FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Protestors on the mall

Jump to newest
 

By *icolerobbie OP   Couple
over a year ago

walsall

I have just seen footage of protesters lying on the floor on the mall today, blocking the route of the queens guards.

The police literally dragged them off the road and out of the way it seconds.

How come when they block roads like the M25, the police sit and watch and allow it to happen?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Queen is more important than the pesants

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *elvet RopeMan
over a year ago

by the big field


"I have just seen footage of protesters lying on the floor on the mall today, blocking the route of the queens guards.

The police literally dragged them off the road and out of the way it seconds.

How come when they block roads like the M25, the police sit and watch and allow it to happen?"

Cos it only affects the plebs, not the self appointed special ones

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbie OP   Couple
over a year ago

walsall

It seems so. They were all over them quicker than a used car salesman.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I have just seen footage of protesters lying on the floor on the mall today, blocking the route of the queens guards.

The police literally dragged them off the road and out of the way it seconds.

How come when they block roads like the M25, the police sit and watch and allow it to happen?

Cos it only affects the plebs, not the self appointed special ones "

How did the Queen appoint herself Queen ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Their tactics are not helping their cause

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heBirminghamWeekendMan
over a year ago

here

You know Tom covered this about 12 hours ago…

https://m.fabswingers.com/forum/politics/1310894

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbie OP   Couple
over a year ago

walsall


"You know Tom covered this about 12 hours ago…

https://m.fabswingers.com/forum/politics/1310894

"

Sorry, didn’t see it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heVonMatterhornsCouple
over a year ago

Lincoln

Because they didn't have time to glue themselves down on the Mall

LvM

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbie OP   Couple
over a year ago

walsall

The police were on them long before the super glue set!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Should have just sent the horses in first, they would have soon moved!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *den-Valley-coupleCouple
over a year ago

Cumbria

Law was release changed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

They’re not really helping themselves

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbie OP   Couple
over a year ago

walsall


"They’re not really helping themselves"

What were they protesting against?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 02/06/22 22:39:27]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Were they not dragged away for their own safety? The Guards aren't going to march around them are they? Imagine the outcry if the Police left them there to get trampled on?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Were they not dragged away for their own safety? The Guards aren't going to march around them are they? Imagine the outcry if the Police left them there to get trampled on? "

Probably should have.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbie OP   Couple
over a year ago

walsall


"Were they not dragged away for their own safety? The Guards aren't going to march around them are they? Imagine the outcry if the Police left them there to get trampled on? "

Maybe, but I don’t think that was the case. It was a swift and no nonsense approach.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *a LunaWoman
over a year ago

South Wales


"Were they not dragged away for their own safety? The Guards aren't going to march around them are they? Imagine the outcry if the Police left them there to get trampled on? "

I was just going to say this. I don’t think the guards would have stopped. Because stopping could endanger the lives of royalty.

There is probably some very ancient law that says that Sovereignty and those escorting them are allowed to trample citizens who get in front of their carriage or something.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Were they not dragged away for their own safety? The Guards aren't going to march around them are they? Imagine the outcry if the Police left them there to get trampled on?

Maybe, but I don’t think that was the case. It was a swift and no nonsense approach. "

So what should the Police have done in that circumstance?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *instonandLadyAstorCouple
over a year ago

Not where we seem to be...


"I have just seen footage of protesters lying on the floor on the mall today, blocking the route of the queens guards.

The police literally dragged them off the road and out of the way it seconds.

How come when they block roads like the M25, the police sit and watch and allow it to happen?"

Maybe because the police were already there?

I'm mean, if you're actually standing there it really doesn't take long to respond.

As opposed to being God knows how many messages away on the M25 and having to fight your way through traffic due to the motorway being blocked by idiots.

Thats my theory.

Winston

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbie OP   Couple
over a year ago

walsall


"Were they not dragged away for their own safety? The Guards aren't going to march around them are they? Imagine the outcry if the Police left them there to get trampled on?

Maybe, but I don’t think that was the case. It was a swift and no nonsense approach.

So what should the Police have done in that circumstance? "

Personally, I think they did exactly the right thing. And should do the same with other protesters who feel that they can illegally interfere with peoples day to day lives.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbie OP   Couple
over a year ago

walsall


"I have just seen footage of protesters lying on the floor on the mall today, blocking the route of the queens guards.

The police literally dragged them off the road and out of the way it seconds.

How come when they block roads like the M25, the police sit and watch and allow it to happen?

Maybe because the police were already there?

I'm mean, if you're actually standing there it really doesn't take long to respond.

As opposed to being God knows how many messages away on the M25 and having to fight your way through traffic due to the motorway being blocked by idiots.

Thats my theory.

Winston"

Think that your right. It’s easier to nip in the bud when they are already on the scene.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iberius61Man
over a year ago

Pontefract


"Personally, I think they did exactly the right thing. And should do the same with other protesters who feel that they can illegally interfere with peoples day to day lives. "

The tolerance of peaceful protest is a sign of a healthy democracy. Don't have to agree with them to allow them to have their say. I think we have it about right. 'You've made made your point, now move along sunshine'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbie OP   Couple
over a year ago

walsall


"Personally, I think they did exactly the right thing. And should do the same with other protesters who feel that they can illegally interfere with peoples day to day lives.

The tolerance of peaceful protest is a sign of a healthy democracy. Don't have to agree with them to allow them to have their say. I think we have it about right. 'You've made made your point, now move along sunshine' "

I agree, people have the right to protest. But protesters who think that they are above the law should be dealt with accordingly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Were they not dragged away for their own safety? The Guards aren't going to march around them are they? Imagine the outcry if the Police left them there to get trampled on?

Maybe, but I don’t think that was the case. It was a swift and no nonsense approach.

So what should the Police have done in that circumstance?

Personally, I think they did exactly the right thing. And should do the same with other protesters who feel that they can illegally interfere with peoples day to day lives. "

Absolutely they should... Each situation needs assessing on it's own merit, environment, level of threat, location and Police deployment all factor in I guess

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iberius61Man
over a year ago

Pontefract


"...But protesters who think that they are above the law should be dealt with accordingly."

I'd question what is the difference between disagreeing with a law, and thinking you are above the law? Were the kinder scout trespassers protesting the law, or considering themselves above it? How about the Tolpuddle Martyrs? It's only really long after an event that these decisions can be made I think. Sometimes it's just which side of history did you fall on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eisty LadyWoman
over a year ago

Count Your Blessings Cottage, Gratitude Grove

Should have let them get trampled on

If they needed to be dragged away then should have dragged them through the horse shit

Inconsiderate tossers!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbie OP   Couple
over a year ago

walsall


"...But protesters who think that they are above the law should be dealt with accordingly.

I'd question what is the difference between disagreeing with a law, and thinking you are above the law? Were the kinder scout trespassers protesting the law, or considering themselves above it? How about the Tolpuddle Martyrs? It's only really long after an event that these decisions can be made I think. Sometimes it's just which side of history did you fall on."

This is a very good point.

Kinder scout was a mass tresspass and I believe no real harm was done other than defiance.

The tolpuddle is very interesting. People standing up against unfair work conditions was believed to be the original trade union. Again, people standing up for their rights.

Now compare this to people blockading a petrol station and vandalising the pumps so that nobody can use them. Or people vandalising 4x4 vehicles.

I have more sympathy for the two cases that you mentioned than the behaviour of vandals, even if their cause is valid.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iberius61Man
over a year ago

Pontefract


"...This is a very good point...

Kinder scout was a mass tresspass and I believe no real harm was done other than defiance. "

It was a mass trespass onto what was at the time private land, kept in tip top condition. The trespass ultimately led to the mass erosion that has caused significant damage to our outdoor spaces and the wildlife that lives there.


"...I have more sympathy for the two cases that you mentioned than the behaviour of vandals, even if their cause is valid."

Open up the countryside to free access has caused more damage to our landscape than a few vandals attacking 4x4s...which themselves cause a lot of damage to the environment, e.g. go scuba diving on the great barrier reef, a huge proportion of it is dead, 4x4s are not directly responsible, but they're part of the problem.

Ultimately I don't come down on a side, I'm simply saying that this isn't as black and white as everyone should obey every law without question or protest.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbie OP   Couple
over a year ago

walsall


"...This is a very good point...

Kinder scout was a mass tresspass and I believe no real harm was done other than defiance.

It was a mass trespass onto what was at the time private land, kept in tip top condition. The trespass ultimately led to the mass erosion that has caused significant damage to our outdoor spaces and the wildlife that lives there.

...I have more sympathy for the two cases that you mentioned than the behaviour of vandals, even if their cause is valid.

Open up the countryside to free access has caused more damage to our landscape than a few vandals attacking 4x4s...which themselves cause a lot of damage to the environment, e.g. go scuba diving on the great barrier reef, a huge proportion of it is dead, 4x4s are not directly responsible, but they're part of the problem.

Ultimately I don't come down on a side, I'm simply saying that this isn't as black and white as everyone should obey every law without question or protest."

Again, a good point, the law of unintended consequences is very real.

But breaking laws and protesting against them are different. I agree with one, but not the other.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iberius61Man
over a year ago

Pontefract


"...But breaking laws and protesting against them are different. I agree with one, but not the other."

Trespassing on kinder scout was definitely breaking laws, not just protesting against them.

An interesting discussion, hopefully we can have some more, but I'm afraid I have a long bike ride and a run tomorrow, so sadly time for me to duck out, night

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *riskynriskyCouple
over a year ago

Essex.


"...This is a very good point...

Kinder scout was a mass tresspass and I believe no real harm was done other than defiance.

It was a mass trespass onto what was at the time private land, kept in tip top condition. The trespass ultimately led to the mass erosion that has caused significant damage to our outdoor spaces and the wildlife that lives there.

...I have more sympathy for the two cases that you mentioned than the behaviour of vandals, even if their cause is valid.

Open up the countryside to free access has caused more damage to our landscape than a few vandals attacking 4x4s...which themselves cause a lot of damage to the environment, e.g. go scuba diving on the great barrier reef, a huge proportion of it is dead, 4x4s are not directly responsible, but they're part of the problem.

Ultimately I don't come down on a side, I'm simply saying that this isn't as black and white as everyone should obey every law without question or protest."

Don't bring us 4x4 drivers into it, I think you'll find Prius drivers do far more damage to the planet than us for a number of reasons.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *riskynriskyCouple
over a year ago

Essex.


"They’re not really helping themselves

What were they protesting against?"

Reclaim royal land for the people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asual777Man
over a year ago

i travel all over


"I have just seen footage of protesters lying on the floor on the mall today, blocking the route of the queens guards.

The police literally dragged them off the road and out of the way it seconds.

How come when they block roads like the M25, the police sit and watch and allow it to happen?

Cos it only affects the plebs, not the self appointed special ones

How did the Queen appoint herself Queen ? "

Perhaps not self appointed , but if one is in anyway interested in positions being awarded on merit then it’s hypocritical to celebrate someone ‘achieving’ the pinnacle of our public life through who gave birth to them.

the Monarchy props up an entire class system which works against this very idea. Look at where a succession of prime ministers studied.

With the Queen at the top, a shining beacon of privilege of birth, it is always going to be more difficult to have a society where people achieve positions on the basis of merit. It was an important driver for me leaving a nation which operates on a borderline ‘caste’ system.

As for royals bringing tourists in , well those buildings will still be there if the monarchy is abolished.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *elsh_naturist_coupleCouple
over a year ago

Newport

The police were given new powers very recently to deal with protesters.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I have just seen footage of protesters lying on the floor on the mall today, blocking the route of the queens guards.

The police literally dragged them off the road and out of the way it seconds.

How come when they block roads like the M25, the police sit and watch and allow it to happen?"

You're always going to get idiots like Extinction rebellion. Now they want to throw themselves at the mall. If it was up to me I'd throw them in the Thames estuary.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think they got away lightly was talking to a friend who was there he noticed how many fire arms came out it's scared him idiots that's all I can say definitely not helping there course.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top