Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's strangers on the internet, so best to be prudent " Whilst I tend to agree, there’s a unique way about fab | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's strangers on the internet, so best to be prudent " • ...but not prudish. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone is just looking for an NSA fuck then intimacy and closeness aren't required...? Having public genital pics is different to having friends (or no) pics." I know, my point is that that approach can make intimacy a very taboo thing | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone is just looking for an NSA fuck then intimacy and closeness aren't required...? Having public genital pics is different to having friends (or no) pics. I know, my point is that that approach can make intimacy a very taboo thing " Do you mean taboo in that the people aren't compatible? NSA- no intimacy FWB/ swinging- intimacy? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone is just looking for an NSA fuck then intimacy and closeness aren't required...? Having public genital pics is different to having friends (or no) pics. I know, my point is that that approach can make intimacy a very taboo thing Do you mean taboo in that the people aren't compatible? NSA- no intimacy FWB/ swinging- intimacy? " I think that you’re missing the point of what I’m asking. Maybe I’m being a bit vague this morning? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone is just looking for an NSA fuck then intimacy and closeness aren't required...? Having public genital pics is different to having friends (or no) pics. I know, my point is that that approach can make intimacy a very taboo thing Do you mean taboo in that the people aren't compatible? NSA- no intimacy FWB/ swinging- intimacy? I think that you’re missing the point of what I’m asking. Maybe I’m being a bit vague this morning? " No it's me. I'm knackered. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I had a conversation with friends about this. I said on here we assess bodies first as a general rule, and then the rest comes after. They couldn’t comprehend it, because it’s a bit backwards. " It really is. The more I think about it, the more it strikes me as contradictory to real life interactions. The fact that getting to know someone and friendship/intimacy is very rare is just another aspect of that | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I had a conversation with friends about this. I said on here we assess bodies first as a general rule, and then the rest comes after. They couldn’t comprehend it, because it’s a bit backwards. " This must be why I don't understand the OP question. I don't do this. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I had a conversation with friends about this. I said on here we assess bodies first as a general rule, and then the rest comes after. They couldn’t comprehend it, because it’s a bit backwards. This must be why I don't understand the OP question. I don't do this. " I always look at pics first, do you not? If the pics are ok then I move into the bio | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I had a conversation with friends about this. I said on here we assess bodies first as a general rule, and then the rest comes after. They couldn’t comprehend it, because it’s a bit backwards. This must be why I don't understand the OP question. I don't do this. I always look at pics first, do you not? If the pics are ok then I move into the bio " I know sometimes you get stuck at the pics | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I had a conversation with friends about this. I said on here we assess bodies first as a general rule, and then the rest comes after. They couldn’t comprehend it, because it’s a bit backwards. This must be why I don't understand the OP question. I don't do this. I always look at pics first, do you not? If the pics are ok then I move into the bio " I only look at the pics to see if there's anything that puts me off. I prefer no pics. I chat to people. Not into sex meat catalogue stuff. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’ve often marvelled and found it funny how fab land seems to work in reverse to interactions in ‘the real world’; here we see genitals before faces, a name is a closely guarded secret and personal details are traded like gold. In connection with this, is it also true that being sexy or our bodies are easier to expose and show than our emotions? Is intimacy and closeness the final taboo on fab? " I feel that many people crave the brief intimacy that sex brings and are searching for it here, some using their body to attract partners. Genuine intimacy and closeness isn't possible to achieve with casual encounters in my opinion so yes, maybe it is the final taboo | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |