FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Cop accused of being on Fab

Jump to newest
 

By *ikemagic OP   Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield

Thought fellow Fabbers would find this of interest that appeared on the site of my local 'newspaper' the Huddersfield Examiner and its website Yorkshire Live. The article reads:

‘West Yorkshire cop accused of 'uploading image of genitals on Fab Swingers website'

Details of misconduct hearing revealed by West Yorkshire Police: A former West Yorkshire police officer uploaded naked images of himself to a website called 'Fab Swingers', it is claimed.

Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month following allegations that he conducted himself in a manner that broke professional standards.

The allegations, outlined by West Yorkshire Police, are as follows:

"On or before the 29th June 2020, uploading images of himself to website, namely Fab Swingers.

"One image depicted the former officer wearing police uniform and a warrant card.

"A further image showed his naked torso and genitalia and was displayed on the profile page of the account.

"In a further unconnected matter, the former officer has attended at the address of a member of the public in the course of his duties on 28th May 2020, following a report that they had been subject of a controlling or coercive relationship.

"He subsequently engaged in an intimate personal relationship with this individual."

A gross misconduct hearing is expected to take place at West Yorkshire Police headquarters in Wakefield on July 19.

Fab Swingers describes itself as 'fun, free and fabulous'. The home page says: "Run by swingers, for swingers, for free. "Live cam, chat, email, pics: Free."

It adds: "Takes 3-4 minutes to register and get full use of site."

Would-be swingers are warned "DO NOT use your real name" on the online form.

.

My take on this is the main issue is this officer allegedly was on Fab in his uniform with ID showing that I guess is a big no-no. And also that he was doing it during working hours. Happy to be corrected if I am wrong on this.

Also, there may be Fabbers out there who may not realise being on here could affect their livelihood. Like to think most are aware enough but, well, this chap seems likes he's come a cropper.

PS - I'm sure Fab won't mind being screenshotted in the article - there's no such thing as bad publicity after all. Especially if its free.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nly4funMan
over a year ago

Nottingham

There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke-de-PleasureMan
over a year ago

Leeds

Yes. I think its the 'doing it on the beat' (ahem allegedly) that's landed him in the most hot water

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

But whoever it was that has blown the whistle on him would br a member here too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!"

Definitely. I’ve met a couple. They can’t do that though! Firemen can’t either.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke-de-PleasureMan
over a year ago

Leeds


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!

Definitely. I’ve met a couple. They can’t do that though! Firemen can’t either. "

As far as I know its the uniform. They can't have that shown in any setting 'unbecoming' of the profession. I used to meet a couple and he was a pilot for BA but he always said he had to be careful not have his Captain's uniform anywhere on here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

My take on it is this...he was probably a Bobby on the beat...

The Police Top Dogs have no balls..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!

Definitely. I’ve met a couple. They can’t do that though! Firemen can’t either.

As far as I know its the uniform. They can't have that shown in any setting 'unbecoming' of the profession. I used to meet a couple and he was a pilot for BA but he always said he had to be careful not have his Captain's uniform anywhere on here. "

Yes it is definitely. Not sure about army/navy etc as have seen a few pics in those uniforms on here too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ooo wet tight hornyWoman
over a year ago

lancashire

There are police men on here...I have met with one and chatted to 2, love that uniform....taking a pic with your warrant card though is a no no as then you can be identified NOW TO ALL YOU POLICE MEN ON FAB.....SHOW US YOUR TRUNCHEONS

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imi_RougeWoman
over a year ago

Portsmouth

But there's loads of guys in uniform on here... And many other regular dating sites.

I haven't come across any coppers yet. Surely they'd be pretty stupid to post pics in their uniform with identifying details?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Grate fab in the news agein whooo hooo more fresh meat to have my way with ha ha ok jokes aside

I have seen a lot even been contacted bye quite a far few

Some even wanted outdoor sex and such yes I turned them down sounds to much like a sting to be honest on that one

It’s the unform showing that’s the problem

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Some careers have clauses in the contracts about professional public conduct. What he did wrong was show his uniform and warrant card, allowing himself to be identified. But anyone in this line of business (or others in public roles) should take care not to identify themselves on here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There are loads on fab, I've had many police men showing full uniforms, badge numbers,guns and even police cars showing the numberplate in photos sent to me.

Firefighters also showing enough detail and helmet numbers to be able to report them.

Army/Raf/Ambulance personnel

So many do it with no care in the world about being caught out.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke-de-PleasureMan
over a year ago

Leeds


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!

Definitely. I’ve met a couple. They can’t do that though! Firemen can’t either.

As far as I know its the uniform. They can't have that shown in any setting 'unbecoming' of the profession. I used to meet a couple and he was a pilot for BA but he always said he had to be careful not have his Captain's uniform anywhere on here.

Yes it is definitely. Not sure about army/navy etc as have seen a few pics in those uniforms on here too. "

Its the 'officer' bit. The army, navy etc... you've seen won't be officers.

Plus its the doing the deed while on duty he's getting, ahem, fingered for!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emini ManMan
over a year ago

There and to the left a bit


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!

Definitely. I’ve met a couple. They can’t do that though! Firemen can’t either.

As far as I know its the uniform. They can't have that shown in any setting 'unbecoming' of the profession. I used to meet a couple and he was a pilot for BA but he always said he had to be careful not have his Captain's uniform anywhere on here.

Yes it is definitely. Not sure about army/navy etc as have seen a few pics in those uniforms on here too. "

It's any identifying marks that causes the problem such as name badges, regiment insignia etc - whilst the uniform itself being used would be frowned on, if the wearer can't be identified there's not a lot can be done really.

Pretty stupid to post a pic of a warrant card though

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've fucked a cop off here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There are police men on here...I have met with one and chatted to 2, love that uniform....taking a pic with your warrant card though is a no no as then you can be identified NOW TO ALL YOU POLICE MEN ON FAB.....SHOW US YOUR TRUNCHEONS "

Damn straight lmao

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Thought fellow Fabbers would find this of interest that appeared on the site of my local 'newspaper' the Huddersfield Examiner and its website Yorkshire Live. The article reads:

‘West Yorkshire cop accused of 'uploading image of genitals on Fab Swingers website'

Details of misconduct hearing revealed by West Yorkshire Police: A former West Yorkshire police officer uploaded naked images of himself to a website called 'Fab Swingers', it is claimed.

Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month following allegations that he conducted himself in a manner that broke professional standards.

The allegations, outlined by West Yorkshire Police, are as follows:

"On or before the 29th June 2020, uploading images of himself to website, namely Fab Swingers.

"One image depicted the former officer wearing police uniform and a warrant card.

"A further image showed his naked torso and genitalia and was displayed on the profile page of the account.

"In a further unconnected matter, the former officer has attended at the address of a member of the public in the course of his duties on 28th May 2020, following a report that they had been subject of a controlling or coercive relationship.

"He subsequently engaged in an intimate personal relationship with this individual."

A gross misconduct hearing is expected to take place at West Yorkshire Police headquarters in Wakefield on July 19.

Fab Swingers describes itself as 'fun, free and fabulous'. The home page says: "Run by swingers, for swingers, for free. "Live cam, chat, email, pics: Free."

It adds: "Takes 3-4 minutes to register and get full use of site."

Would-be swingers are warned "DO NOT use your real name" on the online form.

.

My take on this is the main issue is this officer allegedly was on Fab in his uniform with ID showing that I guess is a big no-no. And also that he was doing it during working hours. Happy to be corrected if I am wrong on this.

Also, there may be Fabbers out there who may not realise being on here could affect their livelihood. Like to think most are aware enough but, well, this chap seems likes he's come a cropper.

PS - I'm sure Fab won't mind being screenshotted in the article - there's no such thing as bad publicity after all. Especially if its free. "

I know a cop on here, and a nurse or two, and a midwife... The issue is displaying the uniform and warrant card I guess. And also then engaging in sexual activity with a vulnerable person while on duty.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igmaMan
over a year ago

Yorkshire


"The Police Top Dogs have no balls..

"

Do all police dogs get neutered Tom?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *il sub princessWoman
over a year ago

West Midlands

I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uiffboyMan
over a year ago

Manchester

"Anything you say will be taken down and used in evidence against you"

"Underpants!!!"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No to uniforms, it's bringing the service into disrepute.

There are many proffesionals on here and discretion is key.

If you are recognised it could undermine the work you are doing or be used as a form of coercion.

Posting in his uniform is a huge no no. This also links into another thread whereby people ask if its ok to speak with people they recognise ect outside of fab.

Not everyone is aware of the damage it can do.

I personally am not into swinging bdsm hotwifing ect but tha doesn't stop people making assumptions. Some assumptions can destroy lives.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B69Woman
over a year ago

Wiltshire

Yes I’ve spoken to a few police officers on here and others where their job entails wearing a uniform, the guy was daft to show anything that could be linked to him.

many officers remove recognisable links to their uniform even just driving home from work so no attention is brought to them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I've fucked a cop off here."
she fucked a cop and she liked iiiit....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there "

Nooo!

That is disgusting behaviour!

Gosh, now I'm rethinking being on here!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ORDERMANMan
over a year ago

wrexham


"Grate fab in the news agein whooo hooo more fresh meat to have my way with ha ha ok jokes aside

I have seen a lot even been contacted bye quite a far few

Some even wanted outdoor sex and such yes I turned them down sounds to much like a sting to be honest on that one

It’s the unform showing that’s the problem "

Re wanting outdoor sex..

It's not as though police dont know the best dogging spots

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If you're a cop, be careful how you cop off.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there "

For years now I’ve never told anyone at all what I do for work. Ever since someone traced me on the internet. There’s no need for anyone to. It’s too risky.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eyond PurityCouple
over a year ago

Lincolnshire

There are loads of police on here, of all ranks. And why not, we're all human.

I think the issue is displaying the uniform, which is fair enough, as it should have no relevance to this lifestyle, and could be seen as bringing the force into disrepute, or opportunity for b1ack.mail.

It does beg the question though, who underhandedly reported him?!

Common sense and discretion were clearly missing.

C

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend

It's comprising his effectiveness as an officer....it's wrong morally but could jeopardize his standing in the force and possibly his effectiveness in situations like court appearances...as I say ..his sexuality should be his own private business...but fabs is a public forum and a little research can reveal anyone's identity

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

For years now I’ve never told anyone at all what I do for work. Ever since someone traced me on the internet. There’s no need for anyone to. It’s too risky. "

Mother fuckers! Fucking scroty behaviour! I'm getting right wound up! I don't get would up that easy!

Fucking power hungry control freaks manipulators! Makes me sick!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igchiefMan
over a year ago

Manchester

The moral of the story is...

If you're on here and you're a Bobby just be careful which 'Bobby's Helmet' you end up showing!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's comprising his effectiveness as an officer....it's wrong morally but could jeopardize his standing in the force and possibly his effectiveness in situations like court appearances...as I say ..his sexuality should be his own private business...but fabs is a public forum and a little research can reveal anyone's identity "

True that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"It's comprising his effectiveness as an officer....it's wrong morally but could jeopardize his standing in the force and possibly his effectiveness in situations like court appearances...as I say ..his sexuality should be his own private business...but fabs is a public forum and a little research can reveal anyone's identity "

Surely it's about Pride. Why can't a court judge, an MP, a School teacher, a cop, a fireman be a swinger and still respected by society...is swinging a dirty secret ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

For years now I’ve never told anyone at all what I do for work. Ever since someone traced me on the internet. There’s no need for anyone to. It’s too risky.

Mother fuckers! Fucking scroty behaviour! I'm getting right wound up! I don't get would up that easy!

Fucking power hungry control freaks manipulators! Makes me sick!"

. Luckily he was ok and was literally doing it to show me how easy it was. This was when I first joined years ago and was a bit naive to it all! I’ve learnt lots of lessons. Even my postcode on here is nowhere near where I live x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ad NannaWoman
over a year ago

East London


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!

Definitely. I’ve met a couple. They can’t do that though! Firemen can’t either.

As far as I know its the uniform. They can't have that shown in any setting 'unbecoming' of the profession. I used to meet a couple and he was a pilot for BA but he always said he had to be careful not have his Captain's uniform anywhere on here.

Yes it is definitely. Not sure about army/navy etc as have seen a few pics in those uniforms on here too.

Its the 'officer' bit. The army, navy etc... you've seen won't be officers.

Plus its the doing the deed while on duty he's getting, ahem, fingered for!"

Is Captain an officer?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Grate fab in the news agein whooo hooo more fresh meat to have my way with ha ha ok jokes aside

I have seen a lot even been contacted bye quite a far few

Some even wanted outdoor sex and such yes I turned them down sounds to much like a sting to be honest on that one

It’s the unform showing that’s the problem

Re wanting outdoor sex..

It's not as though police dont know the best dogging spots"

That’s true just found it a bit suspect that was all went with my gut feeling

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otBunsHunWoman
over a year ago

Yorkshire


"I've fucked a cop off here."
me too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *indergirlWoman
over a year ago

somewhere, someplace


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

Nooo!

That is disgusting behaviour!

Gosh, now I'm rethinking being on here!"

Could be worse could check your messages and find one saying I had great fun watching your ass wiggling about as you walked around your shop today

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *offiaCoolWoman
over a year ago

Kidsgrove


"It's comprising his effectiveness as an officer....it's wrong morally but could jeopardize his standing in the force and possibly his effectiveness in situations like court appearances...as I say ..his sexuality should be his own private business...but fabs is a public forum and a little research can reveal anyone's identity

Surely it's about Pride. Why can't a court judge, an MP, a School teacher, a cop, a fireman be a swinger and still respected by society...is swinging a dirty secret ?"

Casual sex is still regarded negatively by many people. Many professions have codes of conduct that dictate that they may not do things in their job nor private life that can be reflected on their profession.

Many threads in the past, have been started where people have expressed their disbelief and frustration when profiles or people have stated they don't post photos because of their job. What they don't understand that it is indeed a reality that their job can be affected and loss of careers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

For years now I’ve never told anyone at all what I do for work. Ever since someone traced me on the internet. There’s no need for anyone to. It’s too risky.

Mother fuckers! Fucking scroty behaviour! I'm getting right wound up! I don't get would up that easy!

Fucking power hungry control freaks manipulators! Makes me sick!

. Luckily he was ok and was literally doing it to show me how easy it was. This was when I first joined years ago and was a bit naive to it all! I’ve learnt lots of lessons. Even my postcode on here is nowhere near where I live x"

Blimey Nora.. I knew you were from Essex

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"It's comprising his effectiveness as an officer....it's wrong morally but could jeopardize his standing in the force and possibly his effectiveness in situations like court

And appearances...as I say ..his sexuality should be his own private business...but fabs is a public forum and a little research can reveal anyone's identity

Surely it's about Pride. Why can't a court judge, an MP, a School teacher, a cop, a fireman be a swinger and still respected by society...is swinging a dirty secret ?

Casual sex is still regarded negatively by many people. Many professions have codes of conduct that dictate that they may not do things in their job nor private life that can be reflected on their profession.

Many threads in the past, have been started where people have expressed their disbelief and frustration when profiles or people have stated they don't post photos because of their job. What they don't understand that it is indeed a reality that their job can be affected and loss of careers."

And especially if they are professional people..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

For years now I’ve never told anyone at all what I do for work. Ever since someone traced me on the internet. There’s no need for anyone to. It’s too risky.

Mother fuckers! Fucking scroty behaviour! I'm getting right wound up! I don't get would up that easy!

Fucking power hungry control freaks manipulators! Makes me sick!

. Luckily he was ok and was literally doing it to show me how easy it was. This was when I first joined years ago and was a bit naive to it all! I’ve learnt lots of lessons. Even my postcode on here is nowhere near where I live x

Blimey Nora.. I knew you were from Essex "

I actually was Tom before I moved here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

For years now I’ve never told anyone at all what I do for work. Ever since someone traced me on the internet. There’s no need for anyone to. It’s too risky.

Mother fuckers! Fucking scroty behaviour! I'm getting right wound up! I don't get would up that easy!

Fucking power hungry control freaks manipulators! Makes me sick!

. Luckily he was ok and was literally doing it to show me how easy it was. This was when I first joined years ago and was a bit naive to it all! I’ve learnt lots of lessons. Even my postcode on here is nowhere near where I live x

Blimey Nora.. I knew you were from Essex

I actually was Tom before I moved here "

I knew it.. you can take the girl out of Southend but you can't .....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illiam180Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield

I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
over a year ago

Newcastle


"Thought fellow Fabbers would find this of interest that appeared on the site of my local 'newspaper' the Huddersfield Examiner and its website Yorkshire Live. The article reads:

‘West Yorkshire cop accused of 'uploading image of genitals on Fab Swingers website'

Details of misconduct hearing revealed by West Yorkshire Police: A former West Yorkshire police officer uploaded naked images of himself to a website called 'Fab Swingers', it is claimed.

Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month following allegations that he conducted himself in a manner that broke professional standards.

The allegations, outlined by West Yorkshire Police, are as follows:

"On or before the 29th June 2020, uploading images of himself to website, namely Fab Swingers.

"One image depicted the former officer wearing police uniform and a warrant card.

"A further image showed his naked torso and genitalia and was displayed on the profile page of the account.

"In a further unconnected matter, the former officer has attended at the address of a member of the public in the course of his duties on 28th May 2020, following a report that they had been subject of a controlling or coercive relationship.

"He subsequently engaged in an intimate personal relationship with this individual."

A gross misconduct hearing is expected to take place at West Yorkshire Police headquarters in Wakefield on July 19.

Fab Swingers describes itself as 'fun, free and fabulous'. The home page says: "Run by swingers, for swingers, for free. "Live cam, chat, email, pics: Free."

It adds: "Takes 3-4 minutes to register and get full use of site."

Would-be swingers are warned "DO NOT use your real name" on the online form.

.

My take on this is the main issue is this officer allegedly was on Fab in his uniform with ID showing that I guess is a big no-no. And also that he was doing it during working hours. Happy to be corrected if I am wrong on this.

Also, there may be Fabbers out there who may not realise being on here could affect their livelihood. Like to think most are aware enough but, well, this chap seems likes he's come a cropper.

PS - I'm sure Fab won't mind being screenshotted in the article - there's no such thing as bad publicity after all. Especially if its free. "

I'm not sure which planet you have just arrived from but you are very late this site is used by all and it's about respecting each others lives.

The end

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, and the wee donkey!

We need to get AC12 to stamp out this corruption

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
over a year ago

Newcastle


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely. "

It's a disciplinary hearing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ily WhiteWoman
over a year ago

?


"My take on it is this...he was probably a Bobby on the beat...

The Police Top Dogs have no balls..

"

I used to know an Inspector that was into dogging...I've also met firemen, a judge, a professional sportsman, people in the armed forces. It was a bit silly to post pictures where he could be identified.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *offiaCoolWoman
over a year ago

Kidsgrove


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely. "

That's a bit like saying 'I posted a vile inappropriate comment about someone on twitter, but I've resigned now so I shouldn't have to be accountable for it'. It still brought his profession into disrepute according to his professional guidelines.

I'm not saying it is right or wrong, just a comparison.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

For years now I’ve never told anyone at all what I do for work. Ever since someone traced me on the internet. There’s no need for anyone to. It’s too risky.

Mother fuckers! Fucking scroty behaviour! I'm getting right wound up! I don't get would up that easy!

Fucking power hungry control freaks manipulators! Makes me sick!

. Luckily he was ok and was literally doing it to show me how easy it was. This was when I first joined years ago and was a bit naive to it all! I’ve learnt lots of lessons. Even my postcode on here is nowhere near where I live x"

Did you ask him to? If not it's not ok

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely. "

It sounds like he has ready left the force. They can't do a lot too him except find him guilty of gross misconduct in his absence and then he will be put on a database to ensure that he can never work in law enforcement again.. the driver for this was those lying Hillsboy cunts who resigned on full pension rather than face the music

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"My take on it is this...he was probably a Bobby on the beat...

The Police Top Dogs have no balls..

I used to know an Inspector that was into dogging...I've also met firemen, a judge, a professional sportsman, people in the armed forces. It was a bit silly to post pictures where he could be identified. "

I had the same...I used to meet an Inspector who would only meet in code.. Inspector Morse..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

Nooo!

That is disgusting behaviour!

Gosh, now I'm rethinking being on here!

Could be worse could check your messages and find one saying I had great fun watching your ass wiggling about as you walked around your shop today "

What?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illiam180Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

It's a disciplinary hearing "

Er... ok. I think we all get that bit!

My question is: If he is a FORMER police officer then he is no longer employed by the police force. If so why are they holding this disciplinary hearing still? He is no longer their 'responsibility' for want of a better word.

So why are they doing this? And does he have to attend?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

For years now I’ve never told anyone at all what I do for work. Ever since someone traced me on the internet. There’s no need for anyone to. It’s too risky.

Mother fuckers! Fucking scroty behaviour! I'm getting right wound up! I don't get would up that easy!

Fucking power hungry control freaks manipulators! Makes me sick!

. Luckily he was ok and was literally doing it to show me how easy it was. This was when I first joined years ago and was a bit naive to it all! I’ve learnt lots of lessons. Even my postcode on here is nowhere near where I live x

Did you ask him to? If not it's not ok "

No I didn’t! And it’s not ok I agree. Made me be more wary though. I didn’t speak to him again afterwards.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, and the wee donkey!

We need to get AC12 to stamp out this corruption "

Don't forget the three kings!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Shouldn’t be in the force if he’s actually that stupid to put a picture anywhere of himself in his uniform with his Id on show …. Really ???

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *offiaCoolWoman
over a year ago

Kidsgrove


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

It's a disciplinary hearing

Er... ok. I think we all get that bit!

My question is: If he is a FORMER police officer then he is no longer employed by the police force. If so why are they holding this disciplinary hearing still? He is no longer their 'responsibility' for want of a better word.

So why are they doing this? And does he have to attend? "

I replied earlier

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illiam180Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

It sounds like he has ready left the force. They can't do a lot too him except find him guilty of gross misconduct in his absence and then he will be put on a database to ensure that he can never work in law enforcement again.. the driver for this was those lying Hillsboy cunts who resigned on full pension rather than face the music"

Ah! Ok. Could affect his pension. That makes sense. Thank you!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entlemanrogueMan
over a year ago

Motherwell

Hahahaha, madness.

If that happened to every cop on her, we would have almost 0 police force.

That goes for nurses as well.

Possiy they wanted to get rid of the cop for some reason.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illiam180Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

It's a disciplinary hearing

Er... ok. I think we all get that bit!

My question is: If he is a FORMER police officer then he is no longer employed by the police force. If so why are they holding this disciplinary hearing still? He is no longer their 'responsibility' for want of a better word.

So why are they doing this? And does he have to attend?

I replied earlier "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

For years now I’ve never told anyone at all what I do for work. Ever since someone traced me on the internet. There’s no need for anyone to. It’s too risky.

Mother fuckers! Fucking scroty behaviour! I'm getting right wound up! I don't get would up that easy!

Fucking power hungry control freaks manipulators! Makes me sick!

. Luckily he was ok and was literally doing it to show me how easy it was. This was when I first joined years ago and was a bit naive to it all! I’ve learnt lots of lessons. Even my postcode on here is nowhere near where I live x

Did you ask him to? If not it's not ok

No I didn’t! And it’s not ok I agree. Made me be more wary though. I didn’t speak to him again afterwards. "

Woa.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illiam180Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield


"Hahahaha, madness.

If that happened to every cop on her, we would have almost 0 police force.

That goes for nurses as well.

Possiy they wanted to get rid of the cop for some reason."

I think its as others have pointed out that he had his warrant card ID here on Fab and also he was 'sealing the deal' while on duty. That is Gross Misconduct in ANY job!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *offiaCoolWoman
over a year ago

Kidsgrove


"Hahahaha, madness.

If that happened to every cop on her, we would have almost 0 police force.

That goes for nurses as well.

Possiy they wanted to get rid of the cop for some reason."

No it isn't an excuse to get rid of him. He was caught breaking his professional code of conduct, they always pursue it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ollycouple71Couple
over a year ago

manchester


"Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, and the wee donkey!

We need to get AC12 to stamp out this corruption "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!"

Very true.. I can back this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!

Very true.. I can back this "

Are you sure this is not a cop and bull story?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I know of a local govt employee dismissed because of a swinger site membership

Bringing authority into disrepute was cited

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!"
I've met a few on here but they are very very discreet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *yron69Man
over a year ago

Fareham

I’ve met people who wouldn’t be out of place in the Keystone Cops.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entleman JayMan
over a year ago

Wakefield


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!

Definitely. I’ve met a couple. They can’t do that though! Firemen can’t either. "

I know of three firemen. Lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
over a year ago

Newcastle


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

It's a disciplinary hearing

Er... ok. I think we all get that bit!

My question is: If he is a FORMER police officer then he is no longer employed by the police force. If so why are they

holding this disciplinary hearing still? He is no longer their 'responsibility' for want of a better word.

So why are they doing this? And does he have to attend? "

It's the process how they handle it like if their is an allegation person gets suspended and yes he does because it's nothing different from a court hearing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illiam180Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

It's a disciplinary hearing

Er... ok. I think we all get that bit!

My question is: If he is a FORMER police officer then he is no longer employed by the police force. If so why are they

holding this disciplinary hearing still? He is no longer their 'responsibility' for want of a better word.

So why are they doing this? And does he have to attend?

It's the process how they handle it like if their is an allegation person gets suspended and yes he does because it's nothing different from a court hearing "

I see. Thanks.

So he'd be say arrested if he didn't attend?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *il sub princessWoman
over a year ago

West Midlands


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

For years now I’ve never told anyone at all what I do for work. Ever since someone traced me on the internet. There’s no need for anyone to. It’s too risky. "

Unfortunately I live where I work so not always as simple as that x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
over a year ago

Newcastle


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

It's a disciplinary hearing

Er... ok. I think we all get that bit!

My question is: If he is a FORMER police officer then he is no longer employed by the police force. If so why are they

holding this disciplinary hearing still? He is no longer their 'responsibility' for want of a better word.

So why are they doing this? And does he have to attend?

It's the process how they handle it like if their is an allegation person gets suspended and yes he does because it's nothing different from a court hearing

I see. Thanks.

So he'd be say arrested if he didn't attend? "

Yes but at this hearing they can also decide if they wish to take the matter further and take it through the courts as it is still committed an offence and a breach of trust and contract against the force

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There was a woman on here, local to me, who had public photo's of her giving a blow job to a uniformed officer, he never made the papers!

There's plenty about who have a thing for uniforms, who's going turn down the opportunity if it's presented?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *indergirlWoman
over a year ago

somewhere, someplace


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

Nooo!

That is disgusting behaviour!

Gosh, now I'm rethinking being on here!

Could be worse could check your messages and find one saying I had great fun watching your ass wiggling about as you walked around your shop today

What?! "

Yup patient where I work apparently

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Many years ago I worked as a milkman delivering pintas. I had to wear a white coat and hat. I could not believe the amount of attention and offers from the ladies I delivered to

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illiam180Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

It's a disciplinary hearing

Er... ok. I think we all get that bit!

My question is: If he is a FORMER police officer then he is no longer employed by the police force. If so why are they

holding this disciplinary hearing still? He is no longer their 'responsibility' for want of a better word.

So why are they doing this? And does he have to attend?

It's the process how they handle it like if their is an allegation person gets suspended and yes he does because it's nothing different from a court hearing

I see. Thanks.

So he'd be say arrested if he didn't attend?

Yes but at this hearing they can also decide if they wish to take the matter further and take it through the courts as it is still committed an offence and a breach of trust and contract against the force"

Right! Gotcha! That's answered my question. There is a legality to the actions he's allegedly perpetrated so that's why they are following it up. And from other comments I understand it could affect his pension and so on.

That all make perfect sense. Thanks!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
over a year ago

Newcastle


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

It's a disciplinary hearing

Er... ok. I think we all get that bit!

My question is: If he is a FORMER police officer then he is no longer employed by the police force. If so why are they

holding this disciplinary hearing still? He is no longer their 'responsibility' for want of a better word.

So why are they doing this? And does he have to attend?

It's the process how they handle it like if their is an allegation person gets suspended and yes he does because it's nothing different from a court hearing

I see. Thanks.

So he'd be say arrested if he didn't attend?

Yes but at this hearing they can also decide if they wish to take the matter further and take it through the courts as it is still committed an offence and a breach of trust and contract against the force

Right! Gotcha! That's answered my question. There is a legality to the actions he's allegedly perpetrated so that's why they are following it up. And from other comments I understand it could affect his pension and so on.

That all make perfect sense. Thanks! "

The main part is the fact tarnishing the force by having images of the uniform the rest just adds as being a police officer and on a swingers site doesn't go down well then the conduct whilst on duty

Many occupations have to follow a code of conduct if caught face a disciplinary hearing an opportunity to defend the conduct of their actions and face whatever punishment

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
over a year ago

Leeds


"There was a woman on here, local to me, who had public photo's of her giving a blow job to a uniformed officer, he never made the papers!

There's plenty about who have a thing for uniforms, who's going turn down the opportunity if it's presented?!"

I have a thing for uniforms and I wear one myself but while I'm working that's first and foremost on my mind!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
over a year ago

Newcastle

So with this it can be a number of things.

1 he was recognised by another and got reported,

2 someone he had met might of tried to put pressure on him (a demand) otherwise would blow the whistle on him.

3 the person who recognised him doesn't like him works at the same location.

Winner gets picked at random

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illiam180Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

It's a disciplinary hearing

Er... ok. I think we all get that bit!

My question is: If he is a FORMER police officer then he is no longer employed by the police force. If so why are they

holding this disciplinary hearing still? He is no longer their 'responsibility' for want of a better word.

So why are they doing this? And does he have to attend?

It's the process how they handle it like if their is an allegation person gets suspended and yes he does because it's nothing different from a court hearing

I see. Thanks.

So he'd be say arrested if he didn't attend?

Yes but at this hearing they can also decide if they wish to take the matter further and take it through the courts as it is still committed an offence and a breach of trust and contract against the force

Right! Gotcha! That's answered my question. There is a legality to the actions he's allegedly perpetrated so that's why they are following it up. And from other comments I understand it could affect his pension and so on.

That all make perfect sense. Thanks!

The main part is the fact tarnishing the force by having images of the uniform the rest just adds as being a police officer and on a swingers site doesn't go down well then the conduct whilst on duty

Many occupations have to follow a code of conduct if caught face a disciplinary hearing an opportunity to defend the conduct of their actions and face whatever punishment"

Oh yes. I always got that bit. My point was maybe say the officer gets caught "on the job literally on the job" so gets suspended pending his hearing. But in the meantime say he wins the triple rollover Lotto and pisses off to his mansion in the sun and if he's lounging on his floating chair in his private pool with supermodel girlfriend he sure as hell ain't gonna give a stuff about any hearing! Let alone attend!

That's the main thing I wasn't sure of. It's the whole 'former' part that I wasn't sure of.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why aren't cops allowed to be on here?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *parkle1974Woman
over a year ago

Leeds


"Why aren't cops allowed to be on here?"

They are, just not in uniform

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
over a year ago

Newcastle


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

It's a disciplinary hearing

Er... ok. I think we all get that bit!

My question is: If he is a FORMER police officer then he is no longer employed by the police force. If so why are they

holding this disciplinary hearing still? He is no longer their 'responsibility' for want of a better word.

So why are they doing this? And does he have to attend?

It's the process how they handle it like if their is an allegation person gets suspended and yes he does because it's nothing different from a court hearing

I see. Thanks.

So he'd be say arrested if he didn't attend?

Yes but at this hearing they can also decide if they wish to take the matter further and take it through the courts as it is still committed an offence and a breach of trust and contract against the force

Right! Gotcha! That's answered my question. There is a legality to the actions he's allegedly perpetrated so that's why they are following it up. And from other comments I understand it could affect his pension and so on.

That all make perfect sense. Thanks!

The main part is the fact tarnishing the force by having images of the uniform the rest just adds as being a police officer and on a swingers site doesn't go down well then the conduct whilst on duty

Many occupations have to follow a code of conduct if caught face a disciplinary hearing an opportunity to defend the conduct of their actions and face whatever punishment

Oh yes. I always got that bit. My point was maybe say the officer gets caught "on the job literally on the job" so gets suspended pending his hearing. But in the meantime say he wins the triple rollover Lotto and pisses off to his mansion in the sun and if he's lounging on his floating chair in his private pool with supermodel girlfriend he sure as hell ain't gonna give a stuff about any hearing! Let alone attend!

That's the main thing I wasn't sure of. It's the whole 'former' part that I wasn't sure of. "

You can still be sacked and still awaiting a hearing then say the hearing goes well you could go back to work but if the police station goes against the hearing which they can it's time for a career change.

Been few cases nothing fab related but went through just that above re decision.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
over a year ago

Newcastle


"Why aren't cops allowed to be on here?

They are, just not in uniform "

I'd like to peel off your uniform gently whilst playing with your hair

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luttTV/TS
over a year ago

Duns


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

It's a disciplinary hearing

Er... ok. I think we all get that bit!

My question is: If he is a FORMER police officer then he is no longer employed by the police force. If so why are they

holding this disciplinary hearing still? He is no longer their 'responsibility' for want of a better word.

So why are they doing this? And does he have to attend?

It's the process how they handle it like if their is an allegation person gets suspended and yes he does because it's nothing different from a court hearing

I see. Thanks.

So he'd be say arrested if he didn't attend?

Yes but at this hearing they can also decide if they wish to take the matter further and take it through the courts as it is still committed an offence and a breach of trust and contract against the force

Right! Gotcha! That's answered my question. There is a legality to the actions he's allegedly perpetrated so that's why they are following it up. And from other comments I understand it could affect his pension and so on.

That all make perfect sense. Thanks! "

Pretty sure it can’t affect his pension, that sort of thing went out some time ago.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obbytupperMan
over a year ago

Menston near Ilkley


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

It's a disciplinary hearing

Er... ok. I think we all get that bit!

My question is: If he is a FORMER police officer then he is no longer employed by the police force. If so why are they holding this disciplinary hearing still? He is no longer their 'responsibility' for want of a better word.

So why are they doing this? And does he have to attend? "

He has probably resigned to save his pension, the outcome of the disciplinary hearing could negate his right to one.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
over a year ago

Newcastle


"I admit I don't understand this part:

"Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month"

If he is a 'former' police officer I'm taking that as meaning he no longer is one. As in he's resigned or whatever. If that being the case why is there a hearing still? What are the consequences if he says 'bollocks to the lot of you' and doesn't attend?

Sorry if that's a daft question but I am asking it genuinely.

It's a disciplinary hearing

Er... ok. I think we all get that bit!

My question is: If he is a FORMER police officer then he is no longer employed by the police force. If so why are they holding this disciplinary hearing still? He is no longer their 'responsibility' for want of a better word.

So why are they doing this? And does he have to attend?

He has probably resigned to save his pension, the outcome of the disciplinary hearing could negate his right to one. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obbytupperMan
over a year ago

Menston near Ilkley


"So with this it can be a number of things.

1 he was recognised by another and got reported,

2 someone he had met might of tried to put pressure on him (a demand) otherwise would blow the whistle on him.

3 the person who recognised him doesn't like him works at the same location.

Winner gets picked at random "

Or when investigation into his other offence of shagging a customer his phone was searched for evidence and up popped his fab profile?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *JB1954Man
over a year ago

Reading

A few years back . Someone in my company “outed me” for being on fab.

I was on holiday at the time. So only found out when returned to work and started getting “comments”

After asking and being asked by my management how they new.

Found out that person who had done this saw me on cam.

Once I found out who , challenged them in front of management . Proved they were on Fab as member etc.

They had seen me on chat rooms on cam. Was fully dressed . Yes member but . Does this mean breaking company rules ?

Person had to admit he was also member as only way that he found me.

He left a few weeks later.

I was at company until retirement until 2019

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ikemagic OP   Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield

WOW!!!

Now I thought this article would be of interest to Fabbers mainly as Fab got a mention in the media again. And indeed it has so thank you to all the contributors.

But what I did NOT expect was so many of you (mainly private messaging me) telling me that you were either sacked or had to change jobs/careers simply for being on here!!!

That is a whole topic in its own right!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iablo soloWoman
over a year ago

southside

Where are all these uniformed men....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ikemagic OP   Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield


"Where are all these uniformed men.... "

Looking at my inbox they've all been sacked!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *riskynriskyCouple
over a year ago

Essex.

Two points I'd like to raise.

A lot of people have said, he must have been outed by a Fab member.

There are press on here, they apparently have an eye out for stories on a slow news day, that's why you should be careful what you have in your public gallery and never post things like dogging locations.

Secondly, company rules, many years ago I got in an argument with the company I was with, I had checked my contract and argued a point, they pulled out a huge book and said I had signed to say I agreed to follow the company rules, this was the rule book...

Most big companies probably have a similar book and you can bet your job on them having a clause on bringing the company/profession into disrepute.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rHotNottsMan
over a year ago

Dubai & Nottingham


"

My take on this is the main issue is this officer allegedly was on Fab in his uniform with ID showing that I guess is a big no-no. And also that he was doing it during working hours. Happy to be corrected if I am wrong on this.

Also, there may be Fabbers out there who may not realise being on here could affect their livelihood. Like to think most are aware enough but, well, this chap seems likes he's come a cropper. "

The issue is is broke professional standards, simple as that. Any professional, I.e member of professional body that agrees to a code of conductor professional ethics needs to be very careful and discreet

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondCougarWoman
over a year ago

Norfuck! / Lincolnshire

It’s surprising how many guys will send a message of themselves in their uniform - it doesn’t do anything for me and I see it as assertive behaviour they think I will be impressed with!

So you’re a police officer / fireman / pilot …. It’s not their uniform that draws me in and if I feel they think it should I delete. I usually point out it’s not particularly clever to disclose that information either

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondCougarWoman
over a year ago

Norfuck! / Lincolnshire

PS: I don’t think you disclosing his name on here was a great idea OP either!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *weedeldumbCouple (MM)
over a year ago

Leeds & Harrogate

Ran the original article past my mate who is a police officer. He says the crucial bit is...

"In a further unconnected matter, the former officer has attended at the address of a member of the public in the course of his duties on 28th May 2020, following a report that they had been subject of a controlling or coercive relationship.

He subsequently engaged in an intimate personal relationship with this individual."

That is one of the biggest no-no's for an officer to engage in he advises.

Of course he says the showing of both genitals while in uniform and his ID card on a public site will also be addressed as that too seriously breaks the rules.

His other point is the 'clickbaity' nature of the article. The deliberate honing in on Fab to give it that spicy "ooh-err missus its a bit naughty this!!!" angle. Despite it not being the most serious allegation.

I have to agree with him there. I notice looking at the original article that Yorkshire Live is owned by Reach who also own such as the Mirror so its bound to go the seedy little shit-rag approach to entice readers.

Doesn't the excuse the officer though. Or ex-officer I should maybe say.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross

I've read about the first ten comments -

My main concern is that there are people that THICK in the police force.

Take away the job and it's just people looking for sex, fun, company .....

Every now and then some people pipe up about those that won't show faces or blurt every aspect of their life on request and call them fakes.

The 'disrepute' clause in many professions is what makes people rightly guard their full identity online.

Man's a tit.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *weedeldumbCouple (MM)
over a year ago

Leeds & Harrogate


"PS: I don’t think you disclosing his name on here was a great idea OP either! "

It isn't the author that exposed his name. His identity is revealed in the main article on Yorkshire Live which is free for ALL ages to read. And shows screenshots of Fab's signing up page.

The author has merely cut and pasted what is readily available worldwide.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"It's comprising his effectiveness as an officer....it's wrong morally but could jeopardize his standing in the force and possibly his effectiveness in situations like court appearances...as I say ..his sexuality should be his own private business...but fabs is a public forum and a little research can reveal anyone's identity

Surely it's about Pride. Why can't a court judge, an MP, a School teacher, a cop, a fireman be a swinger and still respected by society...is swinging a dirty secret ?"

A point missed I think Tom.

How can they demand respect and have authority or credibility when people have seen them at their most human? Even two bit celebrities have a persona to maintain and keep the necessary 'pretence' on top.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *olden PoleMan
over a year ago

Kent


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!

Definitely. I’ve met a couple. They can’t do that though! Firemen can’t either.

As far as I know its the uniform. They can't have that shown in any setting 'unbecoming' of the profession. I used to meet a couple and he was a pilot for BA but he always said he had to be careful not have his Captain's uniform anywhere on here.

Yes it is definitely. Not sure about army/navy etc as have seen a few pics in those uniforms on here too. "

Seen a few blokes getting a bit near the mark wearing their MTP’s and almost showing the DZ flash ( reg insignia ) or their cap badge.

Armed forces is a professional organisation but the brass wouldn’t go all out to get a squaddie who uses his number 1 dress to charm the ladies / guys

J

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
over a year ago

Newcastle

Classified as inappropriate behaviour given line of occupation their is a thin line and as someone has mentioned part of the contract I shall not but this isn't the first time nor will it be the last sadly people should be allowed to enjoy themselves when it doesn't effect the hours of work

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *weedeldumbCouple (MM)
over a year ago

Leeds & Harrogate


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!

Definitely. I’ve met a couple. They can’t do that though! Firemen can’t either.

As far as I know its the uniform. They can't have that shown in any setting 'unbecoming' of the profession. I used to meet a couple and he was a pilot for BA but he always said he had to be careful not have his Captain's uniform anywhere on here.

Yes it is definitely. Not sure about army/navy etc as have seen a few pics in those uniforms on here too.

Seen a few blokes getting a bit near the mark wearing their MTP’s and almost showing the DZ flash ( reg insignia ) or their cap badge.

Armed forces is a professional organisation but the brass wouldn’t go all out to get a squaddie who uses his number 1 dress to charm the ladies / guys

J "

In my comment above I mentioned about asking a mate who is a copper about this and I asked him about uniforms cos I've seen a lot of squaddies on here. Especially applying when we're organising gangbangs. He said he wasn't sure on military but the main issue with a police officer is he could get compromised, especially by someone he's supposed to be investigating. It could also go against him when facing a defence barrister when giving evidence in court. Which makes sense.

I'm thinking a squaddie doesn't quite have that 'responsibility' for want of a better word. But I guess he can't bring the regiment or whatever into disrepute so needs to be a bit careful still.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *olden PoleMan
over a year ago

Kent


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!

Definitely. I’ve met a couple. They can’t do that though! Firemen can’t either.

As far as I know its the uniform. They can't have that shown in any setting 'unbecoming' of the profession. I used to meet a couple and he was a pilot for BA but he always said he had to be careful not have his Captain's uniform anywhere on here.

Yes it is definitely. Not sure about army/navy etc as have seen a few pics in those uniforms on here too.

Seen a few blokes getting a bit near the mark wearing their MTP’s and almost showing the DZ flash ( reg insignia ) or their cap badge.

Armed forces is a professional organisation but the brass wouldn’t go all out to get a squaddie who uses his number 1 dress to charm the ladies / guys

J

In my comment above I mentioned about asking a mate who is a copper about this and I asked him about uniforms cos I've seen a lot of squaddies on here. Especially applying when we're organising gangbangs. He said he wasn't sure on military but the main issue with a police officer is he could get compromised, especially by someone he's supposed to be investigating. It could also go against him when facing a defence barrister when giving evidence in court. Which makes sense.

I'm thinking a squaddie doesn't quite have that 'responsibility' for want of a better word. But I guess he can't bring the regiment or whatever into disrepute so needs to be a bit careful still. "

Police service is easy target to bash when an officer is deemed to be doing something others may frown upon.

If the officer is playing around whilst on duty and showing his uniform and WC then I guess that’s inviting trouble.

The armed forces army in particular is a different animal all together.

Squads could get shit canned for embarrassing the regiment but the general idea is the lads but a lot on the line so it would take more than a uniform on fabs to want the MOD to roast him.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondCougarWoman
over a year ago

Norfuck! / Lincolnshire


"PS: I don’t think you disclosing his name on here was a great idea OP either!

It isn't the author that exposed his name. His identity is revealed in the main article on Yorkshire Live which is free for ALL ages to read. And shows screenshots of Fab's signing up page.

The author has merely cut and pasted what is readily available worldwide. "

Yes I realise that but I don’t think reposting his name in public here helps the situation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"It's comprising his effectiveness as an officer....it's wrong morally but could jeopardize his standing in the force and possibly his effectiveness in situations like court appearances...as I say ..his sexuality should be his own private business...but fabs is a public forum and a little research can reveal anyone's identity

Surely it's about Pride. Why can't a court judge, an MP, a School teacher, a cop, a fireman be a swinger and still respected by society...is swinging a dirty secret ?

A point missed I think Tom.

How can they demand respect and have authority or credibility when people have seen them at their most human? Even two bit celebrities have a persona to maintain and keep the necessary 'pretence' on top. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've shagged a cop off here, they're entitled to a private discreet sex life like the rest of us xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

For years now I’ve never told anyone at all what I do for work. Ever since someone traced me on the internet. There’s no need for anyone to. It’s too risky.

Mother fuckers! Fucking scroty behaviour! I'm getting right wound up! I don't get would up that easy!

Fucking power hungry control freaks manipulators! Makes me sick!

. Luckily he was ok and was literally doing it to show me how easy it was. This was when I first joined years ago and was a bit naive to it all! I’ve learnt lots of lessons. Even my postcode on here is nowhere near where I live x"

Whaaaat! So I'm hiding in the wrong bush?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The real issue (for me) here isn't the fact a policeman was on Fab, it's the sensationalist wording of the article

It's deliberately worded to make the more Conservative reader utter words like 'disgusting'

How dare people have a sex life, let alone one with multiple partners?

Anyone would think we still lived in Victorian Britain at times

"Pull my nightdress down when you're finished Dear"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

Nooo!

That is disgusting behaviour!

Gosh, now I'm rethinking being on here!

Could be worse could check your messages and find one saying I had great fun watching your ass wiggling about as you walked around your shop today

What?!

Yup patient where I work apparently "

That's disrespectful

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

For years now I’ve never told anyone at all what I do for work. Ever since someone traced me on the internet. There’s no need for anyone to. It’s too risky.

Mother fuckers! Fucking scroty behaviour! I'm getting right wound up! I don't get would up that easy!

Fucking power hungry control freaks manipulators! Makes me sick!

. Luckily he was ok and was literally doing it to show me how easy it was. This was when I first joined years ago and was a bit naive to it all! I’ve learnt lots of lessons. Even my postcode on here is nowhere near where I live x

Whaaaat! So I'm hiding in the wrong bush?"

So it’s you behind that tree in my front garden!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What an idiot.putting up a picture of his warrant badge and uniform,what did he expect

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why aren't cops allowed to be on here?

They are, just not in uniform "

Ah... Thanks!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atcherwankerMan
over a year ago

Birmingham

I've not read all of the replies in here, so apologies if I'm repeating something already covered:

Going by the second part of the text from the article, It's possible I may have read a brief statement from the force in question regarding him. (if not, it's another copper doing the exact same thing, which is even more alarming) He was apparently dismissed after being found to have entered into sexual relationships with vulnerable women - generally victims of abusive/violent relationships or sex crimes - that he had attended in an official capacity. I wonder if his presence on here was discovered as a result of deeper investigation by the police complaints bods after his indiscretions with victims had been reported?

(Apologies, again, if it wasn't the same guy that I was reading about. I am presuming, to a certain extent.)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Queen of TartsWoman
Forum Mod

over a year ago

My Own Little World

Many people post pic of themselves wearing their work uniform, whether it is police, the fire service, paramedics and the NHS, armed forces etc standing next to their police car, fire truck in the hope that it will get them a shag.

I don't think most of them realise that it can get them sacked.

Many employment contracts have morality clauses in them (whether you believe they are right and fair or not) and posting pics on here fucking in uniform will fall foul of that clause. Even posting a recognisable face pic can cause trouble with your employer.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rowser79Man
over a year ago

Cork

I’d be of the same opinion that his membership here was discovered as part of an investigation into his relationship with a vulnerable woman!!

Posting an image in uniform reflects bad on whichever force he was in. Engaging in a relationship with the victim of a crime he was investigating is the bigger issue.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hindyMan
over a year ago

Mayfair

The problem is the Huddersfield Examiner. It used to be a wonderful local paper but now that its been absorbed by the Reach Group its deteriorated into a crappy little shitrag like the rest of them sadly.

This 'story' is really about a police officer who abused his position of authority and trust by being engaged in a sexual relationship while on duty. That is the main point here. It was also found in the investigation (according to other reports on this) that he was on Fab and had posted a pic of his uniform and identifying details which is also against the rules. But the main reason they are 'throwing the book at him' is the 1st part.

Now the problem then is this shitrag sensationalises the story. The Examiner is an ailing paper and they're desperate for clicks from ad revenue money. So the 'journalist' (I use that term lightly here) twists the narrative to make it sound like he's been investigated principally for being on Fab and all the rest is a 'in other news' afterthought. No the journalist is wanting the 'juicy' scoop of him being on Fab which isn't a 'crime'. Just the issue of ID and uniform. But the article seethes with 'moral superiority' that Fab is 'wrong' and 'dirty' and 'all the unclean filth on it should be outed and sacked' type of vibe that has no place on what should be a local newspaper site that can be accessed by any viewer of any age.

So, yes, the officer deserves to be investigated and face all coming consequences.

But it'd be nice if jumped up little hacks from crap little shitrag lamestream news sites also reported the actual facts truthfully in the context they require so the public understands the full situation.

Not much to ask. Not really.

But as one famously quipped: "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story".

Lamestream media? They make me vomit.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!"
A couple of years ago a rather lovely police lady and I had a fun evening in the Tower Bridge hotel. I did say ‘Ello ello Ello’ too many times though. Alas no uniform.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ewismixedbbcMan
over a year ago

birmingham

Policia are the worst they into that kinky shit

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *C7995XCouple
over a year ago

London


"There are cops on here. Fact. I’ve been to parties with them!!"

Yes both male and female

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 13/07/21 13:17:59]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Had a meet once he was a copper off here & he turned up in all his uniform & his police motorbike as he was a traffic cop park outside my house he came in we done the deed and off to go he went he’s still on here to!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Thought fellow Fabbers would find this of interest that appeared on the site of my local 'newspaper' the Huddersfield Examiner and its website Yorkshire Live. The article reads:

‘West Yorkshire cop accused of 'uploading image of genitals on Fab Swingers website'

Details of misconduct hearing revealed by West Yorkshire Police: A former West Yorkshire police officer uploaded naked images of himself to a website called 'Fab Swingers', it is claimed.

Andrew Bell, a former police constable, is facing a gross misconduct hearing later this month following allegations that he conducted himself in a manner that broke professional standards.

The allegations, outlined by West Yorkshire Police, are as follows:

"On or before the 29th June 2020, uploading images of himself to website, namely Fab Swingers.

"One image depicted the former officer wearing police uniform and a warrant card.

"A further image showed his naked torso and genitalia and was displayed on the profile page of the account.

"In a further unconnected matter, the former officer has attended at the address of a member of the public in the course of his duties on 28th May 2020, following a report that they had been subject of a controlling or coercive relationship.

"He subsequently engaged in an intimate personal relationship with this individual."

A gross misconduct hearing is expected to take place at West Yorkshire Police headquarters in Wakefield on July 19.

Fab Swingers describes itself as 'fun, free and fabulous'. The home page says: "Run by swingers, for swingers, for free. "Live cam, chat, email, pics: Free."

It adds: "Takes 3-4 minutes to register and get full use of site."

Would-be swingers are warned "DO NOT use your real name" on the online form.

.

My take on this is the main issue is this officer allegedly was on Fab in his uniform with ID showing that I guess is a big no-no. And also that he was doing it during working hours. Happy to be corrected if I am wrong on this.

Also, there may be Fabbers out there who may not realise being on here could affect their livelihood. Like to think most are aware enough but, well, this chap seems likes he's come a cropper.

PS - I'm sure Fab won't mind being screenshotted in the article - there's no such thing as bad publicity after all. Especially if its free. "

I know the guy and yes he did have his pic in uniform but it was sent as a direct photo not as a downloaded image on his profile.

Also it was some sad disgruntled female that then screenshot and reported him because he didn’t want to meet her again… should we all be in fear of getting reported to our employers if we turn people down? I know people it’s happened to and have had it threatened too… fabs supposed to be about having fun… x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I've spoken to a few policemen, one being local. Obviously it's misconduct in his uniform etc & fucking whilst on duty but we're all human. Wonder who the angry person was that told on him.

I had someone send screenshots of my profile to my work, all because I didn't meet him.

Alot of sad twats out there

For years now I’ve never told anyone at all what I do for work. Ever since someone traced me on the internet. There’s no need for anyone to. It’s too risky.

Mother fuckers! Fucking scroty behaviour! I'm getting right wound up! I don't get would up that easy!

Fucking power hungry control freaks manipulators! Makes me sick!

. Luckily he was ok and was literally doing it to show me how easy it was. This was when I first joined years ago and was a bit naive to it all! I’ve learnt lots of lessons. Even my postcode on here is nowhere near where I live x

Whaaaat! So I'm hiding in the wrong bush?

So it’s you behind that tree in my front garden! "

That will be some other perve with the right postcode...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ifferentClassMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

Whatever your view on what a person’s right is to have a sex life in the manner they see fit, the reality is that letting a stranger know what job you do, where you work etc is a risk. Sending someone you don’t know a pic in your work gear is a risk, sending someone you don’t know a face pic is a risk. Any of the above can be used against you either for coercion or just out of pure vindictiveness.

If someone doesn’t fully grasp this then they shouldn’t be allowed out by themselves.

The vast majority on here would be highly compromised if evidence of their activity on here was made known to their employer. Some employers wouldn’t give a shit, some employers would carry out disciplinaries, and in the worst cases people’s jobs will be lost, and lives effectively destroyed. Again, this is reality and should not be news to anyone remotely able to think. Do we really know how our employer would react? I think the answer is a foregone conclusion for any cop, lawyer, teacher, nurse etc but would others want to take that gamble?

If you have public pics on show, is it really a shock if someone messages and said they saw you at the supermarket? It is playing into the hands of creepy bastards who would just love the thought of freaking someone out in this way. As much as it is anyone’s right to have their face on show, don’t be naive enough to think that it isn’t fodder for misuse. Of course, you may not give a damn about that prospect - hats off to you if you are in such a position.

And because many acts of ‘reporting’ can be carried out anonymously, whether to employers or printouts of screenshots sent to family - it is carte blanche for any cowardly, vindictive asshole as they don’t even have to ‘out’ themselves in the process.

Apologies for rambling, but maybe it is a little reminder about being careful on here with pics, personal info, work info etc Think about if it is really worth sending that pic in uniform to a stranger on the off chance it might lead to a shag.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agneto.Man
over a year ago

Bham

While I think it's a bit bad that it came to that, he signed up for the terms.

Unfortunately that's one of the things in public facing jobs, this life has to be a secret.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust RachelTV/TS
over a year ago

Horsham

I find it funny that there is a newspaper article on a copper being in here, but nothing is mentioned about the amount of people meeting up during covid restrictions.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *batMan
over a year ago

Alicante, Spain. (Sometimes in Wales)

His downfall was the second bit. The bit about an intimate relationship with a vulnerable person he met as part of his duty. BIG no no!

Gbat

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss LovelyWoman
over a year ago

Here and There

Everyone has a right to a private life, regardless of their job. He’s free to be a swinger if he likes, he just can’t link it to his job.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ainsb1Man
over a year ago

North Lincs/S.Yorks

I would love to meet a cop on here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issAphroditeWoman
over a year ago

Norwich

And this is why some people are cagey about their privacy. We are all equally entitled to it but for some of us, our jobs mean we are obligated to comply with strict conduct rules or have more of a public profile

It's not a case of thinking we're better or our privacy is more important than yours but rather it could cost us our professional reputation or even job.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

I have few pictures on here. I made the mistake of posting a picture publically on here once when I was working in uniform.. and lost my job..

Apparently it was not appropriate for Ronald McDonald holding his quarter pounder to be photographed on here.. it was not the burger that put the ladies off but the cheese..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

Oh for the day to arrive when people are free to do whatever they want to sexually and consensually and for it to be nobody's business, even if they have a public duty. It feels like the dark ages.

I've dated and been shagged by police and other uniformed guys. Always a pleasure

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abasaurus RexMan
over a year ago

Gloucestershire

It’s just posting photos in the uniform and being identified by his warrant card. Highly doubt anyone cares he’s posted his bits on here. That’s up to him, as long as he does it in his own time in a personal capacity.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I haven't read the full thread ..........

But I've been chatting to a few Gardai/Police/Cops/Detectives from day 1...........

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I haven't read the full thread ..........

But I've been chatting to a few Gardai/Police/Cops/Detectives from day 1........... "

Agus Ciúnas Agam

xxxxxxx I shall remain silent

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top