Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are thousands of empty properties that could be renovated, there would also be jobs for bringing the properties up to a high standard and plenty of training for trades too. " And build houses with cellars like they do in Germany and build good quality blocks of flats that look good and are good to live in. Building on green land is a long term mistake bought on by a desperate short termist gover-mental approach to getting the economy going again. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are thousands of empty properties that could be renovated, there would also be jobs for bringing the properties up to a high standard and plenty of training for trades too. And build houses with cellars like they do in Germany and build good quality blocks of flats that look good and are good to live in. Building on green land is a long term mistake bought on by a desperate short termist gover-mental approach to getting the economy going again. " Does open land mean green sites or include brown sites too ? I agree there were far to many empty properties around in need of renovation .... There are a few schemes where it is able to buy a house for one pound, and them undertake repairs etc. to bring it back to standard , I think huddersfield is one of the places to be trialling this .... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look at some of the recent floods for evidence of the success of that policy in the past !" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They were selling homes for 50p at one point or something stupid up north. I bet they wished they'd kept them now instead of knocking them down. " So did they sell them for 50p or knock them down??? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are thousands of empty properties that could be renovated, there would also be jobs for bringing the properties up to a high standard and plenty of training for trades too. " I think in many urban areas, properties sit derelict because the ground they lie on is worth more £'s wise if sold on to a developer for business or commercial use. I work in an area adjacent to a quite a large council estate, no more than a mile from Central Manchester. There has been some re-gen of council properties, but in the main the land has been cleared and sold to private developers. Other properties have sat mournfully empty for the past 4/5 years just waiting for the bulldozer. I recall going to a meeting of the local chamber of commerce maybe 6 years ago where a speaker from the council spoke of 'new communities' within the outer ring round. I have yet to see a new community - or even the makings of one. What I have seen is a number of small new developments popping up of maybe 50/60 houses, but not with any obvious pattern or reason. Moreover, where the empty lots sat, we now see new hotels, retail parks (often half empty) and more than anything, car parks ! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They were selling homes for 50p at one point or something stupid up north. I bet they wished they'd kept them now instead of knocking them down. So did they sell them for 50p or knock them down??? " God knows and amusingly enough it was a labour initiative! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should we not be thinking of reducing the amount of people in this country and other countries. Too many people, not enough food. Make use of boarded up homes, disused married quarters from old disused military camps." Lots of unused houses. People should be asked to do them up and sell them or rent them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should we not be thinking of reducing the amount of people in this country and other countries. Too many people, not enough food. Make use of boarded up homes, disused married quarters from old disused military camps. Lots of unused houses. People should be asked to do them up and sell them or rent them." The Arny has sold off a lot of their housing stock in the past few years (my sister bought two of them). This was down to the greatly reduced number of soldiers in our standing army and the housing for them simply wasn't needed anymore. There are stipulations governing the purchase of these houses and they are sold with a 25% discount on a first come first served basis when each tranche of housing blocks are released. My sis used to pay a teenager £500 to camp outside for a week and then she'd turn up on the day and take his place. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should we not be thinking of reducing the amount of people in this country and other countries. Too many people, not enough food. Make use of boarded up homes, disused married quarters from old disused military camps. Lots of unused houses. People should be asked to do them up and sell them or rent them." Which is OK in cities, but where I live it is small town with no spare housing stock and a growing population, so new homes are needed. I live in the country, do open land is the only way forward. In cities, I have always wondered about vacant office blocks and why they can't be turned in to flats | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No real long term forward planning in this country I feel." I agree. Too much short termism. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should we not be thinking of reducing the amount of people in this country and other countries. Too many people, not enough food. Make use of boarded up homes, disused married quarters from old disused military camps. Lots of unused houses. People should be asked to do them up and sell them or rent them. Which is OK in cities, but where I live it is small town with no spare housing stock and a growing population, so new homes are needed. I live in the country, do open land is the only way forward. In cities, I have always wondered about vacant office blocks and why they can't be turned in to flats" This is my view too. There are huge numbers of dated, unwanted office buildings, commercial sites and old factories/warehouses the no-one will touch from a business perspective due to location, refurbishment cost and the sheer number of newer more conveniently placed sites. Travelling as much as I do I'm forever seeing sites that would make perfect conversion to flats - and as the biggest shortage is in affordable smaller homes - 1/2 bed - these are ripe for purchase by local government to ease the demand on housing. Just look at what's happened on the old railway site in Taunton - private developers are building away but the first to go up were two blocks of flats, the majority of which are owned by a housing association. And I've been in one and they're perfect for singles, couples, young families and the elderly. Without making such homes available a large proportion of the current stock is being under utilised with singles/couples in 3/4 bed homes that could go to those in need of larger accommodation. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't understand the queue for £500? What is that about?" The Army released their housing stock in blocks and to get one you had to be in the queue on the morning the sales started. It was a first through the door situation so if there was 500 houses for sale and 501 people wanting them the last person missed out. As my sister had two small children to deal with she couldn't camp out in the queue to make sure she got a house so she paid a teenager to do it for her. All the purchasers did the same thing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are thousands of empty properties that could be renovated, there would also be jobs for bringing the properties up to a high standard and plenty of training for trades too. " there was a recent programme about this,its shocking that so many houses are empty! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not until they have used up ALL of the decaying "brownfield sites". That would be stupid." Yep, and all the unused houses | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We own some property in Manchester a few of which are new builds. If someone wants to buy one to let it out I advise against it! Their value has dropped, theres so many around it's difficult or not worth selling them, add up with the cost of the service charges and it's not a good business idea. People much prefer to live in the '2 up, 2 downs' Where we live in Manchester we've also had huge amounts of houses knocked down to be replaced with modern buildings that as another poster has pointed out are already rotting! Meanwhile the 100+ year old ones are going strong! The new ones were also supposed to be affordable but all thats happened is that developers have bought them and are renting them out at unaffordable prices. Theres 1000's of empty houses in Manchester and the owners should be forced to rent them out, Manchester already has a scheme where it makes owners rent to them and other Housing Associations and they recommend tenants for them, but it should be implemented even more." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Again, everyone is concentrating on cities. Lack of housing is a national issue. What about rural communities with no brown field sites? The locals still need affordable housing, so surely pushing through plans on green belt sites is appropriate" Ive seen lots of brown fields at this time of year.... We visited Cornwall this summer and, in-between mouthfuls of TAX-FREE pasty, chatted to a local who told me in winter the place was dead with about 50% of near to harbour places owned by summer only people and caused prices to rise so much locals couldn't afford to live there. A place in Kent is only renting to local people or people who help in the community. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are thousands of empty properties that could be renovated, there would also be jobs for bringing the properties up to a high standard and plenty of training for trades too. " sounds like a far better solution to me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem with many rural locations is holiday homes or commuter ownership. Holiday homes should be taxed so highly they are unviable imo, if you want a holiday home make do with a mobile one. Commuters i.e. wealthy folk who can afford the 100 mile trip to work should also be dissuaded. And no its not envy on my part! " Sorry, but i totally disagree with this statement, if someone has worked hard enough to be able to afford a 2nd home, then fair play to them. They may even rent them out, enabling people who cant afford a top of the range holiday, to have a break at reasonable prices. I do however, agree with slightly higher tax for "rich" but not too much. Am i right in thinking that taxes are worked out on a percentage? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Again, everyone is concentrating on cities. Lack of housing is a national issue. What about rural communities with no brown field sites? The locals still need affordable housing, so surely pushing through plans on green belt sites is appropriate Ive seen lots of brown fields at this time of year.... We visited Cornwall this summer and, in-between mouthfuls of TAX-FREE pasty, chatted to a local who told me in winter the place was dead with about 50% of near to harbour places owned by summer only people and caused prices to rise so much locals couldn't afford to live there. A place in Kent is only renting to local people or people who help in the community. " There is no denying that holiday homes are an issue, but these tend to be in scenic parts. I can't imagine too nan holiday homes in places like around St Austell and the localsCornish Alps. Likewise in parts of Devon. Where I live has very little tourism or, I believe, second homes. But the local youngsters cannot afford the current houses as demand has pushed up price. I love the idea on national scale of compulsory purchases on vacant houses. Getting youngsters into some form of apprenticeship doing building would be a great benefit. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem with many rural locations is holiday homes or commuter ownership. Holiday homes should be taxed so highly they are unviable imo, if you want a holiday home make do with a mobile one. Commuters i.e. wealthy folk who can afford the 100 mile trip to work should also be dissuaded. And no its not envy on my part! Sorry, but i totally disagree with this statement, if someone has worked hard enough to be able to afford a 2nd home, then fair play to them. They may even rent them out, enabling people who cant afford a top of the range holiday, to have a break at reasonable prices. I do however, agree with slightly higher tax for "rich" but not too much. Am i right in thinking that taxes are worked out on a percentage? " Is council tax on holiday homes still subsidised? I do believe second home owners should pay full tax on both properties | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem with many rural locations is holiday homes or commuter ownership. Holiday homes should be taxed so highly they are unviable imo, if you want a holiday home make do with a mobile one. Commuters i.e. wealthy folk who can afford the 100 mile trip to work should also be dissuaded. And no its not envy on my part! Sorry, but i totally disagree with this statement, if someone has worked hard enough to be able to afford a 2nd home, then fair play to them. They may even rent them out, enabling people who cant afford a top of the range holiday, to have a break at reasonable prices. I do however, agree with slightly higher tax for "rich" but not too much. Am i right in thinking that taxes are worked out on a percentage? Is council tax on holiday homes still subsidised? I do believe second home owners should pay full tax on both properties " Im not sure to be honest, but if they are renting a holiday home out that surely is classed as an income, if everything is declared then, again the yearly income would be taxed | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Sorry, but i totally disagree with this statement, if someone has worked hard enough to be able to afford a 2nd home, then fair play to them. So because someone has enough money to price locals out of a home forcing them to move away and ultimately turning the place into a dead holiday village thats ok is it! Some people work bloody hard all their lives yet cant afford one house to live in never mind a holiday home, many because they have been priced out of the market by holiday home owners! " Yeah, we're in the same boat, but there is plenty of places to live that can be affordable, live to your means and all that | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Sorry, but i totally disagree with this statement, if someone has worked hard enough to be able to afford a 2nd home, then fair play to them. So because someone has enough money to price locals out of a home forcing them to move away and ultimately turning the place into a dead holiday village thats ok is it! Some people work bloody hard all their lives yet cant afford one house to live in never mind a holiday home, many because they have been priced out of the market by holiday home owners! Yeah, we're in the same boat, but there is plenty of places to live that can be affordable, live to your means and all that" I used to rent a 2 up, 2 down in a green belt area on the edge of the Pennines / Peak District. It had no gardens front or rear, was on a main road and had a train tack running directly behind it. At their peak, similar houses on that row were selling at £130,000 to £160,000 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are thousands of empty properties that could be renovated, there would also be jobs for bringing the properties up to a high standard and plenty of training for trades too. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is being proposed that more new homes should be built on open land. This country is desperately short on housing and the increase in building would boost the economy. So surely its a good thing and the NIMBYs should be ignored on this occasion, or should they? Full story http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-20510692 " Fuck em build more inner city towerblocks. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I saw an interesting discussion between Heseltine and Richard Rogers yesterday. Both were on more or less the same page on building on green belt: do it and create equivalent pockets of green as part of the deal. Both advocating brownfield regeneration. Both advocating increasing densities. The average age for a first time buyer in London is now 40. The market is still overheated as rich Russian, Chinese and others buy here and inflate the prices. That means that the rental market is also bonkers. People are putting in sealed bids for rental properties. Student accommodation is £200 per week. More can be done in London but accommodating another 1.5 million people is going to be tricky. The rural dilemma is more acute though. The countryside will become a theme park unless we create new housing for rural communities." Its generally cheaper to buy down here than rent, but the wages are so low that people cant get on the housing ladder... Catch 22 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |