FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Contradiction of terms?

Jump to newest
 

By *abloBack OP   Man
over a year ago

London

Met somebody the other night, not from this forum as far as I know, who claimed to be a "collared switch" now I know I don't know too much about the bdsm lifestyle but I found that expression a little unusual to say the least. Only ever heard of subs being collared before

Is this a typical type of relationship?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ild Bill Thickcock.Man
over a year ago

Wet Beaver Creek

what's a "switch"?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We've got a double gang switch for the lights upstairs and down.

I thought the term was contradiction in terms.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he_original_poloWoman
over a year ago

a Primark shoebox in Leicester

May be they are changeable or just fickle..... a lot of people are.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

My definition of switch means both ways but u can't be collared and a switch...if u can its a new one on me... doesn't make much sense either

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abloBack OP   Man
over a year ago

London


"My definition of switch means both ways but u can't be collared and a switch...if u can its a new one on me... doesn't make much sense either "

Agreed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My definition of switch means both ways but u can't be collared and a switch...if u can its a new one on me... doesn't make much sense either "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyScot22Man
over a year ago

Anniesland

Some masters/owners/whatever have more than one collared slave, often there is a hierarchy, where both are sub to the master but one slave is dom to the other (the dom slave in this scenario would be your 'collared switch')?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust_for_laughsCouple
over a year ago

Hinckley


"Some masters/owners/whatever have more than one collared slave, often there is a hierarchy, where both are sub to the master but one slave is dom to the other (the dom slave in this scenario would be your 'collared switch')?"

Sounds like the switch puzzles we had to do when we were learning binary when I first went into IT !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago

(She/ her) in Sensualityland

Are you sure it did not read "collared bitch"? SHould have gone to Specsavers....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abloBack OP   Man
over a year ago

London

Specsavers won't help my ears

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Sounds far to confusing............. I'll stick to completing my rubics cube!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Specsavers won't help my ears "

They will - just ask.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Some masters/owners/whatever have more than one collared slave, often there is a hierarchy, where both are sub to the master but one slave is dom to the other (the dom slave in this scenario would be your 'collared switch')?

Sounds like the switch puzzles we had to do when we were learning binary when I first went into IT ! "

the terms are a bit of an exclusive OR in this case though

Wolf

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Is there ever any rhyme or reason or box to put things in?

I think a fetish is just a fetish and what ever it is just seems to do it for the fetishist.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *c69funCouple
over a year ago

chesterfield

Just because she is collared to her master doesn't mean she has to be sub to everyone. Many people are both dom and sub, I for 1 am sub 95% of the time but I do enjoy been dom from time to time. My partner (Mistress) however is dom 99%of the time. Don't see any problem with what she said to you, maybe she just didn't want to be sub to you .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust_for_laughsCouple
over a year ago

Hinckley


"Some masters/owners/whatever have more than one collared slave, often there is a hierarchy, where both are sub to the master but one slave is dom to the other (the dom slave in this scenario would be your 'collared switch')?

Sounds like the switch puzzles we had to do when we were learning binary when I first went into IT !

the terms are a bit of an exclusive OR in this case though

Wolf

"

Fun days ! Never did get (or have any reason to use) a lot of the clauses !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abloBack OP   Man
over a year ago

London


"Just because she is collared to her master doesn't mean she has to be sub to everyone. Many people are both dom and sub, I for 1 am sub 95% of the time but I do enjoy been dom from time to time. My partner (Mistress) however is dom 99%of the time. Don't see any problem with what she said to you, maybe she just didn't want to be sub to you ."
Why do you think I would have any interest in somebody else's sub? I have have heard of subs Doms/dommes tops bottoms switches and many other descriptions but never a collared switch. It sounds a contradiction in terms which is why I posed the question.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"May be they are changeable or just fickle..... a lot of people are."

my recent experience confirms this.

lady is correct.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *c69funCouple
over a year ago

chesterfield


"Just because she is collared to her master doesn't mean she has to be sub to everyone. Many people are both dom and sub, I for 1 am sub 95% of the time but I do enjoy been dom from time to time. My partner (Mistress) however is dom 99%of the time. Don't see any problem with what she said to you, maybe she just didn't want to be sub to you .Why do you think I would have any interest in somebody else's sub? I have have heard of subs Doms/dommes tops bottoms switches and many other descriptions but never a collared switch. It sounds a contradiction in terms which is why I posed the question. "

Maybe it is a contradiction in terms, but its her master/mistress who she's collared to, doesn't mean she has to be sub outside of that relationship, who's to say her owner doesn't get a thrill out of the fact that she's collared and sub to them but to others she is dom, could be a number of things , which ever it is that's their choice ,it does happen in the bdsm scene, admittedly not very often.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abloBack OP   Man
over a year ago

London


"Just because she is collared to her master doesn't mean she has to be sub to everyone. Many people are both dom and sub, I for 1 am sub 95% of the time but I do enjoy been dom from time to time. My partner (Mistress) however is dom 99%of the time. Don't see any problem with what she said to you, maybe she just didn't want to be sub to you .Why do you think I would have any interest in somebody else's sub? I have have heard of subs Doms/dommes tops bottoms switches and many other descriptions but never a collared switch. It sounds a contradiction in terms which is why I posed the question.

Maybe it is a contradiction in terms, but its her master/mistress who she's collared to, doesn't mean she has to be sub outside of that relationship, who's to say her owner doesn't get a thrill out of the fact that she's collared and sub to them but to others she is dom, could be a number of things , which ever it is that's their choice ,it does happen in the bdsm scene, admittedly not very often. "
By definition a collared sub, what happens elsewhere is irrelevant. What you have described would mean the top could be collared just because the might be subbed by others outside the relationship

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *c69funCouple
over a year ago

chesterfield

I never said or implied her owner could be collered . I implied that "maybe" her owner gets a thrill out of seeing her be dominant to "others" . Maybe to help you understand it better , Its a bit like a vegetarian eating fish , by definition a vegetarian shouldn't," but it does happen", if it works for them then that's their choice. Oh And before you pick fault I'm not a vegetarian lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Flippin eck!!!

didnt realise this BDSM stuff was so complicated!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top