Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The inbox mail system of single women (yeah ok) and couples are pressed to explosion by single male messages, sorry, I meant cock pics. But? If the site was devoid of flying solo guys, would fab not die? Despite being the majority, if we weren't present, fab as a business model would be, well want of a better word... Fabbed! " Make it more like Bumble then, ladies/couples have to message gents first. Less unwanted dickius picturious. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is meant to be an exploitive thread! ...yeah it was funny though. " What's an exploitive thread? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t want to ban single men. I just don’t wish to be spoken to like a piece of meat or have a cock shoved in my face as some kind of incentive. " You miss my point, no person would wish to be considered as such. But men do make the world of fab go round, yet are oft bemoaned. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is meant to be an exploitive thread! ...yeah it was funny though. What's an exploitive thread?" I stand corrected, explorative. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The inbox mail system of single women (yeah ok) and couples are pressed to explosion by single male messages, sorry, I meant cock pics. But? If the site was devoid of flying solo guys, would fab not die? Despite being the majority, if we weren't present, fab as a business model would be, well want of a better word... Fabbed! Make it more like Bumble then, ladies/couples have to message gents first. Less unwanted dickius picturious." I support this message | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is meant to be an exploitive thread! ...yeah it was funny though. What's an exploitive thread?" a thread that goes BOOM | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t want to ban single men. I just don’t wish to be spoken to like a piece of meat or have a cock shoved in my face as some kind of incentive. You miss my point, no person would wish to be considered as such. But men do make the world of fab go round, yet are oft bemoaned." Unfairly so yes. I like the men I know. I’m just careful who I speak to. Simple | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t want to ban single men. I just don’t wish to be spoken to like a piece of meat or have a cock shoved in my face as some kind of incentive. You miss my point, no person would wish to be considered as such. But men do make the world of fab go round, yet are oft bemoaned." Men wouldn’t so ‘oft bemoaned’ if they had some respect for women / nb people who say they don’t wanna talk | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There’s a difference between single men just sending a message and single men sending dozens of messages after being told no; if I tell you no leave me alone. No means no and a lot of single men here struggle to understand " Do you think a no reply auto block system from sending again, if unanswered within the fab message system? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lads its as simple as this if the lady says no just move on and don't pester the girl " Not about pestering, that's a no no, but if single men weren't here, what would fab be? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No. I just want people to treat others with the respect they would want to be treated. Or, with the respect that they would want their mother/sister/daughter to be treated, if they can't get their head around gender differences in the way these things operate." I would agree with this but I hate the think of the way some men treat the females in their lives | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope I wouldn't be here if men were banned. And I keep tight filters so I don't get too many messages and any ones that cheat my filters, are ones like FAF or don't interest me I just delete. I have no issue messaging profiles first if they interest me .The worst that can happen is they ignore me or delete the message. Getting the odd abusive message doesn't bother me they are random strangers on here so I don't give a toss what they think of me or the abuse they give,and it's like the rubbish taking itself out when they give abuse anyhow. So no I think fab works grand just as it is. " Hope exists, thank you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is meant to be an exploitive thread! ...yeah it was funny though. What's an exploitive thread?a thread that goes BOOM " stop it, this is softly serious. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is meant to be an exploitive thread! ...yeah it was funny though. What's an exploitive thread?a thread that goes BOOM stop it, this is softly serious. " BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t want to ban single men. I just don’t wish to be spoken to like a piece of meat or have a cock shoved in my face as some kind of incentive. You miss my point, no person would wish to be considered as such. But men do make the world of fab go round, yet are oft bemoaned. Unfairly so yes. I like the men I know. I’m just careful who I speak to. Simple " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is meant to be an exploitive thread! ...yeah it was funny though. What's an exploitive thread?a thread that goes BOOM stop it, this is softly serious. BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM" Huff, I give up | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is meant to be an exploitive thread! ...yeah it was funny though. What's an exploitive thread?a thread that goes BOOM stop it, this is softly serious. BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM Huff, I give up " boom | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the site just needs a delay built in to stop rapid repeat messages. If you send a message and there is no response then you can’t send another for, say, a day to that account. If that doesn’t get a response then you are delayed for 3 days, then a week, then two weeks, then a month, then a quarter. It will stop all the rapid response merchants." I like this idea of a rapid response merchant. Like an emergency sex service | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The inbox mail system of single women (yeah ok) and couples are pressed to explosion by single male messages, sorry, I meant cock pics. But? If the site was devoid of flying solo guys, would fab not die? Despite being the majority, if we weren't present, fab as a business model would be, well want of a better word... Fabbed! Make it more like Bumble then, ladies/couples have to message gents first. Less unwanted dickius picturious." Men would still complain they don’t get any messages. If someone likes you they will reply to you or message you, regardless of what other men send - What other guys send has nothing to do with whatever happens to your messages. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the site just needs a delay built in to stop rapid repeat messages. If you send a message and there is no response then you can’t send another for, say, a day to that account. If that doesn’t get a response then you are delayed for 3 days, then a week, then two weeks, then a month, then a quarter. It will stop all the rapid response merchants. I like this idea of a rapid response merchant. Like an emergency sex service " as long as they are not rapid in the bedroom as well | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the site just needs a delay built in to stop rapid repeat messages. If you send a message and there is no response then you can’t send another for, say, a day to that account. If that doesn’t get a response then you are delayed for 3 days, then a week, then two weeks, then a month, then a quarter. It will stop all the rapid response merchants." Yeah, that would work too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ban the men from having dick pics as their profile pics. Have a word count for profiles. That might make searching easier for women and then we might send more first messages. " Why ban dick pics from their profile pics it's their profile they can put whatever they want on it just like any woman can on theirs ,you can just ignore a profile that has dick pics if you don't like them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t want to ban single men. I just don’t wish to be spoken to like a piece of meat or have a cock shoved in my face as some kind of incentive. You miss my point, no person would wish to be considered as such. But men do make the world of fab go round, yet are oft bemoaned." Got any idea why people moan about them? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ban the men from having dick pics as their profile pics. Have a word count for profiles. That might make searching easier for women and then we might send more first messages. " Yes!!!! It would make it a given to have to be sincere and sell your character, compatibility and reason for messaging. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ban the men from having dick pics as their profile pics. Have a word count for profiles. That might make searching easier for women and then we might send more first messages. " This could help a little, I only usually show mine on a Tuesday and think that helps | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ban the men from having dick pics as their profile pics. Have a word count for profiles." I am all for both of these. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No. I just want people to treat others with the respect they would want to be treated. Or, with the respect that they would want their mother/sister/daughter to be treated, if they can't get their head around gender differences in the way these things operate. I would agree with this but I hate the think of the way some men treat the females in their lives " True | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t want to ban single men. I just don’t wish to be spoken to like a piece of meat or have a cock shoved in my face as some kind of incentive. You miss my point, no person would wish to be considered as such. But men do make the world of fab go round, yet are oft bemoaned. Got any idea why people moan about them? " Yes, I used to have a couples profile here, I know, believe me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Introducing a match system (similar to some dating apps, where you can only message a person if you match with them) would remove a lot of issues associated with fab...specifically the unsolicited dick pics, and it would also force men to put some more effort in building up their profiles" A way to stop unsolicited pics would be have a option to turn receiving photos off all together. Having a swipe system would still open that option after matching | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ban the men from having dick pics as their profile pics. Have a word count for profiles. That might make searching easier for women and then we might send more first messages. Why ban dick pics from their profile pics it's their profile they can put whatever they want on it just like any woman can on theirs ,you can just ignore a profile that has dick pics if you don't like them." Because I'm not attracted to the man on the basis of what his dick looks like. They can still have them in their albums, just not as their avatar. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ban the men from having dick pics as their profile pics. Have a word count for profiles. That might make searching easier for women and then we might send more first messages. This could help a little, I only usually show mine on a Tuesday and think that helps " 100% more likely to send you a msg based on your avatar compared to a dick pic | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ban the men from having dick pics as their profile pics. Have a word count for profiles. That might make searching easier for women and then we might send more first messages. This could help a little, I only usually show mine on a Tuesday and think that helps 100% more likely to send you a msg based on your avatar compared to a dick pic " Is this a good time to mention you're on my hotlist Also thank you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ban the men from having dick pics as their profile pics. Have a word count for profiles. That might make searching easier for women and then we might send more first messages. This could help a little, I only usually show mine on a Tuesday and think that helps 100% more likely to send you a msg based on your avatar compared to a dick pic Is this a good time to mention you're on my hotlist Also thank you " Aww now I'm blushing!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ban the men from having dick pics as their profile pics. Have a word count for profiles. That might make searching easier for women and then we might send more first messages. This could help a little, I only usually show mine on a Tuesday and think that helps 100% more likely to send you a msg based on your avatar compared to a dick pic Is this a good time to mention you're on my hotlist Also thank you Aww now I'm blushing!! " Good | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t want to ban single men. I just don’t wish to be spoken to like a piece of meat or have a cock shoved in my face as some kind of incentive. You miss my point, no person would wish to be considered as such. But men do make the world of fab go round, yet are oft bemoaned." Not all men | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t want to ban single men. I just don’t wish to be spoken to like a piece of meat or have a cock shoved in my face as some kind of incentive. You miss my point, no person would wish to be considered as such. But men do make the world of fab go round, yet are oft bemoaned. Not all men" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Introducing a match system (similar to some dating apps, where you can only message a person if you match with them) would remove a lot of issues associated with fab...specifically the unsolicited dick pics, and it would also force men to put some more effort in building up their profiles A way to stop unsolicited pics would be have a option to turn receiving photos off all together. Having a swipe system would still open that option after matching " That's a fair point...but I've noticed most women specifically ask for a face pic with the first message they receive | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t want to ban single men. I just don’t wish to be spoken to like a piece of meat or have a cock shoved in my face as some kind of incentive. You miss my point, no person would wish to be considered as such. But men do make the world of fab go round, yet are oft bemoaned. Not all men" We're alright pickle, I don't think we've been bemoaned yet. Not unless it's in private anyway | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Filters. Problem solved, if too many messages from single men is indeed a problem. They should pay me for top quality advice like this. " 'zackly Dan. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Introducing a match system (similar to some dating apps, where you can only message a person if you match with them) would remove a lot of issues associated with fab...specifically the unsolicited dick pics, and it would also force men to put some more effort in building up their profiles A way to stop unsolicited pics would be have a option to turn receiving photos off all together. Having a swipe system would still open that option after matching That's a fair point...but I've noticed most women specifically ask for a face pic with the first message they receive " I don't have a problem with that but also don't think I've been asked as people either already know what I look or I have it to view already anyway. If they ask straight away then they need to be attracted to a face to want to get to know someone I'm guessing | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |