FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Gay Bishops

Jump to newest
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

In the CofE, as long as they are celibate - even in a Civil Partnership. But not women bishops.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

And...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"And..."

I'm surprised they would even raise it now since the vote went against women bishops.

It is strange to suggest that someone in a civil partnership should abstain from sex with their partner.

I'd be happy to see both gay and women bishops.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

did i hear it right that they also have to 'confess' any past gay activity..?

even without that, which PR expert thought that lot up...

(no max clifford puns pls)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"did i hear it right that they also have to 'confess' any past gay activity..?

even without that, which PR expert thought that lot up...

(no max clifford puns pls) "

Confess and repent.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"did i hear it right that they also have to 'confess' any past gay activity..?

even without that, which PR expert thought that lot up...

(no max clifford puns pls)

Confess and repent."

Fecks sake, how to osracize even more people..

maybe thats what they're trying to do..

the church is pretty much split anyway..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Does it really matter. They only represent a minority anyway. The rest of us are non-creationists.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"did i hear it right that they also have to 'confess' any past gay activity..?

even without that, which PR expert thought that lot up...

(no max clifford puns pls)

Confess and repent.

Fecks sake, how to osracize even more people..

maybe thats what they're trying to do..

the church is pretty much split anyway.. "

I'm going to become a Quaker.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Does it really matter. They only represent a minority anyway. The rest of us are non-creationists."

It only matters as it is still the 'official' Church of this country.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *yrdwomanWoman
over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum


"did i hear it right that they also have to 'confess' any past gay activity..?

even without that, which PR expert thought that lot up...

(no max clifford puns pls)

Confess and repent.

Fecks sake, how to osracize even more people..

maybe thats what they're trying to do..

the church is pretty much split anyway..

I'm going to become a Quaker."

You'll have to give up the booze then.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"Does it really matter. They only represent a minority anyway. The rest of us are non-creationists."

It matters as this 'minority' position themselves in high places and create closed shops.

No one in American politics will get to to run the country if they were to renounce God.

Same here really. They all go to church as do the Royals.

I often wonder how 'thinking' people can continue to present a false front

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"Does it really matter. They only represent a minority anyway. The rest of us are non-creationists."

even as a none believer i think it does matter to us as a society tbh..

as the 'established church' they have a vote in the upper house, how can they vote on 'us' and creat law when they represent an organisation which is inherently unequal and discriminatory..?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"did i hear it right that they also have to 'confess' any past gay activity..?

even without that, which PR expert thought that lot up...

(no max clifford puns pls)

Confess and repent.

Fecks sake, how to osracize even more people..

maybe thats what they're trying to do..

the church is pretty much split anyway..

I'm going to become a Quaker.

You'll have to give up the booze then. "

They don't sing either. Equalities but without the singing or booze - it's a quandry.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"did i hear it right that they also have to 'confess' any past gay activity..?

even without that, which PR expert thought that lot up...

(no max clifford puns pls)

Confess and repent.

Fecks sake, how to osracize even more people..

maybe thats what they're trying to do..

the church is pretty much split anyway..

I'm going to become a Quaker."

porridge..?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Celibacy? Isn't that the thing that makes catholic priests such upstanding individuals?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Celibacy? Isn't that the thing that makes catholic priests such upstanding individuals?"

I know that civil partnerships doesn't always mean that it is with your sexual partner but I think it's odd to suggest that you can be in a civil partnership and become a bishop as long as you promise not to have sex with your partner (or anyone else).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Celibacy? Isn't that the thing that makes catholic priests such upstanding individuals?

I know that civil partnerships doesn't always mean that it is with your sexual partner but I think it's odd to suggest that you can be in a civil partnership and become a bishop as long as you promise not to have sex with your partner (or anyone else)."

its more than odd. Its archaic bollocks.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

A vast proportion of the people on the planet believes in some type of god , yet not one of them can offer up any proof that god exsists. Sooooo does it matter ......

Me I couldn't give a monkey's !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aceytopWoman
over a year ago

from a town near you

iv just read a book called the shack,it answered a lot of questions if you could suspend believe in the plot,but it id not explain the one question i wanted answering

"where did God come from how did he comeinto being"he didnt just materialise one day and decide to create the world as we know it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"iv just read a book called the shack,it answered a lot of questions if you could suspend believe in the plot,but it id not explain the one question i wanted answering

"where did God come from how did he comeinto being"he didnt just materialise one day and decide to create the world as we know it"

As the saying goes "God didn't create man, man created god !"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aceytopWoman
over a year ago

from a town near you


"iv just read a book called the shack,it answered a lot of questions if you could suspend believe in the plot,but it id not explain the one question i wanted answering

"where did God come from how did he comeinto being"he didnt just materialise one day and decide to create the world as we know it

As the saying goes "God didn't create man, man created god !" "

i have to agree with you there

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aucy3Couple
over a year ago

glasgow


"In the CofE, as long as they are celibate - even in a Civil Partnership. But not women bishops. "

bishops in a civil partnership remaining celibate,should not be a problem,unless sheep count.

and even though there can be no women bishops.women should not feel this diminishes,nor belittles,the role of women within the church itself,lets face it,those churches aint gonna clean themselves.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does it really matter. They only represent a minority anyway. The rest of us are non-creationists.

even as a none believer i think it does matter to us as a society tbh..

as the 'established church' they have a vote in the upper house, how can they vote on 'us' and creat law when they represent an organisation which is inherently unequal and discriminatory..?"

Maybe it needs someone to take the established church to the European Court of Human Rights and sue them for centuries of lying and deceit. Force them to defend their position or change it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No one in American politics will get to to run the country if they were to renounce God.

Same here really. They all go to church as do the Royals."

There has been speculation about when we might have our first black Prime Minister, in the wake of Mr Obama across the pond.

Personally I think it would be more of a milestone if we were to elect the first Atheist/Humanist (call it what you will) PM or - perish the thought! - have a Monarch who was openly Atheist. A saying which includes the words 'cat' and 'pigeons' comes to mind...

Can't see it happening though... but then, even Rome eventually fell...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No one in American politics will get to to run the country if they were to renounce God.

Same here really. They all go to church as do the Royals.

There has been speculation about when we might have our first black Prime Minister, in the wake of Mr Obama across the pond.

Personally I think it would be more of a milestone if we were to elect the first Atheist/Humanist (call it what you will) PM or - perish the thought! - have a Monarch who was openly Atheist. A saying which includes the words 'cat' and 'pigeons' comes to mind...

Can't see it happening though... but then, even Rome eventually fell...

"

I believe that when such a time comes that our leaders are made up of atheists it will also be a time when the existence of God has been disproven and religion will be in the realms of quacks, cranks and weirdos.

For the moment, it suits humanity to have some form of religion providing the moral backbone that without it society would descend into chaos and anarchy. We're simply not ready to be told that God doesn't exist.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he_original_poloWoman
over a year ago

a Primark shoebox in Leicester

I don't really care if Bishops are gay or women... I don't play Chess that often.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No one in American politics will get to to run the country if they were to renounce God.

Same here really. They all go to church as do the Royals.

There has been speculation about when we might have our first black Prime Minister, in the wake of Mr Obama across the pond.

Personally I think it would be more of a milestone if we were to elect the first Atheist/Humanist (call it what you will) PM or - perish the thought! - have a Monarch who was openly Atheist. A saying which includes the words 'cat' and 'pigeons' comes to mind...

Can't see it happening though... but then, even Rome eventually fell...

I believe that when such a time comes that our leaders are made up of atheists it will also be a time when the existence of God has been disproven and religion will be in the realms of quacks, cranks and weirdos.

For the moment, it suits humanity to have some form of religion providing the moral backbone that without it society would descend into chaos and anarchy. We're simply not ready to be told that God doesn't exist."

I think what 'we' are not ready for is using our own minds to work it out, and make our own decisions rather than have some bloke in a frock tell the masses what they should or should not believe....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don't really care if Bishops are gay or women... I don't play Chess that often."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

It just underlines to me how out of touch - and therefore irrelevant to me - the established church is in this country. The most surprising thing is that anyone still pays any attention to what they think. It's a dinosaur in its death throes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"did i hear it right that they also have to 'confess' any past gay activity..?

even without that, which PR expert thought that lot up...

(no max clifford puns pls)

Confess and repent.

Fecks sake, how to osracize even more people..

maybe thats what they're trying to do..

the church is pretty much split anyway..

I'm going to become a Quaker.

You'll have to give up the booze then.

They don't sing either. Equalities but without the singing or booze - it's a quandry."

We used to sing, we just didn't have music to accompany us and also the women didn't speak at services.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I wonder if Bukkake is acceptable as long as there is no sexual contact….!.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hello all,

religions are an anachronism, their views and beliefs do not stand up to logical examination.

As Wishy said, if we one day had an aetheist monarch, that would be interesting to say the least, However as Henry formed the Anglican church it would be appropriate that another monarch disbanded it?

Alec

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Celibacy? Isn't that the thing that makes catholic priests such upstanding individuals?"

Celibate really only means unmarried. It came to mean 'not having sex' when there was the presumption that only married people had sex.

Clearly this has never applied to clergy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"It just underlines to me how out of touch - and therefore irrelevant to me - the established church is in this country. The most surprising thing is that anyone still pays any attention to what they think. It's a dinosaur in its death throes."

It's great to watch an organised religion tearing itself apart.

Anyone who watched Rowan Whatshisname giving a tour of Canterbury knows the Church of England still lives in the 17th century.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In the CofE, as long as they are celibate - even in a Civil Partnership. But not women bishops. "

Sort sighted moralistic fools come to mind for the CofE hierarchy. Its their choice but if religious crews wish to survive in their hood they need to adapt.

I would also change the lords prayer for the times to start......

The Lord is my homie, I shunt want innit like cos he is bad like....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Just before Saturnalia I made a point of watching the three programmes about Westminster Abbey on BBC2 and couldn't help the thought running through my mind all the time .... "What if all this were to be proved to be built on a lie..? What would all these people who have given everything to the service of 'God', do..?"

Brought it home just how much of our society - well, our whole society tbh - is built on what is in a book, written 30+ years after the death of the main character, which we only know about thanks to a guy called Saul, who changed his name to Paul when he 'appeared' out of the desert and started to tell stories about a bloke called Jesus..

Keep wondering if it's just me....????

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.

Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.

Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?

Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?

Epicurus 300 BC

sums it up for me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"Just before Saturnalia I made a point of watching the three programmes about Westminster Abbey on BBC2 and couldn't help the thought running through my mind all the time .... "What if all this were to be proved to be built on a lie..? What would all these people who have given everything to the service of 'God', do..?"

Brought it home just how much of our society - well, our whole society tbh - is built on what is in a book, written 30+ years after the death of the main character, which we only know about thanks to a guy called Saul, who changed his name to Paul when he 'appeared' out of the desert and started to tell stories about a bloke called Jesus..

Keep wondering if it's just me....????

"

find it hard to comprehend that with all the 'learned' folk in 'the church' that they did'nt suss it oooh about several hundred years ago..

somehow doubt they would ever admit its bollocks tbh..

disclaimer; 'in the church' applies to all other organised and none organised belief systems..

including star trek..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just before Saturnalia I made a point of watching the three programmes about Westminster Abbey on BBC2 and couldn't help the thought running through my mind all the time .... "What if all this were to be proved to be built on a lie..? What would all these people who have given everything to the service of 'God', do..?"

Brought it home just how much of our society - well, our whole society tbh - is built on what is in a book, written 30+ years after the death of the main character, which we only know about thanks to a guy called Saul, who changed his name to Paul when he 'appeared' out of the desert and started to tell stories about a bloke called Jesus..

Keep wondering if it's just me....????

find it hard to comprehend that with all the 'learned' folk in 'the church' that they did'nt suss it oooh about several hundred years ago..

somehow doubt they would ever admit its bollocks tbh..

disclaimer; 'in the church' applies to all other organised and none organised belief systems..

including star trek.."

How dare you diss Star Trek!!!!

That's nothing but the truth I tell you!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Maybe they should read the book they preach about.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Maybe they should read the book they preach about."
and, maybe, questioned it just a little...?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Maybe they should read the book they preach about. and, maybe, questioned it just a little...?

"

Such hypocritical.quotes as 'judge not, lest ye be judged'

'let he without sin cast the first stone'

'whats good for the goose is good for the gander'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Maybe they should read the book they preach about. and, maybe, questioned it just a little...?

Such hypocritical.quotes as 'judge not, lest ye be judged'

'let he without sin cast the first stone'

'whats good for the goose is good for the gander'

"

Which book has the last one?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top