Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What do you think of women boasting about their unread messages? Wouldn’t it be better for them to apply filters to reduce the number ? Or block men altogether so they don’t receive any ? Speaking as someone who has 1 unread message so obviously not jealous!! Lol" Can I ask why you haven’t opened the one you’ve got. No criticism or agenda, just being nosey. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If people would just read profiles and respect what others have on their profiles as to what they are looking for then the messages shouldn't be in that great a number. Why should woman have to turn filters on?????" Have to agree with this .Reading a profile is to hard for some mind | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If people would just read profiles and respect what others have on their profiles as to what they are looking for then the messages shouldn't be in that great a number. Why should woman have to turn filters on????? Have to agree with this .Reading a profile is to hard for some mind " Very true x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's not worth worrying about" Just this. Nod, smile or roll your eyes and get on with your day | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What do you think of women boasting about their unread messages? Wouldn’t it be better for them to apply filters to reduce the number ? Or block men altogether so they don’t receive any ? Speaking as someone who has 1 unread message so obviously not jealous!! Lol Can I ask why you haven’t opened the one you’ve got. No criticism or agenda, just being nosey. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much " Who's doing a LAM....People are answering the OP! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much " What's LAM? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much " I don’t post it as a lam, I post because I feel really bad about bulk deleting, but sometimes I just have to. I tend to have filters on, but if I take them off for a forum game or something then my box gets full, and not in the way I like it filled | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much What's LAM?" Look at me.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much I don’t post it as a lam, I post because I feel really bad about bulk deleting, but sometimes I just have to. I tend to have filters on, but if I take them off for a forum game or something then my box gets full, and not in the way I like it filled " Ooh er missus | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much What's LAM? Look at me...." Ah. Thank you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much What's LAM?" Look at me I’d guess | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much " No offence taken on my part I didn't post anything here about it but I updated my status to try and stop follow up messages. "Why haven't you answered my first three?" It worked to a point. They certainly slowed down. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What do you think of women boasting about their unread messages? Wouldn’t it be better for them to apply filters to reduce the number ? Or block men altogether so they don’t receive any ? Speaking as someone who has 1 unread message so obviously not jealous!! Lol" What makes you think we don't have filters on anyway? Many women/couples do. I do. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much Who's doing a LAM....People are answering the OP! " I was answering and agreeing with the OP. I didn't say people in the thread were doing a LAM, just that that's how I perceive it. As an unnecessary thing to post. I gave a nod to folk who had commented, with their reason, so as show that I wasn't including them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much No offence taken on my part I didn't post anything here about it but I updated my status to try and stop follow up messages. "Why haven't you answered my first three?" It worked to a point. They certainly slowed down. " Thanks lovely, and none was meant to you x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much I don’t post it as a lam, I post because I feel really bad about bulk deleting, but sometimes I just have to. I tend to have filters on, but if I take them off for a forum game or something then my box gets full, and not in the way I like it filled " Ah, but Hippy, you're your own worst enemy. You drop your filters for the games & they're in like Flyn for your boobies x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much I don’t post it as a lam, I post because I feel really bad about bulk deleting, but sometimes I just have to. I tend to have filters on, but if I take them off for a forum game or something then my box gets full, and not in the way I like it filled Ah, but Hippy, you're your own worst enemy. You drop your filters for the games & they're in like Flyn for your boobies x" They bloody are, apparently I should drop my knickers as well | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much " I'm going to agree with this mainly because I'm chuckling at Red's balls to be so direct about how she sees it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much I'm going to agree with this mainly because I'm chuckling at Red's balls to be so direct about how she sees it. " Cheers Meli! Sometimes I just have to say it as I see it. If you don't want hundreds of messages, filter up! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've referred to this in the past as the female equivalent of a sky remote. There have been a number of humble boast threads over the last year or so from women claiming to have 500+ unread messages and others post saying that's nothing they have 800 or 1000. It doesn't bother me how many they have tbh but it is used by some as a measuring tool to determine popularity. I've seen screenshots that some have sent in private messages to prove that they really do have all those unread messages. " I never get this, how is it a measure of popularity. Some men would message an Apple pie if they thought they could fuck it. Nothing on here is an indication of popularity, not messages, fabs or anything. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much I'm going to agree with this mainly because I'm chuckling at Red's balls to be so direct about how she sees it. Cheers Meli! Sometimes I just have to say it as I see it. If you don't want hundreds of messages, filter up! " Users shouldn't need to "filter up" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much I'm going to agree with this mainly because I'm chuckling at Red's balls to be so direct about how she sees it. Cheers Meli! Sometimes I just have to say it as I see it. If you don't want hundreds of messages, filter up! " You'd think that would be the logical thing to do wouldn't you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much I'm going to agree with this mainly because I'm chuckling at Red's balls to be so direct about how she sees it. Cheers Meli! Sometimes I just have to say it as I see it. If you don't want hundreds of messages, filter up! You'd think that would be the logical thing to do wouldn't you " You would indeed lovely. If you're gonna complain about 100's of messages - and let's be clear, that's what I'm refereeing to - employ filters. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If people would just read profiles and respect what others have on their profiles as to what they are looking for then the messages shouldn't be in that great a number. Why should woman have to turn filters on?????" Agreed you wise lady sparkle, I even have it written in my 1st paragraph and still receive loads of messages every day from unverified ppl | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If people would just read profiles and respect what others have on their profiles as to what they are looking for then the messages shouldn't be in that great a number. Why should woman have to turn filters on????? Agreed you wise lady sparkle, I even have it written in my 1st paragraph and still receive loads of messages every day from unverified ppl " Maybe the way to go is just have blank profiles | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't have any unread messages. It bothers me having it showing. Cant cope with the red dots on my apps either. " Or blue for e-mails. I get all twitchy when I see colleagues with 100's or in some cases 1000's. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've referred to this in the past as the female equivalent of a sky remote. There have been a number of humble boast threads over the last year or so from women claiming to have 500+ unread messages and others post saying that's nothing they have 800 or 1000. It doesn't bother me how many they have tbh but it is used by some as a measuring tool to determine popularity. I've seen screenshots that some have sent in private messages to prove that they really do have all those unread messages. I never get this, how is it a measure of popularity. Some men would message an Apple pie if they thought they could fuck it. Nothing on here is an indication of popularity, not messages, fabs or anything." I'm not talking about the content of the messages because the whole point is that they are all unread. It's all about the numbers and very naive to say it's not when it's used every single day on here by some women to basically say mines bigger than yours. I've seen it dozens of times in the forums and just as often in private messages. Why else would anyone start a thread telling everyone how many unread messages they have if it wasn't a LAM or a humble boast? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've referred to this in the past as the female equivalent of a sky remote. There have been a number of humble boast threads over the last year or so from women claiming to have 500+ unread messages and others post saying that's nothing they have 800 or 1000. It doesn't bother me how many they have tbh but it is used by some as a measuring tool to determine popularity. I've seen screenshots that some have sent in private messages to prove that they really do have all those unread messages. I never get this, how is it a measure of popularity. Some men would message an Apple pie if they thought they could fuck it. Nothing on here is an indication of popularity, not messages, fabs or anything. I'm not talking about the content of the messages because the whole point is that they are all unread. It's all about the numbers and very naive to say it's not when it's used every single day on here by some women to basically say mines bigger than yours. I've seen it dozens of times in the forums and just as often in private messages. Why else would anyone start a thread telling everyone how many unread messages they have if it wasn't a LAM or a humble boast? " I’m only speaking for myself, I don’t feel that amount of messages = popularly. Some men will literally message any women in reach. I don’t consider it a marker of popularity. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've referred to this in the past as the female equivalent of a sky remote. There have been a number of humble boast threads over the last year or so from women claiming to have 500+ unread messages and others post saying that's nothing they have 800 or 1000. It doesn't bother me how many they have tbh but it is used by some as a measuring tool to determine popularity. I've seen screenshots that some have sent in private messages to prove that they really do have all those unread messages. I never get this, how is it a measure of popularity. Some men would message an Apple pie if they thought they could fuck it. Nothing on here is an indication of popularity, not messages, fabs or anything. I'm not talking about the content of the messages because the whole point is that they are all unread. It's all about the numbers and very naive to say it's not when it's used every single day on here by some women to basically say mines bigger than yours. I've seen it dozens of times in the forums and just as often in private messages. Why else would anyone start a thread telling everyone how many unread messages they have if it wasn't a LAM or a humble boast? " And just to add, I don't see any amount of messages,fabs,friend requests or how many times you post on the forums as a sign of popularity but it's very obvious that some are confising productivity with popularity and they use all those tools as part of their USP | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've referred to this in the past as the female equivalent of a sky remote. There have been a number of humble boast threads over the last year or so from women claiming to have 500+ unread messages and others post saying that's nothing they have 800 or 1000. It doesn't bother me how many they have tbh but it is used by some as a measuring tool to determine popularity. I've seen screenshots that some have sent in private messages to prove that they really do have all those unread messages. I never get this, how is it a measure of popularity. Some men would message an Apple pie if they thought they could fuck it. Nothing on here is an indication of popularity, not messages, fabs or anything. I'm not talking about the content of the messages because the whole point is that they are all unread. It's all about the numbers and very naive to say it's not when it's used every single day on here by some women to basically say mines bigger than yours. I've seen it dozens of times in the forums and just as often in private messages. Why else would anyone start a thread telling everyone how many unread messages they have if it wasn't a LAM or a humble boast? And just to add, I don't see any amount of messages,fabs,friend requests or how many times you post on the forums as a sign of popularity but it's very obvious that some are confising productivity with popularity and they use all those tools as part of their USP " I agree | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The worst feature on here is the messages showing as unread , or deleted . It seems it is what gets people's backs up for some reason. Mayby the fact they can't handle rejection and then seeing that a message has been unread or deleted sends they pysyco lol. But if that feature wasn't on I think noone would know . And a lot can't grasp that the men to women ratio is insane , so most women get hundreds of messages a second " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No offence to the ladies posting above but I do read it as a LAM status. Or at the very least that the lady doth protest too much No offence taken on my part I didn't post anything here about it but I updated my status to try and stop follow up messages. "Why haven't you answered my first three?" It worked to a point. They certainly slowed down. Thanks lovely, and none was meant to you x" All good | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why turn filters on when they might just be able tell from the picture or beginning of the message that they aren’t interested, maybe they aren’t looking to chat to somebody new or your message just joins the list of the other 100s they have. Don’t worry about others so much …. Just relax and enjoy the site " Exactly, we shouldn't need to turn on filters just because others are too lazy to read. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why turn filters on when they might just be able tell from the picture or beginning of the message that they aren’t interested, maybe they aren’t looking to chat to somebody new or your message just joins the list of the other 100s they have. Don’t worry about others so much …. Just relax and enjoy the site " Along with the pointless (imo) how many views have you had? So many view in stealth no one would even know. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've referred to this in the past as the female equivalent of a sky remote. There have been a number of humble boast threads over the last year or so from women claiming to have 500+ unread messages and others post saying that's nothing they have 800 or 1000. It doesn't bother me how many they have tbh but it is used by some as a measuring tool to determine popularity. I've seen screenshots that some have sent in private messages to prove that they really do have all those unread messages. I never get this, how is it a measure of popularity. Some men would message an Apple pie if they thought they could fuck it. Nothing on here is an indication of popularity, not messages, fabs or anything." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some men would message an Apple pie if they thought they could fuck it." • Whoa there young lady! I have seen many delectably enticing and salaciously inviting Apple Pies that would benefit from my love making. Especially the ones sprinkled with copious amounts of sweet cinnamon. Don't knock it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The worst feature on here is the messages showing as unread , or deleted . It seems it is what gets people's backs up for some reason. Mayby the fact they can't handle rejection and then seeing that a message has been unread or deleted sends they pysyco lol. But if that feature wasn't on I think noone would know . And a lot can't grasp that the men to women ratio is insane , so most women get hundreds of messages a second " 65% men apparently, I read a review of this site. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"2,983,848 unread messages " Prove it I thought it stopped before 2000 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some men would message an Apple pie if they thought they could fuck it. • Whoa there young lady! I have seen many delectably enticing and salaciously inviting Apple Pies that would benefit from my love making. Especially the ones sprinkled with copious amounts of sweet cinnamon. Don't knock it. " *goes and sprinkles cinnamon on myself. After a few shakes, I take the lid off and throw it over my head in utter bliss* | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've referred to this in the past as the female equivalent of a sky remote. There have been a number of humble boast threads over the last year or so from women claiming to have 500+ unread messages and others post saying that's nothing they have 800 or 1000. It doesn't bother me how many they have tbh but it is used by some as a measuring tool to determine popularity. I've seen screenshots that some have sent in private messages to prove that they really do have all those unread messages. I never get this, how is it a measure of popularity. Some men would message an Apple pie if they thought they could fuck it. Nothing on here is an indication of popularity, not messages, fabs or anything. I'm not talking about the content of the messages because the whole point is that they are all unread. It's all about the numbers and very naive to say it's not when it's used every single day on here by some women to basically say mines bigger than yours. I've seen it dozens of times in the forums and just as often in private messages. Why else would anyone start a thread telling everyone how many unread messages they have if it wasn't a LAM or a humble boast? " whats a LAM? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've referred to this in the past as the female equivalent of a sky remote. There have been a number of humble boast threads over the last year or so from women claiming to have 500+ unread messages and others post saying that's nothing they have 800 or 1000. It doesn't bother me how many they have tbh but it is used by some as a measuring tool to determine popularity. I've seen screenshots that some have sent in private messages to prove that they really do have all those unread messages. I never get this, how is it a measure of popularity. Some men would message an Apple pie if they thought they could fuck it. Nothing on here is an indication of popularity, not messages, fabs or anything. I'm not talking about the content of the messages because the whole point is that they are all unread. It's all about the numbers and very naive to say it's not when it's used every single day on here by some women to basically say mines bigger than yours. I've seen it dozens of times in the forums and just as often in private messages. Why else would anyone start a thread telling everyone how many unread messages they have if it wasn't a LAM or a humble boast? whats a LAM?" Look at me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've referred to this in the past as the female equivalent of a sky remote. There have been a number of humble boast threads over the last year or so from women claiming to have 500+ unread messages and others post saying that's nothing they have 800 or 1000. It doesn't bother me how many they have tbh but it is used by some as a measuring tool to determine popularity. I've seen screenshots that some have sent in private messages to prove that they really do have all those unread messages. I never get this, how is it a measure of popularity. Some men would message an Apple pie if they thought they could fuck it. Nothing on here is an indication of popularity, not messages, fabs or anything. I'm not talking about the content of the messages because the whole point is that they are all unread. It's all about the numbers and very naive to say it's not when it's used every single day on here by some women to basically say mines bigger than yours. I've seen it dozens of times in the forums and just as often in private messages. Why else would anyone start a thread telling everyone how many unread messages they have if it wasn't a LAM or a humble boast? whats a LAM?" I saw this the other day on a post and wondered what it was too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |