Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes I know they're from different eras..but often wondered...both in their prime...who would win! ." Tyson in his prime hands down. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm gonna buck the trend and say Fury. Tyson always struggled against fighters with good defences and I think Fury is one of the smartest fighters ever- he knows how to spoil and wouldn't be intimidated like many of Tyson's opponents were. Plus as shown against Wilder Fury has an amazing chin." Good points. I think many of Tysons oponents were beaten by fear before they threw a punch. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Let's not forget that mediocre fighters went the distance with Mike Tyson when he was in his prime. Mike Tyson once said that athletes have improved. I say take the athletes from by gone days and put them in a 100 meter sprint with the top athletes of today and none of them would medal. Just look at the records for proof. Mike Tyson is around 5'10/5'11 and Tyson Fury is 6'9! " But athletes from the past would be better if they were born now. Because they would have same improved diets and training as the athletes of nowadays. Fury would win. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fury. Tyson was great but his prime is a myth. He struggled against all the best fighters of his era. His early record was padded with binmen." Littered with binmen | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fury. Tyson was great but his prime is a myth. He struggled against all the best fighters of his era. His early record was padded with binmen. Littered with binmen " I can’t believe I missed that one. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd go with Fury as well. As plenty have said, Tyson struggled when up against the very best. It could even be argued he lost against Lennox Lewis twice because the first Lewis Tyson fight was rigged by the judges and Don King............the second fight though Lewis just stopped him......so no doubt who was best out those two." He only fought Lewis once. He fought Holyfield twice. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |