FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

A question to provoke some thought,

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Would you kill 10 people to save 100?

lol soz

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Can I choose the 10 people? As Ive got a list made already.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 02/09/21 18:39:14]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Can I choose the 10 people? As Ive got a list made already. "

Hahaha remind me not to get on your bad side

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uddy laneMan
over a year ago

dudley

Only hundred not worth the effort.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Save them from what? It really would depend. If the 100 people were sick and sadly going to die anyway, and the 10 people were healthy and I'd be murdering them, then no.

If all 110 people were going to die anyway UNLESS I picked 10 to kill, then sure. It makes sense to do that. Pointless everyone dying!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm making big assumptions here as there are some gaps in the question.

Yes, in order to save the 100 amazonian nymphomaniacs, I would gladly kill 10 mass murderers

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ny1localMan
over a year ago

READING

Conversely if I had 10 in my family, I'd kill 100 to save them. (Even the annoying wee ba..ards)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andsome HandMan
over a year ago

roundabout

Who are the 10? How must I kill them? Will i face 10 murder convictions after?

Who are the 100? Are they fit and healthy?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otSoPoshWoman
over a year ago

In a ball gown because that's how we roll in N. Devon


"Who are the 10? How must I kill them? Will i face 10 murder convictions after?

Who are the 100? Are they fit and healthy? "

I'm gonna wait for the answers to these questions before answering.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

There is no ifs and buts to the question, think of the utilitarian approach;

If there were a train track that had two paths, one path ran over 10 people and the other 100 - would you kill the 10 to save the 100?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There is no ifs and buts to the question, think of the utilitarian approach;

If there were a train track that had two paths, one path ran over 10 people and the other 100 - would you kill the 10 to save the 100?"

I can't drive a train

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes without question

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *elshkinkyMan
over a year ago

south wales

Can I just do all 110

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Can I choose the 10 people? As Ive got a list made already.

Hahaha remind me not to get on your bad side"

Bring chocolate or beer and Im a pussy cat.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvelover39Man
over a year ago

Somewhere

Sod it yes, now where is my hammer

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ambozaMan
over a year ago

kilburn park

GCSE Philosophy.... utilitarianism is ugly

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes probably I would kill 10 but I really don't like this question because no matter what you do you're a monster.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There is no ifs and buts to the question, think of the utilitarian approach;

If there were a train track that had two paths, one path ran over 10 people and the other 100 - would you kill the 10 to save the 100?

I can't drive a train "

I didn't know we had to drive the train. Why don't we just use the brakes then ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"GCSE Philosophy.... utilitarianism is ugly "

Freshly out of my GCSE’s xoxo

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onb21Woman
over a year ago

Cardiff

Only if you shrink them. I can't kill anything bigger than a house spider.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *olly_chromaticTV/TS
over a year ago

Stockport

The Trolley Problem...

If you had a time machine and could go kill covid case zero - would you? If you had to look them in the eyes, be personally responsible...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What if you are one of the 10?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iltopbearMan
over a year ago

Norfolk

The killing of another human.....?

Yaaaay thats a really good topic to have a laugh about

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"The Trolley Problem...

If you had a time machine and could go kill covid case zero - would you? If you had to look them in the eyes, be personally responsible..."

Yep, a bit selfish if they were opposed really

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Short answer, no, I would never kill ANYONE! I'm a nice chap with a kind heart.

Slightly longer answer, if I HAD, to kill 10 people, I would mainly beat them to death with a baseball bat.

Not really bothered about saving 100 people either way...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asmeenTV/TS
over a year ago

STOKE ON TRENT

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urvelover39Man
over a year ago

Somewhere


"The killing of another human.....?

Yaaaay thats a really good topic to have a laugh about "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"The killing of another human.....?

Yaaaay thats a really good topic to have a laugh about "

don’t you sound like the life and soul of the party

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts

This reminds me of an episode of hollyoaks years ago where a man with a gun, think it was a vicar, said she had to choose 2 of her children to die or he’ll kill all 5 of them. It stayed with me for ages. Had nightmares about it! I can’t imagine a worse situation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I’d kill 10 people to potentially save 1

That’s the nature of the beast. And I sleep easy too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Obviously there are many factors surrounding this OP and when it came to it I think most people would choose to save 100 lives for the sake of 10.

The bigger question is would you give up your own live to save them all?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There is no ifs and buts to the question, think of the utilitarian approach;

If there were a train track that had two paths, one path ran over 10 people and the other 100 - would you kill the 10 to save the 100?"

We automatically do this anyway I think. If there are only two choices and only a split second to make those choices, we go for the one which will cause the least suffering.

like if there's a child in the road, I swerve, even if that means swerving into a deer. Because somewhere in my mind, I have already decided that children matter more than deer. The decision has already been made at a subconscious level.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asmeenTV/TS
over a year ago

STOKE ON TRENT


"No"

I couldn't

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iltopbearMan
over a year ago

Norfolk


"The killing of another human.....?

Yaaaay thats a really good topic to have a laugh about

don’t you sound like the life and soul of the party "

You're welcome to my PTSD!

Killing isnt pleasant.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Obviously there are many factors surrounding this OP and when it came to it I think most people would choose to save 100 lives for the sake of 10.

The bigger question is would you give up your own live to save them all? "

Would I sacrifice myself to save the lives of 110? absolutely

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andsome HandMan
over a year ago

roundabout


"There is no ifs and buts to the question, think of the utilitarian approach;

If there were a train track that had two paths, one path ran over 10 people and the other 100 - would you kill the 10 to save the 100?"

If it's the trolley problem, then it's the 10 getting toasted. Less loss of life.

Slightly related, the good place does a great bit on the trolley problem. If you haven't watched it you should.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"There is no ifs and buts to the question, think of the utilitarian approach;

If there were a train track that had two paths, one path ran over 10 people and the other 100 - would you kill the 10 to save the 100?

We automatically do this anyway I think. If there are only two choices and only a split second to make those choices, we go for the one which will cause the least suffering.

like if there's a child in the road, I swerve, even if that means swerving into a deer. Because somewhere in my mind, I have already decided that children matter more than deer. The decision has already been made at a subconscious level."

See this, best response yet! And I couldn’t agree more, we make decisions every day which elude to the same principe, we sacrifice one thing for another; whether we’re aware of it or not.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aysOfOurLivesCouple
over a year ago

Essex


"There is no ifs and buts to the question, think of the utilitarian approach;

If there were a train track that had two paths, one path ran over 10 people and the other 100 - would you kill the 10 to save the 100?"

…now. Ask…

What if the track of 100 were all high ranking nazis?

What if the 100 were 99 children and Hitler?

Would it affect/alter your decision?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"There is no ifs and buts to the question, think of the utilitarian approach;

If there were a train track that had two paths, one path ran over 10 people and the other 100 - would you kill the 10 to save the 100?

…now. Ask…

What if the track of 100 were all high ranking nazis?

What if the 100 were 99 children and Hitler?

Would it affect/alter your decision?"

It’s an entirely different question. But I guess I started this to provoke thought. Nazi’s were brainwashed by a dictator, if Hitler didn’t exist would the ideologies he put forth and drilled into people were never screamed from a place of power - would that have changed history?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Would you kill 10 people to save 100?

lol soz"

Of course

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *adyBugsWoman
over a year ago

cognito


"Can I just do all 110 "

If you aren’t allowed to kill 110, can I do it instead?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There is no ifs and buts to the question, think of the utilitarian approach;

If there were a train track that had two paths, one path ran over 10 people and the other 100 - would you kill the 10 to save the 100?

We automatically do this anyway I think. If there are only two choices and only a split second to make those choices, we go for the one which will cause the least suffering.

like if there's a child in the road, I swerve, even if that means swerving into a deer. Because somewhere in my mind, I have already decided that children matter more than deer. The decision has already been made at a subconscious level.

See this, best response yet! And I couldn’t agree more, we make decisions every day which elude to the same principe, we sacrifice one thing for another; whether we’re aware of it or not. "

Even when not making a decision we have made one to not decide

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *elshkinkyMan
over a year ago

south wales


"Can I just do all 110

If you aren’t allowed to kill 110, can I do it instead?"

I’ve done 65…. Give us a hand

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top