FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Worst book you’ve ever read

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

People often talk about the best books they’ve ever read…but what about the worst books you’ve ever read?

Here’s my worst books:

The Age of Anxiety - Pete Townshend (even being a Who fan didn’t save it)

Afternoon of a Good Woman- Nina Bawden

The Hothouse on the East River- Muriel Spark

Plain Girl- Arthur Miller (tho this is a novella)

So…worst book you’ve ever read?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tooveMan
over a year ago

belfast

Those stupid ones about mr grey and some woman.

Absolutely terrible. Badly written.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Those stupid ones about mr grey and some woman.

Absolutely terrible. Badly written. "

50 shades of grey?

Never read them; I was young when they came out (pretty sure I was just a child).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inballs99Man
over a year ago

Blackheath

The highway code was a bit naff

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tooveMan
over a year ago

belfast


"Those stupid ones about mr grey and some woman.

Absolutely terrible. Badly written.

50 shades of grey?

Never read them; I was young when they came out (pretty sure I was just a child). "

Yeah. They're absolutely shite. No redeeming features at all. I read them because everyone was raving about them but they were badly written by someone who didn't have a clue what she was writing about.

They were even worse than the old Joe Hawkins books.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ammo89Man
over a year ago

Aberdeen

Sunset Song, had to read it at school. Did anyone else have to suffer this god-awful pile of dump?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *riel13Woman
over a year ago

Northampton

I thought Catcher in the Rye was pants!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Tinker, tailor, soldier, Spy - john le carre

Tried it three times and couldn't finish it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I thought Catcher in the Rye was pants! "

Wow really I love Catcher in the Rye!! One of my favourite books…though I do see a lot of people saying they hate it so maybe I need to reconsider hahahaha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Talking to strangers: Malcolm Gladwell

Neuromancer: William Gibson

A short history of nearly everything: Bill Bryson

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uminsiderMKMan
over a year ago

St Austell

The Phonebook

One heck of a list of characters, but no plot whatsoever...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ou only live onceMan
over a year ago

London

Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad.

I know it's a classic, and deals with some important themes, but I just found it turgid.

But I now just give up on books I'm not enjoying! There's too much to read to struggle through bad stuff!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *riel13Woman
over a year ago

Northampton


"I thought Catcher in the Rye was pants!

Wow really I love Catcher in the Rye!! One of my favourite books…though I do see a lot of people saying they hate it so maybe I need to reconsider hahahaha "

Hahaha! I felt like I was permanently waiting for something to happen lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heArrowsCouple
over a year ago

I tried to read a book called the years of rice and salt.

I couldn't make head nor tail of it. Its 20 years sitting on a book shelf waiting for me to try again.

It's well reviewed... just too dense for me at the time.

I tried to read Robert ludlum books too and I found them so boring.

Also the silmarillion by Tolkien. Masterful idea, horrible book.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Heart goes last by Atwood.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Couldn't get into 50 shades, and I love kink

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The Keeper of Lost Things. Absolute dross.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Talking to strangers: Malcolm Gladwell

Neuromancer: William Gibson

A short history of nearly everything: Bill Bryson"

Necromancer is brilliant, full of what were then ground breaking and innovative ideas about the Web and cyber security.

Haven't read it fir years so it may have aged badly I guess.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ookingfun82Man
over a year ago

Enniskillen

War and Peace. Wanted to read as it is supposed to be an all time great. I started so had to make myself finish it, never been as glad to finish a book, just endless with nothing much happening.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittlemiss Hal O weenCouple
over a year ago

Southampton

See like the cheesiness of 50 shades... Tried to read War and Peace... Good grief lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I thought Catcher in the Rye was pants! "

Really?! I read it last year and really enjoyed it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aizyWoman
over a year ago

west midlands

Lord of the rings, I loved The Hobbit so thought I'd enjoy it, couldn't even make it halfway through, never bothered watching the films either

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Jane eyre. Hated it at school, hate it now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Comedian Les Dawson wrote a sci-fi novel in the 80s called A Time Before Genesis, it was utter guff but strangely enjoyable.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itygamesMan
over a year ago

UK

Found the bible very repetitive.

Chapter 4 psalm 68 page 396

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I thought Catcher in the Rye was pants! "

It’s one of my favourite books! The tension is incredible, it’s really clever writing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Lord of the rings, I loved The Hobbit so thought I'd enjoy it, couldn't even make it halfway through, never bothered watching the films either"

Another one of my favourites , though I grant you it’s a long read. I think I love it for nostalgic reasons as much as anything else x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ustdaveHantsMan
over a year ago

chippenham

Anything by Andy mcnab makes my skin crawl

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Lord of the rings, I loved The Hobbit so thought I'd enjoy it, couldn't even make it halfway through, never bothered watching the films either"

Was going to say exactly the same thing!

Wading through the first half of the fellowship of the ring was like wading through treacle whilst platting fog. Truly awful experience and at the time I could speed read a page three lines at a time so (insert entity here) help dyslexics FFS!

The whole Tolkien works are master pieces similar to the Mona Lisa but both have their appeal and maybe their day.

As for reading material I'd rather not have engaged with - most of the recent business propositions and quotes for work I've had to sift through were just dreadful

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Found the bible very repetitive.

Chapter 4 psalm 68 page 396"

The Bible is a bit rubbish

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

Actually I see the Bible and raise it to Mein Kampf.

I tried to read it in English and German. Neither was pleasant

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Jane eyre. Hated it at school, hate it now "

One of my most favourite books! Though definitely long, and I’d imagine if I had to read it in a school setting I’d hate it too!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I read the first chapter of Harry Potter and the Philosophers' Stone with my eldest when it came out. That was enough for both of us.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ersiantugMan
over a year ago

Cardiff


"Talking to strangers: Malcolm Gladwell

Neuromancer: William Gibson

A short history of nearly everything: Bill Bryson

Necromancer is brilliant, full of what were then ground breaking and innovative ideas about the Web and cyber security.

Haven't read it fir years so it may have aged badly I guess."

--I read the first page or two of Neuromancer back in the day, but I just couldn't read on. The 'cyberpunk' thing was a keeper though! (though I realise he didn't quite originate it).

The same went for the Bryson, funnily enough.

And off my head, London Fields by Martin Amis. (who always appears at some point on these lists I know).--

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ersiantugMan
over a year ago

Cardiff


"Comedian Les Dawson wrote a sci-fi novel in the 80s called A Time Before Genesis, it was utter guff but strangely enjoyable."

-You what? I must go and see...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ewburylad86Man
over a year ago

Newbury


"Found the bible very repetitive.

Chapter 4 psalm 68 page 396

The Bible is a bit rubbish "

As respectful as I am to the bible, it’s not a riveting read

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Talking to strangers: Malcolm Gladwell

Neuromancer: William Gibson

A short history of nearly everything: Bill Bryson

Necromancer is brilliant, full of what were then ground breaking and innovative ideas about the Web and cyber security.

Haven't read it fir years so it may have aged badly I guess.

--I read the first page or two of Neuromancer back in the day, but I just couldn't read on. The 'cyberpunk' thing was a keeper though! (though I realise he didn't quite originate it).

The same went for the Bryson, funnily enough.

And off my head, London Fields by Martin Amis. (who always appears at some point on these lists I know).--

"

Oh god…I read Dead Babies by Martin Amis and crikey…possibly one of the worst books I’ve ever read. Genuinely. It’s awful. The writing is awful, the plot is awful; half of it doesn’t make sense. The characters are awful: basically, the whole book is DREADFUL.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rHotNottsMan
over a year ago

Dubai & Nottingham


"Found the bible very repetitive.

Chapter 4 psalm 68 page 396"

This style of poetry utilises repetition, parallelism and rhythm, it’s very common in Hebrew poems

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ersiantugMan
over a year ago

Cardiff

[Removed by poster at 02/06/22 02:15:42]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *yronMan
over a year ago

grangemouth

'Bonaparte's Warriors' by Richard Howard.

The author tried to get in on the Napoleonic scene that Bernard Cornwell had brought to life with his excellent 'Sharpe' series. The difference here was, it would be centered around the French army.

Good premise and it looked good, as it would be about the elite French Dragoons.

It didn't work. Nothing seems to happen, the dialogue is lacklustre, there's jokes that I'm sure that the author found hysterical, but don't work and you really don't warm to the characters.

I'm told that there's others in the series, but I can't bring myself to read more than one.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ersiantugMan
over a year ago

Cardiff


"Lord of the rings, I loved The Hobbit so thought I'd enjoy it, couldn't even make it halfway through, never bothered watching the films either"

-- It took me a good 10 years of returning to get out of the Shire, but it was worth it in the end though I thought. The second book is the best one and is quite exciting to read (and is better for having a couple of women in). The third one moves along too, and probably covers too much if anything. The films did an ok job of fanning it all out.

I think that most people agree the Hobbit is probably his best book and that LOR starts pretty slow. I know that some find the Silmarillion to be the better written (Tolkien could forget about the finesse of his prose from time to time in LOR I found - a bit like Jackson with his directing), so it will be interesting to see what the new Amazon series will be like. --

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ny1localMan
over a year ago

READING

Most of Shakespeare's stuff I find is hard going to read, but totally different when watching it being performed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imbobaMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Lord of the rings, I loved The Hobbit so thought I'd enjoy it, couldn't even make it halfway through, never bothered watching the films either"

I sense the need for a long weekend film marathon in the making. I’ll keep you busy during the boring bits (fortunately not too many not too long.).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ack688Man
over a year ago

abruzzo Italy (and UK)

A book that gets a lot of great reviews but which I thought was just awful was A Little Life by Hanya Yanagihara. I didn’t like the writing style, the story, the characters, I don’t know why I persisted with it really.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he normal oneMan
over a year ago

Hereford

I normally stick with a book no matter how much it grips me but the one failure I had was The curious incident of the dog in the nighttime, after it being recommended to me by a workmate I seem to remember being a fair way in and giving up I had no clue what was going on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
over a year ago

couple, us we him her.

IT by Stephen King

Found it incredibly tedious and drawn out only ever managed to get a 1/3rd into it. Lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ncemoreroundthesunCouple
over a year ago

on the move

A book about an Australian who joined the foreign legion, was so awful I've forgotten the title.

Famous wise the handmaids tale bored the arse off me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *undance_KidMan
over a year ago

London

Just read James Herbert’s The Fog as thought I’d try a different genre, found that a struggle to get to the end. Then Graeme Souness’s autobiography was also very poor didn’t give any insights at all. I wouldn’t say that to his face mind

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lint-EverhardMan
over a year ago

Perpignan and cap


"I normally stick with a book no matter how much it grips me but the one failure I had was The curious incident of the dog in the nighttime, after it being recommended to me by a workmate I seem to remember being a fair way in and giving up I had no clue what was going on."

Dude! That's an awesome book, I urge you to give it another go.

50 shades of grey for me was 50 shades of sh#te.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *undance_KidMan
over a year ago

London

Yep I couldn’t finish IT either.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Talking to strangers: Malcolm Gladwell

Neuromancer: William Gibson

A short history of nearly everything: Bill Bryson

Necromancer is brilliant, full of what were then ground breaking and innovative ideas about the Web and cyber security.

Haven't read it fir years so it may have aged badly I guess.

--I read the first page or two of Neuromancer back in the day, but I just couldn't read on. The 'cyberpunk' thing was a keeper though! (though I realise he didn't quite originate it).

The same went for the Bryson, funnily enough.

And off my head, London Fields by Martin Amis. (who always appears at some point on these lists I know).--

"

I eventually read the whole of Neuromancer. I was expecting that I will get used to his writing style at some point. That never happened. I ended up reading chapter notes on the internet after every chapter to confirm what's happening really is what I think is happening

With Bryson book, the problem is he tries to write long passages about scientists who discovered something before actually going into the actual discovery they made which is the chapter's topic. He thinks it makes the book interesting. But it did the entire opposite to me. It felt like there are more pages in the book talking about the scientists compared to explanation of the actual discoveries. No one wants to know which university every damn scientist when to, who their parents were and who they married.

I found David Christian's Origin Story book much more crisp and to the point.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *riel13Woman
over a year ago

Northampton


"I thought Catcher in the Rye was pants!

Really?! I read it last year and really enjoyed it."

I just don't think I got the point of it, so...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eavenNhellCouple
over a year ago

carrbrook stalybridge

100 days of sodom by the marqui de sade

Just dont go there jesus was hard work manged to get a quarter of the way in before I had enough

Closely followed by moby dick 15 chapters in and the fish ain't appeared

Only two books I have never finnished

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Man I love Neuromancer but I think I can see your point. As for Tolkien I love the Silmarillion so LOTR is pretty straightforward in comparison

My equivalent I guess would be Fahrenheit 451 and Catch 22. I just remember 451 being a complete slog. I went into Catch thinking it was a serious account of a bobber squadron and could just never square it away that it was satire.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Radon daughters

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ickshawedCouple
over a year ago

Wolverhampton

Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov. I hated the character, and found it too dull to finish it.

The Sea, The Sea by Iris Murdoch was turgid

But my one true hate was the poems of Carol Ann Duffy. I studied them at A level and despised them. Absolute dross. Self obsessed bullshit.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ealitybitesMan
over a year ago

Belfast

Read the first 2 chapters of the first fifty shades book and decided it was written by a 12 year old for 12 year olds so I gave up.

Moby dick was too much like reading an encyclopedia.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"But my one true hate was the poems of Carol Ann Duffy. I studied them at A level and despised them. Absolute dross. Self obsessed bullshit. "

Oh lord you’ve just given me flash backs to things I thought I’d suppressed!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acavityMan
over a year ago

Redditch

The beach, by Alex Garland

Just couldn't get in to it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The beach, by Alex Garland

Just couldn't get in to it."

One of my favourite books

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ang bang bangity bangCouple
over a year ago

Sunderland

Crime and Punishment - Fyodor Dostoevsky

Utter shite.

Also Jane's Austins Emma is possibly the only book I couldn't finish

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lynJMan
over a year ago

Morden


"Lord of the rings, I loved The Hobbit so thought I'd enjoy it, couldn't even make it halfway through, never bothered watching the films either

-- It took me a good 10 years of returning to get out of the Shire, but it was worth it in the end though I thought. The second book is the best one and is quite exciting to read (and is better for having a couple of women in). The third one moves along too, and probably covers too much if anything. The films did an ok job of fanning it all out.

I think that most people agree the Hobbit is probably his best book and that LOR starts pretty slow. I know that some find the Silmarillion to be the better written (Tolkien could forget about the finesse of his prose from time to time in LOR I found - a bit like Jackson with his directing), so it will be interesting to see what the new Amazon series will be like. --"

JRR didn't actually finish writing the Silmarillion. His son Christopher completed it after his death.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Spycatcher by Peter Wright. Originally banned in the UK for security reasons, a friend got me a copy on her trip to NY. Seriously, I was falling asleep at the end of every page.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend


"I tried to read a book called the years of rice and salt.

I couldn't make head nor tail of it. Its 20 years sitting on a book shelf waiting for me to try again.

It's well reviewed... just too dense for me at the time.

I tried to read Robert ludlum books too and I found them so boring.

Also the silmarillion by Tolkien. Masterful idea, horrible book. "

I couldn't get into the silmarillion either...could read lotr forever

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ickshawedCouple
over a year ago

Wolverhampton


"But my one true hate was the poems of Carol Ann Duffy. I studied them at A level and despised them. Absolute dross. Self obsessed bullshit.

Oh lord you’ve just given me flash backs to things I thought I’d suppressed!!! "

My apologies. It really was awful stuff wasn't it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

My apologies. It really was awful stuff wasn't it "

Luckily my memories of them are really vague. I just remember doing them at GCSE and, having always been an avid reader, feeling that literature was just not for me. Which, looking back, is actually a tad sad. I’ve always been a fantasy/sci fi nerd and I think English lit at school mostly put me off reading other genres and poetry. A prejudice that I’ve only just started to overcome.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Also the silmarillion by Tolkien. Masterful idea, horrible book.

I couldn't get into the silmarillion either...could read lotr forever "

It was always the epic scale of the Silmarillion that got me. Sure LOtR has a balrog, the Sil has the elves fighting an army of balrogs!! Teen me swooned.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *a LunaWoman
over a year ago

South Wales

Kestrel for a Knave (or Kes)

We read it in School and it left a lasting impression on me (which I guess is good) of hardship and gloom.

It was hard going. And it made me appreciate my home comforts and getting home from School to a good tea!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Peig by Peig Sayers

Autobiography about an Irish woman living on an island off the south coast of Ireland about 100 years ago.

Rain, misery and deprecation.

Makes Angela's Ashes seem like Willy Wonka & The Chocolate Factory

It's in Irish too ...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dward_TeagueMan
over a year ago

wolverhampton

I don’t really have one. If I’m not enjoying a book then I don’t continue with it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ang bang bangity bangCouple
over a year ago

Sunderland


"Peig by Peig Sayers

Autobiography about an Irish woman living on an island off the south coast of Ireland about 100 years ago.

Rain, misery and deprecation.

Makes Angela's Ashes seem like Willy Wonka & The Chocolate Factory

It's in Irish too ..."

Oh god I'd forgotten about that. I've just had flash backs to reading that utter utter shite. I'm pretty sure I'd blanked them out prior to this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *2000ManMan
over a year ago

Worthing

Try as I might to like, a couple of the scifi books by Ben Bova are tedious without much going on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iaisonseekerMan
over a year ago

Liverpool

So interesting to see people's different tastes - there's a couple of books here that I really like, in fact.

From my own point of view, the book that have found least enjoyable was Middlemarch as a teenager but I couldn't objectively say it was a bad book.

The accolade of worst book has to go to The Da Vinci Code, which I read when there was a brief craze for it about 20 years ago. The premise is interesting but I have never read such formulaic, mechanical prose with cardboard cut-out characters either before or since.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So interesting to see people's different tastes - there's a couple of books here that I really like, in fact.

From my own point of view, the book that have found least enjoyable was Middlemarch as a teenager but I couldn't objectively say it was a bad book.

The accolade of worst book has to go to The Da Vinci Code, which I read when there was a brief craze for it about 20 years ago. The premise is interesting but I have never read such formulaic, mechanical prose with cardboard cut-out characters either before or since."

I have a copy of Middlemarch that I’m hoping to read- the thing that’s putting me off is it’s length! I don’t do well with long books

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

the dictionary

the zebra did it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layisbetterwithLaughterMan
over a year ago

Stourbridge

I finished 1984 out of a sense of duty, but couldn't say I enjoyed it. Thought provoking, yes. A chore? Absolutely.

Some of people's most hated are some of my favourites ha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heRazorsEdgeMan
over a year ago

Wales/ All over UK

Undoubtedly it was 50 Shades of Grey… came across exactly as the badly adapted fan fiction it started out as.

Second place goes to Steven Gerrard’s autobiography… extremely dull and repetitive

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andonmessMan
over a year ago

A world all of his own

The 39 steps. Really wish I'd never bothered reading it lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ubal1Man
over a year ago

Newry Down

Although a lot of people get comfort from it, and use it to guide their daily interactions, I have found The Bible to be both

incomprehensible and an irrelevance, at least to me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hechairman18Man
over a year ago

Salford Quays , Manchester

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.

By Stig someone or other.

I kept thinking, it's got to get better. Something will happen soon.

Three quarters in and still nothing.

Didn't finish it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ack688Man
over a year ago

abruzzo Italy (and UK)


"100 days of sodom by the marqui de sade

Just dont go there jesus was hard work manged to get a quarter of the way in before I had enough

Closely followed by moby dick 15 chapters in and the fish ain't appeared

Only two books I have never finnished "

I thought 120 days of sodom was really interesting, so well structured and considering it was basically a first draft written on toilet paper while in the bastille it’s incredible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ack688Man
over a year ago

abruzzo Italy (and UK)


"Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov. I hated the character, and found it too dull to finish it. "

I don’t think you’re supposed to like any if the characters, there are so few redeeming features of any of them, but it’s about obsession and derangement, the prose is striking and unusual too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iaisonseekerMan
over a year ago

Liverpool


"So interesting to see people's different tastes - there's a couple of books here that I really like, in fact.

From my own point of view, the book that have found least enjoyable was Middlemarch as a teenager but I couldn't objectively say it was a bad book.

The accolade of worst book has to go to The Da Vinci Code, which I read when there was a brief craze for it about 20 years ago. The premise is interesting but I have never read such formulaic, mechanical prose with cardboard cut-out characters either before or since.

I have a copy of Middlemarch that I’m hoping to read- the thing that’s putting me off is it’s length! I don’t do well with long books "

A woman on Fab who is put off by length - surely you are a true Unicorn

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I finished 1984 out of a sense of duty, but couldn't say I enjoyed it. Thought provoking, yes. A chore? Absolutely.

Some of people's most hated are some of my favourites ha"

I love 1984; I love it so much I’ve acquired 3 copies of it hahaha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.

By Stig someone or other.

I kept thinking, it's got to get better. Something will happen soon.

Three quarters in and still nothing.

Didn't finish it."

I loved that book. It's the suspense that keeps the book going. Did you already watch the film by any chance? If yes, it takes away all the fun of it because you already know the killer

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uenevereWoman
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

50 Shades of Grey is the worst book I have ever read, closely followed by A Day In The Life of Ivan Desisovic, which I had to read for English Lit at school.

At least the latter was well written...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"100 days of sodom by the marqui de sade

Just dont go there jesus was hard work manged to get a quarter of the way in before I had enough

Closely followed by moby dick 15 chapters in and the fish ain't appeared

Only two books I have never finnished

I thought 120 days of sodom was really interesting, so well structured and considering it was basically a first draft written on toilet paper while in the bastille it’s incredible."

Just finished reading the Wikipedia entry and now I feel sick

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eneralKenobiMan
over a year ago

North Angus

Jokes on the Loo from M&S, it was shit

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itty9899Man
over a year ago

Craggy Island

The Bible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urhamdebbiecdTV/TS
over a year ago

bishop auckland

The bible

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ersiantugMan
over a year ago

Cardiff

I wonder how much of the Bible people have actually read? It's actually a collection of books, translated differently at different times.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"100 days of sodom by the marqui de sade

Just dont go there jesus was hard work manged to get a quarter of the way in before I had enough

Closely followed by moby dick 15 chapters in and the fish ain't appeared

Only two books I have never finnished

I thought 120 days of sodom was really interesting, so well structured and considering it was basically a first draft written on toilet paper while in the bastille it’s incredible.

Just finished reading the Wikipedia entry and now I feel sick "

I have read the plot of the film. Have the same feeling

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky-MinxWoman
over a year ago

Grantham

Anything by Shakespeare. Can't even remember titles

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *verage Guy90Man
over a year ago

Stockton On Tees

1984. Good book but I have never felt so down from reading a book before or since.

Anything Shakespeare.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oh I loved The Silmarillion and all other things Tolkien

The book I most hated reading was American Psycho, which I had to read at Uni. It was well written I suppose, but the monologues about Phil Collins and Whitney Houston albums on top of the ultra violence was more than I could cope with.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layisbetterwithLaughterMan
over a year ago

Stourbridge


"Oh I loved The Silmarillion and all other things Tolkien

The book I most hated reading was American Psycho, which I had to read at Uni. It was well written I suppose, but the monologues about Phil Collins and Whitney Houston albums on top of the ultra violence was more than I could cope with."

The Silmarillion audio book on Audible is really good. I definitely picked up some things I had missed reading it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *penbicoupleCouple
over a year ago

Northampton


"I normally stick with a book no matter how much it grips me but the one failure I had was The curious incident of the dog in the nighttime, after it being recommended to me by a workmate I seem to remember being a fair way in and giving up I had no clue what was going on."

Bloody love that book!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *penbicoupleCouple
over a year ago

Northampton


"I wonder how much of the Bible people have actually read? It's actually a collection of books, translated differently at different times."

I've read it all the way through about a dozen times. (Former career path; don't ask!)

Song of Songs is beautiful, as is Jonah. I don't see many other redeeming features (maybe Ecclesiastes?).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

The Silmarillion audio book on Audible is really good. I definitely picked up some things I had missed reading it."

I can second this! I think some people bounce off the first part of the book, the one that covers the valar (gods). I think once you’re past that and into the “history” part then it becomes much easier to read.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Enduring Love by Ian McEwan. Had to study it for A-Level English Lit. and OMG it's terrible, film wasn't much cop either!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *idnight RamblerMan
over a year ago

Pershore

The Welsh trilogy of books by Alexander Cordell. Once popular, they now read as trite and more a parody of industrial revolution Wales. Even the Welsh dialogue doesn't ring true to me - and I grew up in the Valleys.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ikesEmBigMan
over a year ago

Herts

Chicken Lickin'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uriousscouserWoman
over a year ago

Wirral

I can normally plough through even the worst of books (you never know if they'll improve in the final chapter), but there are half a dozen that I've just not been able to force myself to finish.

The one that stands out for me was the Historian by Elizabeth Kostova. It's not that it was badly written, it was just so incredibly dull while also being as far fetched as a bucket of shit from China. It wasn't entertaining enough to make the world believable and I gave up half way through.

It grieves me that I couldn't force myself to finish it, particularly as a few of my friends loved the book and it had such great reviews, but I found it a terrible waste of paper and ink.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *Cocksucker84Man
over a year ago

newcastle

I recently tried The Corrections by Jonathan Franzen and got about 200 pages in (it sits at around 700 pages). I found it to be pretentious and incredibly misogynistic. Awful book.

Similarly, I've never understood the appeal around Jack Kerouac's On The Road.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top