FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

The Hobbit

Jump to newest
 

By *efree OP   Man
over a year ago

North Staffs

Would you still want to take your kids to see a film if you knew the writer's family were still in denial that a family member was a prolific paedophile?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eakcoupleCouple
over a year ago

peak district

Well. lots of people listen to Benjamin Britten's music and he was a REAL perv. We don't believe Tolkien was a paedo, anyway.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Well. lots of people listen to Benjamin Britten's music and he was a REAL perv. We don't believe Tolkien was a paedo, anyway.

"

Britten was the patron of my school choir

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

any proof? or just the daily mail?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"any proof? or just the daily mail?"
There hiding in our toilets and making our films lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"any proof? or just the daily mail?There hiding in our toilets and making our films lol"

best start killing everyone just to make sure

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nfieldishCouple
over a year ago

Enfield

Especially the fat hobbitses.....we don't likes the fat hobbitses do we...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *efree OP   Man
over a year ago

North Staffs

Not the author himself, but his son and the family have spent thousands trying to cover it up!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Not the author himself, but his son and the family have spent thousands trying to cover it up! "

any proof?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Not the author himself, but his son and the family have spent thousands trying to cover it up! "

An interesting story but I would guess if there was solid matter the filth would have clamped him in irons.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Would you still want to take your kids to see a film if you knew the writer's family were still in denial that a family member was a prolific paedophile? "

Yes.

For a few reasons :

- the film, whilst based on the writers works, has its own merits as a production

- the film is a 12A so we are not talking juniors here, we are talking high school age

- by that age, children should understand to not believe everything they are told or to rely on one source of information to make their decisions

and after all, it's not likely that the writer or any member of his family is gonna pop by for a crafty fondle whilst you are tucking into your nachos

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I agree the paedo shouldn't be allowed to have his actions covered up, but Tolkien, the writer of the hobbit and lotr wasn't himself a paedo.

It's a personal decision to boycott the film, but I would see it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *kmale421Man
over a year ago

wirral


"Would you still want to take your kids to see a film if you knew the writer's family were still in denial that a family member was a prolific paedophile? "

Well I wasn't aware of that but it wouldn't stop me going to see the film or reread the book, just like many people still listen too and buy music by people like Michael Jackson, who at the very least was very dubious

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Would you still want to take your kids to see a film if you knew the writer's family were still in denial that a family member was a prolific paedophile? "

Alleged - the missing word is 'Alleged' because he was NOT convicted of being such as far as I recall.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *efree OP   Man
over a year ago

North Staffs

[Removed by poster at 14/12/12 16:55:13]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *insfordcoupleCouple
over a year ago

winsford cheshire

If you dont have any proof its true you can get done for slander and defernation of charcater

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *efree OP   Man
over a year ago

North Staffs

Alleged? Tolkien's son was arrested, but not convicted because the prosecution was not pursued due to his ill health.

The Catholic Church paid out £15000 to Christopher Carrie for failing in their duty of care.

Fr Tolkien is believed to have been the most prolific paedophile within the Catholic Church.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You know, it worries me it really does.

It seems that the latest fashion is to posthumously 'convict by vox-populi' - no actual criminal charges can be brought posthumously and the accused can never have their day in court to deny the claims.

Yet as the current trend is showing, the finger is pointed, the words are said and immediately it must be true, for the accused cannot answer the allegations. It doesn't matter if the accusers have an axe to gind, a grudge to bear or a wallet to fill - Be you a saint or the common man, you are simply 'guilty in absentia'.

Its wrong. Its McCarthy-esq 'Witch-Hunt' type wrong and its not going to stop because the genie is out of the bottle.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *efree OP   Man
over a year ago

North Staffs

Take me to court!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Alleged? Tolkien's son was arrested, but not convicted because the prosecution was not pursued due to his ill health.

The Catholic Church paid out £15000 to Christopher Carrie for failing in their duty of care.

Fr Tolkien is believed to have been the most prolific paedophile within the Catholic Church. "

Believed to be?? Alleged to be?

Not convicted in a court of law by a jury of his peers.

So, its alleged. Plain and simple.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *efree OP   Man
over a year ago

North Staffs

I'm not alleging I am saying.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Alleged? Tolkien's son was arrested, but not convicted because the prosecution was not pursued due to his ill health.

The Catholic Church paid out £15000 to Christopher Carrie for failing in their duty of care.

Fr Tolkien is believed to have been the most prolific paedophile within the Catholic Church.

Believed to be?? Alleged to be?

Not convicted in a court of law by a jury of his peers.

So, its alleged. Plain and simple. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Alleged? Tolkien's son was arrested, but not convicted because the prosecution was not pursued due to his ill health.

The Catholic Church paid out £15000 to Christopher Carrie for failing in their duty of care.

Fr Tolkien is believed to have been the most prolific paedophile within the Catholic Church. "

even murderes etc etc can be creative people..it would be different if in their 'art' they were promoting their crimes.I believe people can still buy Garry glitter music.There could be hidden messages in the art..but thet could be entirely subjective to who is looking at the work.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I absolutely hate it when people come up with statements, their when in ti a public arena and then state what they ar e saying it's the undeniable truth without any facts or substantiation

If you have any evidence to the contrary then bring it forward, or take it to the relevant authorities ...

This forum is not a lynch mob.

There should be due process, and I'm sure that if new evidence were ti be presented then the authorities would investigate it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nfieldishCouple
over a year ago

Enfield


"I absolutely hate it when people come up with statements, their when in ti a public arena and then state what they ar e saying it's the undeniable truth without any facts or substantiation

If you have any evidence to the contrary then bring it forward, or take it to the relevant authorities ...

This forum is not a lynch mob.

There should be due process, and I'm sure that if new evidence were ti be presented then the authorities would investigate it "

you have yr bum out...just sayin...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I do, and it's verified too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Take me to court! "

I would like to see that. The more people that are convicted of defamation of character whilst hiding behind a keyboard may make people think before the type

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Take me to court!

I would like to see that. The more people that are convicted of defamation of character whilst hiding behind a keyboard may make people think before the type"

Says Fabs own Dexter

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Take me to court!

I would like to see that. The more people that are convicted of defamation of character whilst hiding behind a keyboard may make people think before the type

Says Fabs own Dexter "

Homicide and slander are very different crimes....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

This is all becoming like a nasty re run of the McCarthy witch hunts of the 50's.....

I'm sure some people actually get off on all of this tittle tattle

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *kywatcherMan
over a year ago

Southwick


"Take me to court!

I would like to see that. The more people that are convicted of defamation of character whilst hiding behind a keyboard may make people think before the type

Says Fabs own Dexter

Homicide and slander are very different crimes...."

Try libel - the written word. Slander is the spoken word.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eakcoupleCouple
over a year ago

peak district

We're going to see it tonight. If Gandalf starts playing with the dwarves we'll know these rumours are true... That's Snow White's thing!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *efree OP   Man
over a year ago

North Staffs

Ok no problem let me say again Father JRR Tolkien (that's a Catholic priest) was a child molesting piece of crap, can I make it any clearer?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I for one will NOT be watching the film! because I think it will be rather dull

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Ok no problem let me say again Father JRR Tolkien (that's a Catholic priest) was a child molesting piece of crap, can I make it any clearer?

"

so why would that affect whether i read his dad's book?

If your kids were paedos, would that mesn your life's work is suddenly null and void?

Stupid hysteria. Stop reading the daily mail

Even if JRR was a paedo, it's still a cracking book

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ngel n tedCouple
over a year ago

maidstone


"Ok no problem let me say again Father JRR Tolkien (that's a Catholic priest) was a child molesting piece of crap, can I make it any clearer?

so why would that affect whether i read his dad's book?

If your kids were paedos, would that mesn your life's work is suddenly null and void?

Stupid hysteria. Stop reading the daily mail

Even if JRR was a paedo, it's still a cracking book"

I'm off to watch it tonite

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hang on a minute, I thought you said it was christopher tolkien ...

Confused.com

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!


"Would you still want to take your kids to see a film if you knew the writer's family were still in denial that a family member was a prolific paedophile?

Well I wasn't aware of that but it wouldn't stop me going to see the film or reread the book, just like many people still listen too and buy music by

people like Michael Jackson, who at

the very least was very dubious"

Same here. I'm gonna go and see it. I never sing Gary Glitter songs anymore though and deleted them from my iPod a couple of years ago.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

Do you boycott Woody Allen films? Do you start a protest if a Michael Jackson album is released?

JRR Tolkein did not make the films. He's dead. How does boycotting a Peter Jackson film bring awareness to paedophillia in the Catholic Church except by making such a distant connection as to trivialise something so shameful and painful to many?

OP - you have shouted your point. I can see that you are angry. Please for the sake of such a serious issue use that energy to fight the real cause and not a film that most people won't even realise is based on a book.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ngel n tedCouple
over a year ago

maidstone

We certainly won't be allowing anyone to come round "n fix it" for u s this year!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay


"Hang on a minute, I thought you said it was christopher tolkien ...

Confused.com "

I don't think he knows one Tolkien from another.....the rants of the Paedo Outers often end up in confusion, which is a major reason for them being sued for their rants.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *entilusMan
over a year ago

Beautiful North Wales

On a point of information: The not proved allegation was made against Father John Francis Reuel Tolkien 1917-2003 NOT his author father JRR [John Ronald Reuel] Tolkien 1892-1973, NOR JRR's youngest son and literary executor Christopher Tolkien who produced the Silmarillion.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top