FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Pics rejected

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Has anyone else has pics rejected the put them back on n then they were approved ???

I had it today

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *etcplCouple
over a year ago

Gapping Fanny


"Has anyone else has pics rejected the put them back on n then they were approved ???

I had it today "

And you decided the best thing was to draw attention to previosuly rejected photos being approved?

We have had it the other way, but as photo mods are people it is bound to happen that different mods view photo content differently.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orkshirefucktruck3Man
over a year ago

rotherham

Hi.hoping someone reads this that can help.ive just had a pic rejected that has top half of face chopped off rather than put the mask over eyes cover on so cant understand why.i kno some pic mods get it wrong but then noticed a few more wrongly rejected that ive left on and reported to fab 4 days back and heard nothing.can anyone with power have a look please and sort this as i take care to abide by rules but sadly have to contact and wait

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

Mods are all individuals.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why would you have a pic rejected?

I've seen EVERYTHING legal on here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornycougaWoman
over a year ago

Wherever I lay my hat


"Why would you have a pic rejected?

I've seen EVERYTHING legal on here "

I'm with my man on this one. Unless there is illegal activity involved I for one am curious about what could lead to a rejection??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why would you have a pic rejected?

I've seen EVERYTHING legal on here

I'm with my man on this one. Unless there is illegal activity involved I for one am curious about what could lead to a rejection?? "

We had one rejected for other people being visible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orkshirefucktruck3Man
over a year ago

rotherham

There will be some mods not quite sure or dont enlarge the pic to see its been obscured but the owners should monitor the pic mods and get shut of the ones that dont correctly monitor.ive just reported the mod who has rejected mine

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornycougaWoman
over a year ago

Wherever I lay my hat


"Why would you have a pic rejected?

I've seen EVERYTHING legal on here

I'm with my man on this one. Unless there is illegal activity involved I for one am curious about what could lead to a rejection??

We had one rejected for other people being visible. "

So do they give you feedback? Mine have always been approved in a nanosecond so I thought the "approval" process was er... Liberal shall we say

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andyfloss2000Woman
over a year ago

ashford

Often get pics/ vids rejected x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eff4000Man
over a year ago

Camberley

If I had a video of me getting sucked off at a gloryhole, would that be rejected do you think?

Only thing of me in it would be my cock, the girl has consented to share but she's not on here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ud and BryanCouple
over a year ago

Boston, Lincolnshire


"If I had a video of me getting sucked off at a gloryhole, would that be rejected do you think?

Only thing of me in it would be my cock, the girl has consented to share but she's not on here."

If the girl can be identified - regardless of consent - it should be rejected.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arnaclebillMan
over a year ago

Robin Hood County


"Has anyone else has pics rejected the put them back on n then they were approved ???

I had it today "

Yes, a couple of times. It depends on who is assessing them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ot - CoupleCouple
over a year ago

Glasgow

Someone sent us a tribute photo and we decided to use it on our profile with the owners permission, it was rejected because it wasn't our photo.

Photos are rejected for a number of reasons.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ot - CoupleCouple
over a year ago

Glasgow

We've seen photos on here with people taking a selfie with their dog.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eff4000Man
over a year ago

Camberley


"If I had a video of me getting sucked off at a gloryhole, would that be rejected do you think?

Only thing of me in it would be my cock, the girl has consented to share but she's not on here.

If the girl can be identified - regardless of consent - it should be rejected."

Ok, thought so, and for the best no doubt.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ictoria_1976TV/TS
over a year ago

Launceston


"Has anyone else has pics rejected the put them back on n then they were approved ???

I had it today "

I have it happen all the time - especially on the sister site

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ormorantMan
over a year ago

Lincolnshire

Most common seems to be when your not in the pic but there are hundreds on here with no one in sight….must depend on who you are..!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ud and BryanCouple
over a year ago

Boston, Lincolnshire


"Most common seems to be when your not in the pic but there are hundreds on here with no one in sight….must depend on who you are..!!"

More likely to be based on who sees it.

We've found if you report such pictures they get removed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes one of mine was rejected so I tried again a while later and it was approved. The rejection was too rude for this site haha it was only me in a ball gag.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecky and justCouple
over a year ago

Godalming

We’ve had the most ridiculous rejection of pictures in the past.

Becky’s bum with a handprint rejected as being “too rude for this site” when there’s a spanking section in the photo categories…!

If you search it, many of which are way worse, with evidence of damage.

Makes no sense and comes down to who moderates it.

We’ve also had people report our profile. Randomly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hromosexualsCouple
over a year ago

Near Abercynon


" We've seen photos on here with people taking a selfie with their dog. "

What's wrong with that? No consent from the dog?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes iv had different pics rejected for different reasons, all depends on the mods at the time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset

Photos have to contain the profile owner and any others shown should have identities hidden.

If there's any doubt that the person who owns the profile is in the shot it may get rejected.

I've seen plenty of photos where the people in them look completely different to most of the others in a gallery. Mods are given guidance and if a photo is rejected there's a reason.

Some slip through and are rejected later if reported. Other get rejected and are approved after appeals.

Mods are volunteers. They're not paid.

It's pretty bad form to complain about them and/or report them. It's simple enough to dispute any decision.

A

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset

Here's the rules.

"Strictly adults 18+ only. You and anyone in the photos must be aged 18+ and MUST have been 18+ at the time the photos were taken.

The photos must be yours and you must be in the photos. You must be in any photo you upload. This means that photos of your bike/car/dildo collection for example, will be rejected unless you are in the photo too.

Nothing nasty. The photo can't show anyone who might be being hurt, or who has been hurt. It also can't show anything that is outside the norms. If it's too rude, taboo or unpleasant, or if it puts us off our dinner, it is not welcome here.

We're not Facebook. The site isn't for family shots, it's not facebook. That means ONLY pictures of adults aged 18+ at the time the photo was taken, no matter what the context.

No watermarks. Photo can't be watermarked. If your photo is watermarked either by this site or another site, it will be rejected. We can only accept original photos.

Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

Legal. The photo can't show any illegal activity.

No pets / animals. Sorry, but you can't include your pets in the photos. Unfortunately, this turns some perverts on and we don't want their kind on Fab.

No public scenes with identifiable adults or under 18s. Photos taken in public places with other people in the background who can be identified OR under 18 will be rejected. If you have photos like this you want on the site, crop them in a graphics program or blank everyone in the background."

So for those above that have said they had pics rejected. If a photo shows 'visible harm' having been caused then it could fall foul of the rules. If any photos show other people but not the profile owner they'll definitely fall foul. If people can be identified - not just by faces but visible Tattoos for example - they can fall foul of the rules.

If you're just posting photos of yourselves you're less likely to get a photo rejected than if someone else is in it. Many single male profiles often have more of a play partner on display than the guy whose profile it is. Plenty of similar sites don't allow others to be shown full stop, so be grateful Fab does.

A

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why would you have a pic rejected?

I've seen EVERYTHING legal on here

I'm with my man on this one. Unless there is illegal activity involved I for one am curious about what could lead to a rejection??

We had one rejected for other people being visible.

So do they give you feedback? Mine have always been approved in a nanosecond so I thought the "approval" process was er... Liberal shall we say"

Yea we were given the reason in a (probably) automatic message

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecky and justCouple
over a year ago

Godalming


"Here's the rules.

"Strictly adults 18+ only. You and anyone in the photos must be aged 18+ and MUST have been 18+ at the time the photos were taken.

The photos must be yours and you must be in the photos. You must be in any photo you upload. This means that photos of your bike/car/dildo collection for example, will be rejected unless you are in the photo too.

Nothing nasty. The photo can't show anyone who might be being hurt, or who has been hurt. It also can't show anything that is outside the norms. If it's too rude, taboo or unpleasant, or if it puts us off our dinner, it is not welcome here.

We're not Facebook. The site isn't for family shots, it's not facebook. That means ONLY pictures of adults aged 18+ at the time the photo was taken, no matter what the context.

No watermarks. Photo can't be watermarked. If your photo is watermarked either by this site or another site, it will be rejected. We can only accept original photos.

Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

Legal. The photo can't show any illegal activity.

No pets / animals. Sorry, but you can't include your pets in the photos. Unfortunately, this turns some perverts on and we don't want their kind on Fab.

No public scenes with identifiable adults or under 18s. Photos taken in public places with other people in the background who can be identified OR under 18 will be rejected. If you have photos like this you want on the site, crop them in a graphics program or blank everyone in the background."

So for those above that have said they had pics rejected. If a photo shows 'visible harm' having been caused then it could fall foul of the rules. If any photos show other people but not the profile owner they'll definitely fall foul. If people can be identified - not just by faces but visible Tattoos for example - they can fall foul of the rules.

If you're just posting photos of yourselves you're less likely to get a photo rejected than if someone else is in it. Many single male profiles often have more of a play partner on display than the guy whose profile it is. Plenty of similar sites don't allow others to be shown full stop, so be grateful Fab does.

A"

Totally understand and agree with all above.

But..

why have a spanking category within photos and then reject spanking photos…?

Doesn’t make any sense.

Search the spanking pics and there are lots, lots and lots with hand prints.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"Here's the rules.

"Strictly adults 18+ only. You and anyone in the photos must be aged 18+ and MUST have been 18+ at the time the photos were taken.

The photos must be yours and you must be in the photos. You must be in any photo you upload. This means that photos of your bike/car/dildo collection for example, will be rejected unless you are in the photo too.

Nothing nasty. The photo can't show anyone who might be being hurt, or who has been hurt. It also can't show anything that is outside the norms. If it's too rude, taboo or unpleasant, or if it puts us off our dinner, it is not welcome here.

We're not Facebook. The site isn't for family shots, it's not facebook. That means ONLY pictures of adults aged 18+ at the time the photo was taken, no matter what the context.

No watermarks. Photo can't be watermarked. If your photo is watermarked either by this site or another site, it will be rejected. We can only accept original photos.

Others in your photo OK so long as faces are obscured and you have permission. You can have other people in your photos too (to clarify, you must also be in the photo) so long as you have their permission to upload to your account on here AND their faces are obscured (face pixellated or blacked out; just blacking out the eyes is NOT ok).

Legal. The photo can't show any illegal activity.

No pets / animals. Sorry, but you can't include your pets in the photos. Unfortunately, this turns some perverts on and we don't want their kind on Fab.

No public scenes with identifiable adults or under 18s. Photos taken in public places with other people in the background who can be identified OR under 18 will be rejected. If you have photos like this you want on the site, crop them in a graphics program or blank everyone in the background."

So for those above that have said they had pics rejected. If a photo shows 'visible harm' having been caused then it could fall foul of the rules. If any photos show other people but not the profile owner they'll definitely fall foul. If people can be identified - not just by faces but visible Tattoos for example - they can fall foul of the rules.

If you're just posting photos of yourselves you're less likely to get a photo rejected than if someone else is in it. Many single male profiles often have more of a play partner on display than the guy whose profile it is. Plenty of similar sites don't allow others to be shown full stop, so be grateful Fab does.

A

Totally understand and agree with all above.

But..

why have a spanking category within photos and then reject spanking photos…?

Doesn’t make any sense.

Search the spanking pics and there are lots, lots and lots with hand prints.

"

Yep. It's an oddity.

I suspect any severe bruising would infer physical harm so would be rejected.

Not sure if it's still the case but watersports pics used to be banned (although there are videos on site today) yet its an interest box to be ticked.

I've seen plenty of pics slip through the net over the last 14 years including obvious nicked porn pics.

Mods aren't perfect.

But as I said - they're unpaid volunteers. No point in slating them for trying to do a job few would do themselves.

Just appeal anything when you think a bad decision has been made and if you have no joy, take it on the chin and post something else.

A

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top