Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is that a GCSE? I. Got unlucky for some 13 " Guess English wasn't one of them! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What are O levels? " . Mine was the last year to do O levels and CSEs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What are O levels? . Mine was the last year to do O levels and CSEs " I wasn’t far off | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What are O levels? " Those were the exams they set when exams were actually difficult :p (Ok, I am kidding there before anyone takes offence) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"9 Same. I wonder if they were the same subjects?" Can’t even remember half of them. Funny thing was I failed maths and went straight into a bank at 16 and was there for 25 years | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is that a GCSE? I. Got unlucky for some 13 Guess English wasn't one of them! I actually got an A in English language and an A* in English literature. I got an E in autocorrect though, damn. I’m just about to take my Greek GCSE, so I’ll be able to make autocorrect mistakes in another language also " As well or too not also, I would have thought, but then I didn't get two A grade English o-levels! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is that a GCSE? I. Got unlucky for some 13 Guess English wasn't one of them! I actually got an A in English language and an A* in English literature. I got an E in autocorrect though, damn. I’m just about to take my Greek GCSE, so I’ll be able to make autocorrect mistakes in another language also As well or too not also, I would have thought, but then I didn't get two A grade English o-levels! " Nope, also is fine | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is that a GCSE? I. Got unlucky for some 13 Guess English wasn't one of them! I actually got an A in English language and an A* in English literature. I got an E in autocorrect though, damn. I’m just about to take my Greek GCSE, so I’ll be able to make autocorrect mistakes in another language also As well or too not also, I would have thought, but then I didn't get two A grade English o-levels! " Clearly. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is that a GCSE? I. Got unlucky for some 13 " Yes and no. O levels were replaced by GCSE’s - so arguably yes - but O levels were very different. They were based on an exam only approach - no course work - so five years of effort was reflected in about 2 exams. If you were ill or had anxiety you were unlucky. First kids were split into two factions. The ‘brighter’ kids took o- levels (about the top 40 per cent) The rest took CSE’s (A grade 1 CSE was considered to be the equivalent of an O level grade C - ie a minimum pass.) When a child took an O level there was no set pass percentage - ie 50 percent - you competed with everyone else in your national year group. Roughly half were automatically failed (so if you were in a ‘clever’ year you were unlucky). If the 50 percent or so who passed, the majority were given a C - the next group up given a B - and only the top 10 percent or so given an A. It was considered a cruel system as you can imagine but - if you passed your O levels - particularly with good grades - employers who knew the system respected O levels - so if you wanted you could go straight into ‘good’ employment. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What are O levels? . Mine was the last year to do O levels and CSEs " We were lucky. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is that a GCSE? I. Got unlucky for some 13 Guess English wasn't one of them! I actually got an A in English language and an A* in English literature. I got an E in autocorrect though, damn. I’m just about to take my Greek GCSE, so I’ll be able to make autocorrect mistakes in another language also As well or too not also, I would have thought, but then I didn't get two A grade English o-levels! Nope, also is fine " It's preferable to use 'also' toward the end of a sentence. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"9 Same. I wonder if they were the same subjects? Can’t even remember half of them. Funny thing was I failed maths and went straight into a bank at 16 and was there for 25 years " I was also in a bank. Most bankers have no idea what Maths is, especially investment bankers. With 9 Os, did you do As? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seven for me then failed all my A levels " What happened. Teenage hormones? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What are O levels? Those were the exams they set when exams were actually difficult :p (Ok, I am kidding there before anyone takes offence)" Seconded | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is that a GCSE? I. Got unlucky for some 13 Yes and no. O levels were replaced by GCSE’s - so arguably yes - but O levels were very different. They were based on an exam only approach - no course work - so five years of effort was reflected in about 2 exams. If you were ill or had anxiety you were unlucky. First kids were split into two factions. The ‘brighter’ kids took o- levels (about the top 40 per cent) The rest took CSE’s (A grade 1 CSE was considered to be the equivalent of an O level grade C - ie a minimum pass.) When a child took an O level there was no set pass percentage - ie 50 percent - you competed with everyone else in your national year group. Roughly half were automatically failed (so if you were in a ‘clever’ year you were unlucky). If the 50 percent or so who passed, the majority were given a C - the next group up given a B - and only the top 10 percent or so given an A. It was considered a cruel system as you can imagine but - if you passed your O levels - particularly with good grades - employers who knew the system respected O levels - so if you wanted you could go straight into ‘good’ employment. " That is, by far, the best description I've ever come across to describe how it all worked. Clearly and succinctly put. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is that a GCSE? I. Got unlucky for some 13 Yes and no. O levels were replaced by GCSE’s - so arguably yes - but O levels were very different. They were based on an exam only approach - no course work - so five years of effort was reflected in about 2 exams. If you were ill or had anxiety you were unlucky. First kids were split into two factions. The ‘brighter’ kids took o- levels (about the top 40 per cent) The rest took CSE’s (A grade 1 CSE was considered to be the equivalent of an O level grade C - ie a minimum pass.) When a child took an O level there was no set pass percentage - ie 50 percent - you competed with everyone else in your national year group. Roughly half were automatically failed (so if you were in a ‘clever’ year you were unlucky). If the 50 percent or so who passed, the majority were given a C - the next group up given a B - and only the top 10 percent or so given an A. It was considered a cruel system as you can imagine but - if you passed your O levels - particularly with good grades - employers who knew the system respected O levels - so if you wanted you could go straight into ‘good’ employment. " Not quite correct, grades were based on a bell curve which meant it didn't matter or effect your grade if you was in a "clever" year or not. Basically, it didn't matter if you scored high or low on the exam, the top 10% got an A grade and that's why employers like it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is that a GCSE? I. Got unlucky for some 13 Yes and no. O levels were replaced by GCSE’s - so arguably yes - but O levels were very different. They were based on an exam only approach - no course work - so five years of effort was reflected in about 2 exams. If you were ill or had anxiety you were unlucky. First kids were split into two factions. The ‘brighter’ kids took o- levels (about the top 40 per cent) The rest took CSE’s (A grade 1 CSE was considered to be the equivalent of an O level grade C - ie a minimum pass.) When a child took an O level there was no set pass percentage - ie 50 percent - you competed with everyone else in your national year group. Roughly half were automatically failed (so if you were in a ‘clever’ year you were unlucky). If the 50 percent or so who passed, the majority were given a C - the next group up given a B - and only the top 10 percent or so given an A. It was considered a cruel system as you can imagine but - if you passed your O levels - particularly with good grades - employers who knew the system respected O levels - so if you wanted you could go straight into ‘good’ employment. Not quite correct, grades were based on a bell curve which meant it didn't matter or effect your grade if you was in a "clever" year or not. Basically, it didn't matter if you scored high or low on the exam, the top 10% got an A grade and that's why employers like it." I daresay some moderation from the Board also came into play? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is that a GCSE? I. Got unlucky for some 13 Yes and no. O levels were replaced by GCSE’s - so arguably yes - but O levels were very different. They were based on an exam only approach - no course work - so five years of effort was reflected in about 2 exams. If you were ill or had anxiety you were unlucky. First kids were split into two factions. The ‘brighter’ kids took o- levels (about the top 40 per cent) The rest took CSE’s (A grade 1 CSE was considered to be the equivalent of an O level grade C - ie a minimum pass.) When a child took an O level there was no set pass percentage - ie 50 percent - you competed with everyone else in your national year group. Roughly half were automatically failed (so if you were in a ‘clever’ year you were unlucky). If the 50 percent or so who passed, the majority were given a C - the next group up given a B - and only the top 10 percent or so given an A. It was considered a cruel system as you can imagine but - if you passed your O levels - particularly with good grades - employers who knew the system respected O levels - so if you wanted you could go straight into ‘good’ employment. Not quite correct, grades were based on a bell curve which meant it didn't matter or effect your grade if you was in a "clever" year or not. Basically, it didn't matter if you scored high or low on the exam, the top 10% got an A grade and that's why employers like it. I daresay some moderation from the Board also came into play? " Employers constantly complain these days that they haven't a clue if the interviewee in front of them with 10 O-levels or whatever they're called is bright or not! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Many employers give candidate aptitude tests I think these days. I'm fairly certain the complaints by employers were the same when I was younger. Fortunately, in my line of work there's a layer of professional exams on top, so if the candidate hasn't passed them, they're effectively of no use anyway. Working out if they've got people skills is another matter ..." Yes I remember going for a whole series of aptitude tests. Saturday mornings for a couple of months I think. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seven for me then failed all my A levels " Same here | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What are O levels? . Mine was the last year to do O levels and CSEs " Me too! I think I got 8 but that’s all I took. Maybe because I didn’t do Latin | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My favourite O Levels was probably The Very Best of The O Levels." Volume 1 or 2 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"9 GCSEs and 4 A levels ... Although I'd guess 90pc of anything I was taught has long since been forgotten. Same as my first degree. I hate to say it kids, but ice you start working your academic side quickly becomes irrelevant and your work CV becomes all important. " Don't listen to this completely folks. My degree was used daily for all my working life. Certainly the basic principles - not all of it but much of it was used. I can still recite most of the physics formula that I learnt when I was 15 and I still use it occasionally even though I am retired. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"9 GCSEs and 4 A levels ... Although I'd guess 90pc of anything I was taught has long since been forgotten. Same as my first degree. I hate to say it kids, but ice you start working your academic side quickly becomes irrelevant and your work CV becomes all important. " Very true about the academic vs experience. But still many companies still depend high grades for the top jobs. And still value qualifications. But that is changing in some industries as diversity is being explored and employers start to realise that 4 A*s and a 1st class degree don’t guarantee the most productive and innovative workers. Ideally a good team needs a combo of the swots and disrupters. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |