FabSwingers.com forum: Prince Harry

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Does him admitting to shooting insurgents increase the risk of a direct terrorist attack on him?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think he's turned out a really decent bloke. He didn't do that well academically (two As, a B and a C I think) but in his inter_iew he came across as intelligent and a no nonsense sort of chap. He has a healthy disdain for the press but considering it was the press who hounded his mother into a parisienne wall at 100mph I can't really blame him for that.

I'm impressed by both princes but I prefer Harry over William.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Does him admitting to shooting insurgents increase the risk of a direct terrorist attack on him?"

Possibly, but security around him will be tighter than a ducks arse.

I have a lot of admiration for the guy. If you notice, while being inter_iewed he was constantly staying aware of what was going on around him and ready to go at any moment, infact he did just pull his mic off and jump into his AH-64 during one inter_iew.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nfieldishCouple
over a year ago

Enfield

"Does him admitting to shooting insurgents increase the risk of a direct terrorist attack on him?"

I thought this...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

He surely is at a high risk from a terrorist attack anyway due to being a royal !

He seems a nice enough fella, better than many of the royals and at least he's working

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So what he was deployed in basically a war zone and yet we are meant to be shocked he fired at someone.

On a day like today when its announced up to a further five thousand soldiers positions will be scrapped there is talk of sending troops to mali.

Will the royals be in the batch of sacked folk i doubt it.

I think what with afghanistan and other conflicts we will not be able to defend ourselves in case of attack.

Armed forces protect and serve then get thanks for risking your lives but fuck off now. Oh and if we struggle can you come back as volunteers to help for free and by the way we will raid your pension pots.

Government should hang their heads in shame

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's also worth noting that he's no longer out there. This information is a few months old, it was held back for this very reason.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think what with afghanistan and other conflicts we will not be able to defend ourselves in case of attack.

Attack from whom exactly? It's not the cold war anymore. You need to move on. We're a mobile peacekeeping force now.

As for Harry, all credit to the guy. Always thought he was hard done by in the press. I don't see why the media are making a big deal of him killing insurgents. He's flying an attack helicopter in a war zone! Well Duh!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Does him admitting to shooting insurgents increase the risk of a direct terrorist attack on him?"

The risk was high soon after it was known he was on Afghan territory. Many Soldiers have openly admitted to killing in battle but the media being the media, they make a song and dance about it.

Like all of our boys out there, he's doing a great job.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So what he was deployed in basically a war zone and yet we are meant to be shocked he fired at someone.

On a day like today when its announced up to a further five thousand soldiers positions will be scrapped there is talk of sending troops to mali.

Will the royals be in the batch of sacked folk i doubt it.

I think what with afghanistan and other conflicts we will not be able to defend ourselves in case of attack.

Government should hang their heads in shame

As opposed to keeping thousands of personnel we don't need and would have to pay for just because they 'did us a favour' a little while ago?

It's a job like any other and if cuts need to be made then it has to come from the staff levels. Less people = less equipment = less accommodation etc = less expenditure.

We're also highly adep at fighting wars with fewer and fewer people. Gone are the days of General Haig trying to advance his drinks cabinet six miles at the expense of 10,000 soldier's lives.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *eavenNhellCouple
over a year ago

carrbrook stalybridge

we wont have an Army soon less than 80.000 strong = defense force and nothing more

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"we wont have an Army soon less than 80.000 strong = defense force and nothing more "

Nowadays that's pretty much all we need. Wars aren't fought the same way they were 50yrs ago.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"we wont have an Army soon less than 80.000 strong = defense force and nothing more

Nowadays that's pretty much all we need. Wars aren't fought the same way they were 50yrs ago."

Persactly. Plus it's rare we go in as the sole force. A European force is pretty much mandatory these days and I'd be all in favour of a european standing army. That doesn't mean I'd like full EU integration though.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think he's turned out a really decent bloke. He didn't do that well academically (two As, a B and a C I think) but in his inter_iew he came across as intelligent and a no nonsense sort of chap. He has a healthy disdain for the press but considering it was the press who hounded his mother into a parisienne wall at 100mph I can't really blame him for that.

I'm impressed by both princes but I prefer Harry over William."

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

"Does him admitting to shooting insurgents increase the risk of a direct terrorist attack on him?

Possibly, but security around him will be tighter than a ducks arse.

..........."

Just like it was in Vegas?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Does him admitting to shooting insurgents increase the risk of a direct terrorist attack on him?

Possibly, but security around him will be tighter than a ducks arse.

...........

Just like it was in Vegas?"

He stated in the inter_iew that he was in a private area and he should not have been subjected to media intrusion. He has a point. We're all entitled to privacy but he did concede that it him being 'more army and less prince' which he regretted. He seems perfectly at ease putting his hands up and admitting he made a mistake and for that I think he deserves some leeway. He'll always have his critics though as he's a royal and some people don't like them just for being what they are.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

Has it finally been decided that he has any royal blood at all?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *els_BellsWoman
over a year ago

with the moon n stars somewhere in gtr manc

I'm impressed by both princes but I prefer Harry over William.

I admire them both. But, I disagree with it being in the press Harry shot at the Taliban or it being released where he is as it could put the rest of the troops in more danger.

Dont get me wrong I personally take my hat off to him fighting for his country, just dont see the point in it being released to the press he took fire.

Just hope all our troops keep safe.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *els_BellsWoman
over a year ago

with the moon n stars somewhere in gtr manc

"Has it finally been decided that he has any royal blood at all?"

Think that would have been tested as soon as he popped out.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

"Has it finally been decided that he has any royal blood at all?

Think that would have been tested as soon as he popped out."

I doubt that very much.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *els_BellsWoman
over a year ago

with the moon n stars somewhere in gtr manc

"Has it finally been decided that he has any royal blood at all?

Think that would have been tested as soon as he popped out.

I doubt that very much."

Why? Because it wasnt released to the press?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

In this house Prince Harry is considered to be a fine young man, the fact that he is actively serving his country just strengthens that belief.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Has it finally been decided that he has any royal blood at all?"

That I like.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

"Has it finally been decided that he has any royal blood at all?

Think that would have been tested as soon as he popped out.

I doubt that very much.

Why? Because it wasnt released to the press?"

No, just in case they didn't get the answer they'd have hoped for.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

"In this house Prince Harry is considered to be a fine young man, the fact that he is actively serving his country just strengthens that belief."

That's undoubtedly true. Doesn't go anyway to confirming who his father might have been.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

"In this house Prince Harry is considered to be a fine young man, the fact that he is actively serving his country just strengthens that belief."

That's undoubtedly true. Doesn't go anyway to confirming who his father might have been.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

European force that's a laugh, the only two countries in Europe with decent well trained troops are UK an France ,Germany could be strong an good but the last time they were aloud to have a well trained army didn't work out to well for the rest of Europe.

If we relied on the rest of Europe the Falklands wouldnt have happened.

When the shit hits the fan all they do is sit round tut and argue!

As for Harry he's one of the best royals in a long time , he's a target no-matter what he does!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *els_BellsWoman
over a year ago

with the moon n stars somewhere in gtr manc

"In this house Prince Harry is considered to be a fine young man, the fact that he is actively serving his country just strengthens that belief.

That's undoubtedly true. Doesn't go anyway to confirming who his father might have been."

I agree with Jane.

But if the royals arent bothered (allegedly) who his biological father is should we?

Doubt he'll make king so does it matter? He has been brought up as a royal so he is one in my eyes

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"In this house Prince Harry is considered to be a fine young man, the fact that he is actively serving his country just strengthens that belief."

Totally agree. He is a proper sound lad.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Does him admitting to shooting insurgents increase the risk of a direct terrorist attack on him?

Possibly, but security around him will be tighter than a ducks arse.

...........

Just like it was in Vegas?

Do not get me wrong anyone who joins the armed services are heroes in my book however in this case harry has to decide if he wants to be treated as normal or a royal if royal then fine whilst I personally believe they are drain on money we kept getting tod is scarce.

If he wants to be normal then he should should resign as royal and survive like the rest of us do.

It seems case of double standards.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

"In this house Prince Harry is considered to be a fine young man, the fact that he is actively serving his country just strengthens that belief.

That's undoubtedly true. Doesn't go anyway to confirming who his father might have been."

But I'm not the one who is questioning his parentage....you are.

I am discussing Prince Harry as a serving member of our armed forces, which I believe was the subject of the thread, you decided to throw your hat into the ring questioning who is father is.

I don't care if his father is Mick Jagger....I consider him to be a very likeable young bloke.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"In this house Prince Harry is considered to be a fine young man, the fact that he is actively serving his country just strengthens that belief.

That's undoubtedly true. Doesn't go anyway to confirming who his father might have been."

Are you 100% certain that the man who sired you is the man listed on your birth certificate? Who knows what stray you mother might have hooked up with to beget you.

Not nice having someone cast aspersions on your parentage is it? Even less so when somone implies one's mother was putting it about a bit.

Watch Harry again and study his mouth when he speaks. He has the same habit of dropping one side of his mouth when he speaks that his father has. Prince Charles does it too. Harry's red hair comes from his mother's side. His uncle Earl Spencer had/has the same colour hair.

Or maybe you just want to believe bullshit as it reinforces your hatred of the royal family.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Prince Harry is a fine pilot and a credit to his family and fellow soldiers. His brother is in a more mundane role but a serving airman. For how much longer is another matter.

Let's not forget that Prince Andrew flew helicopters on active service. Prior to him, other male Royals have served in the Armed Forces for hundreds of years without such high profiles.

The difference now is that the media has much faster means of communication than back then. Also it was less intrusive.

As an ex-serviceman myself, I can appreciate how Harry felt before deploying to a war zone.

Live for today for there may be no tomorrow was our motto back then, and probably still is today. In other words, go out and enjoy yourself before it may be too late.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *els_BellsWoman
over a year ago

with the moon n stars somewhere in gtr manc

"In this house Prince Harry is considered to be a fine young man, the fact that he is actively serving his country just strengthens that belief.

That's undoubtedly true. Doesn't go anyway to confirming who his father might have been.

Are you 100% certain that the man who sired you is the man listed on your birth certificate? Who knows what stray you mother might have hooked up with to beget you.

Not nice having someone cast aspersions on your parentage is it? Even less so when somone implies one's mother was putting it about a bit.

Thank you.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

Huge

from me.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

That's undoubtedly true. Doesn't go anyway to confirming who his father might have been."

which matters not a jot really though, does it..

the likes of you nor i will ever know anything different, he is a Prince end of..

tittle tattle and gossip..

he is a serving member of the armed forces of this country, fair play to him for going out there when he could have side stepped it..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I only watched that little clip of him on the news, there was something very sexy about him

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I only watched that little clip of him on the news, there was something very sexy about him

Birds of a feather flock together

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *eakcoupleCouple
over a year ago

peak district

Are you saying the terrorists didn't deserve to be slotted? Think Harry has given a great example, like the fighting royalty of old.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

I saw the inter_iew clips last night and thought he came across as quite candid. The section of him losing his army Harry persona when he goes into the mess hall shows the balance he is always trying to get, and not always succeeding.

His bed was a mess and I was most shocked at that.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I only watched that little clip of him on the news, there was something very sexy about him

Birds of a feather flock together

*sticks up middle finger

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

I just find it hilarious that, in a system based entirely on LEGITIMATE succession, few people seem to care whether someone who could (had Harry been born first) have been the heir to the throne might not actually be legitimate.

Whilst on the subject of hilarity, I'm also amused to learn that the Middleton girl (who will probably become Queen one day) is obliged to curtsey to Eugenie and Beatrice on the grounds they have royal blood and she doesn't.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I just find it hilarious that, in a system based entirely on LEGITIMATE succession, few people seem to care whether someone who could (had Harry been born first) have been the heir to the throne might not actually be legitimate.

I find it hilarious that you don't seem to be able to grasp the topic of conversation!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I admire him. He put himself in harm's way just like the other guys and girls deployed. He has made errors in judgement such as the incident in America but haven't we all.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

"..................

I find it hilarious that you don't seem to be able to grasp the topic of conversation!"

The thread had moved a long way from his chances of being killed by the second post.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I wonder how long it will be before he is flying Apaches across the southern Sahara ?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

When you come up with some actual evidence to back up your gossip then I'll enter into meaningful debate with you on the matter, until that time it's just tittle tattle as far as I'm concerned.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ady4ladyWoman
over a year ago

liverpool

Very proud of Harry and all our Royal family.

Trying to pull them down by questioning parenthood is not clever. Its spiteful and bitter - and I speak from experience.

Royal or not its a hurtful accusation

Harry is a fine example of a decent young man. All credit to him.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"..................

I find it hilarious that you don't seem to be able to grasp the topic of conversation!

The thread had moved a long way from his chances of being killed by the second post."

Mine is the second post and firmly on topic. Feel free to carry on, its amusing...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ady4ladyWoman
over a year ago

liverpool

I think the Royals are always under threat, not only from terrorists !!!

I think the enter_iew will probably stir up a few angry feelings, but wont make him any more under threat than usual.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ady4ladyWoman
over a year ago

liverpool

*inter_iew*

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

To be fair, his mother did spread the love around, so he could be anyone's or he could be Charlie's.

Either way, he seems very sound and I like him. As someone said earlier he has much more personality than his brother

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm not a royalist by any stretch of the imagination, but he seems like a really nice, well balanced young man doing his bit under difficult circumstances, I like him

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

"Does him admitting to shooting insurgents increase the risk of a direct terrorist attack on him?"

I am guessing the risk has always been high anyway.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *londeCazWoman
over a year ago

Arse End of the Universe, Cumbria

"Does him admitting to shooting insurgents increase the risk of a direct terrorist attack on him?

I am guessing the risk has always been high anyway."

I'm with Ruggers on this one...all that's been done is it's been explicitly said that he's been involved in shooting the enemy - anyone that hadn't worked that out already as he's an "Apache Attack Helicopter" pilot maybe isn't the brightest button in the box

And on a completely unrelated note, having just watched the inter_iew - phwoar, I so would

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

"Does him admitting to shooting insurgents increase the risk of a direct terrorist attack on him?"

Yes, if they can identify him in his uniform. He might be kept out of the way.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *bbandflowCouple
over a year ago

South Devon

As far as one can tell, and it's early days yet, he seems to be a genuinely grounded, decent young man, and thankfully free of the stilted autocracy that defines Charles.

Not forgetting, albeit one of material privilege, that his childhood, and adolescence, were lived out in an increasingly dysfunctional family, culminating in the trauma of his Mother's early death. Not the best of starts!

There are plenty of other decent young men who don't grab the attention of the media, but to his credit, it feels like he has much in common with them, which is more than can be said for many Royals

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

"Has it finally been decided that he has any royal blood at all?"

I have only seen odd snippets of the inter_iew but one bit was how he hates the tittle tattle in the press about his private life and how he hopes the people who read it all don't always believe it.

I find it disrespectful to gossip about peoples private lives when none of us know what is the truth....it comes across as a gossip who likes to make people squirm and I am sure his parentage being questioned would be making someone squirm.

I for one don't care what the nasty gossips talk about ....hopefully he has gotten over listening to the crap too.

I think he has turned out a decent man who sounds very grounded and I think people should leave him and his private business alone.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

"As far as one can tell, and it's early days yet, he seems to be a genuinely grounded, decent young man, and thankfully free of the stilted autocracy that defines Charles.

.......... "

Not much like Charles. I wonder why that might be.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

"As far as one can tell, and it's early days yet, he seems to be a genuinely grounded, decent young man, and thankfully free of the stilted autocracy that defines Charles.

..........

Not much like Charles. I wonder why that might be."

cos it suits you to be a troll maybe..?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Putting his military and public service to one side for a moment, there is something rather sexy about him

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Not much like Charles. I wonder why that might be."

His mother raised him that way.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Its a lot more risky now i am afraid.

Afgan news reports......

Taliban Chief Blasts 'Coward' Prince Harry over Playstation Comments

Describing his work in the cockpit, Harry told Sky News: "It's a joy for me because I'm one of those people who loves playing PlayStation and XBox, so with my thumbs I like to think I'm probably quite useful."

In response to Harry's comments, a senior Taliban spokesman condemned the Prince's comparison of the war in Afghanistan to a game.

In a phone inter_iew from Afhganistan, Zabihullah Mujahid said the third in line to the throne of England was a "coward", adding: "This statement is not even worth condemning. It is worse than that.

"To describe the war in Afghanistan as a game demeans anyone - especially a prince, who is supposed to be made of better things."

Mujahid added that Harry's inter_iew revealed that the quality of coalition forces deployed by Nato was low.

"It shows the lack of understanding, of knowledge," said Mujadin. "It shows they are unfamiliar with the situation and shows why they are losing," he said.

An unnamed commander based in

Aghanistan's Helmand province was also angered by the prince's comments.

"It's not a game - it's very, very real," he said.

And reprisals will be due.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

have you noticed over the years how the most virulent anti royal statements on here always seem to emanate from the same part of the kingdom?

I don't give two hoots about the royal family but we've got em so i guess I'll live with it. As for Harry.as a person I quite like him and he didn't duck his duties do good luck to him.calling his parentage into question is irrelevant,a cheap shot and pretty pathetic

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

"Its a lot more risky now i am afraid.

Afgan news reports......

Taliban Chief Blasts 'Coward' Prince Harry over Playstation Comments

In response to Harry's comments, a senior Taliban spokesman condemned the Prince's comparison of the war in Afghanistan to a game.

In a phone inter_iew from Afhganistan, Zabihullah Mujahid said the third in line to the throne of England was a "coward", adding: "This statement is not even worth condemning. It is worse than that.

"To describe the war in Afghanistan as a game demeans anyone - especially a prince, who is supposed to be made of better things."

Mujahid added that Harry's inter_iew revealed that the quality of coalition forces deployed by Nato was low.

"It shows the lack of understanding, of knowledge," said Mujadin. "It shows they are unfamiliar with the situation and shows why they are losing," he said.

An unnamed commander based in

Aghanistan's Helmand province was also angered by the prince's comments.

"It's not a game - it's very, very real," he said.

And reprisals will be due. "

A lot more risky?......

Tell that to our lads (and lasses) fighting on the frontline in Afghanistan.....it's been a 'lot more risky' for the last Five or Six years.

These cowardly bastards don't need any excuse to continue their attacks against our troops or the women and children of Afghanistan, they have a love for killing people.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Its a lot more risky now i am afraid.

Afgan news reports......

Taliban Chief Blasts 'Coward' Prince Harry over Playstation Comments

In response to Harry's comments, a senior Taliban spokesman condemned the Prince's comparison of the war in Afghanistan to a game.

In a phone inter_iew from Afhganistan, Zabihullah Mujahid said the third in line to the throne of England was a "coward", adding: "This statement is not even worth condemning. It is worse than that.

"To describe the war in Afghanistan as a game demeans anyone - especially a prince, who is supposed to be made of better things."

Mujahid added that Harry's inter_iew revealed that the quality of coalition forces deployed by Nato was low.

"It shows the lack of understanding, of knowledge," said Mujadin. "It shows they are unfamiliar with the situation and shows why they are losing," he said.

An unnamed commander based in

Aghanistan's Helmand province was also angered by the prince's comments.

"It's not a game - it's very, very real," he said.

And reprisals will be due.

A lot more risky?......

Tell that to our lads (and lasses) fighting on the frontline in Afghanistan.....it's been a 'lot more risky' for the last Five or Six years.

These cowardly bastards don't need any excuse to continue their attacks against our troops or the women and children of Afghanistan, they have a love for killing people."

I didnt mean more risky for our troops they are in the most dangerous position of all, I know that and have a few friends that are on the front line as well.

I am saying it has just got a lot more dangerous for the Royal Family.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *atinaBabeCouple
over a year ago

casa caliente

i love prince harry hes rocks

xxx

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Its a lot more risky now i am afraid.

Afgan news reports......

Taliban Chief Blasts 'Coward' Prince Harry over Playstation Comments

In response to Harry's comments, a senior Taliban spokesman condemned the Prince's comparison of the war in Afghanistan to a game.

In a phone inter_iew from Afhganistan, Zabihullah Mujahid said the third in line to the throne of England was a "coward", adding: "This statement is not even worth condemning. It is worse than that.

"To describe the war in Afghanistan as a game demeans anyone - especially a prince, who is supposed to be made of better things."

Mujahid added that Harry's inter_iew revealed that the quality of coalition forces deployed by Nato was low.

"It shows the lack of understanding, of knowledge," said Mujadin. "It shows they are unfamiliar with the situation and shows why they are losing," he said.

An unnamed commander based in

Aghanistan's Helmand province was also angered by the prince's comments.

"It's not a game - it's very, very real," he said.

And reprisals will be due. "

Would you expect any less from a Taliban warlord?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

On a "fab" note....i would sooooo do him....lush lush lush!

Anyway sorry. Back to politics

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ctavius StuntMan
over a year ago

london

"Its a lot more risky now i am afraid.

Afgan news reports......

Taliban Chief Blasts 'Coward' Prince Harry over Playstation Comments

In response to Harry's comments, a senior Taliban spokesman condemned the Prince's comparison of the war in Afghanistan to a game.

In a phone inter_iew from Afhganistan, Zabihullah Mujahid said the third in line to the throne of England was a "coward", adding: "This statement is not even worth condemning. It is worse than that.

"To describe the war in Afghanistan as a game demeans anyone - especially a prince, who is supposed to be made of better things."

Mujahid added that Harry's inter_iew revealed that the quality of coalition forces deployed by Nato was low.

"It shows the lack of understanding, of knowledge," said Mujadin. "It shows they are unfamiliar with the situation and shows why they are losing," he said.

An unnamed commander based in

Aghanistan's Helmand province was also angered by the prince's comments.

"It's not a game - it's very, very real," he said.

And reprisals will be due.

A lot more risky?......

Tell that to our lads (and lasses) fighting on the frontline in Afghanistan.....it's been a 'lot more risky' for the last Five or Six years.

These cowardly bastards don't need any excuse to continue their attacks against our troops or the women and children of Afghanistan, they have a love for killing people."

Get out of their country then.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"On a "fab" note....i would sooooo do him....lush lush lush!

Anyway sorry. Back to politics

Nice funbags.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"On a "fab" note....i would sooooo do him....lush lush lush!

Anyway sorry. Back to politics

Nice funbags.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

lol sometimes I really do smile at this site....here we are discussing something serious and then someone comes along and says "nice funbags"

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

"Its a lot more risky now i am afraid.

Afgan news reports......

Taliban Chief Blasts 'Coward' Prince Harry over Playstation Comments

In response to Harry's comments, a senior Taliban spokesman condemned the Prince's comparison of the war in Afghanistan to a game.

In a phone inter_iew from Afhganistan, Zabihullah Mujahid said the third in line to the throne of England was a "coward", adding: "This statement is not even worth condemning. It is worse than that.

"To describe the war in Afghanistan as a game demeans anyone - especially a prince, who is supposed to be made of better things."

Mujahid added that Harry's inter_iew revealed that the quality of coalition forces deployed by Nato was low.

"It shows the lack of understanding, of knowledge," said Mujadin. "It shows they are unfamiliar with the situation and shows why they are losing," he said.

An unnamed commander based in

Aghanistan's Helmand province was also angered by the prince's comments.

"It's not a game - it's very, very real," he said.

And reprisals will be due.

A lot more risky?......

Tell that to our lads (and lasses) fighting on the frontline in Afghanistan.....it's been a 'lot more risky' for the last Five or Six years.

These cowardly bastards don't need any excuse to continue their attacks against our troops or the women and children of Afghanistan, they have a love for killing people.

Get out of their country then."

You appear to have overlooked the fact that the majority of the Taliban are not in fact Afghans....but Pakistanis fighting in another country.

So not THEIR country after all.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

"lol sometimes I really do smile at this site....here we are discussing something serious and then someone comes along and says "nice funbags"

That's the thing I like about it. Sympathy given with a naked cock avatar, politics discussed by a stocking top avatar and funbags.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ctavius StuntMan
over a year ago

london

"Its a lot more risky now i am afraid.

Afgan news reports......

Taliban Chief Blasts 'Coward' Prince Harry over Playstation Comments

In response to Harry's comments, a senior Taliban spokesman condemned the Prince's comparison of the war in Afghanistan to a game.

In a phone inter_iew from Afhganistan, Zabihullah Mujahid said the third in line to the throne of England was a "coward", adding: "This statement is not even worth condemning. It is worse than that.

"To describe the war in Afghanistan as a game demeans anyone - especially a prince, who is supposed to be made of better things."

Mujahid added that Harry's inter_iew revealed that the quality of coalition forces deployed by Nato was low.

"It shows the lack of understanding, of knowledge," said Mujadin. "It shows they are unfamiliar with the situation and shows why they are losing," he said.

An unnamed commander based in

Aghanistan's Helmand province was also angered by the prince's comments.

"It's not a game - it's very, very real," he said.

And reprisals will be due.

A lot more risky?......

Tell that to our lads (and lasses) fighting on the frontline in Afghanistan.....it's been a 'lot more risky' for the last Five or Six years.

These cowardly bastards don't need any excuse to continue their attacks against our troops or the women and children of Afghanistan, they have a love for killing people.

Get out of their country then.

You appear to have overlooked the fact that the majority of the Taliban are not in fact Afghans....but Pakistanis fighting in another country.

So not THEIR country after all."

Not really. You seem to have overlooked that the "taliban and al qaeda" were created and named by the cia. And as far as love for killing people i think you will find that western forces have killed and maimed by factors of a hundred thousand more innocent men women and children.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

Actually the Taliban in it's earlier guise of Mujahideen were created by the Pakistan government who supplied their weaponary but it was largely funded by both the United States and Saudi Arabia.

When the Russians were forced out of the region the Pakistan politician Sami ul Haq split from the Pakistan government and reformed and refunded them as the Taleban (Taliban) in an attempt to enforce strict islamic laws upon the country of Afghanistan and the mountains of Pakistan and it's population.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I adore Harry, think hes a bit of a wildcard which i like, hes not too bad to look at either. If he gets shot at he shoots back, whats the problem?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend

ginger never going to be king. might as well wear suits with big targets on

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"ginger never going to be king. might as well wear suits with big targets on "
Well that makes a lot of sense, care to explain?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 23/01/13 06:41:35]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Its a lot more risky now i am afraid.

Afgan news reports......

Taliban Chief Blasts 'Coward' Prince Harry over Playstation Comments

In response to Harry's comments, a senior Taliban spokesman condemned the Prince's comparison of the war in Afghanistan to a game.

In a phone inter_iew from Afhganistan, Zabihullah Mujahid said the third in line to the throne of England was a "coward", adding: "This statement is not even worth condemning. It is worse than that.

"To describe the war in Afghanistan as a game demeans anyone - especially a prince, who is supposed to be made of better things."

Mujahid added that Harry's inter_iew revealed that the quality of coalition forces deployed by Nato was low.

"It shows the lack of understanding, of knowledge," said Mujadin. "It shows they are unfamiliar with the situation and shows why they are losing," he said.

An unnamed commander based in

Aghanistan's Helmand province was also angered by the prince's comments.

"It's not a game - it's very, very real," he said.

And reprisals will be due.

A lot more risky?......

Tell that to our lads (and lasses) fighting on the frontline in Afghanistan.....it's been a 'lot more risky' for the last Five or Six years.

These cowardly bastards don't need any excuse to continue their attacks against our troops or the women and children of Afghanistan, they have a love for killing people.

Get out of their country then.

You appear to have overlooked the fact that the majority of the Taliban are not in fact Afghans....but Pakistanis fighting in another country.

So not THEIR country after all."

Oh shut up!

its is news report on the Talibans response to the inter_iew, And yes it has got a lot more risky especialy for the British public, more mainland terrorist attack could been even more provocted your a fool, stop being so one sighted like you were the last time!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Oh shut up!

We don't use phrases like 'shut up' on here. Everyone is allowed their opinion and only if Admin or the Mods feel a post has transgressed the posting guidelines is a post or thread removed. It is not for you to censor anyone.

The Taliban threat to the British public in the UK is minimal or non-existent. Your argument carries no weight whatsoever.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm impressed by both princes but I prefer Harry over William."

Well said that man!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"lol sometimes I really do smile at this site....here we are discussing something serious and then someone comes along and says "nice funbags"

That's the thing I like about it. Sympathy given with a naked cock avatar, politics discussed by a stocking top avatar and funbags."

It makes it hard to concentrate sometimes. Surreal.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Oh shut up!

The Taliban threat to the British public in the UK is minimal or non-existent. Your argument carries no weight whatsoever."

I apologise for the shut up comment! if u think an attack is minimal or non existant do you not feel that is a under estimate of the terrorist threat to the Uk and British Nationals! After all America thought on those lines. And then 9/11 also the London bombings.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I love Harry such a great guy and just trying to be as normal as he possible as he can sure he's made mistakes but lets face it who hasn't its part of growing up difference is his will always be plastered on the front page of the papers and news his mother would be very proud of the way he has turned out she only ever wanted the boys to have as normal life as possible

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Oh shut up!

The Taliban threat to the British public in the UK is minimal or non-existent. Your argument carries no weight whatsoever.

At the time of 9/11 and 7/7 Al-Qaida were a known threat but they were not considered capable of carrying out anything on the scale that hit New York that day. Both the UK and US security services learned much in the aftermath of those attacks and I'm confident that we are safe in our towns and cities. Of course there will always be rogue operators capable of hitting without warning but we faced that with the IRA for decades didn't we. We survived that, and we'll survive muslim extremism.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Going back to the original thread about a direct threat to Harry, I think it has increased. A terrorist trained in Pakistan and back here could easily get close at a public appearance and blow him and Harry to pieces. I think with the attention on Harry and his role in Afghanistan, it would be huge publicity for their cause

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread