FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Moral Transgression in ASD

Jump to newest
 

By *heNerdyFemby OP   Woman
over a year ago

Eastbourne (she/they)

A recent study has shown that while observed both Neurotypical and Autistic people did good things at the same rate when they had an audience.

Autistic people carried on doing good things without an audience.

Unlike the Neurotypical.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ad NannaWoman
over a year ago

East London

What good things?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts

What did they do?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heNerdyFemby OP   Woman
over a year ago

Eastbourne (she/they)

Lifted from the study:

"ASD participants and healthy control subjects (HCs) decided in public or private whether to incur a personal cost for funding a morally good cause (Good Context) or receive a personal gain for benefiting a morally bad cause (Bad Context)."

Note: referring to the neurotypical as healthy control subjects is ABLESIT AF

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hoirCouple
over a year ago

Clacton/Bury St. Edmunds

So basically Autistics are good people and Neurotypicals are only good when someone is watching? Sounds like more collectivist crap to me

P

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uxom redCouple
over a year ago

Shrewsbury

And?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ad NannaWoman
over a year ago

East London

Who did the study?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *athers123Man
over a year ago

Harpenden

I do bad things when people aren't watching too. Sometimes I wonder if these bad things would be good things if people were watching, maybe a round of applause would ensue.

Would anyone like to take part in an experiment?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heNerdyFemby OP   Woman
over a year ago

Eastbourne (she/they)


"Who did the study?"

If you google the study name you should find it.

"Right Temporoparietal Junction Underlies Avoidance of Moral Transgression in Autism Spectrum Disorder"

It is a trash fire of a study, the guy running it is ableist as anything, he tries to paint Autistic peoples morals not being dependent on witnesses as being a defect.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This is completely anecdotal, but I'm autistic, as is my eldest son, my siblings, and both parents. My parents have done some very, very shitty things. Autistic people may not care as much about social standing as neurotypical people, but we're still capable of being arseholes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

w

Seems like a weird study to do when it’s a spectrum

What’s the selection criteria? They talk to you and say “yeah your autistic enough”

A guy at work is on the spectrum and he’s a piece of shit whether your looking or not

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hoirCouple
over a year ago

Clacton/Bury St. Edmunds


"Who did the study?

If you google the study name you should find it.

"Right Temporoparietal Junction Underlies Avoidance of Moral Transgression in Autism Spectrum Disorder"

It is a trash fire of a study, the guy running it is ableist as anything, he tries to paint Autistic peoples morals not being dependent on witnesses as being a defect."

Then by your own admission it's BS and doesn't need to be thought about

P

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *heNerdyFemby OP   Woman
over a year ago

Eastbourne (she/they)


"Who did the study?

If you google the study name you should find it.

"Right Temporoparietal Junction Underlies Avoidance of Moral Transgression in Autism Spectrum Disorder"

It is a trash fire of a study, the guy running it is ableist as anything, he tries to paint Autistic peoples morals not being dependent on witnesses as being a defect.

Then by your own admission it's BS and doesn't need to be thought about

P"

Is that what I said?

I criticised his conclusions, not his data.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top