Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What film doesn’t need a sequel? What film didn't need a sequel? Doesn’t need is the thing Didn't need highlander " Ahhh….There is a, The Thing sequel (technically a prequel though) - It’s unsurprisingly, not a patch on Carpenter’s classic but is sort of watchable (although Rob Bottin’s incredible hands on special effects work is predictably replaced with CGI galore) Anyhoo…. Doesn’t Require a sequel: Shawshank Redemption Didn’t require a sequel. John Wick (I’m not a big fan of the sequels) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What film doesn’t need a sequel? What film didn't need a sequel? Doesn’t need is the thing Didn't need highlander " Apparently - there doesn't have to be only one. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What film doesn’t need a sequel? What film didn't need a sequel? Doesn’t need is the thing Didn't need highlander " Doesn’t : A Bridge Too Far Didn’t : Grease I actually find most of Grease unwatchable these days but the sequel was never ever, ever watchable | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |