Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prompted by another post (where some very valid points were raised) I'm curious for the other 'not really a swinger' people, why you choose here than say other places for hook ups/dating etc? I've said it before over the years but as a single woman I find the men I encounter here to be far better,more attractive to me,(and more attracted to me) more intelligent, more interesting and actually more respectful than those I've met elsewhere. I've never once been ghosted or stalked by anyone I've met here. Is it that people can be more honest about what they are looking for or who they are here than they can be elsewhere? " What's a 'swinger' ? Til someone comes up with a valid definition then why can't singles be here for each other? As far as I'm concerned those that think swinging is just for couples only should join a wife (or of course husband) swapping site. Swinging has evolved from what it used to be seen as and what so many think it should be. There's room for everyone. A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally, we don’t see singles, either male or females as swingers. I even went and looked up the definition and it’s the swopping of partners. A single person doesn’t have a partner to swop in our opinion. We don’t mind them being here though before anyone jumps up and down on us. " I'd kinda agree with this too. We are actually quite good fun to have around | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prompted by another post (where some very valid points were raised) I'm curious for the other 'not really a swinger' people, why you choose here than say other places for hook ups/dating etc? I've said it before over the years but as a single woman I find the men I encounter here to be far better,more attractive to me,(and more attracted to me) more intelligent, more interesting and actually more respectful than those I've met elsewhere. I've never once been ghosted or stalked by anyone I've met here. Is it that people can be more honest about what they are looking for or who they are here than they can be elsewhere? What's a 'swinger' ? Til someone comes up with a valid definition then why can't singles be here for each other? As far as I'm concerned those that think swinging is just for couples only should join a wife (or of course husband) swapping site. Swinging has evolved from what it used to be seen as and what so many think it should be. There's room for everyone. A" There is definitely room for everyone. I think that's why I keep coming back! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a swinger either, it's a very outdated term in my view. Poly would be closer to it for me, but then the whole 'scene' is very tribal anyway, so swingers are only part of the equation. There's swingers, tantra, kink, poly, sex positive, all kinds of flavours. Swinger is just a catch-all term really, and not everyone identifies with it. I certainly don't. There are other sites/apps as well, where the term swinger is never used, at all, literally. And mainly because it's old fashioned - people who don't understand what recreational sex, or poly dating is, tend to use it as a fallback, but I think it sounds like something from the 70's and also conjurs up images of keys in a fruit bowl & all that." I'm sad the keys in a bowl thing doesn't happen. Totally burst my bubble when I went to a party Recreational sex is probably it for me,though I'm not really a fan of labels. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I never really thought about it. I just googled bicurious years ago and fab came up so I joined. I’ve never been a swinger and never will be yet I’ve always found what I wanted here and had some amazing times. I’m not really bothered if people think I shouldn’t be here. I’m probably the opposite of what the site is about but it’s worked for me. " I think that's the secret. Use the tools of the site to do whatever works for you. Like you, I've had some great experiences and I doubt I'm really what the site was ever set up for . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Good question, not a swinger, no interest in sex clubs etc. Single and enjoy female company in all forms, seemed a good place to potentially find that. Not found that , but I enjoy the flirting that can happen to make me feel better about myself and the forums can be fun and interesting. " I think the occasional ego boost is a very welcome bonus of hanging out here. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I never really thought about it. I just googled bicurious years ago and fab came up so I joined. I’ve never been a swinger and never will be yet I’ve always found what I wanted here and had some amazing times. I’m not really bothered if people think I shouldn’t be here. I’m probably the opposite of what the site is about but it’s worked for me. I think that's the secret. Use the tools of the site to do whatever works for you. Like you, I've had some great experiences and I doubt I'm really what the site was ever set up for ." The term is about as outdated as the website! (I mean this affectionately dear mods!) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally, we don’t see singles, either male or females as swingers. I even went and looked up the definition and it’s the swopping of partners. A single person doesn’t have a partner to swop in our opinion. We don’t mind them being here though before anyone jumps up and down on us. " Wrong. Definition of a swinger here. 'A person who engages in group sex or the swapping of sexual partners.' 2 singles just meeting for sex are not swingers though. I suspect some women use this site because they can meet men they truly desire who might not be interested in dating them in the false hope that they could date them. And some are disappointed when the reality hits. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"… I think it sounds like something from the ’70s and also conjours up images of keys in a fruit bowl and all that." I kinda like that though. I quite like that the word ‘swingers’ feels a little retro. A bit Abigail’s Party. A little bit naff, even. For me, that daft British edge to the word stops it all feeling too serious. Because some people can take it all so bloody seriously. It’s about sex. It’s supposed to be fun. And that includes the occasional bit of falling off the bed and collapsing in a heap of giggles. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally, we don’t see singles, either male or females as swingers. I even went and looked up the definition and it’s the swopping of partners. A single person doesn’t have a partner to swop in our opinion. We don’t mind them being here though before anyone jumps up and down on us. Wrong. Definition of a swinger here. 'A person who engages in group sex or the swapping of sexual partners.' 2 singles just meeting for sex are not swingers though. I suspect some women use this site because they can meet men they truly desire who might not be interested in dating them in the false hope that they could date them. And some are disappointed when the reality hits. " Other way round for me. I’ve found the men often want more than I’m willing or able to give | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I call myself a swinger, even though I'm single. I don't mind other people telling me I'm not a swinger though. We all have our own definitions. I think I would engage on here no matter what my circumstances because I like sex positive websites generally and I'm non monogamous so fit in here better than most places I don't use fab the way a lot do. I don't use it to find single men or hook up the one or two times I've tried it's just a massive flop so I'm not doing that again. " Yours is an interesting post, in that you use the term swinger, sex positive, non monogamous, and hook up. So 4 different terms in the space of just 3 short paragraphs. It's a good illustration of the point as a whole, I think. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally, we don’t see singles, either male or females as swingers. I even went and looked up the definition and it’s the swopping of partners. A single person doesn’t have a partner to swop in our opinion. We don’t mind them being here though before anyone jumps up and down on us. Wrong. Definition of a swinger here. 'A person who engages in group sex or the swapping of sexual partners.' 2 singles just meeting for sex are not swingers though. I suspect some women use this site because they can meet men they truly desire who might not be interested in dating them in the false hope that they could date them. And some are disappointed when the reality hits. " I think for me men are more attracted to me here and not in the real world. Possibly because on Tinder my profile photo is me and an alpaca rather than getting my boobs out on here . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally, we don’t see singles, either male or females as swingers. I even went and looked up the definition and it’s the swopping of partners. A single person doesn’t have a partner to swop in our opinion. We don’t mind them being here though before anyone jumps up and down on us. Wrong. Definition of a swinger here. 'A person who engages in group sex or the swapping of sexual partners.' 2 singles just meeting for sex are not swingers though. I suspect some women use this site because they can meet men they truly desire who might not be interested in dating them in the false hope that they could date them. And some are disappointed when the reality hits. I think for me men are more attracted to me here and not in the real world. Possibly because on Tinder my profile photo is me and an alpaca rather than getting my boobs out on here . " It's because of the potential of sex without groundwork or commitment. They just want to fuck not date. Value on here doesn't necessarily equate to true value in the real world. Some women are hitting the metaphorical wall. These type of men generally have options too they can date younger more fertile women. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prompted by another post (where some very valid points were raised) I'm curious for the other 'not really a swinger' people, why you choose here than say other places for hook ups/dating etc? I've said it before over the years but as a single woman I find the men I encounter here to be far better,more attractive to me,(and more attracted to me) more intelligent, more interesting and actually more respectful than those I've met elsewhere. I've never once been ghosted or stalked by anyone I've met here. Is it that people can be more honest about what they are looking for or who they are here than they can be elsewhere? " men are men its just what you expect of them i suppose, some guys think with their dicks and thats the same on any site /app but most are courteous and give and receive respectful messages | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not I'm a fake and a time waster " wonko doesn't bonko | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not I'm a fake and a time waster wonko doesn't bonko " Exactly! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a swinger either, it's a very outdated term in my view. Poly would be closer to it for me, but then the whole 'scene' is very tribal anyway, so swingers are only part of the equation. There's swingers, tantra, kink, poly, sex positive, all kinds of flavours. Swinger is just a catch-all term really, and not everyone identifies with it. I certainly don't. There are other sites/apps as well, where the term swinger is never used, at all, literally. And mainly because it's old fashioned - people who don't understand what recreational sex, or poly dating is, tend to use it as a fallback, but I think it sounds like something from the 70's and also conjurs up images of keys in a fruit bowl & all that. I'm sad the keys in a bowl thing doesn't happen. Totally burst my bubble when I went to a party Recreational sex is probably it for me,though I'm not really a fan of labels. " A friend of mine tells me that there are still the odd "Keys in the bowl" house parties but nothing like they used to be in the 1960s when it was possible to have a choice of two or three parties over a weekend. You have to bear in mind that there was no internet or mobile phones in those days but the pubs were a useful source of information. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When I was a swingle I was her for fwb sex with no dating BS or blurred lines.. People were more up front about it being sex focused not pretending to date to get sex on dating sites. " Yeah I'd say most men on here are on here purely for sex, women not so much. You can't blame them for taking advantage of the ratios but you can blame them for being naive when they don't realise the men are only looking for sex. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can blame them for not being honest about their intentions if they aren't. Having a fwb over a fb is more fun in my opinion - intelligence is sexy & makes for multi-dimentional sex. " If a woman was on here looking for a relationship and a guy said he was too, they had sex and then he wasn't interested anymore. You might sympathise a little with the woman but she should be aware of the environment she is in. If you can't meet similar people on here that you can in the real world then it's probably too good to be true. Don't be getting carried away, there is a reason why. You have to be aware and accept it for what it is. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't want to date, not looking for a relationship of any kind so I wouldn't do normal dating sites. Also, I can pull much hotter guys on here than in real life, I like that. " Pretty much the same for me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I meant on dating sites, not here. I preferred here as I wasn't looking for a relationship at the time. I'm married now so thankfully a moot issue." Yeah same applies on dating sites . If your matches don't look like they do on here you have to understand why that is. Not a moot issue for the op though, lots of women on here who are looking for a relationship and think they're being conned when a guy just uses them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Also, I can pull much hotter guys on here than in real life, I like that. " You are aware of the reality though. You are less likely to get hurt. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally, we don’t see singles, either male or females as swingers. I even went and looked up the definition and it’s the swopping of partners. A single person doesn’t have a partner to swop in our opinion. We don’t mind them being here though before anyone jumps up and down on us. " You don't mind singles being here, well that's very magnamanous of you! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I meant on dating sites, not here. I preferred here as I wasn't looking for a relationship at the time. I'm married now so thankfully a moot issue. Yeah same applies on dating sites . If your matches don't look like they do on here you have to understand why that is. Not a moot issue for the op though, lots of women on here who are looking for a relationship and think they're being conned when a guy just uses them. " Who's to say I'm not using the men I meet. I want the boyfriend experience without the farting,mother in law or drama and maybe I might want a few so I don't get bored | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I meant on dating sites, not here. I preferred here as I wasn't looking for a relationship at the time. I'm married now so thankfully a moot issue. Yeah same applies on dating sites . If your matches don't look like they do on here you have to understand why that is. Not a moot issue for the op though, lots of women on here who are looking for a relationship and think they're being conned when a guy just uses them. Who's to say I'm not using the men I meet. I want the boyfriend experience without the farting,mother in law or drama and maybe I might want a few so I don't get bored " Good for you if you're having fun. Just don't expect too much is what I'm saying and giving you the reason why you get more attention on here than tinder etc. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I meant on dating sites, not here. I preferred here as I wasn't looking for a relationship at the time. I'm married now so thankfully a moot issue. Yeah same applies on dating sites . If your matches don't look like they do on here you have to understand why that is. Not a moot issue for the op though, lots of women on here who are looking for a relationship and think they're being conned when a guy just uses them. " Lots of people men and women are open to more than fun As long as everyone's honest and upfront I don't see an issue . It's when people deceive others it becomes one. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Swinging is an attitude, a state of mind, a rule free, non judgemental practise of sexual expression " I like your jokes | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I meant on dating sites, not here. I preferred here as I wasn't looking for a relationship at the time. I'm married now so thankfully a moot issue. Yeah same applies on dating sites . If your matches don't look like they do on here you have to understand why that is. Not a moot issue for the op though, lots of women on here who are looking for a relationship and think they're being conned when a guy just uses them. Lots of people men and women are open to more than fun As long as everyone's honest and upfront I don't see an issue . It's when people deceive others it becomes one. " Totally agree | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I meant on dating sites, not here. I preferred here as I wasn't looking for a relationship at the time. I'm married now so thankfully a moot issue. Yeah same applies on dating sites . If your matches don't look like they do on here you have to understand why that is. Not a moot issue for the op though, lots of women on here who are looking for a relationship and think they're being conned when a guy just uses them. Lots of people men and women are open to more than fun As long as everyone's honest and upfront I don't see an issue . It's when people deceive others it becomes one. " Of course, there isn't an issue if it's mutual. To protect the sheep you gotta catch the wolf, and it takes a wolf to catch a wolf. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Plenty of definitions of ‘swinging’ on the internet. Maybe if it’s an old fashioned term and possibly ethical non monogamy is a more modern term. However each definition seem to suggest non monogamy at least on one side of the encounter. We don’t class two singles playing together as swinging. Funny how Fab segmented their sites into FabSwingers and then FabGuys (for gay and bi guys we think) but has not branched out into something like FabSingles. It would certainly help target each site to a particular interest group. " How? We're a couple looking for single men. Where do you think we'd fit? We were also two singles who met on here, have been married for nearly 8 years now and still meet others. So if singles hadn't been allowed then there's be one less couple here. Actually, a lot less than one, given we know plenty of couples who started out as singles. If you want to find a particular 'interest group' the site gives you all the tools you need. Just don't search for singles if you're not interested in them and they're existence on Fab will cause you no grief, stress or pain. It'll be almost like they don't exist. A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I meant on dating sites, not here. I preferred here as I wasn't looking for a relationship at the time. I'm married now so thankfully a moot issue. Yeah same applies on dating sites . If your matches don't look like they do on here you have to understand why that is. Not a moot issue for the op though, lots of women on here who are looking for a relationship and think they're being conned when a guy just uses them. Lots of people men and women are open to more than fun As long as everyone's honest and upfront I don't see an issue . It's when people deceive others it becomes one. Of course, there isn't an issue if it's mutual. To protect the sheep you gotta catch the wolf, and it takes a wolf to catch a wolf. " I know & I was responding to your statement that lots of women are looking for relationships here They may be ,but so are plenty of men ,theres been several threads started by men about it. I'm not single now ,but I had men wanting more than fun ,when I was. Anyone can use fab how they choose to ,as long as they're not harming anyone else. Have a good day | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I meant on dating sites, not here. I preferred here as I wasn't looking for a relationship at the time. I'm married now so thankfully a moot issue. Yeah same applies on dating sites . If your matches don't look like they do on here you have to understand why that is. Not a moot issue for the op though, lots of women on here who are looking for a relationship and think they're being conned when a guy just uses them. Lots of people men and women are open to more than fun As long as everyone's honest and upfront I don't see an issue . It's when people deceive others it becomes one. Of course, there isn't an issue if it's mutual. To protect the sheep you gotta catch the wolf, and it takes a wolf to catch a wolf. I know & I was responding to your statement that lots of women are looking for relationships here They may be ,but so are plenty of men ,theres been several threads started by men about it. I'm not single now ,but I had men wanting more than fun ,when I was. Anyone can use fab how they choose to ,as long as they're not harming anyone else. Have a good day " Just from what I have found with my extensive research on here. Just surprised how many women are. Yeah it only irks me when they are moaning and judging swingers doing swinging things on a swinging website, on the swinging forum. Like have too many verifications, action shots etc. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Plenty of definitions of ‘swinging’ on the internet. Maybe if it’s an old fashioned term and possibly ethical non monogamy is a more modern term. However each definition seem to suggest non monogamy at least on one side of the encounter. We don’t class two singles playing together as swinging. Funny how Fab segmented their sites into FabSwingers and then FabGuys (for gay and bi guys we think) but has not branched out into something like FabSingles. It would certainly help target each site to a particular interest group. How? We're a couple looking for single men. Where do you think we'd fit? We were also two singles who met on here, have been married for nearly 8 years now and still meet others. So if singles hadn't been allowed then there's be one less couple here. Actually, a lot less than one, given we know plenty of couples who started out as singles. If you want to find a particular 'interest group' the site gives you all the tools you need. Just don't search for singles if you're not interested in them and they're existence on Fab will cause you no grief, stress or pain. It'll be almost like they don't exist. A" You fit in because you and the single guy are participating in ethical non monogamy. We’d class anyone playing with a couple as a swinger. But just an opinion. We don’t make ‘the rules’. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Personally, we don’t see singles, either male or females as swingers. I even went and looked up the definition and it’s the swopping of partners. A single person doesn’t have a partner to swop in our opinion. We don’t mind them being here though before anyone jumps up and down on us. You don't mind singles being here, well that's very magnamanous of you!" It wasn’t meant as a power trip and you know that, jog on | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Plenty of definitions of ‘swinging’ on the internet. Maybe if it’s an old fashioned term and possibly ethical non monogamy is a more modern term. However each definition seem to suggest non monogamy at least on one side of the encounter. We don’t class two singles playing together as swinging. Funny how Fab segmented their sites into FabSwingers and then FabGuys (for gay and bi guys we think) but has not branched out into something like FabSingles. It would certainly help target each site to a particular interest group. How? We're a couple looking for single men. Where do you think we'd fit? We were also two singles who met on here, have been married for nearly 8 years now and still meet others. So if singles hadn't been allowed then there's be one less couple here. Actually, a lot less than one, given we know plenty of couples who started out as singles. If you want to find a particular 'interest group' the site gives you all the tools you need. Just don't search for singles if you're not interested in them and they're existence on Fab will cause you no grief, stress or pain. It'll be almost like they don't exist. A You fit in because you and the single guy are participating in ethical non monogamy. We’d class anyone playing with a couple as a swinger. But just an opinion. We don’t make ‘the rules’. " And you would be correct, the definition of a swinger again. 'A person who engages in group sex or the swapping of sexual partners.' | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Plenty of definitions of ‘swinging’ on the internet. Maybe if it’s an old fashioned term and possibly ethical non monogamy is a more modern term. However each definition seem to suggest non monogamy at least on one side of the encounter. We don’t class two singles playing together as swinging. Funny how Fab segmented their sites into FabSwingers and then FabGuys (for gay and bi guys we think) but has not branched out into something like FabSingles. It would certainly help target each site to a particular interest group. How? We're a couple looking for single men. Where do you think we'd fit? We were also two singles who met on here, have been married for nearly 8 years now and still meet others. So if singles hadn't been allowed then there's be one less couple here. Actually, a lot less than one, given we know plenty of couples who started out as singles. If you want to find a particular 'interest group' the site gives you all the tools you need. Just don't search for singles if you're not interested in them and they're existence on Fab will cause you no grief, stress or pain. It'll be almost like they don't exist. A You fit in because you and the single guy are participating in ethical non monogamy. We’d class anyone playing with a couple as a swinger. But just an opinion. We don’t make ‘the rules’. " But if the site was split so there was a 'Fabsingles' site for them and a 'Fabcouples' site for us......we'd be fucked. Or not. Obviously. That's the point I was making. Swinging has long evolved from couples meeting other couples. Even when that was the general view there were people looking for gangbangs with multiple men and couples that have always sought the elusive bi female unicorns. Old school 'wife swapping' is essentially the old world view of swingers. That ship sailed many moons ago. Swinging has (rightly) become more inclusive, regardless of single/couple/poly/enm status, gender, sexuality, kink or whatever you're individual characteristics may be. And long may it continue. A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not here for sexy times. I’m just here cos it’s a laugh, I learn new shit and the psychology of it all fascinates me " And don’t forget the sociology study bit for a second | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Plenty of definitions of ‘swinging’ on the internet. Maybe if it’s an old fashioned term and possibly ethical non monogamy is a more modern term. However each definition seem to suggest non monogamy at least on one side of the encounter. We don’t class two singles playing together as swinging. Funny how Fab segmented their sites into FabSwingers and then FabGuys (for gay and bi guys we think) but has not branched out into something like FabSingles. It would certainly help target each site to a particular interest group. How? We're a couple looking for single men. Where do you think we'd fit? We were also two singles who met on here, have been married for nearly 8 years now and still meet others. So if singles hadn't been allowed then there's be one less couple here. Actually, a lot less than one, given we know plenty of couples who started out as singles. If you want to find a particular 'interest group' the site gives you all the tools you need. Just don't search for singles if you're not interested in them and they're existence on Fab will cause you no grief, stress or pain. It'll be almost like they don't exist. A You fit in because you and the single guy are participating in ethical non monogamy. We’d class anyone playing with a couple as a swinger. But just an opinion. We don’t make ‘the rules’. But if the site was split so there was a 'Fabsingles' site for them and a 'Fabcouples' site for us......we'd be fucked. Or not. Obviously. That's the point I was making. Swinging has long evolved from couples meeting other couples. Even when that was the general view there were people looking for gangbangs with multiple men and couples that have always sought the elusive bi female unicorns. Old school 'wife swapping' is essentially the old world view of swingers. That ship sailed many moons ago. Swinging has (rightly) become more inclusive, regardless of single/couple/poly/enm status, gender, sexuality, kink or whatever you're individual characteristics may be. And long may it continue. A" We take your point and would be interested in your view as to why Fab spun out FabGuys when FabSwingers is a site for all with an interest in sex ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Plenty of definitions of ‘swinging’ on the internet. Maybe if it’s an old fashioned term and possibly ethical non monogamy is a more modern term. However each definition seem to suggest non monogamy at least on one side of the encounter. We don’t class two singles playing together as swinging. Funny how Fab segmented their sites into FabSwingers and then FabGuys (for gay and bi guys we think) but has not branched out into something like FabSingles. It would certainly help target each site to a particular interest group. How? We're a couple looking for single men. Where do you think we'd fit? We were also two singles who met on here, have been married for nearly 8 years now and still meet others. So if singles hadn't been allowed then there's be one less couple here. Actually, a lot less than one, given we know plenty of couples who started out as singles. If you want to find a particular 'interest group' the site gives you all the tools you need. Just don't search for singles if you're not interested in them and they're existence on Fab will cause you no grief, stress or pain. It'll be almost like they don't exist. A You fit in because you and the single guy are participating in ethical non monogamy. We’d class anyone playing with a couple as a swinger. But just an opinion. We don’t make ‘the rules’. But if the site was split so there was a 'Fabsingles' site for them and a 'Fabcouples' site for us......we'd be fucked. Or not. Obviously. That's the point I was making. Swinging has long evolved from couples meeting other couples. Even when that was the general view there were people looking for gangbangs with multiple men and couples that have always sought the elusive bi female unicorns. Old school 'wife swapping' is essentially the old world view of swingers. That ship sailed many moons ago. Swinging has (rightly) become more inclusive, regardless of single/couple/poly/enm status, gender, sexuality, kink or whatever you're individual characteristics may be. And long may it continue. A We take your point and would be interested in your view as to why Fab spun out FabGuys when FabSwingers is a site for all with an interest in sex ? " I guess there was a demand for it. Let's face it. Bi guys have always been social pariahs to many in the swinging scene, whereas bi women are an attractive bonus. Maybe the owners saw a gap in the market? Maybe they wanted to provide a safe space for them? I suspect if there was sufficient demand there'd be a similar 'Fabgirls' site? There used to be a 'Fabflirts' site - not sure it still exists - geared more for more 'open' dating. That was probably the closest to a Fabsingles site. A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Plenty of definitions of ‘swinging’ on the internet. Maybe if it’s an old fashioned term and possibly ethical non monogamy is a more modern term. However each definition seem to suggest non monogamy at least on one side of the encounter. We don’t class two singles playing together as swinging. Funny how Fab segmented their sites into FabSwingers and then FabGuys (for gay and bi guys we think) but has not branched out into something like FabSingles. It would certainly help target each site to a particular interest group. How? We're a couple looking for single men. Where do you think we'd fit? We were also two singles who met on here, have been married for nearly 8 years now and still meet others. So if singles hadn't been allowed then there's be one less couple here. Actually, a lot less than one, given we know plenty of couples who started out as singles. If you want to find a particular 'interest group' the site gives you all the tools you need. Just don't search for singles if you're not interested in them and they're existence on Fab will cause you no grief, stress or pain. It'll be almost like they don't exist. A You fit in because you and the single guy are participating in ethical non monogamy. We’d class anyone playing with a couple as a swinger. But just an opinion. We don’t make ‘the rules’. But if the site was split so there was a 'Fabsingles' site for them and a 'Fabcouples' site for us......we'd be fucked. Or not. Obviously. That's the point I was making. Swinging has long evolved from couples meeting other couples. Even when that was the general view there were people looking for gangbangs with multiple men and couples that have always sought the elusive bi female unicorns. Old school 'wife swapping' is essentially the old world view of swingers. That ship sailed many moons ago. Swinging has (rightly) become more inclusive, regardless of single/couple/poly/enm status, gender, sexuality, kink or whatever you're individual characteristics may be. And long may it continue. A We take your point and would be interested in your view as to why Fab spun out FabGuys when FabSwingers is a site for all with an interest in sex ? " Would be dominoes, lots of women would be on the single site. Could easily use both though. Would stop the non swingers. There is actually a new app like tinder for kinky people. It's a good idea in my opinion. More revenue for fab. Then everybody knows where they stand to. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prompted by another post (where some very valid points were raised) I'm curious for the other 'not really a swinger' people, why you choose here than say other places for hook ups/dating etc? I've said it before over the years but as a single woman I find the men I encounter here to be far better,more attractive to me,(and more attracted to me) more intelligent, more interesting and actually more respectful than those I've met elsewhere. I've never once been ghosted or stalked by anyone I've met here. Is it that people can be more honest about what they are looking for or who they are here than they can be elsewhere? " Some are here to find a person that's into what they're into , it's as good a place as any for that , those that Swing ..swing ..those that don't ..don't. .. everyone is here for their own reasons, whatever they are . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Plenty of definitions of ‘swinging’ on the internet. Maybe if it’s an old fashioned term and possibly ethical non monogamy is a more modern term. However each definition seem to suggest non monogamy at least on one side of the encounter. We don’t class two singles playing together as swinging. Funny how Fab segmented their sites into FabSwingers and then FabGuys (for gay and bi guys we think) but has not branched out into something like FabSingles. It would certainly help target each site to a particular interest group. How? We're a couple looking for single men. Where do you think we'd fit? We were also two singles who met on here, have been married for nearly 8 years now and still meet others. So if singles hadn't been allowed then there's be one less couple here. Actually, a lot less than one, given we know plenty of couples who started out as singles. If you want to find a particular 'interest group' the site gives you all the tools you need. Just don't search for singles if you're not interested in them and they're existence on Fab will cause you no grief, stress or pain. It'll be almost like they don't exist. A You fit in because you and the single guy are participating in ethical non monogamy. We’d class anyone playing with a couple as a swinger. But just an opinion. We don’t make ‘the rules’. But if the site was split so there was a 'Fabsingles' site for them and a 'Fabcouples' site for us......we'd be fucked. Or not. Obviously. That's the point I was making. Swinging has long evolved from couples meeting other couples. Even when that was the general view there were people looking for gangbangs with multiple men and couples that have always sought the elusive bi female unicorns. Old school 'wife swapping' is essentially the old world view of swingers. That ship sailed many moons ago. Swinging has (rightly) become more inclusive, regardless of single/couple/poly/enm status, gender, sexuality, kink or whatever you're individual characteristics may be. And long may it continue. A We take your point and would be interested in your view as to why Fab spun out FabGuys when FabSwingers is a site for all with an interest in sex ? I guess there was a demand for it. Let's face it. Bi guys have always been social pariahs to many in the swinging scene, whereas bi women are an attractive bonus. Maybe the owners saw a gap in the market? Maybe they wanted to provide a safe space for them? I suspect if there was sufficient demand there'd be a similar 'Fabgirls' site? There used to be a 'Fabflirts' site - not sure it still exists - geared more for more 'open' dating. That was probably the closest to a Fabsingles site. A" We’ll never know I suppose. You are right regarding bi or gay guys being pariahs on the swinging scene. Another theory, and it’s just our theory so please don’t shoot us . Perhaps since the majority of this site seem to be single guys looking for NSA sex that they were worried if it acquired a large proportion of gay single guys, as a hook up place, then it would dilute other interest groups and perhaps lead to people moving to other sites. Better to split around the perspective markets so to speak perhaps Just an opinion. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I meant on dating sites, not here. I preferred here as I wasn't looking for a relationship at the time. I'm married now so thankfully a moot issue. Yeah same applies on dating sites . If your matches don't look like they do on here you have to understand why that is. Not a moot issue for the op though, lots of women on here who are looking for a relationship and think they're being conned when a guy just uses them. Lots of people men and women are open to more than fun As long as everyone's honest and upfront I don't see an issue . It's when people deceive others it becomes one. Of course, there isn't an issue if it's mutual. To protect the sheep you gotta catch the wolf, and it takes a wolf to catch a wolf. " Not necessarily, an Irish Wolfhound was bred to catch Wolves . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" We take your point and would be interested in your view as to why Fab spun out FabGuys when FabSwingers is a site for all with an interest in sex ? I guess there was a demand for it. Let's face it. Bi guys have always been social pariahs to many in the swinging scene, whereas bi women are an attractive bonus. Maybe the owners saw a gap in the market? Maybe they wanted to provide a safe space for them? I suspect if there was sufficient demand there'd be a similar 'Fabgirls' site? There used to be a 'Fabflirts' site - not sure it still exists - geared more for more 'open' dating. That was probably the closest to a Fabsingles site. A We’ll never know I suppose. You are right regarding bi or gay guys being pariahs on the swinging scene. Another theory, and it’s just our theory so please don’t shoot us . Perhaps since the majority of this site seem to be single guys looking for NSA sex that they were worried if it acquired a large proportion of gay single guys, as a hook up place, then it would dilute other interest groups and perhaps lead to people moving to other sites. Better to split around the perspective markets so to speak perhaps Just an opinion. " Quite possibly. Although as I said before, it's not hard to avoid groups you have no interest in on here. Single males will never dilute the volume of couples seeking couples. Singles seeking other singles likewise. It's easy for us to search for sinhke guys that ARE interested in couples, rather than those just looking for singles, simply by ticking a box in the search facility. There are no end of single women on Fab. They don't impact us in any way. Likewise couples. Likewise anyone out of our age preferences. There could be a million more of them and it still wouldn't affect our use or enjoyment of the site. A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" We take your point and would be interested in your view as to why Fab spun out FabGuys when FabSwingers is a site for all with an interest in sex ? I guess there was a demand for it. Let's face it. Bi guys have always been social pariahs to many in the swinging scene, whereas bi women are an attractive bonus. Maybe the owners saw a gap in the market? Maybe they wanted to provide a safe space for them? I suspect if there was sufficient demand there'd be a similar 'Fabgirls' site? There used to be a 'Fabflirts' site - not sure it still exists - geared more for more 'open' dating. That was probably the closest to a Fabsingles site. A We’ll never know I suppose. You are right regarding bi or gay guys being pariahs on the swinging scene. Another theory, and it’s just our theory so please don’t shoot us . Perhaps since the majority of this site seem to be single guys looking for NSA sex that they were worried if it acquired a large proportion of gay single guys, as a hook up place, then it would dilute other interest groups and perhaps lead to people moving to other sites. Better to split around the perspective markets so to speak perhaps Just an opinion. Quite possibly. Although as I said before, it's not hard to avoid groups you have no interest in on here. Single males will never dilute the volume of couples seeking couples. Singles seeking other singles likewise. It's easy for us to search for sinhke guys that ARE interested in couples, rather than those just looking for singles, simply by ticking a box in the search facility. There are no end of single women on Fab. They don't impact us in any way. Likewise couples. Likewise anyone out of our age preferences. There could be a million more of them and it still wouldn't affect our use or enjoyment of the site. A" Yes you’re right. Single people who actually meet are not an issue. The problem can be finding people who actually meet. The search tools could be much better and more specific in scope such as ‘find couples who are both straight and into X, Y and Z and have been verified by in person meet in the last 6 months’ which you can’t really do. The more diversity on the site the better the search tools should be so everyone can find what they are looking for without having to spend hours trawling through profiles which don’t match your interests. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" We take your point and would be interested in your view as to why Fab spun out FabGuys when FabSwingers is a site for all with an interest in sex ? I guess there was a demand for it. Let's face it. Bi guys have always been social pariahs to many in the swinging scene, whereas bi women are an attractive bonus. Maybe the owners saw a gap in the market? Maybe they wanted to provide a safe space for them? I suspect if there was sufficient demand there'd be a similar 'Fabgirls' site? There used to be a 'Fabflirts' site - not sure it still exists - geared more for more 'open' dating. That was probably the closest to a Fabsingles site. A We’ll never know I suppose. You are right regarding bi or gay guys being pariahs on the swinging scene. Another theory, and it’s just our theory so please don’t shoot us . Perhaps since the majority of this site seem to be single guys looking for NSA sex that they were worried if it acquired a large proportion of gay single guys, as a hook up place, then it would dilute other interest groups and perhaps lead to people moving to other sites. Better to split around the perspective markets so to speak perhaps Just an opinion. Quite possibly. Although as I said before, it's not hard to avoid groups you have no interest in on here. Single males will never dilute the volume of couples seeking couples. Singles seeking other singles likewise. It's easy for us to search for