Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" ......,government stats show its just as dangerous if not more when a person is using a phone!" Do they? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And that my friend is the reason hands free was invented :p On a serious not I personally believe whilst driving you should be doing one thing and one thing only, concentrating on roads and surroundings. " Not a bad point but are you going to ban radio's on, smoking in cars, passengers talking to drivers as they are all a distraction. Hands free for answering is no different to talking to a passenger in my book but anything other than wheel, gear nob other car apparatus isn't on. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" ......,government stats show its just as dangerous if not more when a person is using a phone! Do they?" Yes. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"its alot harder to proove they where on their mobile when reporting them. At least with d*unk drivers the proof is still in their system when caught" Unless they have a subsequent reason to stop you, I suspect not. But if you are involved in even a minor accident the phones are now checked routinely and if a phone was being used, it will influence the CPS decision and be used against the driver. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If they are driving along on a motorway for instance,have police the power to access phone records to prove that 17 minutes ago whilst driving your phone was in use ?" but that doesn't apply to a roads, b roads or city streets | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And that my friend is the reason hands free was invented :p On a serious not I personally believe whilst driving you should be doing one thing and one thing only, concentrating on roads and surroundings. Not a bad point but are you going to ban radio's on, smoking in cars, passengers talking to drivers as they are all a distraction. Hands free for answering is no different to talking to a passenger in my book but anything other than wheel, gear nob other car apparatus isn't on. " Hear what you are saying, although I disagree that it is no different. The only times I have ever been caught over the 30 limit has involved hands free phone calls | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I drive daily,,,i tailgated a "half an hour to pass" snail n motorway, phone went as they eventually moved over, but they moved over trying to video me on phone camera in mirror, who is the bad guy ??" Both! Tailgating is potentially very dangerous, as is videoing other drivers. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have seen how many people wouldn.t hesitate to shop a d*unken driver,government stats show its just as dangerous if not more when a person is using a phone!" Get a life. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have seen how many people wouldn.t hesitate to shop a d*unken driver,government stats show its just as dangerous if not more when a person is using a phone! Get a life." Why? It has been shown in at least two different studies that using a handheld phone whilst driving impairs the decision-making process more than being just over the drink drive limit, and that isn't even beginning to address the dangers of people who drive whilst looking at websites and/or texting on their handsets. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have seen how many people wouldn.t hesitate to shop a d*unken driver,government stats show its just as dangerous if not more when a person is using a phone!" i see more woman doing make up in the mirror than i do people using phones whilst driving | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have seen how many people wouldn.t hesitate to shop a d*unken driver,government stats show its just as dangerous if not more when a person is using a phone! i see more woman doing make up in the mirror than i do people using phones whilst driving" Unfortunately i see people at every major junction, every day i commute using their phones. The ones that get me are the idiots playing with their phones in their laps, not realising that their phones are lighting up the car interior making it blatantly obvious what they are doing. Perhaps the penalties simply aren't high enough? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have seen how many people wouldn.t hesitate to shop a d*unken driver,government stats show its just as dangerous if not more when a person is using a phone!" Before the wearing of seat belts became compulsory less people wore them that those who didn't. When mobile phones first came out less people refrained from using them whilst driving than those who did. It takes a law to make people law breakers, and it takes a miserable asshole to grass on unsuspecting fellow motorists. As said already in this thread, when the police attend an RTA one of the first things they do is request mobile phone records for the parties involved. If they weren't using their phones then that can be discounted as a possible cause for the accident, but if they discover a mobile phone was in use it tends to become the main culprit for the entire crash. Wouldn't it be lovely if those condescending grassers had never travelled without wearing a seatbelt, or had never used a mobile whilst driving BEFORE it became illegal to do either. Then I might have some empathy with them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |