found the timing of it convenient. Wooton has said the source was a ex who had abused him and tried to ruin his life, I’m honestly not sure what to make of it and if there’s legs to the story. It was the behaviour of the left that stuck out to me What behaviour..? Who represents the left that displayed this behaviour..?" People like Owen Jones and Carol Vorderman, a lot of left wing journalists that I’d never heard of. Regarding Wooton, I think he’s a trash journalist and not a good person but I’m undecided at this point as to what he was done and if it Is warranted and has legs | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not a fan of this guy at all but I think his claims that his ex abused him should be taken seriously and I respect him for taking some accountability and speaking honestly on tv. What surprised me was how the left used Wooton to turn the conversation away from Huw Edwards without much info/evidence. It was like the left had received a memo and were firing back at the right Are you saying the Dan Wooton story shouldn't have been reported..? No not necessarily, I just found the timing of it convenient. Wooton has said the source was a ex who had abused him and tried to ruin his life, I’m honestly not sure what to make of it and if there’s legs to the story. It was the behaviour of the left that stuck out to me " The timing is only the timing because of wooton’s tweets about Edwards as if he was taking the high ground, the allegations had been known in Fleet Street for a while and alluded to in the spectator and private eye but that was as far as it went until the tweets he made… and then removed when his allegations became wider known! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not a fan of this guy at all but I think his claims that his ex abused him should be taken seriously and I respect him for taking some accountability and speaking honestly on tv. What surprised me was how the left used Wooton to turn the conversation away from Huw Edwards without much info/evidence. It was like the left had received a memo and were firing back at the right Are you saying the Dan Wooton story shouldn't have been reported..? No not necessarily, I just found the timing of it convenient. Wooton has said the source was a ex who had abused him and tried to ruin his life, I’m honestly not sure what to make of it and if there’s legs to the story. It was the behaviour of the left that stuck out to me What behaviour..? Who represents the left that displayed this behaviour..? People like Owen Jones and Carol Vorderman, a lot of left wing journalists that I’d never heard of. Regarding Wooton, I think he’s a trash journalist and not a good person but I’m undecided at this point as to what he was done and if it Is warranted and has legs " Of course individual people who don't like Dan Wooton are going to use it has an agenda. Dont you think it happens o the opposite side. But your first post was like there's a big organisation conspiring against Dan Wooton to stop the Huw Edward story. The Huw Edward story has gone quiet because there's nothing new yet to discuss and until there is, it would just be regurgitation of the same old. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not a fan of this guy at all but I think his claims that his ex abused him should be taken seriously and I respect him for taking some accountability and speaking honestly on tv. What surprised me was how the left used Wooton to turn the conversation away from Huw Edwards without much info/evidence. It was like the left had received a memo and were firing back at the right Are you saying the Dan Wooton story shouldn't have been reported..? No not necessarily, I just found the timing of it convenient. Wooton has said the source was a ex who had abused him and tried to ruin his life, I’m honestly not sure what to make of it and if there’s legs to the story. It was the behaviour of the left that stuck out to me What behaviour..? Who represents the left that displayed this behaviour..? People like Owen Jones and Carol Vorderman, a lot of left wing journalists that I’d never heard of. Regarding Wooton, I think he’s a trash journalist and not a good person but I’m undecided at this point as to what he was done and if it Is warranted and has legs Of course individual people who don't like Dan Wooton are going to use it has an agenda. Dont you think it happens o the opposite side. But your first post was like there's a big organisation conspiring against Dan Wooton to stop the Huw Edward story. The Huw Edward story has gone quiet because there's nothing new yet to discuss and until there is, it would just be regurgitation of the same old." What I meant was the left was completely united in deeming the Huw Edwards sandal a non story and immediately turned the attention to Wooton. It has gone quiet regarding Huw, I suspect that’s due to lawyers | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not a fan of this guy at all but I think his claims that his ex abused him should be taken seriously and I respect him for taking some accountability and speaking honestly on tv. What surprised me was how the left used Wooton to turn the conversation away from Huw Edwards without much info/evidence. It was like the left had received a memo and were firing back at the right Are you saying the Dan Wooton story shouldn't have been reported..? No not necessarily, I just found the timing of it convenient. Wooton has said the source was a ex who had abused him and tried to ruin his life, I’m honestly not sure what to make of it and if there’s legs to the story. It was the behaviour of the left that stuck out to me What behaviour..? Who represents the left that displayed this behaviour..? People like Owen Jones and Carol Vorderman, a lot of left wing journalists that I’d never heard of. Regarding Wooton, I think he’s a trash journalist and not a good person but I’m undecided at this point as to what he was done and if it Is warranted and has legs Of course individual people who don't like Dan Wooton are going to use it has an agenda. Dont you think it happens o the opposite side. But your first post was like there's a big organisation conspiring against Dan Wooton to stop the Huw Edward story. The Huw Edward story has gone quiet because there's nothing new yet to discuss and until there is, it would just be regurgitation of the same old. What I meant was the left was completely united in deeming the Huw Edwards sandal a non story and immediately turned the attention to Wooton. It has gone quiet regarding Huw, I suspect that’s due to lawyers " There you go again describing a group of individuals has representing the left. You seem to be wanting to make it a left v right story. Despite listening to so many left wing commentators, your last post said you don't even know what he's been accused of. How is this possible..? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not a fan of this guy at all but I think his claims that his ex abused him should be taken seriously and I respect him for taking some accountability and speaking honestly on tv. What surprised me was how the left used Wooton to turn the conversation away from Huw Edwards without much info/evidence. It was like the left had received a memo and were firing back at the right Are you saying the Dan Wooton story shouldn't have been reported..? No not necessarily, I just found the timing of it convenient. Wooton has said the source was a ex who had abused him and tried to ruin his life, I’m honestly not sure what to make of it and if there’s legs to the story. It was the behaviour of the left that stuck out to me What behaviour..? Who represents the left that displayed this behaviour..? People like Owen Jones and Carol Vorderman, a lot of left wing journalists that I’d never heard of. Regarding Wooton, I think he’s a trash journalist and not a good person but I’m undecided at this point as to what he was done and if it Is warranted and has legs Of course individual people who don't like Dan Wooton are going to use it has an agenda. Dont you think it happens o the opposite side. But your first post was like there's a big organisation conspiring against Dan Wooton to stop the Huw Edward story. The Huw Edward story has gone quiet because there's nothing new yet to discuss and until there is, it would just be regurgitation of the same old. What I meant was the left was completely united in deeming the Huw Edwards sandal a non story and immediately turned the attention to Wooton. It has gone quiet regarding Huw, I suspect that’s due to lawyers There you go again describing a group of individuals has representing the left. You seem to be wanting to make it a left v right story. Despite listening to so many left wing commentators, your last post said you don't even know what he's been accused of. How is this possible..? " That’s because it is part of a battle between the left and the right. GB news news don’t like the mainstream media, the left don’t like GB news because it’s right wing. The far left all have the same opinions they are almost totalitarian. I do know what he’s been accused of, the story came from a ex lover who allegedly abused Wooton. Is this person a trusted source? He may be guilty however I’m unsure at this point if there’s legs to the story | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not a fan of this guy at all but I think his claims that his ex abused him should be taken seriously and I respect him for taking some accountability and speaking honestly on tv. What surprised me was how the left used Wooton to turn the conversation away from Huw Edwards without much info/evidence. It was like the left had received a memo and were firing back at the right Are you saying the Dan Wooton story shouldn't have been reported..? No not necessarily, I just found the timing of it convenient. Wooton has said the source was a ex who had abused him and tried to ruin his life, I’m honestly not sure what to make of it and if there’s legs to the story. It was the behaviour of the left that stuck out to me What behaviour..? Who represents the left that displayed this behaviour..? People like Owen Jones and Carol Vorderman, a lot of left wing journalists that I’d never heard of. Regarding Wooton, I think he’s a trash journalist and not a good person but I’m undecided at this point as to what he was done and if it Is warranted and has legs Of course individual people who don't like Dan Wooton are going to use it has an agenda. Dont you think it happens o the opposite side. But your first post was like there's a big organisation conspiring against Dan Wooton to stop the Huw Edward story. The Huw Edward story has gone quiet because there's nothing new yet to discuss and until there is, it would just be regurgitation of the same old. What I meant was the left was completely united in deeming the Huw Edwards sandal a non story and immediately turned the attention to Wooton. It has gone quiet regarding Huw, I suspect that’s due to lawyers There you go again describing a group of individuals has representing the left. You seem to be wanting to make it a left v right story. Despite listening to so many left wing commentators, your last post said you don't even know what he's been accused of. How is this possible..? That’s because it is part of a battle between the left and the right. GB news news don’t like the mainstream media, the left don’t like GB news because it’s right wing. The far left all have the same opinions they are almost totalitarian. I do know what he’s been accused of, the story came from a ex lover who allegedly abused Wooton. Is this person a trusted source? He may be guilty however I’m unsure at this point if there’s legs to the story " Do the far right all have different opinions..? GB news want to become main stream media, just at the moment they don't have enough followers. It seems to be using Farage’s old trick of claiming to be anti establishment while to hoodwink people. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not a fan of this guy at all but I think his claims that his ex abused him should be taken seriously and I respect him for taking some accountability and speaking honestly on tv. What surprised me was how the left used Wooton to turn the conversation away from Huw Edwards without much info/evidence. It was like the left had received a memo and were firing back at the right Are you saying the Dan Wooton story shouldn't have been reported..? No not necessarily, I just found the timing of it convenient. Wooton has said the source was a ex who had abused him and tried to ruin his life, I’m honestly not sure what to make of it and if there’s legs to the story. It was the behaviour of the left that stuck out to me What behaviour..? Who represents the left that displayed this behaviour..? People like Owen Jones and Carol Vorderman, a lot of left wing journalists that I’d never heard of. Regarding Wooton, I think he’s a trash journalist and not a good person but I’m undecided at this point as to what he was done and if it Is warranted and has legs Of course individual people who don't like Dan Wooton are going to use it has an agenda. Dont you think it happens o the opposite side. But your first post was like there's a big organisation conspiring against Dan Wooton to stop the Huw Edward story. The Huw Edward story has gone quiet because there's nothing new yet to discuss and until there is, it would just be regurgitation of the same old. What I meant was the left was completely united in deeming the Huw Edwards sandal a non story and immediately turned the attention to Wooton. It has gone quiet regarding Huw, I suspect that’s due to lawyers There you go again describing a group of individuals has representing the left. You seem to be wanting to make it a left v right story. Despite listening to so many left wing commentators, your last post said you don't even know what he's been accused of. How is this possible..? That’s because it is part of a battle between the left and the right. GB news news don’t like the mainstream media, the left don’t like GB news because it’s right wing. The far left all have the same opinions they are almost totalitarian. I do know what he’s been accused of, the story came from a ex lover who allegedly abused Wooton. Is this person a trusted source? He may be guilty however I’m unsure at this point if there’s legs to the story Do the far right all have different opinions..? GB news want to become main stream media, just at the moment they don't have enough followers. It seems to be using Farage’s old trick of claiming to be anti establishment while to hoodwink people. " Yeah the right do also share most of the same opinions, i see more left wing stuff online but that may just be my experience. i agree anything involving Farage is a red flag. im seeing something play out in real time and im trying to work out whats really going on | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He’s scum. He’s made a lot of money throwing accusations about and ruining peoples lives but karma always catches up with people." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not much cover by the media about Dan Wooton paying thousands for indecent photos. Is it because people don't know who he is? " Never heard of him, who is he and what’s he supposed to of done? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not a fan of this guy at all but I think his claims that his ex abused him should be taken seriously and I respect him for taking some accountability and speaking honestly on tv. What surprised me was how the left used Wooton to turn the conversation away from Huw Edwards without much info/evidence. It was like the left had received a memo and were firing back at the right Are you saying the Dan Wooton story shouldn't have been reported..? No not necessarily, I just found the timing of it convenient. Wooton has said the source was a ex who had abused him and tried to ruin his life, I’m honestly not sure what to make of it and if there’s legs to the story. It was the behaviour of the left that stuck out to me What behaviour..? Who represents the left that displayed this behaviour..? People like Owen Jones and Carol Vorderman, a lot of left wing journalists that I’d never heard of. Regarding Wooton, I think he’s a trash journalist and not a good person but I’m undecided at this point as to what he was done and if it Is warranted and has legs Of course individual people who don't like Dan Wooton are going to use it has an agenda. Dont you think it happens o the opposite side. But your first post was like there's a big organisation conspiring against Dan Wooton to stop the Huw Edward story. The Huw Edward story has gone quiet because there's nothing new yet to discuss and until there is, it would just be regurgitation of the same old. What I meant was the left was completely united in deeming the Huw Edwards sandal a non story and immediately turned the attention to Wooton. It has gone quiet regarding Huw, I suspect that’s due to lawyers There you go again describing a group of individuals has representing the left. You seem to be wanting to make it a left v right story. Despite listening to so many left wing commentators, your last post said you don't even know what he's been accused of. How is this possible..? That’s because it is part of a battle between the left and the right. GB news news don’t like the mainstream media, the left don’t like GB news because it’s right wing. The far left all have the same opinions they are almost totalitarian. I do know what he’s been accused of, the story came from a ex lover who allegedly abused Wooton. Is this person a trusted source? He may be guilty however I’m unsure at this point if there’s legs to the story Do the far right all have different opinions..? GB news want to become main stream media, just at the moment they don't have enough followers. It seems to be using Farage’s old trick of claiming to be anti establishment while to hoodwink people. Yeah the right do also share most of the same opinions, i see more left wing stuff online but that may just be my experience. i agree anything involving Farage is a red flag. im seeing something play out in real time and im trying to work out whats really going on" Wooton has been accused by several people of black mail, threats and bullying etc. Not to mention there are two allegations of drugging and r*pe. Huw Edwards is a bit of a non story as the alleged victim has said it is all lies and nothing happened. Also two police forces have looked into it and decided no criminality took place. If the allegations against Wooton are true then we know there would be a case to answer as black mail and r*pe are most certainly not legal! The biggest issue here though regarding the media, is that Wooton is Rupert Murdochs lap dog and probably has plenty of dirt on him and seeing as Murdoch controls most of the media nothing is being reported!!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not a fan of this guy at all but I think his claims that his ex abused him should be taken seriously and I respect him for taking some accountability and speaking honestly on tv. What surprised me was how the left used Wooton to turn the conversation away from Huw Edwards without much info/evidence. It was like the left had received a memo and were firing back at the right Are you saying the Dan Wooton story shouldn't have been reported..? No not necessarily, I just found the timing of it convenient. Wooton has said the source was a ex who had abused him and tried to ruin his life, I’m honestly not sure what to make of it and if there’s legs to the story. It was the behaviour of the left that stuck out to me What behaviour..? Who represents the left that displayed this behaviour..? People like Owen Jones and Carol Vorderman, a lot of left wing journalists that I’d never heard of. Regarding Wooton, I think he’s a trash journalist and not a good person but I’m undecided at this point as to what he was done and if it Is warranted and has legs Of course individual people who don't like Dan Wooton are going to use it has an agenda. Dont you think it happens o the opposite side. But your first post was like there's a big organisation conspiring against Dan Wooton to stop the Huw Edward story. The Huw Edward story has gone quiet because there's nothing new yet to discuss and until there is, it would just be regurgitation of the same old. What I meant was the left was completely united in deeming the Huw Edwards sandal a non story and immediately turned the attention to Wooton. It has gone quiet regarding Huw, I suspect that’s due to lawyers There you go again describing a group of individuals has representing the left. You seem to be wanting to make it a left v right story. Despite listening to so many left wing commentators, your last post said you don't even know what he's been accused of. How is this possible..? That’s because it is part of a battle between the left and the right. GB news news don’t like the mainstream media, the left don’t like GB news because it’s right wing. The far left all have the same opinions they are almost totalitarian. I do know what he’s been accused of, the story came from a ex lover who allegedly abused Wooton. Is this person a trusted source? He may be guilty however I’m unsure at this point if there’s legs to the story Do the far right all have different opinions..? GB news want to become main stream media, just at the moment they don't have enough followers. It seems to be using Farage’s old trick of claiming to be anti establishment while to hoodwink people. Yeah the right do also share most of the same opinions, i see more left wing stuff online but that may just be my experience. i agree anything involving Farage is a red flag. im seeing something play out in real time and im trying to work out whats really going on Wooton has been accused by several people of black mail, threats and bullying etc. Not to mention there are two allegations of drugging and r*pe. Huw Edwards is a bit of a non story as the alleged victim has said it is all lies and nothing happened. Also two police forces have looked into it and decided no criminality took place. If the allegations against Wooton are true then we know there would be a case to answer as black mail and r*pe are most certainly not legal! The biggest issue here though regarding the media, is that Wooton is Rupert Murdochs lap dog and probably has plenty of dirt on him and seeing as Murdoch controls most of the media nothing is being reported!!!! " There’s lots of red flags in regards to Huw Edwards. There’s 7 people that have made allegations and he’s being investigated by the BBC. Regarding Wooton, I have not seen the r*pe allegations. I have today seen people tweeting about r*pe but with no substance. There’s also a lot of Red flags in regards Wooten. I don’t think he’s a good person. Huw is much more famous than Wooton that’s prob why he got more coverage plus the sources were stronger ie parents of young adult. BBC stafff vs ex lover | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
