FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

4 types of intelligence

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

I just read an article about 4 types of intelligence.

IQ rational, analytic intelligence.

EQ emotional intelligence.

SQ social intelligence, how well do you build social connections and networks?

AQ adversity intelligence, how well do you deal with rough times and problems.

So what’s your dominant Q? Which one do you rely on most to get through life right now?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Interesting...though there's a quote by Francois Mauriac that says " The highest sign of intelligence is doubt".

But in the spirit of the game I'd put mine as emotional.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Blimey, I have no idea.

I’m just existing from one day to the next.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iren!Woman
over a year ago

leeds


"I just read an article about 4 types of intelligence.

IQ rational, analytic intelligence.

EQ emotional intelligence.

SQ social intelligence, how well do you build social connections and networks?

AQ adversity intelligence, how well do you deal with rough times and problems.

So what’s your dominant Q? Which one do you rely on most to get through life right now? "

Love this topic!!!

20% Rational

40% Emotional

30% Social

10% Adversity

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

AQ

IQ

CQ & SW

Basically an island!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *reyToTheFairiesWoman
over a year ago

Carlisle usually

I think most of my strength is in the rational. Socially would be the weakest absolutely.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think they all lean on eachother. Take one out the others weaken.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andyfloss2000Woman
over a year ago

ashford

I would guess sq x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornucopiaMan
over a year ago

Bexley

PQ I'm always needing a toilet

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Self assessment as:

AQ

IQ

EQ

SQ(not a lot of this going on tbh)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Intelligence is IQ, the others are emotional characteristics.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Definitely IQ. Out of interest, does the article show much difference between the sexes and the old emotion/ration debate, or is the disparity a whole myth?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hrista BellendWoman
over a year ago

surrounded by twinkly lights

I need to delve deeper as I use all 4, love an online test

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Definitely IQ. Out of interest, does the article show much difference between the sexes and the old emotion/ration debate, or is the disparity a whole myth? "

The article I read didn’t, though I’ve read other sources which said women typically demonstrate a higher AQ. But perhaps women are better at leveraging SQ in adversity?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"Intelligence is IQ, the others are emotional characteristics."

Interesting Blooms ..... I am not a fan of I.Q. testing.

I'm more BBQ

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"Definitely IQ. Out of interest, does the article show much difference between the sexes and the old emotion/ration debate, or is the disparity a whole myth?

The article I read didn’t, though I’ve read other sources which said women typically demonstrate a higher AQ. But perhaps women are better at leveraging SQ in adversity? "

Do you think that is true ? If it is true do you think it's down to biological factors or cultural experience ? Come to think of it - how is it even measured ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osey WalesMan
over a year ago

Surrey


"I just read an article about 4 types of intelligence.

IQ rational, analytic intelligence.

EQ emotional intelligence.

SQ social intelligence, how well do you build social connections and networks?

AQ adversity intelligence, how well do you deal with rough times and problems.

So what’s your dominant Q? Which one do you rely on most to get through life right now? "

I dont understand ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"I just read an article about 4 types of intelligence.

IQ rational, analytic intelligence.

EQ emotional intelligence.

SQ social intelligence, how well do you build social connections and networks?

AQ adversity intelligence, how well do you deal with rough times and problems.

So what’s your dominant Q? Which one do you rely on most to get through life right now?

I dont understand ?

"

^ UQ

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acDreamyMan
over a year ago

Wirral

I'm more I and A. I wish I was a bit more E and S at times.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittlebirdWoman
over a year ago

The Big Smoke

I would say mine is equally balanced between all 4. Has taken 40 years plus to get there though

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Definitely IQ. Out of interest, does the article show much difference between the sexes and the old emotion/ration debate, or is the disparity a whole myth?

The article I read didn’t, though I’ve read other sources which said women typically demonstrate a higher AQ. But perhaps women are better at leveraging SQ in adversity?

Do you think that is true ? If it is true do you think it's down to biological factors or cultural experience ? Come to think of it - how is it even measured ?"

I’ve no idea if it’s true, or even plausible. But did make me think of that quip about women being like teabags - you don’t know how strong they are until they’re in hot water. Which is quite fun.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osey WalesMan
over a year ago

Surrey


"I just read an article about 4 types of intelligence.

IQ rational, analytic intelligence.

EQ emotional intelligence.

SQ social intelligence, how well do you build social connections and networks?

AQ adversity intelligence, how well do you deal with rough times and problems.

So what’s your dominant Q? Which one do you rely on most to get through life right now?

I dont understand ?

^ UQ"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"Definitely IQ. Out of interest, does the article show much difference between the sexes and the old emotion/ration debate, or is the disparity a whole myth?

The article I read didn’t, though I’ve read other sources which said women typically demonstrate a higher AQ. But perhaps women are better at leveraging SQ in adversity?

Do you think that is true ? If it is true do you think it's down to biological factors or cultural experience ? Come to think of it - how is it even measured ?

I’ve no idea if it’s true, or even plausible. But did make me think of that quip about women being like teabags - you don’t know how strong they are until they’re in hot water. Which is quite fun. "

Fun yes. Same could be said about men tho ....... As can the demonstration of AQ. Come to think of it ... same can be said of dogs..... deer , any animal really .....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Definitely IQ. Out of interest, does the article show much difference between the sexes and the old emotion/ration debate, or is the disparity a whole myth?

The article I read didn’t, though I’ve read other sources which said women typically demonstrate a higher AQ. But perhaps women are better at leveraging SQ in adversity?

Do you think that is true ? If it is true do you think it's down to biological factors or cultural experience ? Come to think of it - how is it even measured ?

I’ve no idea if it’s true, or even plausible. But did make me think of that quip about women being like teabags - you don’t know how strong they are until they’re in hot water. Which is quite fun.

Fun yes. Same could be said about men tho ....... As can the demonstration of AQ. Come to think of it ... same can be said of dogs..... deer , any animal really ..... "

I agree

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'd like to think I balance IQ and EQ pretty well, have experienced and survived plenty of adversity but not lining up for more. Social intelligence is hampered by being introverted and not liking people very much on the whole.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top