sinhke guys that ARE interested in couples, rather than those just looking for singles, simply by ticking a box in the search facility. There are no end of single women on Fab. They don't impact us in any way. Likewise couples. Likewise anyone out of our age preferences. There could be a million more of them and it still wouldn't affect our use or enjoyment of the site. A Yes you’re right. Single people who actually meet are not an issue. The problem can be finding people who actually meet. The search tools could be much better and more specific in scope such as ‘find couples who are both straight and into X, Y and Z and have been verified by in person meet in the last 6 months’ which you can’t really do. The more diversity on the site the better the search tools should be so everyone can find what they are looking for without having to spend hours trawling through profiles which don’t match your interests. " I always meet. I, however, don't meet many people's 'wants'. Never mind | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" We take your point and would be interested in your view as to why Fab spun out FabGuys when FabSwingers is a site for all with an interest in sex ? I guess there was a demand for it. Let's face it. Bi guys have always been social pariahs to many in the swinging scene, whereas bi women are an attractive bonus. Maybe the owners saw a gap in the market? Maybe they wanted to provide a safe space for them? I suspect if there was sufficient demand there'd be a similar 'Fabgirls' site? There used to be a 'Fabflirts' site - not sure it still exists - geared more for more 'open' dating. That was probably the closest to a Fabsingles site. A We’ll never know I suppose. You are right regarding bi or gay guys being pariahs on the swinging scene. Another theory, and it’s just our theory so please don’t shoot us . Perhaps since the majority of this site seem to be single guys looking for NSA sex that they were worried if it acquired a large proportion of gay single guys, as a hook up place, then it would dilute other interest groups and perhaps lead to people moving to other sites. Better to split around the perspective markets so to speak perhaps Just an opinion. Quite possibly. Although as I said before, it's not hard to avoid groups you have no interest in on here. Single males will never dilute the volume of couples seeking couples. Singles seeking other singles likewise. It's easy for us to search for sinhke guys that ARE interested in couples, rather than those just looking for singles, simply by ticking a box in the search facility. There are no end of single women on Fab. They don't impact us in any way. Likewise couples. Likewise anyone out of our age preferences. There could be a million more of them and it still wouldn't affect our use or enjoyment of the site. A Yes you’re right. Single people who actually meet are not an issue. The problem can be finding people who actually meet. The search tools could be much better and more specific in scope such as ‘find couples who are both straight and into X, Y and Z and have been verified by in person meet in the last 6 months’ which you can’t really do. The more diversity on the site the better the search tools should be so everyone can find what they are looking for without having to spend hours trawling through profiles which don’t match your interests. " Here's what we do. When we browse and find profiles we're not interested in we block them. Guarantees they'll never show up again and that future searches won't take hours. You can boost your chances using advanced search. Most of what you mentioned is there. Verified (but not within 6 months). You can select interests but then that assumes they've listed everything accurately and that they'd be willing to do those things with everyone - unlikely. Straight? No option there but again, just block anyone bi that you come across. Even in big cities there aren't hundreds of potential meets even using the loosest filters, so after a couple of searches you'll have eliminated most of the people you wouldn't want to meet. It's a seriously effective way to browse. A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I meant on dating sites, not here. I preferred here as I wasn't looking for a relationship at the time. I'm married now so thankfully a moot issue. Yeah same applies on dating sites . If your matches don't look like they do on here you have to understand why that is. Not a moot issue for the op though, lots of women on here who are looking for a relationship and think they're being conned when a guy just uses them. Lots of people men and women are open to more than fun As long as everyone's honest and upfront I don't see an issue . It's when people deceive others it becomes one. Of course, there isn't an issue if it's mutual. To protect the sheep you gotta catch the wolf, and it takes a wolf to catch a wolf. Not necessarily, an Irish Wolfhound was bred to catch Wolves . " Yeah. Just means you have to think like one. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not here for sexy times. I’m just here cos it’s a laugh, I learn new shit and the psychology of it all fascinates me And don’t forget the sociology study bit for a second " Haha no chance. I’m convinced I’ll be proven right | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m not here for sexy times. I’m just here cos it’s a laugh, I learn new shit and the psychology of it all fascinates me And don’t forget the sociology study bit for a second Haha no chance. I’m convinced I’ll be proven right " Ha! The countdown is on. 23 days to go. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I meant on dating sites, not here. I preferred here as I wasn't looking for a relationship at the time. I'm married now so thankfully a moot issue. Yeah same applies on dating sites . If your matches don't look like they do on here you have to understand why that is. Not a moot issue for the op though, lots of women on here who are looking for a relationship and think they're being conned when a guy just uses them. Lots of people men and women are open to more than fun As long as everyone's honest and upfront I don't see an issue . It's when people deceive others it becomes one. Of course, there isn't an issue if it's mutual. To protect the sheep you gotta catch the wolf, and it takes a wolf to catch a wolf. Not necessarily, an Irish Wolfhound was bred to catch Wolves . Yeah. Just means you have to think like one. " I know exactly what you mean | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |