FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Police Shoot Dead Dogs in the Street

Jump to newest
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Video is circulating in online newspapers of the buildup of an incident where a man was tasered and his two dogs literally shot dead and lifeless by armed police. Some reports say that the first dog was shot as it lunged at police and the second tried running away and was literally dragging the dead dog away as the leads were tangled. The fleeing dog appears to have been shot in the back by police whilst running away. This happened on the streets of London which Mayor Khan says are safe. What's going on here guys. It's all over the news......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why would they shoot them if they’re already dead?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why would they shoot them if they’re already dead? "

Rule #2 DOUBLE TAP

Have you learned nothing from movies?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why would they shoot them if they’re already dead? "

Give it a second read, it's very clear

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why would they shoot them if they’re already dead?

Rule #2 DOUBLE TAP

Have you learned nothing from movies? "

I was too busy watching Emma Stone to pay attention to the rules.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why would they shoot them if they’re already dead?

Give it a second read, it's very clear "

Reading is for losers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think reading is a shit football team too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andyfloss2000Woman
over a year ago

ashford

How very cruel! X

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why would they shoot them if they’re already dead?

Rule #2 DOUBLE TAP

Have you learned nothing from movies?

I was too busy watching Emma Stone to pay attention to the rules.

"

That's fair, but she wasn't in it at the point was she?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why would they shoot them if they’re already dead?

Rule #2 DOUBLE TAP

Have you learned nothing from movies?

I was too busy watching Emma Stone to pay attention to the rules.

That's fair, but she wasn't in it at the point was she? "

I’d have to rewatch it. I still don’t think I’ve seen the second one.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There was a time when they would just shoot them dead. Dead and lifeless is a shot too far, as well as a waste of ammunition that the public have to pay for.

Your report seems to have missed out the part about Plod were responding to a report of the dogs having mauled a woman and the owner being a complete dick, but whatever..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estarossa.Woman
over a year ago

Flagrante


"There was a time when they would just shoot them dead. Dead and lifeless is a shot too far, as well as a waste of ammunition that the public have to pay for.

Your report seems to have missed out the part about Plod were responding to a report of the dogs having mauled a woman and the owner being a complete dick, but whatever.."

You expect unbiased news reporting? From this guy all the lols

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entlemanrogueMan
over a year ago

Motherwell


"Why would they shoot them if they’re already dead?

Rule #2 DOUBLE TAP

Have you learned nothing from movies? "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oofy321Man
over a year ago

moon base zero


"There was a time when they would just shoot them dead. Dead and lifeless is a shot too far, as well as a waste of ammunition that the public have to pay for.

Your report seems to have missed out the part about Plod were responding to a report of the dogs having mauled a woman and the owner being a complete dick, but whatever.."

That's tom for yer

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why would they shoot them if they’re already dead?

Give it a second read, it's very clear

Reading is for losers."

Well done for being an adult, here's a gold star

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think reading is a shit football team too"

Aye nearly as bad as Derby.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 08/05/23 12:52:38]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why would they shoot them if they’re already dead?

Give it a second read, it's very clear

Reading is for losers.

Well done for being an adult, here's a gold star "

Well done for having zero sense of humour

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *host63Man
over a year ago

Bedfont Feltham


"Video is circulating in online newspapers of the buildup of an incident where a man was tasered and his two dogs literally shot dead and lifeless by armed police. Some reports say that the first dog was shot as it lunged at police and the second tried running away and was literally dragging the dead dog away as the leads were tangled. The fleeing dog appears to have been shot in the back by police whilst running away. This happened on the streets of London which Mayor Khan says are safe. What's going on here guys. It's all over the news......"

I don't know the background only the aftermath. So I won't comment. And no I don't love the police I don't have enough information

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why would they shoot them if they’re already dead?

Give it a second read, it's very clear "

Nope, definitely the headline by Tom was that police shot dead dogs in the street. I even put my reading glasses on, look see

"Police Shoot Dead Dogs in the Street"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lym4realCouple
over a year ago

plymouth

Believe anything ( just about ) about the London met ?? after all arresting people for wearing a t shirt ?? loathsome police force ....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why would they shoot them if they’re already dead?

Give it a second read, it's very clear

Reading is for losers.

Well done for being an adult, here's a gold star

Well done for having zero sense of humour "

Have a look at the emoji's mate, you do keep scanning

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Replay shows the man and his dogs.. could the feds have handled it better.. ?

The Americans have a device like a noose on a pole which captures the buggers without harming them. They could have been destroyed later

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"Replay shows the man and his dogs.. could the feds have handled it better.. ?

The Americans have a device like a noose on a pole which captures the buggers without harming them. They could have been destroyed later "

You know how it is Tom, once these buggers taste blood there’s no going back.

Maybe they should have shot the owner instead.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"Replay shows the man and his dogs.. could the feds have handled it better.. ?

The Americans have a device like a noose on a pole which captures the buggers without harming them. They could have been destroyed later

You know how it is Tom, once these buggers taste blood there’s no going back.

Maybe they should have shot the owner instead."

They tasered the owner...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emma HoldenTV/TS
over a year ago

Ramsey

Tasering is a bit savage for simply tying a poo bag to a tree branch instead of putting it in the bin.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Tasering is a bit savage for simply tying a poo bag to a tree branch instead of putting it in the bin.

"

It’s really not. Disgusting practice…

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"Tasering is a bit savage for simply tying a poo bag to a tree branch instead of putting it in the bin.

"

Should have been shot for that, never mind tasered.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *opinovMan
over a year ago

Point Nemo, Cumbria


"Replay shows the man and his dogs.. could the feds have handled it better.. ?

The Americans have a device like a noose on a pole which captures the buggers without harming them. They could have been destroyed later "

Yeah, coz the yanks are really really restrained when it comes to using guns.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
over a year ago

Leeds


"

The Americans have a device like a noose on a pole which captures the buggers without harming them. "

A lasso ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Tasering is a bit savage for simply tying a poo bag to a tree branch instead of putting it in the bin.

"

Not in my book. Disgusting behaviour.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Dogs attack woman, police called, man aggressive, refuses to hand dogs over and sets them on police...

You expect police to be walking around with a lasso in their pockets and to be seriously injured or killed so you won't be offended at vicious dogs?

Have you been attacked by dogs or seen them ripping things apart. You certainly don't pet them or do a crocodile dundee.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onkeynutWoman
over a year ago

somewhere


"Dogs attack woman, police called, man aggressive, refuses to hand dogs over and sets them on police...

You expect police to be walking around with a lasso in their pockets and to be seriously injured or killed so you won't be offended at vicious dogs?

Have you been attacked by dogs or seen them ripping things apart. You certainly don't pet them or do a crocodile dundee.

"

Oh don’t ruin a good story. It’s much easier to police bash if you say they just shot some random guys dogs in the street!

I have watched the video, there is only one person to blame for the fate of the dogs and that is their owner.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Police get bashed if they do or if they don't... they can never win.

We could make up a new story though as they always apologise for everything.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"Replay shows the man and his dogs.. could the feds have handled it better.. ?

The Americans have a device like a noose on a pole which captures the buggers without harming them. They could have been destroyed later "

And the point of destroying them later is what?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"Replay shows the man and his dogs.. could the feds have handled it better.. ?

The Americans have a device like a noose on a pole which captures the buggers without harming them. They could have been destroyed later "

Ahh the american police.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

The device is not a lassoo. A lassoo is a piece of rope which is thrown by cowboy on a horse to catch cattle or a wild horse. The device that Tom is talking about is a long rigid pole with a noose on the end so that once caught the dog cannot bite you as long as the dog catcher holds onto the stick. It is probably called a 'dogcatcher' or something similar. An improved design probably means the pole is telescopic and easily carried in every police car or on his utility belt

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"Replay shows the man and his dogs.. could the feds have handled it better.. ?

The Americans have a device like a noose on a pole which captures the buggers without harming them. They could have been destroyed later

And the point of destroying them later is what? "

If the police used the tactical dogcatcher device as described then the dogs could have been safely and quietly taken away from prying eyes. There would not be members of the public filming and having jury by TV. Less upset for members witnessing dogs being gunned down in the streets. Let's not forget the cost of council workers called out on a bank holiday weekend to clean warm dogs blood of the streets.

This could of all been done quietly behind closed doors. Nothing to see here, just move along...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *UGGYBEAR2015Man
over a year ago

BRIDPORT


"Tasering is a bit savage for simply tying a poo bag to a tree branch instead of putting it in the bin.

"

Don’t get me started on people who discard bags of dog mess into hedges.

They should be heavily fined and banned from keeping dogs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

Idiots who use their dogs literally as weapons deserve to have them removed, and in extreme circumstances shot if necessary.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"Replay shows the man and his dogs.. could the feds have handled it better.. ?

The Americans have a device like a noose on a pole which captures the buggers without harming them. They could have been destroyed later

And the point of destroying them later is what?

If the police used the tactical dogcatcher device as described then the dogs could have been safely and quietly taken away from prying eyes. There would not be members of the public filming and having jury by TV. Less upset for members witnessing dogs being gunned down in the streets. Let's not forget the cost of council workers called out on a bank holiday weekend to clean warm dogs blood of the streets.

This could of all been done quietly behind closed doors. Nothing to see here, just move along..."

Maybe. Presumably they risk assessed and decided the best course of action in those circumstances. Are you intimating that the dogs should not have been out down and that the police should have let them attack them or other members of the film crew?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *elvet RopeMan
over a year ago

by the big field


"The device is not a lassoo. A lassoo is a piece of rope which is thrown by cowboy on a horse to catch cattle or a wild horse. The device that Tom is talking about is a long rigid pole with a noose on the end so that once caught the dog cannot bite you as long as the dog catcher holds onto the stick. It is probably called a 'dogcatcher' or something similar. An improved design probably means the pole is telescopic and easily carried in every police car or on his utility belt"

You seem to know a lot about this device Tom?

Secret fetish is it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Replay shows the man and his dogs.. could the feds have handled it better.. ?

The Americans have a device like a noose on a pole which captures the buggers without harming them. They could have been destroyed later

Ahh the american police. "

English police, it was in London

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"Replay shows the man and his dogs.. could the feds have handled it better.. ?

The Americans have a device like a noose on a pole which captures the buggers without harming them. They could have been destroyed later

Ahh the american police.

English police, it was in London "

"The Americans have a device like a noose on a pole which..."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Reports that Gazza was refused entry to the police cordon. He arrived with a fishing rod and four tins of carlsberg

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *angtidy42Couple
over a year ago

Redditch


"Why would they shoot them if they’re already dead?

Rule #2 DOUBLE TAP

Have you learned nothing from movies?

"

Rule #1 finger off the trigger and straight along the magazine housing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top