FabSwingers.com forum: New law

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Soon it will be against the law to put videos/pics on internet without consent listening to Dominic Raab yesterday...not sure how this will be moderated here.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Should have been the law already

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West

Agree with the law, but Raab might also want to put his house in order.......

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West

"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself "

There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ansexualPandaMan
over a year ago

Near You

All videos must be vetted by Dominic Raab, I always thought he had a kinky side.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself

There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person? "

Yeah i was thinking more of a single pringle really

I see so many photos and wonder about consent.. Esp those that look like they are taken in a non-fab world

I also wonder how many face pics etc are st*len from fb etc (oh i didn't know that was a bad fab word !)

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself

There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person? "

Message them and ask. Keep the message.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *eroLondonMan
over a year ago

Mayfair

The law is one thing.

Enforcing it is another.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself

There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?

Message them and ask. Keep the message. "

My messages auto delete.. But also people change profile names, people leave +come back ..some people are not on fab even

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West

"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself

There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?

Message them and ask. Keep the message. "

But the message will vanish if they go UNLOS

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I was of the understanding that was already the case, however, it would seem that the difference between this and as things stand now is 'mallice'.

Apparently, the current law is to fo with sharing such media with the intent to cause someone distress / harm etc but the new proposal is basically doing away with tgat caveat and simplifying things to just a matter of consent

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Soon it will be against the law to put videos/pics on internet without consent listening to Dominic Raab yesterday...not sure how this will be moderated here."

You should brush up on site rules fella. Fab already states that pictures MUST include profile owner with identities of others obscured - and, as I understand, that you must have consent of all those in the picture to post it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

Sounds like an announcement simply to make it look as if the government are doing something about something.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself

There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?

Message them and ask. Keep the message.

My messages auto delete.. But also people change profile names, people leave +come back ..some people are not on fab even

Screenshot them. If people are not on fab and you have fucked them, surely you have an alternative contact for them?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself

There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?

Message them and ask. Keep the message.

But the message will vanish if they go UNLOS"

Screenshot it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why is it that as soon as consent is mentioned with regards to something sexual, people forget how to obtain consent?

It’s really not difficult.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

And if you’re struggling to get their consent as you can’t contact them, don’t put any pictures or videos of them up.

You’re all welcome.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *usie pTV/TS
over a year ago

taunton

I sort of thought that was already the case but fook me going to take some policing, have to identify all the stars and ask if they gave permission, but presumably if someone claims you have put them on a video without consent you going to be in big shite seems like a mine field or maybe gold field for legal profession.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West

"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself

There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?

Message them and ask. Keep the message.

But the message will vanish if they go UNLOS

Screenshot it."

Yes I suppose that's an option. We don't post pics/vids of anyone but ourselves, however, plenty do.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *orny PTMan
over a year ago

Peterborough

Was this Matt Handcock's idea?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

"Why is it that as soon as consent is mentioned with regards to something sexual, people forget how to obtain consent?

It’s really not difficult. "

I suspect it will be extraordinarily difficult to enforce, but in terms of knowing for myself that I've obtained consent, that's pretty easy.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself

There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person? "

Consent forum signed the same as hub and hamster have

Any video on hub and hamster now is pro porn

even if the title says stranger dogging or what ever the title is completely porn bs

As a consent forum need to be filled in and I.d sent him off all people in the video

And yes videos aren’t atuo checked they manually check

As I have had a couple bonce back on me

Cleaning that I need to hand in the female I.D that soloed in the video and need to go though a bunch off plava to explain it’s me that’s in the video

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

"Sounds like an announcement simply to make it look as if the government are doing something about something."

Like ID for adult content. Which quietly vanished

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

And it’s all ready a law and has been for years op

Posting pics or share someone pics

Falls under revenge porn

I can see a lot off these group chats landing them selfs on a register

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself

There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?

Consent forum signed the same as hub and hamster have

Any video on hub and hamster now is pro porn

even if the title says stranger dogging or what ever the title is completely porn bs

As a consent forum need to be filled in and I.d sent him off all people in the video

And yes videos aren’t atuo checked they manually check

As I have had a couple bonce back on me

Cleaning that I need to hand in the female I.D that soloed in the video and need to go though a bunch off plava to explain it’s me that’s in the video "

Tbh, I think that was through Visa withdrawing payments, not UK law

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Sounds like an announcement simply to make it look as if the government are doing something about something.

Like ID for adult content. Which quietly vanished"

Still there

Hub and hamster require I.D and consent forums and all that to be done for a video to be posted

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself

There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?

Consent forum signed the same as hub and hamster have

Any video on hub and hamster now is pro porn

even if the title says stranger dogging or what ever the title is completely porn bs

As a consent forum need to be filled in and I.d sent him off all people in the video

And yes videos aren’t atuo checked they manually check

As I have had a couple bonce back on me

Cleaning that I need to hand in the female I.D that soloed in the video and need to go though a bunch off plava to explain it’s me that’s in the video

Tbh, I think that was through Visa withdrawing payments, not UK law"

Yes it was but it’s still the same thing thay use the uk government office app Yoti to check if your I.D is legit or not

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *enny PR9TV/TS
over a year ago

Southport

How will this affect the videos I post on the internet of me telling TV licence officers to fuck off when they call at my door?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nightsoftheCoffeeTableCouple
over a year ago

Leeds

"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself

There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person? "

Easily in our case, screenshots the conversation asking if it's ok.

Mrs

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *jorkishMan
over a year ago

Seaforth

People involved I sexual would hopefully have all consented. However, posting that sexual activity on here or elsewhere is a different story. I often see photos or videos and wonder if that person gave consent for her or him to shown as online platform even if their faces have been obscured

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself "

How about video with other people??

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rHotNottsMan
over a year ago

Dubai & Nottingham

Any video on hub and hamster now is pro porn

There’s a video on hub of a fab member with an electric drill with a dildo attached with duct tape and various giggling women enjoying it, it’s hilarious and can assure you it ain’t pro porn, although it should be

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Soon it will be against the law to put videos/pics on internet without consent listening to Dominic Raab yesterday...not sure how this will be moderated here.

True but the way the law it was described even that will not be acceptable, if you dont have consent of the other party

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Surely if the person is loading their own video, that would constitute consent.. I'm sure there is something in the rules that you can only load photos /vids of yourself

There's definitely vids on here of threesomes etc but how would a couple, for example, prove consent of the third person?

Message them and ask. Keep the message.

My messages auto delete.. But also people change profile names, people leave +come back ..some people are not on fab even

Screenshot them. If people are not on fab and you have fucked them, surely you have an alternative contact for them?"

This the point I was trying to make. Trouble waters ahead

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think fab would just have to change the rules and only the person whose account it is can be in any photos even if they are blurred out. This will be trickier for couples accounts though.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everyone should calm down. Bully Raab will be away before this law is set up.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Everyone should calm down. Bully Raab will be away before this law is set up.

Regardless it's not just him that is calling for this and has been in the cards for ages. I think it's about time we started looking at the law again because it doesn't really cover a world where most of us interact regularly on social media.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Was this Matt Handcock's idea?"

Dominic Raab's

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"And it’s all ready a law and has been for years op

Posting pics or share someone pics

Falls under revenge porn

I can see a lot off these group chats landing them selfs on a register "

Ch3ck this out your are confusing this. Reveng porn was for partner, people who had relationship. The new law will widen the legal cover. Even video modified to show people who were not in rhe original video will be illegal without consent. To put is simple al most any meterial put in a forum show have a consent. Covering the face with emoji will not be enough if someone complains about it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"People involved I sexual would hopefully have all consented. However, posting that sexual activity on here or elsewhere is a different story. I often see photos or videos and wonder if that person gave consent for her or him to shown as online platform even if their faces have been obscured"

These are somes of the loopholes the law is crying to close. Consent for sex, is not consent to recording; The body is not just the face.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Everyone should calm down. Bully Raab will be away before this law is set up.

It is not just Raab's this the government reponce to multiple complains and campains. If anything it is like to be law sooner reither than later.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I read before that there's likely to be a whole can of worms over this as more children whose parents have posted pics of them online grow up. Maybe embarrassing things which could come back to haunt them and impact their mental health or even job opportunities.

Remember the guy who tried to sure nirvana for using his baby pic? Like that but multiplied by every parent who has posted something that might even been funny at the time, but the kid didn't get to consent.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Everyone should calm down. Bully Raab will be away before this law is set up.

Sound like to have been following this subject for a while. You need to go back to Mr Mosley's privacy case with The Sun few years ago to understand some of the consequences, and the public opinion these days.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"I read before that there's likely to be a whole can of worms over this as more children whose parents have posted pics of them online grow up. Maybe embarrassing things which could come back to haunt them and impact their mental health or even job opportunities.

That will lead to no where. As parent you are the gardian ( unless parentalxright is removed from you), this give you quite a lot of rights, to make choices for the person including bad onces sometines. This is why social service step in to proptect children if they think you ain't acting in the child best interest.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ryan...Man
over a year ago

1950's Original

"All videos must be vetted by Dominic Raab, I always thought he had a kinky side."
..and all Raabits must be vetted

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *imi_RougeWoman
over a year ago

Portsmouth

"I think fab would just have to change the rules and only the person whose account it is can be in any photos even if they are blurred out. This will be trickier for couples accounts though. "

Exactly. Single people should only have photos of themselves.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ryan...Man
over a year ago

1950's Original

I wonder if finally fabswingers will allow ordinary pics on profiles

( pet dogs,landscapes, pictures of freshly baked cakes, angel cake, chocolate cake,jam rolly Polly(the original steamed sort with suet) etc etc..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ig1gaz1Man
over a year ago

bradford

"Soon it will be against the law to put videos/pics on internet without consent listening to Dominic Raab yesterday...not sure how this will be moderated here."

Whilst I agree on consent to pics and vids being posted online. Yes theres many on here thats been posted.

But really its about the cover up at downing street affair

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh8KscD256c

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *den-Valley-coupleCouple
over a year ago

Cumbria

"Should have been the law already"

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread