FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Picky Women

Jump to newest
 

By *opsy Rogers OP   Woman
over a year ago

London

Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *VineMan
over a year ago

The right place


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky."

Agreed. A lot of men are picky too.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ealitybitesMan
over a year ago

Belfast

I wouldn't shag any woman that wasn't picky/fussy/selective.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Are you saying men aren’t picky ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *irty desireWoman
over a year ago

newcatle


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky."

Me neither.. its just another excuse they add to there tiny violin

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky."

Because they are fucking idiots... Thirsty idiots!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *yrdsisWoman
over a year ago

Gleam Street

It's a blanket cover all to stop them whining and make them feelall better

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts

I hate when people say I’m picky/choosy etc. I just know what I want and what I don’t want. Nothing to do with standards and being picky.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky."

Agreed ..

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I’m just playing forum bingo, just waiting for someone to turn up and it will be a full house.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ecadent_DevonMan
over a year ago

Okehampton


"I’m just playing forum bingo, just waiting for someone to turn up and it will be a full house. "

How do?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *uicybbwWoman
over a year ago

Buckinghamshire

Men get over excited

They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything.

We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *orYourPleasure xxWoman
over a year ago

Leeds

Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

These women be talking like men are collective unit, instead of individual hoomans.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky.

Me neither.. its just another excuse they add to there tiny violin "

Fixed it!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"These women be talking like men are collective unit, instead of individual hoomans."

Haha. To be fair some men are quite choosy. I prefer those men.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ecadent_DevonMan
over a year ago

Okehampton

Yeap all men are arseholes. Except the good ones #youknowwhoyouare

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ofdiamondsMan
over a year ago

Between wisbech & Kings lynn

It's not about pickiness, that's just something to make them feel better for being turned down.

If someone doesn't like you that way it doesn't automatically make them picky

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think picky isn't the right term, should be using "selective" or "true to your type". We do all have a type, a body part etc that we are attracted to.

In response to your question tho, the answer is .... be true to yourself and what you find attractive in a man, regardless of what others think.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *irty desireWoman
over a year ago

newcatle


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky.

Me neither.. its just another excuse they add to there tiny violin

Fixed it!"

Love it x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ? "

I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ?

I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters "

I couldn’t have sex with someone I wasn’t attracted to physically. No matter how decent they were.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Men get over excited

They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything.

We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called. "

They? Men? Could you possibly - just in the interests of being polite - not refer to all men, as though there were no exceptions to your self-made “rule”. Otherwise, ya know, it sounds sexist as f**k. Thanks

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall

Wow the man bashing is strong today

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wow the man bashing is strong today"

You noticed too ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ?

I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters

I couldn’t have sex with someone I wasn’t attracted to physically. No matter how decent they were. "

But looks are subjective so i doubt you have fancied everyone you have had sex with.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"Men get over excited

They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything.

We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called.

They? Men? Could you possibly - just in the interests of being polite - not refer to all men, as though there were no exceptions to your self-made “rule”. Otherwise, ya know, it sounds sexist as f**k. Thanks "

He’s right to be fair

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Being picky - or fussy, or whatever word you choose - isn’t a bad trait.

To me, it just means being true to your values and beliefs, in terms of how you go about selecting people with whom you may potentially choose to share intimacy or even a bed* with.

*note: beds aren’t the only place for “a making the a love” (must be said in an Italian accent)

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ?

I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters

I couldn’t have sex with someone I wasn’t attracted to physically. No matter how decent they were.

But looks are subjective so i doubt you have fancied everyone you have had sex with. "

That sentence doesn’t make sense at all to me.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

BINGO

I’m here

.

.

.

.

.

It wasn’t me, was it? Sorry City

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *VineMan
over a year ago

The right place

Picky is another word so selective. I would think most people are selective. And therefore picky.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By * and R cple4Couple
over a year ago

swansea


"Wow the man bashing is strong today"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"BINGO

I’m here

.

.

.

.

.

It wasn’t me, was it? Sorry City "

Nope, I haven’t shouted house yet!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ?

I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters

I couldn’t have sex with someone I wasn’t attracted to physically. No matter how decent they were.

But looks are subjective so i doubt you have fancied everyone you have had sex with.

That sentence doesn’t make sense at all to me. "

Looks are subjective so yes I have fancied everyone I’ve had sex with 100%.

Would have made more sense if you’d have said looks are subjective so I doubt someone else would fancy everyone I’ve had sex with.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ecadent_DevonMan
over a year ago

Okehampton

Do I have to climb down from schlong mountain and knock some heads together again?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *orbidden eastMan
over a year ago

london dodging electric scooters


"Picky is another word so selective. I would think most people are selective. And therefore picky. "

There you go sir got it in one.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *etcplCouple
over a year ago

Gapping Fanny


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky."

Picky = A person’s preferences surely?

At least no one gave me a free fuck coupon when I joined that I could cash in to whomever I wanted!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I could shag someone I didn't physically fancy and have done.

But on Fab I am very picky as I want a bit more than 'just a shag'. Even my profile is deliberately off-putting.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"Wow the man bashing is strong today

You noticed too ?"

Is there a mallet emoji?!

*Mallet bashing man emoji*

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I’m just playing forum bingo, just waiting for someone to turn up and it will be a full house. "

What do we win?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I’m just playing forum bingo, just waiting for someone to turn up and it will be a full house.

What do we win?"

A mallet, apparently

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky."

……

It is not picky to have standards and preferences - I’ve seen too many male profiles that clearly appear to have neither

Just because someone does have preferences it doesn’t mean that it is set in stone, they can be changed for the right person.

For the wrong person it becomes easier to say to them that if they bothered their arse to read my preferences before they initiated contact they’d have known they were wasting their time.

My preferences are clearly written on my profile I wish men would too - they sadly seem to have a huge net and just trawl the site for anything they can get rather that target something specific

Anyone who understands marketing knows that’s not going to get them anywhere except nowhere

- Feisty Lady

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *parkle1974Woman
over a year ago

Leeds

I called it being selective x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ablo minibar123Woman
over a year ago

.


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky."
exactly!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ex HolesMan
over a year ago

Up North

Another man bashing thread I see.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Men get over excited

They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything.

We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called. "

What would be a good name for a charitable hooker service?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"I’m just playing forum bingo, just waiting for someone to turn up and it will be a full house.

What do we win?

A mallet, apparently "

Gimme it I’m gonna go proper man bashing

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli

I like women being picky, I'm picky myself and there is nothing wrong with that

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"Men get over excited

They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything.

We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called.

What would be a good name for a charitable hooker service?"

Free Fuckz

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I have messages from women that arnt my type. Im not desperate for a fuck. But women think we are.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ecadent_DevonMan
over a year ago

Okehampton


"Men get over excited

They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything.

We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called.

What would be a good name for a charitable hooker service?"

Altruistic Escorts - “We Give a Fuck”

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nothing wrong in being picky

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Picky woman and proud. Ive been called 'stuck up' and 'hard work' for expecting some rapport before deciding on a meet. Thats a delete.

Im more aroused by mental than visual stimulation so chiselled abs or gym bod can only get someone so far. Id make no apologies or have any regrets for that.

As my early Fabguru advised 'You do you Boo'

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I’m just playing forum bingo, just waiting for someone to turn up and it will be a full house.

What do we win?

A mallet, apparently "

Ah that figures....

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Picky woman and proud. Ive been called 'stuck up' and 'hard work' for expecting some rapport before deciding on a meet. Thats a delete.

Im more aroused by mental than visual stimulation so chiselled abs or gym bod can only get someone so far. Id make no apologies or have any regrets for that.

As my early Fabguru advised 'You do you Boo' "

On point, she is (Yoda Style)

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

*disclaimer: you do NOT look like yoda

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It makes me wonder what the ‘hit rate’ is for these men offline. Are they able to get every woman they speak to into bed? I’m not quite certain what warrants their rant here.

If their success rate here is so much worse than offline, logic would dictate that they ought to log off and conduct their business offline.

I’m mystified as the solution seems awfully clear.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *issLipsandhipsWoman
over a year ago

middle of nowhere


"Men get over excited

They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything.

We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called.

What would be a good name for a charitable hooker service?

Altruistic Escorts - “We Give a Fuck” "

Brilliant!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Know that feeling all two well

First message I am the hottest thing on planet earth

Say no

And the next thing I am just some guy in a dress who want to fuck you any way

Get a kick out off it ever time and think

Well clearly you did

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky."

Then women are so picky they’re not even happy when the standby cock turns up instead of the original

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rHotNottsMan
over a year ago

Dubai & Nottingham

Well the fact there’s so many pitiful men here makes it easier for decent guys imo, if you’re half decent you’re snapped up !

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky.

Then women are so picky they’re not even happy when the standby cock turns up instead of the original "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"These women be talking like men are collective unit, instead of individual hoomans."

I was referring to the specific group of men that the OP was referring to

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ?

I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters "

Being attracted to someone is not the same as being judgemental about looks... Unfortunately too many don't understand this!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ?

I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters

Being attracted to someone is not the same as being judgemental about looks... Unfortunately too many don't understand this!! "

It’s quite scary and unbelievable how many don’t! Surely that’s just a given. Common knowledge, logic!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky."

Maybe some people the term picky when they actually mean preferences

We all have the right, men and women

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky.

Then women are so picky they’re not even happy when the standby cock turns up instead of the original "

It's like a bloody tombola

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ?

I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters

Being attracted to someone is not the same as being judgemental about looks... Unfortunately too many don't understand this!!

It’s quite scary and unbelievable how many don’t! Surely that’s just a given. Common knowledge, logic!"

Seriously... If I don't fancy someone enough to want to fuck them, do they really just assume that they must be ugly... Or even that I think they are... I don't fucking fancy Brad Pitt ffs!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"Everyone has the right to be picky. You wouldn't have sex with someone you didn't find attractive would you ?

I disagree. Yes its good to be picky but you cant tell me no one has ever had sex with someone they found attractive. Not everyone is judgemental over looks and prefer someone who is genuine and reliable. I have met women who some would say are not attractive but they have been decent people. Sometimes the so called attractive people are the biggest timewasters

Being attracted to someone is not the same as being judgemental about looks... Unfortunately too many don't understand this!!

It’s quite scary and unbelievable how many don’t! Surely that’s just a given. Common knowledge, logic!

Seriously... If I don't fancy someone enough to want to fuck them, do they really just assume that they must be ugly... Or even that I think they are... I don't fucking fancy Brad Pitt ffs! "

Me neither. Or George Clooney! I never seem to go for the ones other people think are “perfect looking” anyway. I have a unique taste. Also if I don’t fancy someone nothing will be happening either even if they have the best personality in the world.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There's nothing as fragile as a bruised ego.

I get through fab safe in the knowledge I'm not to everyone's taste, but the few I have met were well worth meeting. They were "picky", they were selective, discerning even!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ndrew CareyMan
over a year ago

Peterborough, Cambridgeshire & Lincolnshire


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky."

Unfortunately some people think that just because users are on the site, they are gagging for it and will shag anyone.

I dread to think what messages women receive as some of the messages I get (sorry, demands) are ridiculous.

Couples are especially problematic in my experience.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham

This thread again?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham

People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky.

Me neither.. its just another excuse they add to there tiny violin "

Suck my tiny violin!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I hate when people say I’m picky/choosy etc. I just know what I want and what I don’t want. Nothing to do with standards and being picky. "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's like being in a people supermarket....you pick the food you like....if there's no avocado your not gonna get a kipper instead....

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion."

Nah that’s crap. I only meet who I think are 10/10. And wouldn’t matter how many or how little men there are here I still wouldn’t meet them. Ratio means shit to me.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion.

Nah that’s crap. I only meet who I think are 10/10. And wouldn’t matter how many or how little men there are here I still wouldn’t meet them. Ratio means shit to me. "

It still applies though, the bigger the pool of people, the more 10/10 people there will be, eventually you’ll hit a point where you won’t meet some of the 10/10 people because the pool is too big.

Remember, a 10/10 is a 10/10 stood alone. But if there’s 100 10/10 guys stood around him? He might not be in your radar anymore

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion.

Nah that’s crap. I only meet who I think are 10/10. And wouldn’t matter how many or how little men there are here I still wouldn’t meet them. Ratio means shit to me.

It still applies though, the bigger the pool of people, the more 10/10 people there will be, eventually you’ll hit a point where you won’t meet some of the 10/10 people because the pool is too big.

Remember, a 10/10 is a 10/10 stood alone. But if there’s 100 10/10 guys stood around him? He might not be in your radar anymore "

Nope. You’ve lost me now

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion.

Nah that’s crap. I only meet who I think are 10/10. And wouldn’t matter how many or how little men there are here I still wouldn’t meet them. Ratio means shit to me.

It still applies though, the bigger the pool of people, the more 10/10 people there will be, eventually you’ll hit a point where you won’t meet some of the 10/10 people because the pool is too big.

Remember, a 10/10 is a 10/10 stood alone. But if there’s 100 10/10 guys stood around him? He might not be in your radar anymore

Nope. You’ve lost me now "

It’s just maths. Nothing complicated to it. As the pool size increases, individual chances of meeting decrease. And there’s nothing wrong with that, you’re acting defensive like it’s a fault about you. It’s not. It’s just what happens when you have large pools of men that massively out number the women

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's a kinder thing to say to someone than "You've got no chance you ugly fuck".

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion."

This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion.

This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite! "

Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this?

It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion.

Nah that’s crap. I only meet who I think are 10/10. And wouldn’t matter how many or how little men there are here I still wouldn’t meet them. Ratio means shit to me.

It still applies though, the bigger the pool of people, the more 10/10 people there will be, eventually you’ll hit a point where you won’t meet some of the 10/10 people because the pool is too big.

Remember, a 10/10 is a 10/10 stood alone. But if there’s 100 10/10 guys stood around him? He might not be in your radar anymore

Nope. You’ve lost me now

It’s just maths. Nothing complicated to it. As the pool size increases, individual chances of meeting decrease. And there’s nothing wrong with that, you’re acting defensive like it’s a fault about you. It’s not. It’s just what happens when you have large pools of men that massively out number the women "

Defensive? No. I don’t have faults.

There’s quite a large pool of men on fab now.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's a kinder thing to say to someone than "You've got no chance you ugly fuck"."

If that's what you think it means then you need to work on that!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion.

This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite!

Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this?

It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys "

No! They aren't!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's a kinder thing to say to someone than "You've got no chance you ugly fuck".

If that's what you think it means then you need to work on that! "

There's always one.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's a kinder thing to say to someone than "You've got no chance you ugly fuck".

If that's what you think it means then you need to work on that!

There's always one."

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion.

This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite!

Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this?

It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys

No! They aren't! "

Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy.

Now scale that up to 100,000 single guys on here. There’s plenty of guys that would be getting meets, except they’re being pushed out by the sheer size of the pool.

You seem really defensive about it. But like I said, I’ve not a knock on anyone, it’s just maths

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion.

This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite!

Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this?

It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys

No! They aren't!

Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy.

Now scale that up to 100,000 single guys on here. There’s plenty of guys that would be getting meets, except they’re being pushed out by the sheer size of the pool.

You seem really defensive about it. But like I said, I’ve not a knock on anyone, it’s just maths "

If I liked 2 guys enough to want to fuck them... I would... If there were 20... I would... Alot want now or nowt... Now who is doing someone out of a meet?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

But just because I think someone is a 10,or attractive enough to want to meet them it doesn't mean every woman in my area will... Because it's only near your theory with 1 woman at a time

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion.

This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite!

Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this?

It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys

No! They aren't!

Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy.

Now scale that up to 100,000 single guys on here. There’s plenty of guys that would be getting meets, except they’re being pushed out by the sheer size of the pool.

You seem really defensive about it. But like I said, I’ve not a knock on anyone, it’s just maths

If I liked 2 guys enough to want to fuck them... I would... If there were 20... I would... Alot want now or nowt... Now who is doing someone out of a meet? "

That might be true for you, but it’s not true for everyone, lots of people don’t meet often, so only the best picks get through.

The example still stands, and like I said, it’s not a knock on anyone, it’s just how the game is rigged. But let’s not make a thread and act like it isn’t rigged like that. Guys that would get meets often don’t because of the sheer volume of guys. And I think it’s those ones that get extra butt hurt.

It’s been true through out history. With science we’ve found that while 80% of women were able to pass on their genes. Only roughly 20% of guys were.

That 80% leaves a lot of butt hurt sexless guys through history

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy. "

Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion.

This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite!

Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this?

It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys

No! They aren't!

Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy.

Now scale that up to 100,000 single guys on here. There’s plenty of guys that would be getting meets, except they’re being pushed out by the sheer size of the pool.

You seem really defensive about it. But like I said, I’ve not a knock on anyone, it’s just maths

If I liked 2 guys enough to want to fuck them... I would... If there were 20... I would... Alot want now or nowt... Now who is doing someone out of a meet?

That might be true for you, but it’s not true for everyone, lots of people don’t meet often, so only the best picks get through.

The example still stands, and like I said, it’s not a knock on anyone, it’s just how the game is rigged. But let’s not make a thread and act like it isn’t rigged like that. Guys that would get meets often don’t because of the sheer volume of guys. And I think it’s those ones that get extra butt hurt.

It’s been true through out history. With science we’ve found that while 80% of women were able to pass on their genes. Only roughly 20% of guys were.

That 80% leaves a lot of butt hurt sexless guys through history "

Tbf... I can't be arsed to explain that you are still, somewhat, mistaken... If attraction was the only variable, you would be, more so... But it's not... Alot of things put women off of the men on here... Even the the apparent 10s...I think your theory is too simplistic

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion.

This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite!

Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this?

It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys

No! They aren't!

Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy.

Now scale that up to 100,000 single guys on here. There’s plenty of guys that would be getting meets, except they’re being pushed out by the sheer size of the pool.

You seem really defensive about it. But like I said, I’ve not a knock on anyone, it’s just maths

If I liked 2 guys enough to want to fuck them... I would... If there were 20... I would... Alot want now or nowt... Now who is doing someone out of a meet?

That might be true for you, but it’s not true for everyone, lots of people don’t meet often, so only the best picks get through.

The example still stands, and like I said, it’s not a knock on anyone, it’s just how the game is rigged. But let’s not make a thread and act like it isn’t rigged like that. Guys that would get meets often don’t because of the sheer volume of guys. And I think it’s those ones that get extra butt hurt.

It’s been true through out history. With science we’ve found that while 80% of women were able to pass on their genes. Only roughly 20% of guys were.

That 80% leaves a lot of butt hurt sexless guys through history

Tbf... I can't be arsed to explain that you are still, somewhat, mistaken... If attraction was the only variable, you would be, more so... But it's not... Alot of things put women off of the men on here... Even the the apparent 10s...I think your theory is too simplistic "

Ok, so I kinda explained... Ah well

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy.

Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t.

"

You forgot the part where we expand the example to 100,000 single guys on here.

That’s where the example makes sense, that’s why it’s an example, because it illustrates a bigger point. Don’t be so obtuse

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy.

Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t.

You forgot the part where we expand the example to 100,000 single guys on here.

That’s where the example makes sense, that’s why it’s an example, because it illustrates a bigger point. Don’t be so obtuse "

She's not obtuse. She's just being reflexive *scarpers*

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"People miss the point of what they mean by picky

They don’t mean you fuck anything, they mean you have so many options that people that would normally get a yes, now get a no.

Picky is the wrong word, it’s more that their options are so many, they can afford to be more selective.

Let’s say fir example a woman meets 100 times a year and she only meets guys that she thinks are an 8/10.

If your on a site where there’s only 100 guys that are 8/10 and above them technically they should all get a meet.

Now let’s say your on a site where there’s 1000 8/10 and above guys. Well now 900 of them are gonna go without a meet. And let’s say out of those 1000 guys, 200 of them are 9/10.

Well now none of the 8/10 guys get a meet. It’s not that the woman is more picky, it’st that her options are so many that her standards have been artificially brought up.

This isn’t a dig at women either, this is capitalism in a nutshell. It’s a buyers market for women, they hold all the power, and guts get butt hurt about it and blame women, when it’s no ones fault, it’s just the market

But I also don’t like I how woman play this “I’m not picky coz I wouldn’t fuck you anyways” line because that’s not what’s going on here

There seems to be a thread like this once a week. It’s kinda sad to think that all the nasty messages butt hurt guys send warrant all these discussion.

This is still rubbish! Who I choose to share my body with is exactly the same as if I wasn't on here... I can't help who I am attracted to and who I'm not... I admire your body but if I don't luke your face or how you are if we chat, it's not happening, whether here or half cut in the pub... Regardless of how horny I might be either... Blokes that lower their standards to get laid... Knock yaself out... But I won't and high standards have nothing to do with looks... Attraction is not the same... Not sure how many times this needs repeating... Oh and scales on attractiveness are also shite!

Why do you think “lowering your standards” had anything to do with this?

It’s not about women lowering their standards, it’s about their standards being artificially brought up by the sheer number of guys

No! They aren't!

Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy.

Now scale that up to 100,000 single guys on here. There’s plenty of guys that would be getting meets, except they’re being pushed out by the sheer size of the pool.

You seem really defensive about it. But like I said, I’ve not a knock on anyone, it’s just maths

If I liked 2 guys enough to want to fuck them... I would... If there were 20... I would... Alot want now or nowt... Now who is doing someone out of a meet?

That might be true for you, but it’s not true for everyone, lots of people don’t meet often, so only the best picks get through.

The example still stands, and like I said, it’s not a knock on anyone, it’s just how the game is rigged. But let’s not make a thread and act like it isn’t rigged like that. Guys that would get meets often don’t because of the sheer volume of guys. And I think it’s those ones that get extra butt hurt.

It’s been true through out history. With science we’ve found that while 80% of women were able to pass on their genes. Only roughly 20% of guys were.

That 80% leaves a lot of butt hurt sexless guys through history

Tbf... I can't be arsed to explain that you are still, somewhat, mistaken... If attraction was the only variable, you would be, more so... But it's not... Alot of things put women off of the men on here... Even the the apparent 10s...I think your theory is too simplistic "

I’ll take a “can’t be bothered to explain” as an “that’s actually a fair point I don’t want to discuss”

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy.

Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t.

You forgot the part where we expand the example to 100,000 single guys on here.

That’s where the example makes sense, that’s why it’s an example, because it illustrates a bigger point. Don’t be so obtuse "

Did you just learn the word ‘obtuse’ from the Shawshank redemption ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy.

Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t.

You forgot the part where we expand the example to 100,000 single guys on here.

That’s where the example makes sense, that’s why it’s an example, because it illustrates a bigger point. Don’t be so obtuse

Did you just learn the word ‘obtuse’ from the Shawshank redemption ?

"

Genuinely did and it’s my fave

But yeah my point still stands. In the example I mentioned guy B might fire off the “wow yoir so picky” because he got pushed out of the meet by a more attractive guy.

It doesn’t mean her standards dropped, it means the pool size is so big guys that would have got a meet either don’t, or have to wait longer.

I just don’t like how we turn this into a “if I wouldn’t fucj you it doesn’t matter either way” discussion because that’s not what’s happening. There are genuinely guys you would fuck had the sample size been smaller.

And like I’ve parroted 100x already. It’s not a knock on women. It’s not in defence of guys that send off snotty messages. It’s just the maths behind the site. Guys massively out number the women. It’s just how the game is

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy.

Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t.

"

This makes more sense

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hmm I'm definitely picky. But I like guys who are picky too.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Do I have to climb down from schlong mountain and knock some heads together again? "

I like the sound of this mountain!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky.

It's not picky at all its discerning...nothing wrong with that.

Agreed. A lot of men are picky too. "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

They say they are fussy, picky, choosy, entitled to their own standard but then pick up an horrid plasticky rubber thingy out of their bedside table

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ad NannaWoman
over a year ago

East London

I'm really not picky where physical appearances are concerned, but I'm struggling to find someone compatible.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"They say they are fussy, picky, choosy, entitled to their own standard but then pick up an horrid plasticky rubber thingy out of their bedside table "

To be fair that plasticky rubbery thing that lives in their draw has more personality that a lot of guys on here

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *otSoPoshWoman
over a year ago

In a ball gown because that's how we roll in N. Devon

Ok. There is a chance that I'm a little cranky what with the devil kicking the shit out of my uterus.

But seriously. First, let's please stop lumping men together. And lumping women together. It's kinda offensive to men and to women.

People are allowed to be "picky". And there's absolutely no maths that can explain it ffs. It's not about rating people out of 10. It isn't about percentages or ratios. It's about who you find attractive, for whatever reason. I might find someone knicker droppingly gorgeous, but Nora and Ariel (sorry ladies, you came to mind first) might be repulsed by them. And someone that every other woman on fab is desperate to have notice them, I might want nothing to do with. Because WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT.

And as City said, if there are 2, or 10, or 100 men I want to meet (assuming they want to meet me), I don't have to choose between them. I can meet them all. And if there were only 2, 10, or 100 men on the site and I didn't fancy any of them, I wouldn't be meeting any of them. Fuck what the sample size is. All my life I've spent in male heavy places and quite frankly I never once started being attracted to someone I wouldn't have been just because they were "the best of what was available", which is basically what's being said. I'll go without perving and go without sex rather than settle for someone who doesn't make my eyes light up.

Let's not bash men. Let's not bash women. And let's not bash anyone else.

Sorry. I'll get back in my box now.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"Ok. There is a chance that I'm a little cranky what with the devil kicking the shit out of my uterus.

But seriously. First, let's please stop lumping men together. And lumping women together. It's kinda offensive to men and to women.

People are allowed to be "picky". And there's absolutely no maths that can explain it ffs. It's not about rating people out of 10. It isn't about percentages or ratios. It's about who you find attractive, for whatever reason. I might find someone knicker droppingly gorgeous, but Nora and Ariel (sorry ladies, you came to mind first) might be repulsed by them. And someone that every other woman on fab is desperate to have notice them, I might want nothing to do with. Because WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT.

And as City said, if there are 2, or 10, or 100 men I want to meet (assuming they want to meet me), I don't have to choose between them. I can meet them all. And if there were only 2, 10, or 100 men on the site and I didn't fancy any of them, I wouldn't be meeting any of them. Fuck what the sample size is. All my life I've spent in male heavy places and quite frankly I never once started being attracted to someone I wouldn't have been just because they were "the best of what was available", which is basically what's being said. I'll go without perving and go without sex rather than settle for someone who doesn't make my eyes light up.

Let's not bash men. Let's not bash women. And let's not bash anyone else.

Sorry. I'll get back in my box now."

Yeah get back in your box!!

Very well said though miss

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West

My Maths joke seems to have been erased. Ruled out. I calculated it'd go down like an inverse correlation coefficient too

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They say they are fussy, picky, choosy, entitled to their own standard but then pick up an horrid plasticky rubber thingy out of their bedside table

To be fair that plasticky rubbery thing that lives in their draw has more personality that a lot of guys on here "

Lmao...i was thinking just that

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everyone's allowed to be picky, I'm not overly picky but I do have my limits

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"Ok. There is a chance that I'm a little cranky what with the devil kicking the shit out of my uterus.

But seriously. First, let's please stop lumping men together. And lumping women together. It's kinda offensive to men and to women.

People are allowed to be "picky". And there's absolutely no maths that can explain it ffs. It's not about rating people out of 10. It isn't about percentages or ratios. It's about who you find attractive, for whatever reason. I might find someone knicker droppingly gorgeous, but Nora and Ariel (sorry ladies, you came to mind first) might be repulsed by them. And someone that every other woman on fab is desperate to have notice them, I might want nothing to do with. Because WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT.

And as City said, if there are 2, or 10, or 100 men I want to meet (assuming they want to meet me), I don't have to choose between them. I can meet them all. And if there were only 2, 10, or 100 men on the site and I didn't fancy any of them, I wouldn't be meeting any of them. Fuck what the sample size is. All my life I've spent in male heavy places and quite frankly I never once started being attracted to someone I wouldn't have been just because they were "the best of what was available", which is basically what's being said. I'll go without perving and go without sex rather than settle for someone who doesn't make my eyes light up.

Let's not bash men. Let's not bash women. And let's not bash anyone else.

Sorry. I'll get back in my box now."

Well you kinda prove my point

Let’s say there’s 100 guys on here you would meet. So you start meeting then, and around 20 in one of them puts a status saying “fucking hell I can’t get laid” and someone else says “it’s a number game they can be picky” is he wrong?

Technically it is a numbers game because as you said, there’s 100 you’d meet so there’s a number element to your chance of getting the meet even if your in that 100 people you still would have to wait.

And technically you do have the ability to be extra picky because there’s 100 options, so you choose the best out of those 100 first, and for the guy that get picked last. Well it’s shit luck for him .

And no ones in the wrong. It’s just how the numbers work out. The only people here on the wrong are guys sending out shitty messages when they don’t get picked. But let’s not pretend that there isn’t an element of numbers to it

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *andycandy88Woman
over a year ago

Northolt


"Nothing wrong in being picky"

I agree as I am myself and would feel alot more special hearing a guy say he is xx

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *1c4yMan
over a year ago

stourbridge

There are a lot of attractive guys on here that would ''lower the bar'' to get a shag even if they would never admit it.

So there are always plenty of good looking guys for women to select from.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ea monkeyMan
over a year ago

Manchester (he/him)


"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy.

Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t.

You forgot the part where we expand the example to 100,000 single guys on here.

That’s where the example makes sense, that’s why it’s an example, because it illustrates a bigger point. Don’t be so obtuse

Did you just learn the word ‘obtuse’ from the Shawshank redemption ?

Genuinely did and it’s my fave

But yeah my point still stands. In the example I mentioned guy B might fire off the “wow yoir so picky” because he got pushed out of the meet by a more attractive guy.

It doesn’t mean her standards dropped, it means the pool size is so big guys that would have got a meet either don’t, or have to wait longer.

I just don’t like how we turn this into a “if I wouldn’t fucj you it doesn’t matter either way” discussion because that’s not what’s happening. There are genuinely guys you would fuck had the sample size been smaller.

And like I’ve parroted 100x already. It’s not a knock on women. It’s not in defence of guys that send off snotty messages. It’s just the maths behind the site. Guys massively out number the women. It’s just how the game is "

Your posts show how little you understand the site or the way that women work.

City Jeans nailed the response.

The main problem in this thread is that men often assume that most women’s laws of attraction work the same as most men’s, they don’t.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The nerve of the women on here being picky!

I don’t know what they are thinking, imagining they can pick and choose who they sleep with!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They say they are fussy, picky, choosy, entitled to their own standard but then pick up an horrid plasticky rubber thingy out of their bedside table

To be fair that plasticky rubbery thing that lives in their draw has more personality that a lot of guys on here "

I hope you don’t mean that thread

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ad NannaWoman
over a year ago

East London


"Ok. There is a chance that I'm a little cranky what with the devil kicking the shit out of my uterus.

But seriously. First, let's please stop lumping men together. And lumping women together. It's kinda offensive to men and to women.

People are allowed to be "picky". And there's absolutely no maths that can explain it ffs. It's not about rating people out of 10. It isn't about percentages or ratios. It's about who you find attractive, for whatever reason. I might find someone knicker droppingly gorgeous, but Nora and Ariel (sorry ladies, you came to mind first) might be repulsed by them. And someone that every other woman on fab is desperate to have notice them, I might want nothing to do with. Because WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT.

And as City said, if there are 2, or 10, or 100 men I want to meet (assuming they want to meet me), I don't have to choose between them. I can meet them all. And if there were only 2, 10, or 100 men on the site and I didn't fancy any of them, I wouldn't be meeting any of them. Fuck what the sample size is. All my life I've spent in male heavy places and quite frankly I never once started being attracted to someone I wouldn't have been just because they were "the best of what was available", which is basically what's being said. I'll go without perving and go without sex rather than settle for someone who doesn't make my eyes light up.

Let's not bash men. Let's not bash women. And let's not bash anyone else.

Sorry. I'll get back in my box now.

Well you kinda prove my point

Let’s say there’s 100 guys on here you would meet. So you start meeting then, and around 20 in one of them puts a status saying “fucking hell I can’t get laid” and someone else says “it’s a number game they can be picky” is he wrong?

Technically it is a numbers game because as you said, there’s 100 you’d meet so there’s a number element to your chance of getting the meet even if your in that 100 people you still would have to wait.

And technically you do have the ability to be extra picky because there’s 100 options, so you choose the best out of those 100 first, and for the guy that get picked last. Well it’s shit luck for him .

And no ones in the wrong. It’s just how the numbers work out. The only people here on the wrong are guys sending out shitty messages when they don’t get picked. But let’s not pretend that there isn’t an element of numbers to it "

There's zero chance of someone having sex with me if I don't find him attractive. Doesn't matter if he's the only person asking.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy.

Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t.

You forgot the part where we expand the example to 100,000 single guys on here.

That’s where the example makes sense, that’s why it’s an example, because it illustrates a bigger point. Don’t be so obtuse

Did you just learn the word ‘obtuse’ from the Shawshank redemption ?

Genuinely did and it’s my fave

But yeah my point still stands. In the example I mentioned guy B might fire off the “wow yoir so picky” because he got pushed out of the meet by a more attractive guy.

It doesn’t mean her standards dropped, it means the pool size is so big guys that would have got a meet either don’t, or have to wait longer.

I just don’t like how we turn this into a “if I wouldn’t fucj you it doesn’t matter either way” discussion because that’s not what’s happening. There are genuinely guys you would fuck had the sample size been smaller.

And like I’ve parroted 100x already. It’s not a knock on women. It’s not in defence of guys that send off snotty messages. It’s just the maths behind the site. Guys massively out number the women. It’s just how the game is

Your posts show how little you understand the site or the way that women work.

City Jeans nailed the response.

The main problem in this thread is that men often assume that most women’s laws of attraction work the same as most men’s, they don’t. "

It’s such a cop out to just say “yeah you don’t get it”.

The example to me makes perfect sense, that’s that would normally get a meet are pushed out by hitter guys, the bigger the sample size, the more often that happen.

No ones really changed my mind about that, and I’m open to having it change, not no ones actually tried in my opinion

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"Ok. There is a chance that I'm a little cranky what with the devil kicking the shit out of my uterus.

But seriously. First, let's please stop lumping men together. And lumping women together. It's kinda offensive to men and to women.

People are allowed to be "picky". And there's absolutely no maths that can explain it ffs. It's not about rating people out of 10. It isn't about percentages or ratios. It's about who you find attractive, for whatever reason. I might find someone knicker droppingly gorgeous, but Nora and Ariel (sorry ladies, you came to mind first) might be repulsed by them. And someone that every other woman on fab is desperate to have notice them, I might want nothing to do with. Because WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT.

And as City said, if there are 2, or 10, or 100 men I want to meet (assuming they want to meet me), I don't have to choose between them. I can meet them all. And if there were only 2, 10, or 100 men on the site and I didn't fancy any of them, I wouldn't be meeting any of them. Fuck what the sample size is. All my life I've spent in male heavy places and quite frankly I never once started being attracted to someone I wouldn't have been just because they were "the best of what was available", which is basically what's being said. I'll go without perving and go without sex rather than settle for someone who doesn't make my eyes light up.

Let's not bash men. Let's not bash women. And let's not bash anyone else.

Sorry. I'll get back in my box now.

Well you kinda prove my point

Let’s say there’s 100 guys on here you would meet. So you start meeting then, and around 20 in one of them puts a status saying “fucking hell I can’t get laid” and someone else says “it’s a number game they can be picky” is he wrong?

Technically it is a numbers game because as you said, there’s 100 you’d meet so there’s a number element to your chance of getting the meet even if your in that 100 people you still would have to wait.

And technically you do have the ability to be extra picky because there’s 100 options, so you choose the best out of those 100 first, and for the guy that get picked last. Well it’s shit luck for him .

And no ones in the wrong. It’s just how the numbers work out. The only people here on the wrong are guys sending out shitty messages when they don’t get picked. But let’s not pretend that there isn’t an element of numbers to it

There's zero chance of someone having sex with me if I don't find him attractive. Doesn't matter if he's the only person asking."

Obviously? No ones said you would?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Let’s make it simple. Let’s say your looking for a meet and 2 guys message you, both are a good fit for you and you’d meet them both.

But guy A is a little hotter than guy B, or he’s got slightly better chat, or whatever. So you meet guy A.

There’s a realistic example of a guy that would have got a meet, had the sample size been smaller. He got pushed out by a more attractive guy.

Let’s make this simple for you, if a woman is looking to meet and she likes two men, then the chances are, now wait for this, it’s a doozy, the chances are she will meet them both, not at the same time, but at different times, I know this could be a hard concept to grasp. It’s not a case of saying sorry buddy you were so close, it’s not a job interview with one vacancy. Also people don’t think in terms of 8/10 or whatever, you either fancy someone or you don’t.

You forgot the part where we expand the example to 100,000 single guys on here.

That’s where the example makes sense, that’s why it’s an example, because it illustrates a bigger point. Don’t be so obtuse

Did you just learn the word ‘obtuse’ from the Shawshank redemption ?

Genuinely did and it’s my fave

But yeah my point still stands. In the example I mentioned guy B might fire off the “wow yoir so picky” because he got pushed out of the meet by a more attractive guy.

It doesn’t mean her standards dropped, it means the pool size is so big guys that would have got a meet either don’t, or have to wait longer.

I just don’t like how we turn this into a “if I wouldn’t fucj you it doesn’t matter either way” discussion because that’s not what’s happening. There are genuinely guys you would fuck had the sample size been smaller.

And like I’ve parroted 100x already. It’s not a knock on women. It’s not in defence of guys that send off snotty messages. It’s just the maths behind the site. Guys massively out number the women. It’s just how the game is

Your posts show how little you understand the site or the way that women work.

City Jeans nailed the response.

The main problem in this thread is that men often assume that most women’s laws of attraction work the same as most men’s, they don’t. "

Perfect.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *uriousscouserWoman
over a year ago

Wirral


"Ok. There is a chance that I'm a little cranky what with the devil kicking the shit out of my uterus.

But seriously. First, let's please stop lumping men together. And lumping women together. It's kinda offensive to men and to women.

People are allowed to be "picky". And there's absolutely no maths that can explain it ffs. It's not about rating people out of 10. It isn't about percentages or ratios. It's about who you find attractive, for whatever reason. I might find someone knicker droppingly gorgeous, but Nora and Ariel (sorry ladies, you came to mind first) might be repulsed by them. And someone that every other woman on fab is desperate to have notice them, I might want nothing to do with. Because WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT.

And as City said, if there are 2, or 10, or 100 men I want to meet (assuming they want to meet me), I don't have to choose between them. I can meet them all. And if there were only 2, 10, or 100 men on the site and I didn't fancy any of them, I wouldn't be meeting any of them. Fuck what the sample size is. All my life I've spent in male heavy places and quite frankly I never once started being attracted to someone I wouldn't have been just because they were "the best of what was available", which is basically what's being said. I'll go without perving and go without sex rather than settle for someone who doesn't make my eyes light up.

Let's not bash men. Let's not bash women. And let's not bash anyone else.

Sorry. I'll get back in my box now."

I have been accused many times of being too picky, it seems to rankle more that someone they find unattractive says thanks but no thanks. Because I'm fat I ought to be grateful just to be noticed.

Fuck that shit - as long as I have access to my vibe and batteries I'll meet who I want to meet, not just anyone who messages me.

If I was on a site of 10 men and I didn't fancy any of them, Vincent my one-eared rabbit and I will muddle through quite happily before I consider meeting someone I don't fancy because "fuckit, best of a bad lot". 10 men or 10,000 men, it doesn't make a difference to whether I fancy an individual.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *aughty_builder87Man
over a year ago

Keston

This a conversation i have with my swinger friends all the time and this is how I see it but please feel free to correct me if I’m wrong. I wouldn’t say that women are too fussy but I would say that women do have more selection in terms of who they choose to play with. A female friend has 900+ unread messages in her inbox and is purely overwhelmed by the amount of messages that she gets and some of the messages are so foul that she will never get through them all so she is selective over which ones she bothers to read. Single guys can be their own worst enemies at times.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *heNYCSausageMan
over a year ago

Everton

[Removed by poster at 15/06/21 22:09:25]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Picky and proud.

I won’t and don’t lower my standards and I won’t sleep with someone I’m not attracted to I’d rather not have sex.

I think being selective about who you meet in places like this is a good thing, it shows you’re here for quality and not quantity.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *otSoPoshWoman
over a year ago

In a ball gown because that's how we roll in N. Devon


"Ok. There is a chance that I'm a little cranky what with the devil kicking the shit out of my uterus.

But seriously. First, let's please stop lumping men together. And lumping women together. It's kinda offensive to men and to women.

People are allowed to be "picky". And there's absolutely no maths that can explain it ffs. It's not about rating people out of 10. It isn't about percentages or ratios. It's about who you find attractive, for whatever reason. I might find someone knicker droppingly gorgeous, but Nora and Ariel (sorry ladies, you came to mind first) might be repulsed by them. And someone that every other woman on fab is desperate to have notice them, I might want nothing to do with. Because WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT.

And as City said, if there are 2, or 10, or 100 men I want to meet (assuming they want to meet me), I don't have to choose between them. I can meet them all. And if there were only 2, 10, or 100 men on the site and I didn't fancy any of them, I wouldn't be meeting any of them. Fuck what the sample size is. All my life I've spent in male heavy places and quite frankly I never once started being attracted to someone I wouldn't have been just because they were "the best of what was available", which is basically what's being said. I'll go without perving and go without sex rather than settle for someone who doesn't make my eyes light up.

Let's not bash men. Let's not bash women. And let's not bash anyone else.

Sorry. I'll get back in my box now.

Well you kinda prove my point

Let’s say there’s 100 guys on here you would meet. So you start meeting then, and around 20 in one of them puts a status saying “fucking hell I can’t get laid” and someone else says “it’s a number game they can be picky” is he wrong?

Technically it is a numbers game because as you said, there’s 100 you’d meet so there’s a number element to your chance of getting the meet even if your in that 100 people you still would have to wait.

And technically you do have the ability to be extra picky because there’s 100 options, so you choose the best out of those 100 first, and for the guy that get picked last. Well it’s shit luck for him .

And no ones in the wrong. It’s just how the numbers work out. The only people here on the wrong are guys sending out shitty messages when they don’t get picked. But let’s not pretend that there isn’t an element of numbers to it "

I enjoy how you managed to pick out the parts of my post that back up your argument and completely ignore the parts that don't.

Well done you.

It isn't a numbers game. It's purely availability. If I want to meet 100 men it's fuck all to do with choosing who to meet first. That comes down to who happens to be right place right time.

And I say again, more bluntly this time. Fuck the numbers. If I don't want someone to stick their cock in me I'm not going to have them stick their cock in me. Whether that means I get no sex for years.

People can call it picky. People can say it's because I can afford to be picky. But that's crap.

I'm fat, I'm not that attractive and I spent the best part of 40 years basically being overlooked a hell of a lot of the time. A lot like a single man on fab actually.

No one would have said "she can afford to be picky" despite the fact I was SURROUNDED BY MEN most of the time. But I still didn't take a dicking from someone I didn't particularly want to just because of the numbers.

People simplify things far too much on here. At the same time as making them too complicated. And if it makes them feel better to blame it on numbers, rock on.

But it's absolutely not the case.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others.

So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *otSoPoshWoman
over a year ago

In a ball gown because that's how we roll in N. Devon


"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others.

So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact."

And that is where the numbers come in. But that's not because you're choosing one 8/10 or 9/10 or 10/10 over another, as you say it's purely because you don't get to see them.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *heNYCSausageMan
over a year ago

Everton


"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others.

So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact."

So that’s why you never reply to me?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why would someone not be picky?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others.

So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact.

So that’s why you never reply to me? "

That's entirely the reason

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Men get over excited

They think because women are in here it means we are waiting with our legs open and operate as a charitable hooker service. They think we will fuck anything.

We of course get called names when we point that we aren’t out to them…picky is just one of the nicer things I’ve been called. "

Exactly this!! Just because I'm here it doesn't mean I want to have sex with YOU. Calm down sugar tits

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others.

So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact.

And that is where the numbers come in. But that's not because you're choosing one 8/10 or 9/10 or 10/10 over another, as you say it's purely because you don't get to see them."

But do you at least understand how it theres 10 guys you’d meet in your inbox, and you pick one, there’s 9 you didn’t pick that day. That’s where the numbers come in. Because if the guy you picked didn’t message, you would have picked one of the other 9.

So 9 guys didn’t get a meet that day because of numbers. If the sample size was smaller the guys chance of getting the meet that day increase

That’s what we mean by numbers game. Not that your throwing a virtual dart on the “whose near me” part of fabs and fucking whoever it lands on

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *heNYCSausageMan
over a year ago

Everton


"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others.

So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact.

So that’s why you never reply to me?

That's entirely the reason "

Thought so!!! I’ll message you now, keep an eye out for it x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *odgerMooreMan
over a year ago

Carlisle

A woman with standards isn’t ‘picky’ she just has self respect - amazing that there are some women on this site who don’t want to shag everyone here - contrary to what a lot of guys on here believe!! The more I hear here the more I start to despair of guys on here - and the forum crew aren’t included in that - the forum crowd are a different breed - brains & humour and most importantly respect!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *aitonelMan
over a year ago

Liverpool


"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others.

So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact."

It also means due to a higher pool size, that the chances of a guy being exactly who you are looking for are higher.

Flip that around and due to a smaller pool size of women the chances of a man catching the eye of a woman he is attracted to are potentially much lower.

The numbers game exists.

Women have the advantage and benefit of higher chance of potentially finding a compatible and successful match. They just have to wade through a hell of a lot more shit to find it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others.

So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact.

So that’s why you never reply to me?

That's entirely the reason

Thought so!!! I’ll message you now, keep an eye out for it x"

I can't believe you sent me that, Jesus... I don't even know how you managed to insert it there?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *iscean_dreamMan
over a year ago

Llanelli

When I go on that swipy site I probably swipe right once for every 100 people. I think a large amount of guys here would just swipe right on everyone and then see what happens out of desperation. The clear and obvious thing to do is not be so desperate to just get your leg over, if I can go 9 months without and still tell people I'm not interested because I won't lower the bar then I see no reason why other guys can't and just accept than it's a matter of choice and preference

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West

Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *heNYCSausageMan
over a year ago

Everton


"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others.

So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact.

So that’s why you never reply to me?

That's entirely the reason

Thought so!!! I’ll message you now, keep an eye out for it x

I can't believe you sent me that, Jesus... I don't even know how you managed to insert IN there? "

You serious?!?!? You said you loved it and can’t wait to try fitting little Tony in again next time I visit you!!!

Fixed your type too haha

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA "

Haha will it be teacher assessed though? If so, I insist on useless grade exemplification criteria and a different exam question for each of us, sat in a different way on different days

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *odgerMooreMan
over a year ago

Carlisle


"I do think there's an element of maths here. If I get a thousand messages over a 3 day period, it's likely I'll be attracted to a few of those guys. But there's a really good chance I'll miss the messages of the few I'm attracted to, in amongst the others.

So the numbers thing is relevant i think. It doesn't change who I would or wouldn't sleep with, but it might mean I never see his message to make that contact.

So that’s why you never reply to me?

That's entirely the reason

Thought so!!! I’ll message you now, keep an eye out for it x

I can't believe you sent me that, Jesus... I don't even know how you managed to insert it there? "

Ahhh I knew there was a reason you hadn’t swooned into my arms all pouty & flustered after reading my poetic sexiness!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA

Haha will it be teacher assessed though? If so, I insist on useless grade exemplification criteria and a different exam question for each of us, sat in a different way on different days "

Teacher assessed but internally validated by peers

You can have your criteria and a differentiated set of questions

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA "

If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account

Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA

If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account

Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time "

Excellent exam question. I'll draft the success criteria now!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *heNYCSausageMan
over a year ago

Everton


"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA

If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account

Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time "

Half the time? Where are you getting your facts from bud? The Sun?

I get meets, I get offered meets. I turn down meets. If I say I’ll meet someone. I’ve never cancelled or let them down!!!

Yes! Despite how it looks on the forums, I’m picky haha

In a side. It’s, I loved how my phone changed “picky” to “lucky”!!! It knows me so well lol

A

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA

If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account

Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time

Half the time? Where are you getting your facts from bud? The Sun?

I get meets, I get offered meets. I turn down meets. If I say I’ll meet someone. I’ve never cancelled or let them down!!!

Yes! Despite how it looks on the forums, I’m picky haha

In a side. It’s, I loved how my phone changed “picky” to “lucky”!!! It knows me so well lol

A"

Haha well your obviously a good one!

But I’ve met couples that have had weeks and weeks of planned meets then excuses.

I went to an 8 guy gangbang with a hot wife and husband, to be the only guy that turned up!

I think one thing guys should take away from this is that women suffer on here too. I know it’s sucks being a single guy and never getting meets, but imagine how frustrating it must be to be a couple constantly getting shitty messages, cancelled on, shit excuses, fakes, liars, creeps.

I think I can handle not getting many meets, I dunno if I could handle the stress and anxiety of having to blindly work my way through the sea of psycho creeps trying to find someone even half decent and sane and genuine

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I only meet the elite anyway both here and real life so this thread doesn’t apply to me.

There’s no men that could have had a meet had someone more handsome not been available because I go years, yes years between meets. Only the most handsome men who make angels weep when they lay eyes upon them get a chance to be between my thighs.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

On fab men are just objectified as sex toys to be used as and when single women and couples chose. Well one can only hope?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *heNYCSausageMan
over a year ago

Everton


"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA

If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account

Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time

Half the time? Where are you getting your facts from bud? The Sun?

I get meets, I get offered meets. I turn down meets. If I say I’ll meet someone. I’ve never cancelled or let them down!!!

Yes! Despite how it looks on the forums, I’m picky haha

In a side. It’s, I loved how my phone changed “picky” to “lucky”!!! It knows me so well lol

A

Haha well your obviously a good one!

But I’ve met couples that have had weeks and weeks of planned meets then excuses.

I went to an 8 guy gangbang with a hot wife and husband, to be the only guy that turned up!

I think one thing guys should take away from this is that women suffer on here too. I know it’s sucks being a single guy and never getting meets, but imagine how frustrating it must be to be a couple constantly getting shitty messages, cancelled on, shit excuses, fakes, liars, creeps.

I think I can handle not getting many meets, I dunno if I could handle the stress and anxiety of having to blindly work my way through the sea of psycho creeps trying to find someone even half decent and sane and genuine "

And that’s what the forums are for!!! Talk to people like they’re a human, include male and females in all conversations, and show your personality.

I can’t remember the last time I met a non forumite. Don’t even bother messaging them any more, the messages get lost in the deluge of horny males demanding to “fuck now”

Actually that’s a lie, there’s two non forumites I still talk to, but I rarely send 1st messages any more.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *odgerMooreMan
over a year ago

Carlisle


"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA

If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account

Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time

Half the time? Where are you getting your facts from bud? The Sun?

I get meets, I get offered meets. I turn down meets. If I say I’ll meet someone. I’ve never cancelled or let them down!!!

Yes! Despite how it looks on the forums, I’m picky haha

In a side. It’s, I loved how my phone changed “picky” to “lucky”!!! It knows me so well lol

A

Haha well your obviously a good one!

But I’ve met couples that have had weeks and weeks of planned meets then excuses.

I went to an 8 guy gangbang with a hot wife and husband, to be the only guy that turned up!

I think one thing guys should take away from this is that women suffer on here too. I know it’s sucks being a single guy and never getting meets, but imagine how frustrating it must be to be a couple constantly getting shitty messages, cancelled on, shit excuses, fakes, liars, creeps.

I think I can handle not getting many meets, I dunno if I could handle the stress and anxiety of having to blindly work my way through the sea of psycho creeps trying to find someone even half decent and sane and genuine "

Agree 100% - not to mention the cost of hotels/days off/ travelling. The guys that do that are going to ruin it for the rest of us because decent couples & she’s will leave the site and there’ll only be loons left!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham


"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA

If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account

Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time

Half the time? Where are you getting your facts from bud? The Sun?

I get meets, I get offered meets. I turn down meets. If I say I’ll meet someone. I’ve never cancelled or let them down!!!

Yes! Despite how it looks on the forums, I’m picky haha

In a side. It’s, I loved how my phone changed “picky” to “lucky”!!! It knows me so well lol

A

Haha well your obviously a good one!

But I’ve met couples that have had weeks and weeks of planned meets then excuses.

I went to an 8 guy gangbang with a hot wife and husband, to be the only guy that turned up!

I think one thing guys should take away from this is that women suffer on here too. I know it’s sucks being a single guy and never getting meets, but imagine how frustrating it must be to be a couple constantly getting shitty messages, cancelled on, shit excuses, fakes, liars, creeps.

I think I can handle not getting many meets, I dunno if I could handle the stress and anxiety of having to blindly work my way through the sea of psycho creeps trying to find someone even half decent and sane and genuine

Agree 100% - not to mention the cost of hotels/days off/ travelling. The guys that do that are going to ruin it for the rest of us because decent couples & she’s will leave the site and there’ll only be loons left! "

Implying there aren’t only loons left

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West

Gosh, two more things to add into my equations - hotel costs and the degree of loony-ness. It's getting to be a Higher Tier paper, this is

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Gosh, two more things to add into my equations - hotel costs and the degree of loony-ness. It's getting to be a Higher Tier paper, this is "

Extension packs, like the IGCSE

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entleman JayMan
over a year ago

Wakefield

Am I allowed to say I’m picky, or would that leave myself open to being described as entitled? Genuine question.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *odgerMooreMan
over a year ago

Carlisle


"Well, tonight we've proved that applied Maths is jolly interesting, if nothing else. I'm drafting a bunch of exam-style questions based around the probability of two guys, rated 8/10 for attractiveness, both managing to get their ends away, without the meet being cancelled OR them being shunned for a stunt cock. I'll let you know the feedback from AQA

If meet A is travelling at 30mph and meet B is travelling at 40mpg, how long until they both txt you with an excuse as to why they can’t meet that suddenly delete their account

Honestly the horror stories I’ve heard from couples about planning meets then guys not turning up. That’s how you know guys are the problem on here. Even the ones getting meets don’t turn up half the time

Half the time? Where are you getting your facts from bud? The Sun?

I get meets, I get offered meets. I turn down meets. If I say I’ll meet someone. I’ve never cancelled or let them down!!!

Yes! Despite how it looks on the forums, I’m picky haha

In a side. It’s, I loved how my phone changed “picky” to “lucky”!!! It knows me so well lol

A

Haha well your obviously a good one!

But I’ve met couples that have had weeks and weeks of planned meets then excuses.

I went to an 8 guy gangbang with a hot wife and husband, to be the only guy that turned up!

I think one thing guys should take away from this is that women suffer on here too. I know it’s sucks being a single guy and never getting meets, but imagine how frustrating it must be to be a couple constantly getting shitty messages, cancelled on, shit excuses, fakes, liars, creeps.

I think I can handle not getting many meets, I dunno if I could handle the stress and anxiety of having to blindly work my way through the sea of psycho creeps trying to find someone even half decent and sane and genuine

Agree 100% - not to mention the cost of hotels/days off/ travelling. The guys that do that are going to ruin it for the rest of us because decent couples & she’s will leave the site and there’ll only be loons left!

Implying there aren’t only loons left "

One or two

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *issAphroditeWoman
over a year ago

Norwich

Nowt wrong with being picky, you just can't impose your standards on other people.

Women having "choice" on here is such a misnomer. It's like being at a buffet when you've multiple food allergies.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky."

Agreed !

Most the men ( not all ) that do post such threads or posts are just looking for a pat on the back and some attention!

Ye got to at least try standing out on here

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

HOUSE!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I just don't get when being picky became a thing to be proud of. When I was growing up picky certainly wasn't a positive trait. So many think it just means they have standards. That says more about general education sadly.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"HOUSE! "

You went too early, sadly

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Same time tomorrow then, I wonder what will be said about men tomorrow, it’s so exciting. Night night everyone x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *heNYCSausageMan
over a year ago

Everton


"HOUSE! "

So thankful it wasn’t me haha

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I only meet the elite anyway both here and real life so this thread doesn’t apply to me.

There’s no men that could have had a meet had someone more handsome not been available because I go years, yes years between meets. Only the most handsome men who make angels weep when they lay eyes upon them get a chance to be between my thighs. "

Elites - what makes you have such a entitled attitude and think you are something special?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I only meet the elite anyway both here and real life so this thread doesn’t apply to me.

There’s no men that could have had a meet had someone more handsome not been available because I go years, yes years between meets. Only the most handsome men who make angels weep when they lay eyes upon them get a chance to be between my thighs.

Elites - what makes you have such a entitled attitude and think you are something special? "

Don’t bite mate !

Can’t find her post is she hot ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Na mate I take that back that bitch is seriously special !

Hope she sees this !

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *odgerMooreMan
over a year ago

Carlisle


"I only meet the elite anyway both here and real life so this thread doesn’t apply to me.

There’s no men that could have had a meet had someone more handsome not been available because I go years, yes years between meets. Only the most handsome men who make angels weep when they lay eyes upon them get a chance to be between my thighs. "

Quite right too….. where do you want these bins putting….? Up the front or in the back??

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" Na mate I take that back that bitch is seriously special !

Hope she sees this ! "

Hello. Where have you been?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky."

I see *those* men as the boys at school who would label a girl frigid if she didn’t do what they wanted.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inkyInkedBiWoman
over a year ago

.


" Na mate I take that back that bitch is seriously special !

Hope she sees this ! "

Any need for bitch?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 15/06/21 23:55:10]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *etwifeandhim69Couple
over a year ago

Darlington


"Why, when men post that they can't get laid, other men tell them it's because there are so many men here women can be picky?

I wouldn't shag someone I didnt fancy if they were one of a thousand or the only one left.

That's not picky."

That's exactly what picky is.

Picky means to be fussy or hard to please and by extension, means you're very careful about choosing what you like.

You said it yourself. If you dont fancy someone, you won't sleep with them. You dont suddenly think I'm horny so I'll just shag that guy.

Theres nothing wrong with being picky and there is nothing wrong with the guys saying women are picky either because its right. It could be 500 men or more per woman on this site. You can pick any of them or none of them. That is your call based on whatever terms you decide.

Not sure how else they should they phrase it?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" Na mate I take that back that bitch is seriously special !

Hope she sees this ! "

Average at best in my book.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Average? Seriously bro ? Hey that’s your opinion!

I reckon she’s just looking for that exact reaction ! She’s probably sitting back laughing !

And no there wasn’t any need for bitch I was just writing off the cuff !

But I think that same girl slagged my cat thread ! So I ain’t bothered

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inkyInkedBiWoman
over a year ago

.


" Na mate I take that back that bitch is seriously special !

Hope she sees this !

Average at best in my book."

‘She’s average at best with an entitled attitude. Sod that you can have her’

That was your deleted comment.

Absolutely no need to comment on someone’s appearance like that

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gent CoulsonMan
over a year ago

Secret hideaway in the pennines

I will admit I am picky, but I accept that I am not going to be compatible with some that I am attracted to. That is their choice, I accept that with good grace

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 
 

By *rincess peachWoman
over a year ago

shits creek

If I want a 6 armed ewok who shaves all 6 armpits and nothing else that's up to me.

If my foof ain't hungry for anything/anyone else that's that.

I dunno, I wonder if it's the same dudes who think people only ever come online when looking for a dicking, in their heads they think we're all getting boned and buggered by the gym fit chiseled warlords on a daily basis.

If I'm content going years without sex that's up to me ain't it.

I wouldn't go to a Celine Dion concert coz I couldn't get tickets to Biffy Clyro... I don't fucking like Celine Dion music so I'd go without. I don't understand why not doing something we don't want to do is seen as being picky or ungrateful.

I wonder if the people banging on about it order the first thing they see on a menu or choose something they actually want to eat, or go somewhere else if there's nothing they fancy.

Meh.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
back to top