FabSwingers.com forum: Wanking and Banking

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Its come out now about OF trying to clean up their site and limit nudity etc, some of the blame is being laid at investors and banks not wanting to endorse explicit content on there any more. Why is it a problem for OF and not other sites such as Fab or PornH*b? People use their banks to pay for explicit content on a lot of platforms. Why is it an issue for one and not others?

I do think there should be work done to stop underage people posting or where people are forced etc. If that the aim to protect vulnerable people then shouldn't all porn sites be heavily vetted and limited?

Just musing and trying to understand really….

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It’s likely that the creators of OF will want to cash in at some point and float the company. Big investors won’t be interested so they are looking to clean up to maximise investment

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"It’s likely that the creators of OF will want to cash in at some point and float the company. Big investors won’t be interested so they are looking to clean up to maximise investment "

Are other explicit content sites not the same though?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It’s likely that the creators of OF will want to cash in at some point and float the company. Big investors won’t be interested so they are looking to clean up to maximise investment

Are other explicit content sites not the same though? "

The vast majority of explicit content sites are privately owned. The owners are not looking for investment from banks and other finance institutions. The likes of OF are basically social media sites, more than porn sites. They would have been started up with the intention of floating on the stock market or looking for institutional investment when they had a big enough membership.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The real reason is the same as why they went after YouTube and hub

It’s spawning to meny self made millionaires who don’t need credit

YouTube and insta and Fb and all the other platforms

Are sole responsible for cratering more millionaires than any other industry in 5 years

Over they 50 years

if people don’t need credit then banks and credit companies don’t make money you know lend 10k pay back 12 over 2 years or what ever

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I guess size of risk and nature of risk.

OF had more of a risk of underage and exploration. And on a greater scale. its a huge lawsuit waiting to happen and a huge PR shitstorm.

I think payment parties also charge a premium on adult sites. So maybe a business decision too.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There’s was a post about 3-4 years ago about a mum who’s children are “ home schooled” but they don’t really do school work they sit on computers and play games all day

She took flack online about how her children will never amount to anything and will spunge off the government for the rest off they life’s and all this bs

Got so bad she end up posting they bank accounts balance online

Turns out her 3 children who aren’t even 10 years off age yet have a combinade net worth north off a 100 million

They will want for nothing in they life’s and they not even high school age

Banks can’t have it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rHotNottsMan
over a year ago

Dubai & Nottingham

Like others have said OF is social media and will be looking to do an IPO and in this climate will likely be guaranteed 51% from investment banks if the IPO goes bad, they won’t touch it if it has underage kids doing porn

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread