Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have a message in my 'sent' folder from 3 weeks ago (when I joined) marked 'unread' to a woman who is online NOW. It's like getting a brown envelope marked HMRC and you hide it, to open it later! lol Should I follow suit and send a red reminder? " I wouldn't mate. Suck it up, delete out of your sent folder and move on.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have a message in my 'sent' folder from 3 weeks ago (when I joined) marked 'unread' to a woman who is online NOW. It's like getting a brown envelope marked HMRC and you hide it, to open it later! lol Should I follow suit and send a red reminder? I wouldn't mate. Suck it up, delete out of your sent folder and move on.. " I agree; bin it as a stumer Wolf | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't send another message. Sometimes there are just too many I go through as fairly as I can. However, I always prioritise answering friends and those I am already chatting too first. A red reminder would just lead me to block." Yep - as a single guy - these things happen. It's life - but a second message will make you appear pushy and desperate. And surely she's not the only profile on site that you could be focussing your attention on? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have had that happen ...lol,not read and not deleted ,just unread !?Strange things do happen on here! Jay " Its not strange, some of us just can't keep up !!!!!!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yep - as a single guy - these things happen. It's life - but a second message will make you appear pushy and desperate. And surely she's not the only profile on site that you could be focussing your attention on? " Not at all. I'm just saying... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would leave it and if she comes back to you at some point in the future... happy days. one thing to consider, you are thinking about giving this up after 3 weeks, if she does read it... that may put her off. An air of confidence is a winner, despondency NO all the best for the future" Wouldn't it make something think "why's he thinking of jacking it in after 3 weeks? What's happened?" Rather than "lol 3 weeks? Quitter!" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would leave it and if she comes back to you at some point in the future... happy days. one thing to consider, you are thinking about giving this up after 3 weeks, if she does read it... that may put her off. An air of confidence is a winner, despondency NO all the best for the future Wouldn't it make something think "why's he thinking of jacking it in after 3 weeks? What's happened?" Rather than "lol 3 weeks? Quitter!" " No - it wouldn't. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would leave it and if she comes back to you at some point in the future... happy days. one thing to consider, you are thinking about giving this up after 3 weeks, if she does read it... that may put her off. An air of confidence is a winner, despondency NO all the best for the future Wouldn't it make something think "why's he thinking of jacking it in after 3 weeks? What's happened?" Rather than "lol 3 weeks? Quitter!" " No........ people are not overly interested in 'what happened' unless a great juicy story that involved you being kidnapped, taken to a loft apartment where 12 beautiful Ukranian ladies gang fucked you and even then, they would be asking for the details for a wank session. if it is because, you haven't had a meet.... Nope onwards and upwards | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Wouldn't it make something think "why's he thinking of jacking it in after 3 weeks? What's happened?" Rather than "lol 3 weeks? Quitter!" " No it would make me think hes pissed off because he has'nt got anyway as quickly as he thought he would so hes going to leave I say this because the same sort of status has been on countless profiles that have been here a short time | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No - it wouldn't. That says more about you then..." Every comment says something about its maker. People 'jack it in' for all manner of reasons. At any time there will be a number of sex tourists and zoo visitors. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No - it wouldn't. That says more about you then..." Yes, that I do not suffer fools, and drama queens, gladly. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone was going to 'jack it in' afyer just 3 weeks I'd think they weren't really into it. If someone can't make a bit of effort then neither would I put the effort in to chatting with them. In my experience, those types would be all done in 3 minutes and putting his coat on. " If that's based on the controversial 1 minute per week theory it's flawed. There is no way I can last that long | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have had that happen ...lol,not read and not deleted ,just unread !?Strange things do happen on here! Jay Its not strange, some of us just can't keep up !!!!!!!! " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone was going to 'jack it in' afyer just 3 weeks I'd think they weren't really into it. If someone can't make a bit of effort then neither would I put the effort in to chatting with them. In my experience, those types would be all done in 3 minutes and putting his coat on. If that's based on the controversial 1 minute per week theory it's flawed. There is no way I can last that long " Liar, I know you are building up to 90 seconds. You do have to test yourself with a woman at some point though. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a judgemental lot you appear to be" Sorry OP. You posted a thread asking a question to which there's been plenty of replies from long standing members with a hell of a lot of experience communicating with others on site. The fact you don't agree with their _iews, advice or contribution does not make them judgemental - just experienced! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a judgemental lot you appear to be" Message her then! You're an adult - you don't need our permission to do things. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone was going to 'jack it in' afyer just 3 weeks I'd think they weren't really into it. If someone can't make a bit of effort then neither would I put the effort in to chatting with them. In my experience, those types would be all done in 3 minutes and putting his coat on. If that's based on the controversial 1 minute per week theory it's flawed. There is no way I can last that long Liar, I know you are building up to 90 seconds. You do have to test yourself with a woman at some point though. " Not a real one surely ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a judgemental lot you appear to be" actually, I love hearing about people having great meets on here, it is a joy to see happy people. keep the faith, keep trying and positivity will help. 'updates' work if established and you are either hotlisted or are friends... then people will react with a variety of intent to your posts. all the best | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Treat responses with a little tongue in cheek, mate. I'm sure there's no offence implied." There was absolutely no offence meant in my first post, nor was my tongue in my cheek. I stated what I would do and offered that as an example of why I thought it would be a bad idea to send another message. OP - the fact is you can't know what is happening with someone else, nor can you control their responses. You can only control yourself and do what feels right for you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Message her then! You're an adult - you don't need our permission to do things." lol I wasn't seeking permission | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a judgemental lot you appear to be" No we're not judgemental. We've just got a LOAD more experience of this than you have matey! Stop whining over the fact that someone was so unimpressed by your message that they didn't hit the 'Reply' button immediately and MOVE ON. There is ONLY - repeat ONLY! - ONE thing that matters in this 'game' and it's RESPONSES. The fact that you sent out 200 messages yesterday and 199 have been read doesn't matter a damn. But the ONE that did reply DOES matter and should receive your undivided attention to take it to the next stage. Delete EVERYTHING from your sent folder and concentrate on your INBOX and you will get where you want to be far quicker! Jeeeeeeeeeeeez and it's not even Thursday Rant Day!!!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry OP. You posted a thread asking a question to which there's been plenty of replies from long standing members with a hell of a lot of experience communicating with others on site. The fact you don't agree with their _iews, advice or contribution does not make them judgemental - just experienced! " Is that not like the police saying that in their experience Asian men traffick women? Or is that being judgemental of all Asian men? Just because its your experience, it doesn't mean it applies to me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No we're not judgemental. We've just got a LOAD more experience of this than you have matey! Stop whining over the fact that someone was so unimpressed by your message that they didn't hit the 'Reply' button immediately and MOVE ON. There is ONLY - repeat ONLY! - ONE thing that matters in this 'game' and it's RESPONSES. The fact that you sent out 200 messages yesterday and 199 have been read doesn't matter a damn. But the ONE that did reply DOES matter and should receive your undivided attention to take it to the next stage. Delete EVERYTHING from your sent folder and concentrate on your INBOX and you will get where you want to be far quicker! Jeeeeeeeeeeeez and it's not even Thursday Rant Day!!!!! " Clearly it's nothing to do with it not being an immediate reply, otherwise I'd have posted this 3 weeks ago. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry OP. You posted a thread asking a question to which there's been plenty of replies from long standing members with a hell of a lot of experience communicating with others on site. The fact you don't agree with their _iews, advice or contribution does not make them judgemental - just experienced! Is that not like the police saying that in their experience Asian men traffick women? Or is that being judgemental of all Asian men? Just because its your experience, it doesn't mean it applies to me " Erm - no! Your original post contained the words "Should I" - which indicated you were asking for reponses via the forum (which is funnily enough what they're there for!). You recieved many common sense responses, from a variety of different sources - single men like yourself, couples and those you are seeking - single women!! To then respond that all that contributed a re 'judgemental' is hardly portraying yourself as someone able to communicate in a sensible manner - a bit like assuming there's something wrong with someone not responding to a message at all, or as quickly as you would like. Good luck! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No we're not judgemental. We've just got a LOAD more experience of this than you have matey! Stop whining over the fact that someone was so unimpressed by your message that they didn't hit the 'Reply' button immediately and MOVE ON. There is ONLY - repeat ONLY! - ONE thing that matters in this 'game' and it's RESPONSES. The fact that you sent out 200 messages yesterday and 199 have been read doesn't matter a damn. But the ONE that did reply DOES matter and should receive your undivided attention to take it to the next stage. Delete EVERYTHING from your sent folder and concentrate on your INBOX and you will get where you want to be far quicker! Jeeeeeeeeeeeez and it's not even Thursday Rant Day!!!!! Clearly it's nothing to do with it not being an immediate reply, otherwise I'd have posted this 3 weeks ago." No, it's not. It's to do with the fact that you STILL have that in your Sent Folder after 3 weeks! Otherwise, how would you know that's it's not been deleted? I will say it again - specially as a single guy - the ONLY that matters is responses - NOT that someone still has your message in their inbox. Just tells me that their 'housekeeping' is crap - and no more. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Erm - no! Your original post contained the words "Should I" - which indicated you were asking for reponses via the forum (which is funnily enough what they're there for!). You recieved many common sense responses, from a variety of different sources - single men like yourself, couples and those you are seeking - single women!! To then respond that all that contributed a re 'judgemental' is hardly portraying yourself as someone able to communicate in a sensible manner - a bit like assuming there's something wrong with someone not responding to a message at all, or as quickly as you would like. Good luck! " I also followed up my 'should I' with 'send a red letter reminder', which unless you know something I don't, isn't possible on this site. I'm well aware of what I wrote, I don't need reminded by way of a point you feel you're proving. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No, it's not. It's to do with the fact that you STILL have that in your Sent Folder after 3 weeks! Otherwise, how would you know that's it's not been deleted? I will say it again - specially as a single guy - the ONLY that matters is responses - NOT that someone still has your message in their inbox. Just tells me that their 'housekeeping' is crap - and no more. " I keep all my sent messages until they're read, deleted or replied to. I felt it a little ignorant that having sent it 3 weeks ago, it's not even been read. However, I am not losing sleep over it. It was an innocently asked question, with obvious tongue-in-cheek as exampled by my HMRC reference | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Think ile go back to feeling my carrots PEELING* " Hahaha! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Think ile go back to feeling my carrots PEELING* Hahaha! " I feel like trimming my courgettes! At least they listen!!!!!!! Lol! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Think ile go back to feeling my carrots PEELING* Hahaha! I feel like trimming my courgettes! At least they listen!!!!!!! Lol! " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now I'm just confused ... the OP asked 'should I?'. Some said yes, some said no. The OP is all sniffy over the ones who said no. That says to me he really wanted everyone to say 'yes - go on, message her again!' So if it makes you feel better OP, 'yes - go on, message her again!' People really shouldn't ask for advice if there is only one response they want to hear." How do you come to that conclusion?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now I'm just confused ... the OP asked 'should I?'. Some said yes, some said no. The OP is all sniffy over the ones who said no. That says to me he really wanted everyone to say 'yes - go on, message her again!' So if it makes you feel better OP, 'yes - go on, message her again!' People really shouldn't ask for advice if there is only one response they want to hear. How do you come to that conclusion??" I can read | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now I'm just confused ... the OP asked 'should I?'. Some said yes, some said no. The OP is all sniffy over the ones who said no. That says to me he really wanted everyone to say 'yes - go on, message her again!' So if it makes you feel better OP, 'yes - go on, message her again!' People really shouldn't ask for advice if there is only one response they want to hear. How do you come to that conclusion?? I can read" Matter of opinion | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now I'm just confused ... the OP asked 'should I?'. Some said yes, some said no. The OP is all sniffy over the ones who said no. That says to me he really wanted everyone to say 'yes - go on, message her again!' So if it makes you feel better OP, 'yes - go on, message her again!' People really shouldn't ask for advice if there is only one response they want to hear. How do you come to that conclusion?? I can read Matter of opinion " Actually, since you got a reasoned response it is not an opinion that they can read, but a fact. Otherwise, how would they have responded? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now I'm just confused ... the OP asked 'should I?'. Some said yes, some said no. The OP is all sniffy over the ones who said no. That says to me he really wanted everyone to say 'yes - go on, message her again!' So if it makes you feel better OP, 'yes - go on, message her again!' People really shouldn't ask for advice if there is only one response they want to hear. How do you come to that conclusion?? I can read Matter of opinion " I think the confrontational attitude you've just displayed here is going to do you no favours at all | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now I'm just confused ... the OP asked 'should I?'. Some said yes, some said no. The OP is all sniffy over the ones who said no. That says to me he really wanted everyone to say 'yes - go on, message her again!' So if it makes you feel better OP, 'yes - go on, message her again!' People really shouldn't ask for advice if there is only one response they want to hear. How do you come to that conclusion?? I can read Matter of opinion Actually, since you got a reasoned response it is not an opinion that they can read, but a fact. Otherwise, how would they have responded?" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now I'm just confused ... the OP asked 'should I?'. Some said yes, some said no. The OP is all sniffy over the ones who said no. That says to me he really wanted everyone to say 'yes - go on, message her again!' So if it makes you feel better OP, 'yes - go on, message her again!' People really shouldn't ask for advice if there is only one response they want to hear. How do you come to that conclusion?? I can read Matter of opinion Actually, since you got a reasoned response it is not an opinion that they can read, but a fact. Otherwise, how would they have responded?" Quite - and I have a BA Hons which also indicates that I can indeed read. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Now I'm just confused ... the OP asked 'should I?'. Some said yes, some said no. The OP is all sniffy over the ones who said no. That says to me he really wanted everyone to say 'yes - go on, message her again!' So if it makes you feel better OP, 'yes - go on, message her again!' People really shouldn't ask for advice if there is only one response they want to hear. How do you come to that conclusion?? I can read Matter of opinion Actually, since you got a reasoned response it is not an opinion that they can read, but a fact. Otherwise, how would they have responded?" Reasoned? Based on what? The answer was based on their opinion, not fact. So the claim they came up with that opinion on the basis of the ability to read is a bit nonsensical. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Quite - and I have a BA Hons which also indicates that I can indeed read. " Well done you. I didn't realise we were playing Educational Top Trumps. However, not to dampen your achievement, my 4 year old can read and has no such qualification. So if you feel you need to base your academic achievements on your abilities to communicate, then it's a sorry world. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Quite - and I have a BA Hons which also indicates that I can indeed read. Well done you. I didn't realise we were playing Educational Top Trumps. However, not to dampen your achievement, my 4 year old can read and has no such qualification. So if you feel you need to base your academic achievements on your abilities to communicate, then it's a sorry world. " Sorry you didn't like all the repsonses on here. Now go away, you are boring everyone. This type of thread has been done to death. Yawn! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Sorry you didn't like all the repsonses on here. Now go away, you are boring everyone. This type of thread has been done to death. Yawn!" A) Boring EVERYONE? Are you the spokesperson? B) You didn't have to reply. If you don't like the content, go _iew a different thread. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Op why are you being so aggressive towards people? You have asked for opinions and you have been given them based on their experience. You have turned what could be a discussion into having a go at people who have taken their time to read and reply on your post. My opinion is don't send another message as it does come across as desperate. As Perky said, try not to concentrate on your sent box and just look in your inbox. Also your status update doesn't help. Either jack it in or don't, it doesn't come across as positive and confident, which is two characteristics in men that woman tend to like. Good luck." How was breakfast? Was gonna message you earlier but as you hadn't replied to my last one..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Op why are you being so aggressive towards people? You have asked for opinions and you have been given them based on their experience. You have turned what could be a discussion into having a go at people who have taken their time to read and reply on your post. My opinion is don't send another message as it does come across as desperate. As Perky said, try not to concentrate on your sent box and just look in your inbox. Also your status update doesn't help. Either jack it in or don't, it doesn't come across as positive and confident, which is two characteristics in men that woman tend to like. Good luck. How was breakfast? Was gonna message you earlier but as you hadn't replied to my last one..... " I was saving your last message for when I have insomnia Brekkie was lush | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No we're not judgemental. We've just got a LOAD more experience of this than you have matey! Stop whining over the fact that someone was so unimpressed by your message that they didn't hit the 'Reply' button immediately and MOVE ON. There is ONLY - repeat ONLY! - ONE thing that matters in this 'game' and it's RESPONSES. The fact that you sent out 200 messages yesterday and 199 have been read doesn't matter a damn. But the ONE that did reply DOES matter and should receive your undivided attention to take it to the next stage. Delete EVERYTHING from your sent folder and concentrate on your INBOX and you will get where you want to be far quicker! Jeeeeeeeeeeeez and it's not even Thursday Rant Day!!!!! Clearly it's nothing to do with it not being an immediate reply, otherwise I'd have posted this 3 weeks ago. No, it's not. It's to do with the fact that you STILL have that in your Sent Folder after 3 weeks! Otherwise, how would you know that's it's not been deleted? I will say it again - specially as a single guy - the ONLY that matters is responses - NOT that someone still has your message in their inbox. Just tells me that their 'housekeeping' is crap - and no more. " My goodness, why all the capitals! there is no need to be so aggressive with your responses, and experience does not automatically mean one is always correct by the way. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No we're not judgemental. We've just got a LOAD more experience of this than you have matey! Stop whining over the fact that someone was so unimpressed by your message that they didn't hit the 'Reply' button immediately and MOVE ON. There is ONLY - repeat ONLY! - ONE thing that matters in this 'game' and it's RESPONSES. The fact that you sent out 200 messages yesterday and 199 have been read doesn't matter a damn. But the ONE that did reply DOES matter and should receive your undivided attention to take it to the next stage. Delete EVERYTHING from your sent folder and concentrate on your INBOX and you will get where you want to be far quicker! Jeeeeeeeeeeeez and it's not even Thursday Rant Day!!!!! Clearly it's nothing to do with it not being an immediate reply, otherwise I'd have posted this 3 weeks ago. No, it's not. It's to do with the fact that you STILL have that in your Sent Folder after 3 weeks! Otherwise, how would you know that's it's not been deleted? I will say it again - specially as a single guy - the ONLY that matters is responses - NOT that someone still has your message in their inbox. Just tells me that their 'housekeeping' is crap - and no more. My goodness, why all the capitals! there is no need to be so aggressive with your responses, and experience does not automatically mean one is always correct by the way. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like he wasn't kidding about jacking it in! " Sue - what have you done! It was all going so well til you showed up!!! Methinks Pearl may be right! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wooooooooooooooooooosh there he has gone..." Something we said? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like he wasn't kidding about jacking it in! Sue - what have you done! It was all going so well til you showed up!!! Methinks Pearl may be right! " Ha, I have the magic touch | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like he wasn't kidding about jacking it in! Sue - what have you done! It was all going so well til you showed up!!! Methinks Pearl may be right! Ha, I have the magic touch " Not saying a word!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Take a chance deffo cos I have 106 unread messages in my inbox that I can't retrieve cos I havent deleted the ones I have read lol and can't till I reread em cos they might have some useful info in them ....... " There is a limit to how many messages you can send/retrieve? I've only been here a year or so..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some of you really need to grow up and stop acting like children, not sure who some of you think you are. The guy asked a perfectly decent question and it only turned nasty because of some of the responses. Whoever said he was BORING every, speak for your self and dont include me in it thankyou" Pretty sure the decent question was answered more than a few times - and that the senisble and positive repsonses and 'advice' given to the OP (which i'm pretty sure he was looking for!) were either ignored or dismissed on every occasion! Personally - given the 3 weeks the OP was on site and his apparent lack of patience and understanding - the only person who needed to grow up was the OP himself! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some of you really need to grow up and stop acting like children, not sure who some of you think you are. The guy asked a perfectly decent question and it only turned nasty because of some of the responses. Whoever said he was BORING every, speak for your self and dont include me in it thankyou" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No we're not judgemental. We've just got a LOAD more experience of this than you have matey! Stop whining over the fact that someone was so unimpressed by your message that they didn't hit the 'Reply' button immediately and MOVE ON. There is ONLY - repeat ONLY! - ONE thing that matters in this 'game' and it's RESPONSES. The fact that you sent out 200 messages yesterday and 199 have been read doesn't matter a damn. But the ONE that did reply DOES matter and should receive your undivided attention to take it to the next stage. Delete EVERYTHING from your sent folder and concentrate on your INBOX and you will get where you want to be far quicker! Jeeeeeeeeeeeez and it's not even Thursday Rant Day!!!!! Clearly it's nothing to do with it not being an immediate reply, otherwise I'd have posted this 3 weeks ago. No, it's not. It's to do with the fact that you STILL have that in your Sent Folder after 3 weeks! Otherwise, how would you know that's it's not been deleted? I will say it again - specially as a single guy - the ONLY that matters is responses - NOT that someone still has your message in their inbox. Just tells me that their 'housekeeping' is crap - and no more. My goodness, why all the capitals! there is no need to be so aggressive with your responses, and experience does not automatically mean one is always correct by the way. " Why all the capitals? Because there is no option for ITALICS (which should have been in italics!!) As for being aggressive, the lack of being able to use italics makes it look aggressive, I know, but looking at the (now departed) OP's post and earlier reponses, it was clear he needed to have the stark facts applicable to a Single Male put to him without 'flowering'. I had to learn them the hard way on other sites previous to meeting my partner. I have also messaged other single males on here privately with the same advice and nearly all actually message back with their appreciation that I cut through all the crap and let them see the web-site based scene the way it really is. I know it is a ruthless way of looking at it, but it is correct nonetheless. The messaging situation on here, and any other similar site, IS (should be those accursed italics again!!) loaded heavily against single males and the sooner they wise-up, the sooner they (generally) achieve their objective. I make no apologies for being blunt with single males on here - I was one, and it is a hard, often long, learning curve along which your confidence and self-esteem can take some considerable knocks - all of which have to be absorbed in private and on your own. Pork | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |