Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever." There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No not at all. But I'd question how attracted a bi man was to me. And that's most definitely and insecurity of mine but would make men who are straight more appealing to me in a one to one scenario. " The thing about being bi is that you could be attracted to either sex. Without knowing you personally, I can see plenty to make you attractive | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not seedy no, but in general two women together is a top male fantasy, yet two men together isn't as high up in the list of women's fantasies, got nothing to do with seediness, I guess different sexes just have different turn ons" If not watching two men together, how about MMF threesomes? Would it be more of a turn-on for all parties to interact? It’s sexier to join in than to sit back and watch. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " It sounds like it would be a very unhealthy opinion to have. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever. There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. " They'll be the straight ones then. In the same way as there are women who recoil at the thought of sexy time with another woman. That doesn't make being bi seedy... that makes some people straight. As has been said, I like sexual people. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever. There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. " as true as that is, it doesnt bring the word seedy to mind. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think I've exhausted most of my debate brain cells for today... But a lot of it comes down to sexism and homophobia. You can tell such things are still subconscious issues (especially with men) by looking around the forum, plenty of men are worried (for example) that by liking various sexual acts they 'could be gay' (it's always gay - never bi!?)... There is a stigma for bi men that still needs to be worked on to be overcome. - bi men are somehow less 'masculine' - They are more likely to cheat - they are more likely to engage in unprotected sex Just some of the things I've seen on the forums let alone heard in conversation. " Exactly. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever. There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. as true as that is, it doesnt bring the word seedy to mind." Bad choice of a word then. What would you call it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? It sounds like it would be a very unhealthy opinion to have. " Indeed it would | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " No, I also don’t think it’s regarded at seedy either. It’s more to do with his masculinity, how many times do you still hear in films or TV series some guy calling another a ‘cock sucker’? It’s saying to both sexes if you indulge in this act in some way your masculinity is diminished. Anal sex even in the gay community if you take it, you’re not as manly as the guy giving. 100% straight is seen as the ultimate in machismo for both men and women, no hint of femininity or submitting to anyone, ergo more attractive. Obviously not all women or men fall into this narrow opinion of what it is to be a man, but for some it’s the ultimate and only preference for a partner even someone who just a FWB. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever. There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. " That would be because they're straight, same as a woman not wanting to be near another woman because it's not her thing | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever. There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. That would be because they're straight, same as a woman not wanting to be near another woman because it's not her thing " I said that a while back... doesn't seem like it is an opinion that is important | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever. There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. That would be because they're straight, same as a woman not wanting to be near another woman because it's not her thing I said that a while back... doesn't seem like it is an opinion that is important " It's more a fact than a opinion though | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nope. is it yours? i have never heard anyone say this ever. There are plenty of men who recoil at the thought of being close to another man’s cock. That would be because they're straight, same as a woman not wanting to be near another woman because it's not her thing I said that a while back... doesn't seem like it is an opinion that is important It's more a fact than a opinion though " I thought so... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " Never done me any harm on here , out and proud | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No not at all..I love just sitting back and watching my husband with another man …" Wish my wife was so open about me being bi. She knows but not keen on the 3ways | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It seems a wasted opportunity for a mixed group not to enjoy each other" For who? Not the straight ones I wouldn’t think | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. " Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. " I'd agree with this, a lot of men's fantasies seem to be mff threesomes. Mrs | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " It’s certainly not my perception but it’s pretty obvious that for whatever reason around here, a lot of people have differing perceptions of bi-males and bi-females. I know about “preferences” and all that but I can’t help feeling sorry for bi-males who are disadvantaged for being honest about their sexuality | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. " It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing." Makes sense yes. I just want to add I don’t think it’s not acceptable it just doesn’t float my boat as such. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. Makes sense yes. I just want to add I don’t think it’s not acceptable it just doesn’t float my boat as such. " Ah yeah I know you've no issues with it, it's just not your thing I wasn't sure which word to use... "normal" and "regular" felt a bit off to me, but "acceptable" seemed to work in my head | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing." I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. " Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category." Lesbian porn has it's own category so how is it double standards? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category." Pretty much exactly what I was going to say | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Lesbian porn has it's own category so how is it double standards? " Lesbian porn does, bisexual porn involving 2 bi women in a threesome is in the straight category and 2 bi men in a threesome isn't. That was the comment made further up. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say " A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there " Is there a bisexual female section? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there " When you flick through vids on PH, how many of them feature lesbians or Bi women playing with a guy even though (I'm assuming) you're looking for straight porn? To a straight women this causes the same issue you have of seeing things you don't want to see as you're flicking through vids | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there When you flick through vids on PH, how many of them feature lesbians or Bi women playing with a guy even though (I'm assuming) you're looking for straight porn? To a straight women this causes the same issue you have of seeing things you don't want to see as you're flicking through vids " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Lesbian porn has it's own category so how is it double standards? Lesbian porn does, bisexual porn involving 2 bi women in a threesome is in the straight category and 2 bi men in a threesome isn't. That was the comment made further up." If you click on the threesome cat and then use filters there's FMM option which no doubt has bi sexual guys on it and that's in the so called straight section of which there isn't one as it's just all or gay | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Lesbian porn has it's own category so how is it double standards? Lesbian porn does, bisexual porn involving 2 bi women in a threesome is in the straight category and 2 bi men in a threesome isn't. That was the comment made further up. If you click on the threesome cat and then use filters there's FMM option which no doubt has bi sexual guys on it and that's in the so called straight section of which there isn't one as it's just all or gay " Yeah I just checked and FMM section is just two dudes fucking a woman, no guy on guy from what I saw | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there When you flick through vids on PH, how many of them feature lesbians or Bi women playing with a guy even though (I'm assuming) you're looking for straight porn? To a straight women this causes the same issue you have of seeing things you don't want to see as you're flicking through vids " It's easy to use the search function so that doesn't happen | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Lesbian porn has it's own category so how is it double standards? Lesbian porn does, bisexual porn involving 2 bi women in a threesome is in the straight category and 2 bi men in a threesome isn't. That was the comment made further up. If you click on the threesome cat and then use filters there's FMM option which no doubt has bi sexual guys on it and that's in the so called straight section of which there isn't one as it's just all or gay Yeah I just checked and FMM section is just two dudes fucking a woman, no guy on guy from what I saw " Then just use search for 2 bi guys | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " Nope, accept people for who they are, what they are and how they are. Do wonder if this is your perception though op | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's porn? It sounds messy" Depends what you type in search bar | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's porn? It sounds messy Depends what you type in search bar " Isn't there some kind of rule about that? Rule 34, I believe. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Lesbian porn has it's own category so how is it double standards? Lesbian porn does, bisexual porn involving 2 bi women in a threesome is in the straight category and 2 bi men in a threesome isn't. That was the comment made further up. If you click on the threesome cat and then use filters there's FMM option which no doubt has bi sexual guys on it and that's in the so called straight section of which there isn't one as it's just all or gay Yeah I just checked and FMM section is just two dudes fucking a woman, no guy on guy from what I saw Then just use search for 2 bi guys " Or we could just mix all the bi porn together | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's porn? It sounds messy Depends what you type in search bar Isn't there some kind of rule about that? Rule 34, I believe." No idea but definitely don't look for blue waffle or whatever it's called | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there When you flick through vids on PH, how many of them feature lesbians or Bi women playing with a guy even though (I'm assuming) you're looking for straight porn? To a straight women this causes the same issue you have of seeing things you don't want to see as you're flicking through vids It's easy to use the search function so that doesn't happen " Can you really not see how this sounds and still think there isn't a double standard? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's porn? It sounds messy Depends what you type in search bar Isn't there some kind of rule about that? Rule 34, I believe. No idea but definitely don't look for blue waffle or whatever it's called " I never search for anything I read on here... since that episode. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there When you flick through vids on PH, how many of them feature lesbians or Bi women playing with a guy even though (I'm assuming) you're looking for straight porn? To a straight women this causes the same issue you have of seeing things you don't want to see as you're flicking through vids It's easy to use the search function so that doesn't happen Can you really not see how this sounds and still think there isn't a double standard? " Not really, I use the search function when looking at porn. Think most people do rather than just looking aimlessly | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What's porn? It sounds messy Depends what you type in search bar Isn't there some kind of rule about that? Rule 34, I believe. No idea but definitely don't look for blue waffle or whatever it's called I never search for anything I read on here... since that episode." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It seems a wasted opportunity for a mixed group not to enjoy each other" Wasted opportunity for who? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there When you flick through vids on PH, how many of them feature lesbians or Bi women playing with a guy even though (I'm assuming) you're looking for straight porn? To a straight women this causes the same issue you have of seeing things you don't want to see as you're flicking through vids It's easy to use the search function so that doesn't happen Can you really not see how this sounds and still think there isn't a double standard? Not really, I use the search function when looking at porn. Think most people do rather than just looking aimlessly " But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I wouldn't describe it as seedy. But bi women are generally more accepted than bi men it seems. And I'd say much of this stems from porn. Some if it may be because most men find 2 women hot. I do. I don’t find 2 men hot though. It's exactly that, it's what straight men like. "Straight" porn is filled with lesbians and bi women because straight men like it. If I want to see bi guys it's all in the gay category. I just get the feeling porn normalises two women playing together (because we see it much more) But still otherises two men playing together (because we see it much less) If it was all mixed in together people might start seeing two guys playing as more of an acceptable thing. I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. Ahhh but the straight women who have no interest in it can flick past it just fine? I think this is the double standard they were talking about so maybe they could place both in a new "Bisexual" category. Pretty much exactly what I was going to say A quick look on PH and there's a bi sexual male section on there When you flick through vids on PH, how many of them feature lesbians or Bi women playing with a guy even though (I'm assuming) you're looking for straight porn? To a straight women this causes the same issue you have of seeing things you don't want to see as you're flicking through vids It's easy to use the search function so that doesn't happen Can you really not see how this sounds and still think there isn't a double standard? Not really, I use the search function when looking at porn. Think most people do rather than just looking aimlessly But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly?" All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen " So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " Not at all. I have nothing against peoples' personal preferences. Its personality that matters. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search?" But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? " But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them " So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would say that male bi-phobia is a bigger issue these days than homophobia I know it's not a competition, I just think we still have a long way to go Recognition and acceptance of bi men needs to be addressed - often starting with bi and gay men themselves This whole fascination from gays of wanting to meet 'straight / bi' guys is equally as unhelpful and, to me, is just homophobia in a different wrapper " I do get what you mean I think, some men will look for any loop hole or excuse not to be bi, there are worse things you can be, like Tory. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it " Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble" You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same " When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh" I haven't contradicted myself though, it's not my problem that you don't understand what I'm saying and I'm not asking you to. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I haven't contradicted myself though, it's not my problem that you don't understand what I'm saying and I'm not asking you to. " You started off by saying you don't want to flick through loads of things, and then say people should use filters just like you do so you don't see it. Sounds pretty contradictory but don't worry, after this, I'll let you have the last word that you're clearly dying to have | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think I've exhausted most of my debate brain cells for today... But a lot of it comes down to sexism and homophobia. You can tell such things are still subconscious issues (especially with men) by looking around the forum, plenty of men are worried (for example) that by liking various sexual acts they 'could be gay' (it's always gay - never bi!?)... There is a stigma for bi men that still needs to be worked on to be overcome. - bi men are somehow less 'masculine' - They are more likely to cheat - they are more likely to engage in unprotected sex Just some of the things I've seen on the forums let alone heard in conversation. " It’s also your own experience of bi men. Definitely not less masculine in my experience , more alpha dom. I shared a house when younger with some bi men and they were basically gay men that would fuck women as well but mostly cruised for men by night and acted straight by day. I’ve also experienced married bi men at swingers parties, clearly much more interested in the men | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I haven't contradicted myself though, it's not my problem that you don't understand what I'm saying and I'm not asking you to. You started off by saying you don't want to flick through loads of things, and then say people should use filters just like you do so you don't see it. Sounds pretty contradictory but don't worry, after this, I'll let you have the last word that you're clearly dying to have " At the moment it's filted so not mixed, it wouldn't be filtered if was mixed is what I'm saying. Do you understand this, do you sprecken the English? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I haven't contradicted myself though, it's not my problem that you don't understand what I'm saying and I'm not asking you to. You started off by saying you don't want to flick through loads of things, and then say people should use filters just like you do so you don't see it. Sounds pretty contradictory but don't worry, after this, I'll let you have the last word that you're clearly dying to have At the moment it's filted so not mixed, it wouldn't be filtered if was mixed is what I'm saying. Do you understand this, do you sprecken the English? " We're not talking about when we use filters. On a general page, browsing the site, on the "straight" version you will see bisexual women in a threesome but not bisexual men in a threesome. For the latter, it has its own category which is why we are saying there is a double standard. You've taken the original point made, and twisted it to fit in your own narrative. So please understand comprehension before judging my English. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No not at all. But I'd question how attracted a bi man was to me. And that's most definitely and insecurity of mine but would make men who are straight more appealing to me in a one to one scenario. " I'd crawl naked over 3 miles of broken glass just to say _ello to you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I haven't contradicted myself though, it's not my problem that you don't understand what I'm saying and I'm not asking you to. You started off by saying you don't want to flick through loads of things, and then say people should use filters just like you do so you don't see it. Sounds pretty contradictory but don't worry, after this, I'll let you have the last word that you're clearly dying to have At the moment it's filted so not mixed, it wouldn't be filtered if was mixed is what I'm saying. Do you understand this, do you sprecken the English? We're not talking about when we use filters. On a general page, browsing the site, on the "straight" version you will see bisexual women in a threesome but not bisexual men in a threesome. For the latter, it has its own category which is why we are saying there is a double standard. You've taken the original point made, and twisted it to fit in your own narrative. So please understand comprehension before judging my English." Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. " Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post" Now now fellas, put the handbags down | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post Now now fellas, put the handbags down " Or you know, just get it on already. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post Now now fellas, put the handbags down Or you know, just get it on already. " Oh hell yeah, I'd watch that | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? Nope, accept people for who they are, what they are and how they are. Do wonder if this is your perception though op " Not my perception. Check my profile: it says I’m bi | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post Now now fellas, put the handbags down Or you know, just get it on already. " Veris would be a beautiful read, | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post Now now fellas, put the handbags down Or you know, just get it on already. Oh hell yeah, I'd watch that " What category would it be in though? How would I filter it in? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " No | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post" Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post Now now fellas, put the handbags down Or you know, just get it on already. Oh hell yeah, I'd watch that What category would it be in though? How would I filter it in?" I think you'd need to use the key word "angry fuck" or similar | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It’s sexy for a woman to be bisexual but seedy for a man. Is this your perception? " I agree with you in part Firstly you are asking this on a swingers site where bi sexuality is common and whereup folks in here are less coded and more open minded I think that society has always more accepted bisexuality and gayness is women but due to religion ale on male sexual attraction is more taboo | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time " Not really, you completely dismissed my opinion on the subject by suggesting "someone pissed in my cornflakes" just beccause I disagreed with you. I found it childish and unnecessary and didn't contribute to the topic at all. If I'm wound up then there's the reason. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time Not really, you completely dismissed my opinion on the subject by suggesting "someone pissed in my cornflakes" just beccause I disagreed with you. I found it childish and unnecessary and didn't contribute to the topic at all. If I'm wound up then there's the reason." Fellas cum on now just kiss and make up, this public flirting is to much... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time Not really, you completely dismissed my opinion on the subject by suggesting "someone pissed in my cornflakes" just beccause I disagreed with you. I found it childish and unnecessary and didn't contribute to the topic at all. If I'm wound up then there's the reason." Ok obviously you can't take sarcasm in any form and are sensitive and if you are wound up that easily then I feel sorry for you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not seedy no, but in general two women together is a top male fantasy, yet two men together isn't as high up in the list of women's fantasies, got nothing to do with seediness, I guess different sexes just have different turn ons" This | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh" I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time Not really, you completely dismissed my opinion on the subject by suggesting "someone pissed in my cornflakes" just beccause I disagreed with you. I found it childish and unnecessary and didn't contribute to the topic at all. If I'm wound up then there's the reason. Ok obviously you can't take sarcasm in any form and are sensitive and if you are wound up that easily then I feel sorry for you " Don't gaslight me like that, into thinking I'm the one who's angry and wound up just because I dared to have a different opinion to you. You're clearly being provocative in your choice of words now and it's clear I'm not going to get an intelligent discussion out of you anymore. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too. " Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too. Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really " That’s your opinion | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too. Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really That’s your opinion " Objectively really. If I say I don't want to see a certain thing (bisexual men) and expect others (straight women) that don't want to see it (bisexual women) to see it anyway, it's a double standard. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too. Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really That’s your opinion " Opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time Not really, you completely dismissed my opinion on the subject by suggesting "someone pissed in my cornflakes" just beccause I disagreed with you. I found it childish and unnecessary and didn't contribute to the topic at all. If I'm wound up then there's the reason. Ok obviously you can't take sarcasm in any form and are sensitive and if you are wound up that easily then I feel sorry for you Don't gaslight me like that, into thinking I'm the one who's angry and wound up just because I dared to have a different opinion to you. You're clearly being provocative in your choice of words now and it's clear I'm not going to get an intelligent discussion out of you anymore." You pretty much said you were wound up in previous reply and it seems the only one that had a issue here is you because it's definitely not me It's hard to have an intelligent covo with someone that doesn't understand the difference between being serious and being sarcastic. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too. Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really That’s your opinion Objectively really. If I say I don't want to see a certain thing (bisexual men) and expect others (straight women) that don't want to see it (bisexual women) to see it anyway, it's a double standard." I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too. Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really That’s your opinion Opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one " And some definitely smell better than others | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean " I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time Not really, you completely dismissed my opinion on the subject by suggesting "someone pissed in my cornflakes" just beccause I disagreed with you. I found it childish and unnecessary and didn't contribute to the topic at all. If I'm wound up then there's the reason. Ok obviously you can't take sarcasm in any form and are sensitive and if you are wound up that easily then I feel sorry for you Don't gaslight me like that, into thinking I'm the one who's angry and wound up just because I dared to have a different opinion to you. You're clearly being provocative in your choice of words now and it's clear I'm not going to get an intelligent discussion out of you anymore. You pretty much said you were wound up in previous reply and it seems the only one that had a issue here is you because it's definitely not me It's hard to have an intelligent covo with someone that doesn't understand the difference between being serious and being sarcastic. " Part of being sarcastic is doing it well | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up." You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Dude we're talking about mashing it into one, that's the original thing so I haven't changed anything at all Look someone has obviously pissed in your cornflakes today so just chill, move on and forgot about it because it doesn't really matter as it's just porn. Don't tell me what to do, I can post what I want and if I disagree with you, I'll justify why. Not tell you not to post Wow chill your beans, you're so angry and uptight all the time Not really, you completely dismissed my opinion on the subject by suggesting "someone pissed in my cornflakes" just beccause I disagreed with you. I found it childish and unnecessary and didn't contribute to the topic at all. If I'm wound up then there's the reason. Ok obviously you can't take sarcasm in any form and are sensitive and if you are wound up that easily then I feel sorry for you Don't gaslight me like that, into thinking I'm the one who's angry and wound up just because I dared to have a different opinion to you. You're clearly being provocative in your choice of words now and it's clear I'm not going to get an intelligent discussion out of you anymore. You pretty much said you were wound up in previous reply and it seems the only one that had a issue here is you because it's definitely not me It's hard to have an intelligent covo with someone that doesn't understand the difference between being serious and being sarcastic. Part of being sarcastic is doing it well" I'll have you know I passed my sarcasm test before you were out of nappies | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. " There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Lads. Come on. Leave it there, yeah? It's not worth the head space you are both giving it at this point. " I'm done now. You're right, it's not worth it a no one's come out smelling of roses as a result. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too. Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really That’s your opinion Opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one And some definitely smell better than others " That all depends on sense of smell | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that " Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too. Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really That’s your opinion Opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one And some definitely smell better than others That all depends on sense of smell " Long covid unfortunately didn't help me there, my sisters ex could clear Albert Hall | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oh yeah and blokes are arseholes too (see above) That's a joke boys before you start trying to lay into me" I was going to agree, everyone can be a arsehole if they want to be and I did see it as a joke so all good | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too. Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really That’s your opinion Opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one And some definitely smell better than others That all depends on sense of smell Long covid unfortunately didn't help me there, my sisters ex could clear Albert Hall " Gas mask required or not | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You’ll both be over my knee in a minute ffs! " I said you could have 1 min but you lost your opportunity, try again in 10 years Ps I'll give him a big man hug when I see him and all will be forgotten | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too. Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really That’s your opinion Opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one And some definitely smell better than others That all depends on sense of smell Long covid unfortunately didn't help me there, my sisters ex could clear Albert Hall Gas mask required or not " I think he'd break through a mask | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd prefer they don't mix it together as I don't want to have to flick past loads of things I don't want to see and I think that's why they don't mash it all together. But you don't want to see bisexual men when you don't flick through and look aimlessly? All the tools are there to not see things you don't want to if coming across them, I use those tools so that doesn't happen So if you use those tools available to you to not see what you don't want, what is the issue with mixing them then into one Bisexual category as it won't affect your very precise porn search? But it would if bi sexual women and men are in together wouldn't it? But then you can use your magic search filters to not see them So can everyone else, so there's no need to change it Going round in circles here, fuck me. Enjoy your own little bubble You have your opinion and I have mine, weird how people don't all think the same When you contradict yourself, it's tough to take that opinion seriously tbh I don’t think he’s contradicted himself. His preference and opinion just like you have your own too. Yeah, and his preference is a double standard, simple really That’s your opinion Opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one And some definitely smell better than others That all depends on sense of smell Long covid unfortunately didn't help me there, my sisters ex could clear Albert Hall Gas mask required or not I think he'd break through a mask " Won't be visiting the Albert Hall any time soon then | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nope and if I'm honest it's post that continue to fuel this perception that hurts the acceptance of bisexual men. That's not a pop at you OP nut there is a stigma that's undeniable so we must be positive in normalising anyone sexuality" Thanks. The point of the post was to see if there is such a perception. People who hold this view won’t change it and I don’t see it encouraging them. If anything it might show them that their view isn’t as widely held as they hoped. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nope and if I'm honest it's post that continue to fuel this perception that hurts the acceptance of bisexual men. That's not a pop at you OP nut there is a stigma that's undeniable so we must be positive in normalising anyone sexuality Thanks. The point of the post was to see if there is such a perception. People who hold this view won’t change it and I don’t see it encouraging them. If anything it might show them that their view isn’t as widely held as they hoped. " Sadly mate i think it is. Its the whole (without sounding woke) toxic masculinity bloke culture. That said some of the nastiest comments and messages I get (here) are from women.sone who are bi themselves I'm openly bi, ex military very much the archetypal man's man. I rarely vet questioned to ny face surprisingly lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Bisexual men is such a turn on! But I think society deems it as dirty - or that they're promiscuous. Bisexuality in women's seems more accepted by society, weirdly. X" This is the way | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about " Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Lads. Come on. Leave it there, yeah? It's not worth the head space you are both giving it at this point. " The man of reason. Also the man with the most kissable face. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? " Touching yourself again? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? " Do I look like a masochist? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? Do I look like a masochist?" Hey we all have our kinks, I won't judge. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? Touching yourself again? " Saving it for later. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? Do I look like a masochist?" What does a masochist look like?! Asking for a friend.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why have so many people got out of the wrong side of bed this morning? Stop moaning, sun's out and it's nearly the day to eat Easter eggs all day long! " Well, my excuse is because the dam sun is out!!! And Easter eggs suck ass. Is summer over yet?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? Touching yourself again? Saving it for later." I'll let you know when I've waxed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? " It's oozing wait that's the precum | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why have so many people got out of the wrong side of bed this morning? Stop moaning, sun's out and it's nearly the day to eat Easter eggs all day long! Well, my excuse is because the dam sun is out!!! And Easter eggs suck ass. Is summer over yet??" I'll send you a chocolate cock instead. Summers not even begun | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? It's oozing wait that's the precum" That's good for decoupage | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why have so many people got out of the wrong side of bed this morning? Stop moaning, sun's out and it's nearly the day to eat Easter eggs all day long! Well, my excuse is because the dam sun is out!!! And Easter eggs suck ass. Is summer over yet?? I'll send you a chocolate cock instead. Summers not even begun " FML I'll take the choccy cock though. Thanks! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? It's oozing wait that's the precum That's good for decoupage " Be careful of those papercuts though | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok, this is me wiping the slate clean now as I've realised I never actually answered the OP To be honest, both men and women face challenges with their bisexuality and women, I can imagine it's often dismissed as it just being a phase but in society, I think it is less accepted for men and it may result in fewer sexual partners due to an existing stigma of men having sex with other men." I'll agree with you mostly, didn't see that coming now did you I think it gives more options for sex though but I guess depends if open about it and who with. I do think people shouldn't judge others based on who they sleep with but people can't always control how they feel about things. Ps I you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? It's oozing wait that's the precum That's good for decoupage Be careful of those papercuts though " You had to go there | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok, this is me wiping the slate clean now as I've realised I never actually answered the OP To be honest, both men and women face challenges with their bisexuality and women, I can imagine it's often dismissed as it just being a phase but in society, I think it is less accepted for men and it may result in fewer sexual partners due to an existing stigma of men having sex with other men. I'll agree with you mostly, didn't see that coming now did you I think it gives more options for sex though but I guess depends if open about it and who with. I do think people shouldn't judge others based on who they sleep with but people can't always control how they feel about things. Ps I you" What do you mean "mostly"? I'm joking, I'm exhausted | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ok, this is me wiping the slate clean now as I've realised I never actually answered the OP To be honest, both men and women face challenges with their bisexuality and women, I can imagine it's often dismissed as it just being a phase but in society, I think it is less accepted for men and it may result in fewer sexual partners due to an existing stigma of men having sex with other men. I'll agree with you mostly, didn't see that coming now did you I think it gives more options for sex though but I guess depends if open about it and who with. I do think people shouldn't judge others based on who they sleep with but people can't always control how they feel about things. Ps I you What do you mean "mostly"? I'm joking, I'm exhausted" I'm sorry for draining you so early in the morning, I promise to be gentle in the future | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No not at all. But I'd question how attracted a bi man was to me. And that's most definitely and insecurity of mine but would make men who are straight more appealing to me in a one to one scenario. " Off topic but you look incredible xx | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I for one am in full support of all the bisexual men. And if you happen to be a bisexual male and have a beard/stubble, a few tattoos maybe, those sexy little vlines then please do get in touch. " Except your filters prevent it lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? It's oozing wait that's the precum That's good for decoupage Be careful of those papercuts though You had to go there " Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? It's oozing wait that's the precum That's good for decoupage Be careful of those papercuts though You had to go there Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug " Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? It's oozing wait that's the precum That's good for decoupage Be careful of those papercuts though You had to go there Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level " Safe words PD, leave the salt out of the equation, you'll be sweet a little sore but sweet | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? It's oozing wait that's the precum That's good for decoupage Be careful of those papercuts though You had to go there Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level Safe words PD, leave the salt out of the equation, you'll be sweet a little sore but sweet " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? It's oozing wait that's the precum That's good for decoupage Be careful of those papercuts though You had to go there Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level Safe words PD, leave the salt out of the equation, you'll be sweet a little sore but sweet " Man of your calibre I'm sure you'll cope | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? It's oozing wait that's the precum That's good for decoupage Be careful of those papercuts though You had to go there Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level Safe words PD, leave the salt out of the equation, you'll be sweet a little sore but sweet Man of your calibre I'm sure you'll cope " I don't think any guy can cope with papercuts on his cock | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can I just say that there are a lot of fit and gorgeously sexy bisexual people in this thread.. " Yourself included | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? It's oozing wait that's the precum That's good for decoupage Be careful of those papercuts though You had to go there Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level Safe words PD, leave the salt out of the equation, you'll be sweet a little sore but sweet Man of your calibre I'm sure you'll cope I don't think any guy can cope with papercuts on his cock " Two bulls could | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? It's oozing wait that's the precum That's good for decoupage Be careful of those papercuts though You had to go there Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level Safe words PD, leave the salt out of the equation, you'll be sweet a little sore but sweet Man of your calibre I'm sure you'll cope I don't think any guy can cope with papercuts on his cock Two bulls could " Oh how I miss him | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I never said I expect them to see it, who's twisting things Mr Bean I'm not twisting anything, I'm explaining how it currently works and where the double standard is as I've done before. It sounds like we're talking about 2 different things but you still wanted to dismiss what I wanted to say by calling me angry and wound up. You said it like I had said I expect them to see it after saying I'd contradicted myself. You are obviously angry and wound up and it shows quite regularly recently on the forums and I'm not the only one that's spotted it either. There you go again, telling me how I feel over a computer screen, who the hell are you to do that? I tried to point out where I thought you contradicted yourself and you disagreed and resorted to getting personal. I don't care what others spotted with regards to me either, good to know they can talk to you about that Read back what you said and tell me you don't think you come across as angry,I'd happily tell you in person exactly the same thing if I see you at Manchester social. Well you thought wrong in thinking I'd contradicted myself and obviously I thought wrong for saying you were angry. So now we've cleared that up and know we're both wrong the thread can get back to what it is actually about Is it just me or can anyone else practically feel the sexual tension? It's oozing wait that's the precum That's good for decoupage Be careful of those papercuts though You had to go there Let's not start any drama PD, you've had enough for one day, it would mean me having to come to MCR social, for a man hug Cuts on my penis by paper is a whole new level Safe words PD, leave the salt out of the equation, you'll be sweet a little sore but sweet Man of your calibre I'm sure you'll cope I don't think any guy can cope with papercuts on his cock Two bulls could Oh how I miss him " I do as well, I have a big void in my soul | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |