Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No " Why not? I think it would help make FAB better and out the jokers | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No Why not? I think it would help make FAB better and out the jokers" I don’t like to be reviewed or rated in any form. People would abuse it. There would be an option not to show it so if it’s negative then people wouldn’t show it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you think a reliability score needs to be introduced? There should be a check box to say your meeting someone and date of meeting (this is not shown publicly) then 24 hours later after meet there should be four options (all private again) - met the person - didn’t meet but rearranged (add new date) - didn’t meet (there was communication) - let down (no communication) Then a score (out of 4) would be displayed publicly on reliability of the person in question… What do you think? " Open to way too much abuse by people with ulterior motives for making life hard for someone. There’d be endless - “I did message”, “no you didn’t” stuff for the mods too. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Not 100% what the outcome of reporting is though, whether they get a short term ban or anything. Anyone know? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No Why not? I think it would help make FAB better and out the jokers" Plenty of people find other ways to out the fake profiles by using a mix of common sense, due diligence and gut feeling. If something seems to good to be true it quite possibly is. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you think a reliability score needs to be introduced? There should be a check box to say your meeting someone and date of meeting (this is not shown publicly) then 24 hours later after meet there should be four options (all private again) - met the person - didn’t meet but rearranged (add new date) - didn’t meet (there was communication) - let down (no communication) Then a score (out of 4) would be displayed publicly on reliability of the person in question… What do you think? " It would be abused and people be victimised. Make your own minds up - you’re adults. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sounds like trip advisor. Not sure I wanted to be rated like a restaurant thanks. " I was just about to put that  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No Why not? I think it would help make FAB better and out the jokers I don’t like to be reviewed or rated in any form. People would abuse it. There would be an option not to show it so if it’s negative then people wouldn’t show it. " I rate you highly. Especially with old fashioned clocks that you’re gran had. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No Why not? I think it would help make FAB better and out the jokers I don’t like to be reviewed or rated in any form. People would abuse it. There would be an option not to show it so if it’s negative then people wouldn’t show it. I rate you highly. Especially with old fashioned clocks that you’re gran had. " . They’re not on show. They’re in the loft lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fab already provides a mechanism for no shows, you can use the 'report them' link from their profile where one of the options for reporting "didnt show up"
Not 100% what the outcome of reporting is though, whether they get a short term ban or anything. Anyone know?"Really? That’s interesting to know, could it be improved and people warned that repeated reporting of their profile will involve a ban. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lately someone updated their status absolutely slating me simply because I declined their offer. Imagine how a rate score would be abused. Some people on here are not very nice. It's not trip advisor! " That’s crap they did that…they should be banned for life for doing that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is the verification system for proving that a person is genuine and to provide feedback. I do tend to agree that there should be an effective way of policing other users on fab, to protect people and to flag up potential threats but what that looks like without being abused, is something that I’m unsure about. " That’s the thing…most on here are a genuine bunch, there would be a few that would use and abuse it, it’s working out how to make it abuse proof | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lately someone updated their status absolutely slating me simply because I declined their offer. Imagine how a rate score would be abused. Some people on here are not very nice. It's not trip advisor! " That’s horrible! I hope that you reported them? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A rating system will be gamed. They always are. Leave it as it is, though I'd consider making reviews private across the board. I don't need to know what Keith's todger got up to with Margaret. " Could it be an extension of the review system currently in place? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Do you think a reliability score needs to be introduced? There should be a check box to say your meeting someone and date of meeting (this is not shown publicly) then 24 hours later after meet there should be four options (all private again) - met the person - didn’t meet but rearranged (add new date) - didn’t meet (there was communication) - let down (no communication) Then a score (out of 4) would be displayed publicly on reliability of the person in question… What do you think? " No.. because in reality nobody has to meet anybody, even if they have had said they would do so. It is not nice when people ghost and don't turn up ect. But that's the way of the game A system like that would be open to abuse. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is the verification system for proving that a person is genuine and to provide feedback. I do tend to agree that there should be an effective way of policing other users on fab, to protect people and to flag up potential threats but what that looks like without being abused, is something that I’m unsure about. That’s the thing…most on here are a genuine bunch, there would be a few that would use and abuse it, it’s working out how to make it abuse proof" The verification process is open to abuse, so is the photo verification. People always find work arounds but a system that’s fair for both parties and gave future partners a genuine insight, would be invaluable | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can see it now Turned me down one star Was in her area had 10 minutes to spare seen she was online she wasn’t up for spreading her legs One star Wouldn’t meet a blank profile one star Call her a slut and showed her my cock on my open message she blocked me one star Can you see how this is going " It would be to design something that stops that kind of abuse…. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can see it now Turned me down one star Was in her area had 10 minutes to spare seen she was online she wasn’t up for spreading her legs One star Wouldn’t meet a blank profile one star Call her a slut and showed her my cock on my open message she blocked me one star Can you see how this is going It would be to design something that stops that kind of abuse…." Nothing can be designed to stop it or in less it was a two way authentication system Whare both parties need to register with fab that they agree to meet at such and such a time and date before leting you in to the rateing system And if someone not going to turn up they not going to authenticate it to let the other party in so it will be widel open to abuse like that if it’s a one way system And they fab would have to inploy a full time staff off adim to go though everyone and delete such things it would be a full time job | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can see it now Turned me down one star Was in her area had 10 minutes to spare seen she was online she wasn’t up for spreading her legs One star Wouldn’t meet a blank profile one star Call her a slut and showed her my cock on my open message she blocked me one star Can you see how this is going It would be to design something that stops that kind of abuse…. Nothing can be designed to stop it or in less it was a two way authentication system Whare both parties need to register with fab that they agree to meet at such and such a time and date before leting you in to the rateing system And if someone not going to turn up they not going to authenticate it to let the other party in so it will be widel open to abuse like that if it’s a one way system And they fab would have to inploy a full time staff off adim to go though everyone and delete such things it would be a full time job " There are algorithms that can take the heat out of that…you could have staff look at disputes to the ratings. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can see it now Turned me down one star Was in her area had 10 minutes to spare seen she was online she wasn’t up for spreading her legs One star Wouldn’t meet a blank profile one star Call her a slut and showed her my cock on my open message she blocked me one star Can you see how this is going It would be to design something that stops that kind of abuse…. Nothing can be designed to stop it or in less it was a two way authentication system Whare both parties need to register with fab that they agree to meet at such and such a time and date before leting you in to the rateing system And if someone not going to turn up they not going to authenticate it to let the other party in so it will be widel open to abuse like that if it’s a one way system And they fab would have to inploy a full time staff off adim to go though everyone and delete such things it would be a full time job There are algorithms that can take the heat out of that…you could have staff look at disputes to the ratings." How much time do you think the staff have got? They're all volunteers who do moderation in their spare time, Fab would have to start employing an army to go through all the disputes that would get raised. There's no perfect system, no magic bullet. Like it or not everyone just has to use their own common sense when it comes to messaging, geting a feel for people, then meeting and getting another feel from them  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sounds like trip advisor. Not sure I wanted to be rated like a restaurant thanks. " This … it’s a no from me to that idea | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can see it now Turned me down one star Was in her area had 10 minutes to spare seen she was online she wasn’t up for spreading her legs One star Wouldn’t meet a blank profile one star Call her a slut and showed her my cock on my open message she blocked me one star Can you see how this is going It would be to design something that stops that kind of abuse…. Nothing can be designed to stop it or in less it was a two way authentication system Whare both parties need to register with fab that they agree to meet at such and such a time and date before leting you in to the rateing system And if someone not going to turn up they not going to authenticate it to let the other party in so it will be widel open to abuse like that if it’s a one way system And they fab would have to inploy a full time staff off adim to go though everyone and delete such things it would be a full time job There are algorithms that can take the heat out of that…you could have staff look at disputes to the ratings." YouTube spent over 100 million on a new ad algorithm that’s ment to stop ad blocker it got cracked in 5 minutes flat YouTube basically set fire to 100 million dollars what chance has fab got So you implant a world algorithm So here we go it’s looking for key world Wouldn’t F m.E O.fF MY blank pr.profile O.ne s t a r algorithm World algorithm defeated user need to repot it to admin and have them remove it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way too open to abuse. " This, it would have to be something that both parties would have to agree on before a meet to work. Otherwise it would simply be open to abuse. And those who have no intention on meeting wouldn't agree to it in the first place. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sounds like trip advisor. Not sure I wanted to be rated like a restaurant thanks. I was just about to put that "It would be handy to know which fab people are clean enough to eat at | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sounds like trip advisor. Not sure I wanted to be rated like a restaurant thanks. I was just about to put that
It would be handy to know which fab people are clean enough to eat at " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
