Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sexuality is important for being able to know who you can or can’t message on here. I think there is currently a misplaced notion that there’s “no such thing as straight” but in reality the vast majority of people are exactly that. How come you never hear anyone say “there’s no such thing as gay. Everyone is on the spectrum” ? Im cool with people labelling themselves as whatever they want. But I’m not cool with imposing rules onto others about whether they can or can’t define themselves as something." Just to clarify incase my post sounded too harsh. I think all sexualities should be accepted. Saying “sexuality is out dated” or implying that it doesn’t exist is not good for anyone. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So there is definitely a difference between hedonism and sexuality. With hedonism, it's anything for the pleasure. Male, female, TV/TS, non-binary, gender fluid, as long as its for pleasure, it doesn't matter. Whereas with bisexuality and the like, there has to be attraction. For instance, with me, I am romantically and sexually attracted to women, but only sexually attracted to men. I've tried relationships with men and they just don't fulfil on an emotional level. " Ok yeah, that's interesting. I'm guessing there will be many different opinions, i definitely understand where youre coming from though. Let's face it sexuality is a very personal thing. It's just something I was musing on this morning | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sexuality is important for being able to know who you can or can’t message on here. I think there is currently a misplaced notion that there’s “no such thing as straight” but in reality the vast majority of people are exactly that. How come you never hear anyone say “there’s no such thing as gay. Everyone is on the spectrum” ? Im cool with people labelling themselves as whatever they want. But I’m not cool with imposing rules onto others about whether they can or can’t define themselves as something. Just to clarify incase my post sounded too harsh. I think all sexualities should be accepted. Saying “sexuality is out dated” or implying that it doesn’t exist is not good for anyone." I totally understand what you meant. It's a decisive subject, I get that. Like I say I was looking for opinions as its something on my mind this morning. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My only gripe is people who refuse to meet with bi men but love bi women. And these are often couples or single women. Now, if they have good reason why, I get it. But if you meet bi women, but meet single men, why not bi men? " I meet bi women but I don't meet bi men. I don't have to give a reason for that to anyone.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My only gripe is people who refuse to meet with bi men but love bi women. And these are often couples or single women. Now, if they have good reason why, I get it. But if you meet bi women, but meet single men, why not bi men? I meet bi women but I don't meet bi men. I don't have to give a reason for that to anyone.." You don't but it dies still make us wonder as to why | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a fan of labels, because I'm not a fan of putting people in boxes, and that seems to me to be what labels do. There aren't enough labels to cover every nuance, anyway. And yet I think there are far too many. I've always thought of sexuality as a sliding scale, with most people finding themselves somewhere along it. Or moving along it depending on whatever factors are affecting them at the time. But that's not popular with some people who feel they're "100% straight or gay". So I don't think labelling sexuality is outdated, but I do think that labels don't work for everyone, regardless of how many new ones are created. Mine would just be "Poshsexual", because my sexuality is unique to me (and not a static thing). However, if people want a label, rock on. Go for it and fill your boots. (And on here, I think you should be able to not choose a sexuality label)" I definitely agree with having the ability to abstain from choosing or labeling yourself if you so wish. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"An interesting question and maybe one for fab to consider when possibly updating their options. Incidentally, I just googled pomosexual. It seems clear on being unclear and just not wishing to label anything. How was your cigar on Saturday? " Haha, it was very nice thanks. I don't often partake so it's all the more pleasurable when I do. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree on one level labels are approximations anyway: they mean different things to different people. But they can be useful also, certainly in initial conversations. E.g. I have probably had around pfft 100 conversations since starting 'dating' again. All querying how my sexual attraction develops. It gets boring, so I say I am demisexual, which is the closest approximation. Once they get that, then we can get to the finer details. I have few inhibitions and they lessen the more turned on I get. Most things a plausible at that point." See, demisexual means nothing to me, because I haven't ever looked into what any of the labels past heterosexual, homosexual and bisexual mean. If I were having the conversation I'd far rather just have it explained as you did in your final paragraph. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree on one level labels are approximations anyway: they mean different things to different people. But they can be useful also, certainly in initial conversations. E.g. I have probably had around pfft 100 conversations since starting 'dating' again. All querying how my sexual attraction develops. It gets boring, so I say I am demisexual, which is the closest approximation. Once they get that, then we can get to the finer details. I have few inhibitions and they lessen the more turned on I get. Most things a plausible at that point. See, demisexual means nothing to me, because I haven't ever looked into what any of the labels past heterosexual, homosexual and bisexual mean. If I were having the conversation I'd far rather just have it explained as you did in your final paragraph." I'm sure for you, I'd be happy to take the time. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree on one level labels are approximations anyway: they mean different things to different people. But they can be useful also, certainly in initial conversations. E.g. I have probably had around pfft 100 conversations since starting 'dating' again. All querying how my sexual attraction develops. It gets boring, so I say I am demisexual, which is the closest approximation. Once they get that, then we can get to the finer details. I have few inhibitions and they lessen the more turned on I get. Most things a plausible at that point. See, demisexual means nothing to me, because I haven't ever looked into what any of the labels past heterosexual, homosexual and bisexual mean. If I were having the conversation I'd far rather just have it explained as you did in your final paragraph. I'm sure for you, I'd be happy to take the time." Thank you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sexuality is important for being able to know who you can or can’t message on here. I think there is currently a misplaced notion that there’s “no such thing as straight” but in reality the vast majority of people are exactly that. How come you never hear anyone say “there’s no such thing as gay. Everyone is on the spectrum” ? Im cool with people labelling themselves as whatever they want. But I’m not cool with imposing rules onto others about whether they can or can’t define themselves as something." I do have to agree with this Its important people are upfront ,there are lots of men and women who don't think theyre bi if they reguarly play with the same sex. If i met a couple with my partner & the lady had said she was straight,i wouldn't then expect her to want fem play. Maybe the options do need changing and there could be a bi playful option or similar. People do query as a women that. I am straight.When i've chatted to couples on my joint profile we've had them ask will she kiss my wife or play with her,even when its been made clear I'm straight. Its not helped bu those who claim to be bi to put on shows for men i don't think. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree on one level labels are approximations anyway: they mean different things to different people. But they can be useful also, certainly in initial conversations. E.g. I have probably had around pfft 100 conversations since starting 'dating' again. All querying how my sexual attraction develops. It gets boring, so I say I am demisexual, which is the closest approximation. Once they get that, then we can get to the finer details. I have few inhibitions and they lessen the more turned on I get. Most things a plausible at that point. See, demisexual means nothing to me, because I haven't ever looked into what any of the labels past heterosexual, homosexual and bisexual mean. If I were having the conversation I'd far rather just have it explained as you did in your final paragraph. I'm sure for you, I'd be happy to take the time. Thank you " Can I get you a drink? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My only gripe is people who refuse to meet with bi men but love bi women. And these are often couples or single women. Now, if they have good reason why, I get it. But if you meet bi women, but meet single men, why not bi men? I meet bi women but I don't meet bi men. I don't have to give a reason for that to anyone.. You don't but it dies still make us wonder as to why" Because men having sex with men are at higher risk of carrying HIV .. You asked ...there is your answer... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree on one level labels are approximations anyway: they mean different things to different people. But they can be useful also, certainly in initial conversations. E.g. I have probably had around pfft 100 conversations since starting 'dating' again. All querying how my sexual attraction develops. It gets boring, so I say I am demisexual, which is the closest approximation. Once they get that, then we can get to the finer details. I have few inhibitions and they lessen the more turned on I get. Most things a plausible at that point. See, demisexual means nothing to me, because I haven't ever looked into what any of the labels past heterosexual, homosexual and bisexual mean. If I were having the conversation I'd far rather just have it explained as you did in your final paragraph. I'm sure for you, I'd be happy to take the time. Thank you Can I get you a drink? " I like coffee | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My only gripe is people who refuse to meet with bi men but love bi women. And these are often couples or single women. Now, if they have good reason why, I get it. But if you meet bi women, but meet single men, why not bi men? I meet bi women but I don't meet bi men. I don't have to give a reason for that to anyone.. You don't but it dies still make us wonder as to why Because men having sex with men are at higher risk of carrying HIV .. You asked ...there is your answer..." And thats why we wear condoms? I should also add that it is now more common for Heterosexuals to have HIV/AIDS than Homo/bisexual men, so that view is very outdated and quite frankly homo/biphobic | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My only gripe is people who refuse to meet with bi men but love bi women. And these are often couples or single women. Now, if they have good reason why, I get it. But if you meet bi women, but meet single men, why not bi men? I meet bi women but I don't meet bi men. I don't have to give a reason for that to anyone.. You don't but it dies still make us wonder as to why Because men having sex with men are at higher risk of carrying HIV .. You asked ...there is your answer..." Incorrect. Rates of both are much higher among straight people, and the highest rates worldwide are in countries where homosexuality is both illegal and socially unacceptable. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My only gripe is people who refuse to meet with bi men but love bi women. And these are often couples or single women. Now, if they have good reason why, I get it. But if you meet bi women, but meet single men, why not bi men? " We only meet bi men lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My only gripe is people who refuse to meet with bi men but love bi women. And these are often couples or single women. Now, if they have good reason why, I get it. But if you meet bi women, but meet single men, why not bi men? I meet bi women but I don't meet bi men. I don't have to give a reason for that to anyone.. You don't but it dies still make us wonder as to why Because men having sex with men are at higher risk of carrying HIV .. You asked ...there is your answer..." Only the ones that BB | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People are what they are, and they like what they like, and to hell with anyone else. " I completely agree with this but I don’t think that makes sexuality outdated, it’s just no one’s business unless you’re having sex. Fact is, the vast majority of people are straight, if you only go your own way that’s gay, and if you swing both ways you’re bi. There’s really no need for any other descriptions, but ultimately, it’s completely irrelevant to anyone you’re not jumping into bed with. I do think all these different labels are just about inclusivity for people who don’t quite know which camp they’re in, but why bother putting a name to it? Just experiment and come to your own conclusions. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love labels, and can't help feeling that people that spend ages looking for loopholes to not be labelled are in a way hiding from themselves or trying to mislead others" I don't understand that logic. Would the same be said of people who just don't label themselves without looking for loopholes? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love labels, and can't help feeling that people that spend ages looking for loopholes to not be labelled are in a way hiding from themselves or trying to mislead others I don't understand that logic. Would the same be said of people who just don't label themselves without looking for loopholes?" To me not so much no | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love labels, and can't help feeling that people that spend ages looking for loopholes to not be labelled are in a way hiding from themselves or trying to mislead others I don't understand that logic. Would the same be said of people who just don't label themselves without looking for loopholes? To me not so much no" I appreciate you responding. Thanks. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't need a label because I'm not selling my sexuality to anyone. I'm straight because I've never had sexual contact or even a sexual thought about another man. I don't need the world to know that I'm straight. I know it and I'm very comfortable being straight especially as it's not up for discussion. I have however over the last few years been asked to justify my sexuality by people who believe I am either afraid to explore or am narrow-minded. This has happened through private messages when I've been told by well verified couples that I don't have options on fab and the only solution is to play bi. I've also been challenged directly and indirectly on the forums with an "ah but" or a "what if?" attitude in regard to certain scenarios. I also know women who have been pressured by couples in the hope that their straightness is only a temporary condition and they have a cure for it. People have a right to label themselves or not as whatever they want. Other people have fuck all right to persuade them otherwise. " Whilst of course well written and said as nobody should apply pressure or have to justify themselves, it does miss one point. The OP implied that others want to apply a label to people because of however much or little they may have done with someone of the same or opposite sex. And I think that's fair as it should be up to the person to label themselves if they want to and not anyone else - in some respect I think you included that in your post too now I come yo think of it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't need a label because I'm not selling my sexuality to anyone. I'm straight because I've never had sexual contact or even a sexual thought about another man. I don't need the world to know that I'm straight. I know it and I'm very comfortable being straight especially as it's not up for discussion. I have however over the last few years been asked to justify my sexuality by people who believe I am either afraid to explore or am narrow-minded. This has happened through private messages when I've been told by well verified couples that I don't have options on fab and the only solution is to play bi. I've also been challenged directly and indirectly on the forums with an "ah but" or a "what if?" attitude in regard to certain scenarios. I also know women who have been pressured by couples in the hope that their straightness is only a temporary condition and they have a cure for it. People have a right to label themselves or not as whatever they want. Other people have fuck all right to persuade them otherwise. Whilst of course well written and said as nobody should apply pressure or have to justify themselves, it does miss one point. The OP implied that others want to apply a label to people because of however much or little they may have done with someone of the same or opposite sex. And I think that's fair as it should be up to the person to label themselves if they want to and not anyone else - in some respect I think you included that in your post too now I come yo think of it. " Agreed with this. I identify as bisexual, however get told I'm not fully bi as I won't let the husband fuck my arse. That is not what bisexuality is. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I'd never say it's outdated but as to way race, sex, sexual orientation and religion are on application forms is beyond me." I work in HR and we have to monitor in case we get accused of discrimination. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't need a label because I'm not selling my sexuality to anyone. I'm straight because I've never had sexual contact or even a sexual thought about another man. I don't need the world to know that I'm straight. I know it and I'm very comfortable being straight especially as it's not up for discussion. I have however over the last few years been asked to justify my sexuality by people who believe I am either afraid to explore or am narrow-minded. This has happened through private messages when I've been told by well verified couples that I don't have options on fab and the only solution is to play bi. I've also been challenged directly and indirectly on the forums with an "ah but" or a "what if?" attitude in regard to certain scenarios. I also know women who have been pressured by couples in the hope that their straightness is only a temporary condition and they have a cure for it. People have a right to label themselves or not as whatever they want. Other people have fuck all right to persuade them otherwise. Whilst of course well written and said as nobody should apply pressure or have to justify themselves, it does miss one point. The OP implied that others want to apply a label to people because of however much or little they may have done with someone of the same or opposite sex. And I think that's fair as it should be up to the person to label themselves if they want to and not anyone else - in some respect I think you included that in your post too now I come yo think of it. Agreed with this. I identify as bisexual, however get told I'm not fully bi as I won't let the husband fuck my arse. That is not what bisexuality is. " You are right and I am sorry as it actually that made me laugh | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My only gripe is people who refuse to meet with bi men but love bi women. And these are often couples or single women. Now, if they have good reason why, I get it. But if you meet bi women, but meet single men, why not bi men? I meet bi women but I don't meet bi men. I don't have to give a reason for that to anyone.. You don't but it dies still make us wonder as to why Because men having sex with men are at higher risk of carrying HIV .. You asked ...there is your answer... And thats why we wear condoms? I should also add that it is now more common for Heterosexuals to have HIV/AIDS than Homo/bisexual men, so that view is very outdated and quite frankly homo/biphobic" So what if the reason someone won't meet bi men is because they are homophobic or biphobic? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My only gripe is people who refuse to meet with bi men but love bi women. And these are often couples or single women. Now, if they have good reason why, I get it. But if you meet bi women, but meet single men, why not bi men? I meet bi women but I don't meet bi men. I don't have to give a reason for that to anyone.. You don't but it dies still make us wonder as to why Because men having sex with men are at higher risk of carrying HIV .. You asked ...there is your answer... And thats why we wear condoms? I should also add that it is now more common for Heterosexuals to have HIV/AIDS than Homo/bisexual men, so that view is very outdated and quite frankly homo/biphobic So what if the reason someone won't meet bi men is because they are homophobic or biphobic? " Their reason is their business. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the sexuality tick box should be removed from Fab profiles as it's irrelevant. The Looking For list is all that's needed. Coming Out shouldn't exist either." I’d rather not waste anyone’s time if don’t match what we’re looking for. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Welcome to my world op. I get into so many arguments with people I concider intelligent. How can they not understand people are just people regardless who they sleep with and what sexuality they are or label themselves. I’ve been curious about alsorts of things through my life, and I think I’m open minded enough to be fluid with my feelings and I just roll with them. I wish others could choose to be that way too instead of feeling they have to say they are -straight-gay-bi and alsorts of others. I think I’m going to come up with my own. I’m attracted to people who attract me. I’m magna-sexual. " Well said. Sometimes it seems a few people are so determined to attach a label to someone it almost feels as if the want to 'stigmatise'them. A bit weird really as not for anyone else to do that. You be you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |