Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
"So I had unprotected sex with a lass, I met her and within within an hour off meeting here we slept together,she finds out she's pregnant a while later.....I accept responsibility because clearly we both chose to be stupid and be unprotected......I tell her I will go through all scans and appointments ect....but once the baby's born I want a DNA, all of a sudden I'm apparently calling her a slag ?? I'm now public enemy number 1 ?? any female advice or experience would help? Genuinely not meaning to portray or make her feel like that, I just don't know her history same as she didn't mine lol " If you were my brother I'd ask and I'd hope you would get a DNA test. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. " Wow so I respect your opinion but in no way am I going to pressure her into an abortion, and as much as I don't want another child if it is mine IL be their.....the post wasn't asking for advise on how to handle the pregnancy just more to see if I was being a cunt asking for the DNA.. and how to go forward from their | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. " Wow! nobody should be convinced into a termination! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. Wow so I respect your opinion but in no way am I going to pressure her into an abortion, and as much as I don't want another child if it is mine IL be their.....the post wasn't asking for advise on how to handle the pregnancy just more to see if I was being a cunt asking for the DNA.. and how to go forward from their " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Was this a fab meet?" Yes | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. Wow so I respect your opinion but in no way am I going to pressure her into an abortion, and as much as I don't want another child if it is mine IL be their.....the post wasn't asking for advise on how to handle the pregnancy just more to see if I was being a cunt asking for the DNA.. and how to go forward from their " Oh ok...I admire you for that...I didn't mean for you to pressurise her into a termination... Just to mention it that she has options and would she not consider a termination. How far is this pregnancy??? But yes definitely insist on a DNA test in the nicest way possible. She probably thought you thought she was trying to trick you by saying the baby is yours & pregnant women can be quite sensitive too & the mind can work overtime. She has to understand that it's completely understandable why you would request a DNA test . Imo I can't believe she is actually going ahead with this pregnancy... It was basically a 1-night stand if I'm correct... Not fair on the foetus either. But anyway I wish you luck OP whatever the outcome may be. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. Wow! nobody should be convinced into a termination!" Not to be convinced or pressurised into a termination...just to be reminded of their options... & to be done in the early stages of pregnancy | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I disagree with abortions, I don't think being an idiot and not being safe means to loose a life, although if that's what she wanted I'd respect that, at the same time I'm not going to be asking her to do it...." What a lucky child to find out that their parents only met for a quick shag with a stranger. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. Wow so I respect your opinion but in no way am I going to pressure her into an abortion, and as much as I don't want another child if it is mine IL be their.....the post wasn't asking for advise on how to handle the pregnancy just more to see if I was being a cunt asking for the DNA.. and how to go forward from their Oh ok...I admire you for that...I didn't mean for you to pressurise her into a termination... Just to mention it that she has options and would she not consider a termination. How far is this pregnancy??? But yes definitely insist on a DNA test in the nicest way possible. She probably thought you thought she was trying to trick you by saying the baby is yours & pregnant women can be quite sensitive too & the mind can work overtime. She has to understand that it's completely understandable why you would request a DNA test . Imo I can't believe she is actually going ahead with this pregnancy... It was basically a 1-night stand if I'm correct... Not fair on the foetus either. But anyway I wish you luck OP whatever the outcome may be. " If you don't get a DNA test OP you are an idiot. She may be pregnant by someone else but shagging around to con as many men as possible to get daddy money from them. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I disagree with abortions, I don't think being an idiot and not being safe means to loose a life, although if that's what she wanted I'd respect that, at the same time I'm not going to be asking her to do it.... What a lucky child to find out that their parents only met for a quick shag with a stranger. " If it is loved and cared for what does it matter? Many children born in to secure relationships don't have that. If I got pregnant from a one night stand I'd probably keep it. I know so many people who struggle to conceive. I've watched the heart break of so many rounds of failed ivf. I know I can love and support a child. How it is conceived is irrelevant. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. Wow! nobody should be convinced into a termination! Not to be convinced or pressurised into a termination...just to be reminded of their options... & to be done in the early stages of pregnancy " Yet you actually did say to convince her to get an abortion. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. " This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I disagree with abortions, I don't think being an idiot and not being safe means to loose a life, although if that's what she wanted I'd respect that, at the same time I'm not going to be asking her to do it.... What a lucky child to find out that their parents only met for a quick shag with a stranger. " Hey i think that is a little uncalled for OP... I don't think you are being unreasonable at all. My only other thought is do you know the pregnancy is genuine - part of me is wondering if it is a scam? I guess if you are local you'll be able to establish that fact fairly soon? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child " Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. " Around abortion then I'll disagree with you, it is only a decision for her ... only she goes through it and only she lives the consequences of that no-one else ... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I disagree with abortions, I don't think being an idiot and not being safe means to loose a life, although if that's what she wanted I'd respect that, at the same time I'm not going to be asking her to do it.... What a lucky child to find out that their parents only met for a quick shag with a stranger. " As a child of the same kind is circumstance I’ve gotta say it’s never bothered me! I feel extremely lucky, I was brought up well and surrounded by love... my parents being horny bastards didnt take away from my upbringing at all | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. " Of course its only a womans decision! A father can chose to be involved or not but absolutely nobody can choose what someone chooses to do with her body! I'm shocked at this attitude. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. Around abortion then I'll disagree with you, it is only a decision for her ... only she goes through it and only she lives the consequences of that no-one else ..." Totally Disagree! My brother’s wife had an abortion for various reasons. Not a day goes by without him feeling the guilt of that (even though he agreed to it too) | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. Of course its only a womans decision! A father can chose to be involved or not but absolutely nobody can choose what someone chooses to do with her body! I'm shocked at this attitude. " Really?! So if a woman is pregnant and still on here meeting loads of people that’s nothing to do with the father of that child as it’s her body?! Be as shocked as you want. I don’t agree | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Was this a fab meet? Yes " If it was a fab meet I think you are well within your right to ask for a paternity test she has unprotected sex with a stranger how many more has she had ... unless you actually had a relationship with her ? We can't really make any judgement as we don't know the full story but I admire that you are willing to stick around for her xx | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Welcome to 18-21 years of maintenance payments and poverty. That's what stupidity gets you. " Yeah I think he gets that bit! And good on for stepping up , I'm not sure how many would! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. Of course its only a womans decision! A father can chose to be involved or not but absolutely nobody can choose what someone chooses to do with her body! I'm shocked at this attitude. Really?! So if a woman is pregnant and still on here meeting loads of people that’s nothing to do with the father of that child as it’s her body?! Be as shocked as you want. I don’t agree " Wow! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are not accusing her of being the town bike but it would take just one other man to make it a possibility that it is not yours. I would apologise that she thought you were implying anything but that it is important for everybody involved especially for the unborn child that there are no doubts. If you intend to be in the child's life after they are born then it's paramount that you have the best possible relationship with the mother. So you are not wrong in asking for a dna but do what you can to soothe her hurt feelings. This must be a very scary time for her so show her as much kindness as you can. " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. Of course its only a womans decision! A father can chose to be involved or not but absolutely nobody can choose what someone chooses to do with her body! I'm shocked at this attitude. Really?! So if a woman is pregnant and still on here meeting loads of people that’s nothing to do with the father of that child as it’s her body?! Be as shocked as you want. I don’t agree Wow! " Wow indeed! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. Around abortion then I'll disagree with you, it is only a decision for her ... only she goes through it and only she lives the consequences of that no-one else ... Totally Disagree! My brother’s wife had an abortion for various reasons. Not a day goes by without him feeling the guilt of that (even though he agreed to it too) " Oh I've known the same ... and for various reasons, totally different to this scenario, been through it though thankfully a different outcome, also know several guys who feel terrible about it too. But I'm sorry it is her body, only she has to go through with it and only she feels that and it's totally different to this and his feelings | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. Of course its only a womans decision! A father can chose to be involved or not but absolutely nobody can choose what someone chooses to do with her body! I'm shocked at this attitude. Really?! So if a woman is pregnant and still on here meeting loads of people that’s nothing to do with the father of that child as it’s her body?! Be as shocked as you want. I don’t agree Wow! " Ok Lorna. One more question as I don’t want to take over this thread. If a woman is pregnant and is on here meeting lots of men, bareback or not you’re saying that’s nothing to do with the father of that baby as it’s her body yes and he shouldn’t even have an opinion never mind a say? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. Wow so I respect your opinion but in no way am I going to pressure her into an abortion, and as much as I don't want another child if it is mine IL be their.....the post wasn't asking for advise on how to handle the pregnancy just more to see if I was being a cunt asking for the DNA.. and how to go forward from their " No you are definitely not being a cunt! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. Of course its only a womans decision! A father can chose to be involved or not but absolutely nobody can choose what someone chooses to do with her body! I'm shocked at this attitude. Really?! So if a woman is pregnant and still on here meeting loads of people that’s nothing to do with the father of that child as it’s her body?! Be as shocked as you want. I don’t agree Wow! Ok Lorna. One more question as I don’t want to take over this thread. If a woman is pregnant and is on here meeting lots of men, bareback or not you’re saying that’s nothing to do with the father of that baby as it’s her body yes and he shouldn’t even have an opinion never mind a say? " You are completely going off topic and I think its best i just say no body gets to decide what someone else does with their body. Of course somebody can have an opinion but no they do not a say! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. Of course its only a womans decision! A father can chose to be involved or not but absolutely nobody can choose what someone chooses to do with her body! I'm shocked at this attitude. Really?! So if a woman is pregnant and still on here meeting loads of people that’s nothing to do with the father of that child as it’s her body?! Be as shocked as you want. I don’t agree Wow! Ok Lorna. One more question as I don’t want to take over this thread. If a woman is pregnant and is on here meeting lots of men, bareback or not you’re saying that’s nothing to do with the father of that baby as it’s her body yes and he shouldn’t even have an opinion never mind a say? You are completely going off topic and I think its best i just say no body gets to decide what someone else does with their body. Of course somebody can have an opinion but no they do not a say!" I admit I went off topic yes. I’ll leave it now. But that was the point I was trying to get across. Equality when it suits in this place sometimes! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. Of course its only a womans decision! A father can chose to be involved or not but absolutely nobody can choose what someone chooses to do with her body! I'm shocked at this attitude. Really?! So if a woman is pregnant and still on here meeting loads of people that’s nothing to do with the father of that child as it’s her body?! Be as shocked as you want. I don’t agree Wow! Ok Lorna. One more question as I don’t want to take over this thread. If a woman is pregnant and is on here meeting lots of men, bareback or not you’re saying that’s nothing to do with the father of that baby as it’s her body yes and he shouldn’t even have an opinion never mind a say? You are completely going off topic and I think its best i just say no body gets to decide what someone else does with their body. Of course somebody can have an opinion but no they do not a say! I admit I went off topic yes. I’ll leave it now. But that was the point I was trying to get across. Equality when it suits in this place sometimes!" Again wow! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. Of course its only a womans decision! A father can chose to be involved or not but absolutely nobody can choose what someone chooses to do with her body! I'm shocked at this attitude. Really?! So if a woman is pregnant and still on here meeting loads of people that’s nothing to do with the father of that child as it’s her body?! Be as shocked as you want. I don’t agree Wow! Ok Lorna. One more question as I don’t want to take over this thread. If a woman is pregnant and is on here meeting lots of men, bareback or not you’re saying that’s nothing to do with the father of that baby as it’s her body yes and he shouldn’t even have an opinion never mind a say? You are completely going off topic and I think its best i just say no body gets to decide what someone else does with their body. Of course somebody can have an opinion but no they do not a say! I admit I went off topic yes. I’ll leave it now. But that was the point I was trying to get across. Equality when it suits in this place sometimes!" Autonomy over your body is not a matter for equality. No one has equal say over my body, I make the decisions _ased on risk factors. People can have opinions but then opinions are like arse holes.... Everyone has one. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. Of course its only a womans decision! A father can chose to be involved or not but absolutely nobody can choose what someone chooses to do with her body! I'm shocked at this attitude. Really?! So if a woman is pregnant and still on here meeting loads of people that’s nothing to do with the father of that child as it’s her body?! Be as shocked as you want. I don’t agree Wow! Ok Lorna. One more question as I don’t want to take over this thread. If a woman is pregnant and is on here meeting lots of men, bareback or not you’re saying that’s nothing to do with the father of that baby as it’s her body yes and he shouldn’t even have an opinion never mind a say? You are completely going off topic and I think its best i just say no body gets to decide what someone else does with their body. Of course somebody can have an opinion but no they do not a say! I admit I went off topic yes. I’ll leave it now. But that was the point I was trying to get across. Equality when it suits in this place sometimes! Autonomy over your body is not a matter for equality. No one has equal say over my body, I make the decisions _ased on risk factors. People can have opinions but then opinions are like arse holes.... Everyone has one." So if a woman wants to potentially put a child at risk that’s nothing to do with the father as it’s her body? I cannot believe I’m getting wow comments on this!! I really can’t! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. This is one decision that should NEVER be coerced by someone else! Her life, her body, her baby ... ONLY her decision! He's already stated he'll stand by the child Whilst I agree nobody should be coerced I don’t agree with the rest. It’s like when people question pregnant women being on here having sex and say it’s their decision only. So the father doesn’t get a say at all? Off topic a bit and that’s another thread but I don’t think everything is just the woman’s decision only. Of course its only a womans decision! A father can chose to be involved or not but absolutely nobody can choose what someone chooses to do with her body! I'm shocked at this attitude. Really?! So if a woman is pregnant and still on here meeting loads of people that’s nothing to do with the father of that child as it’s her body?! Be as shocked as you want. I don’t agree Wow! Ok Lorna. One more question as I don’t want to take over this thread. If a woman is pregnant and is on here meeting lots of men, bareback or not you’re saying that’s nothing to do with the father of that baby as it’s her body yes and he shouldn’t even have an opinion never mind a say? You are completely going off topic and I think its best i just say no body gets to decide what someone else does with their body. Of course somebody can have an opinion but no they do not a say! I admit I went off topic yes. I’ll leave it now. But that was the point I was trying to get across. Equality when it suits in this place sometimes! Autonomy over your body is not a matter for equality. No one has equal say over my body, I make the decisions _ased on risk factors. People can have opinions but then opinions are like arse holes.... Everyone has one. So if a woman wants to potentially put a child at risk that’s nothing to do with the father as it’s her body? I cannot believe I’m getting wow comments on this!! I really can’t!" Yes. That truly is how it works. You would hope they consider the risks involved with having sex while pregnant as with smoking/drinking while pregnant but at the end of the day she can choose to do what she wants to do. If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Wonder how she feel about you now posting on the forums about this " I can't praise the OP enough, he's asked if asking for a DNA test is ok. Which I personally think it is. Maybe he didn't want to tell people they know they met on fab so the child never finds out, but he also wanted to ask people's opinion. I think he's done the best by the lady in question. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I disagree with abortions, I don't think being an idiot and not being safe means to loose a life, although if that's what she wanted I'd respect that, at the same time I'm not going to be asking her to do it.... What a lucky child to find out that their parents only met for a quick shag with a stranger. " I don’t think that matters even if the child did find out. But there’s no need for the child to know. It’s no measure of what kind of parent you’ll be. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Can you have a DNA test while the baby is still in the womb ?" I think its possible but dangerous to the baby so only done in exceptional circumstances. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I disagree with abortions, I don't think being an idiot and not being safe means to loose a life, although if that's what she wanted I'd respect that, at the same time I'm not going to be asking her to do it.... What a lucky child to find out that their parents only met for a quick shag with a stranger. If it is loved and cared for what does it matter? Many children born in to secure relationships don't have that. If I got pregnant from a one night stand I'd probably keep it. I know so many people who struggle to conceive. I've watched the heart break of so many rounds of failed ivf. I know I can love and support a child. How it is conceived is irrelevant. " I completely agree | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Can you have a DNA test while the baby is still in the womb ? I think its possible but dangerous to the baby so only done in exceptional circumstances. " I have just Googled it. Costs about £800 and is perfectly safe for mother and baby. Works from nine weeks. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Can you have a DNA test while the baby is still in the womb ? I think its possible but dangerous to the baby so only done in exceptional circumstances. " Iv just looked it up and I was wrong. You can have one but they are expensive. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" Iv just looked it up and I was wrong. You can have one but they are expensive. " Yes I agree they are expensive but maybe worth it not to pay maintenance for 18 years if the baby isn't really yours and who can put a price on forming an emotional attachment to a child then finding out years later they aren't yours. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" Iv just looked it up and I was wrong. You can have one but they are expensive. Yes I agree they are expensive but maybe worth it not to pay maintenance for 18 years if the baby isn't really yours and who can put a price on forming an emotional attachment to a child then finding out years later they aren't yours. " Yes but in this situation it wouldn't be years, it would be soon after birth going by what the OP has said. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" Yes but in this situation it wouldn't be years, it would be soon after birth going by what the OP has said. " True, if the mother agrees to the DNA test. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" Yes but in this situation it wouldn't be years, it would be soon after birth going by what the OP has said. True, if the mother agrees to the DNA test. " I'm not on what happens if she refuses? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it " This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. " How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"?" To be fair that wasn’t my point. He doesn’t have a living thing inside him which he is potentially putting at risk. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing...." Indeed Based on this, it seems like the OP could, in theory, let the woman concerned go through with the pregnancy in full - or not - on her own, and then tell her to get a DNA test to prove that it's his after all. Basically put all the onus on her, seeing as legally he's not got any rights at the moment anyway | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"?" Then he would be within his rights to do that. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it " Getting PR and being added to the birth certificate is a pretty easy process. Also if the mother refuses the DNA test through CMS then no maintenance would be due. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"? To be fair that wasn’t my point. He doesn’t have a living thing inside him which he is potentially putting at risk. " To be honest, it wasn't mine either. I was sort of agreeing with your earlier statement that men and women are treated very differently, especially seemingly in this case. I was more concerned with the "it's my body and I'll.do what I want with it" attitude that implies that absolutely no one else matters, whatever the circumstances | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing...." I agree, especially when you think the whole process probably won’t be straight forward, is probably expensive and you’re still not guaranteed gaining what you’ve applied for. Dads are essentially at the mercy of the mum and relying on her reasonableness. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. Wow so I respect your opinion but in no way am I going to pressure her into an abortion, and as much as I don't want another child if it is mine IL be their.....the post wasn't asking for advise on how to handle the pregnancy just more to see if I was being a cunt asking for the DNA.. and how to go forward from their Oh ok...I admire you for that...I didn't mean for you to pressurise her into a termination... Just to mention it that she has options and would she not consider a termination. How far is this pregnancy??? But yes definitely insist on a DNA test in the nicest way possible. She probably thought you thought she was trying to trick you by saying the baby is yours & pregnant women can be quite sensitive too & the mind can work overtime. She has to understand that it's completely understandable why you would request a DNA test . Imo I can't believe she is actually going ahead with this pregnancy... It was basically a 1-night stand if I'm correct... Not fair on the foetus either. But anyway I wish you luck OP whatever the outcome may be. " Jeez! Who are you to say if someone should go through with a pregnancy or not?! You don't know her background or anything. Convince her to terminate? That's her choice. Lu | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... I agree, especially when you think the whole process probably won’t be straight forward, is probably expensive and you’re still not guaranteed gaining what you’ve applied for. Dads are essentially at the mercy of the mum and relying on her reasonableness. " There is a simple solution to this. Don't have casual unprotected sex with someone who you have not agreed to have a child with. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... I agree, especially when you think the whole process probably won’t be straight forward, is probably expensive and you’re still not guaranteed gaining what you’ve applied for. Dads are essentially at the mercy of the mum and relying on her reasonableness. " True. I've known several in the past who had their lives turned into an inferno because the mother decided to be a c*nt. Most shocking of all is that the behaviour had "legal" cover. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"You are joking now OP... Yea... If not she has options...I know you have no say in a termination but jeez I'd be straight to my GP firstly for the morning after pill and if it was too late for that pill I'd be onto the next stage of termination pill...chat to her about her options and try to convince her to terminate with empathy of course. Best of Luck with your dilemma...that's the way I see it anyway...a crisis pregnancy = a dilemma which can be very easily sorted in the early stages. " That depends on if she wanted to get pregnant or not. There are some women who want to get pregnant, then pick and choose who the father could be. That way she gets to choose who she can rinse later. One of my very short term girlfriends wanted to get pregnant, so she could get a flat. Safe to say, I didn't help her on that one. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... I agree, especially when you think the whole process probably won’t be straight forward, is probably expensive and you’re still not guaranteed gaining what you’ve applied for. Dads are essentially at the mercy of the mum and relying on her reasonableness. " Reasonableness? Have the people who drafted this law ever even met a woman before??? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... I agree, especially when you think the whole process probably won’t be straight forward, is probably expensive and you’re still not guaranteed gaining what you’ve applied for. Dads are essentially at the mercy of the mum and relying on her reasonableness. Reasonableness? Have the people who drafted this law ever even met a woman before??? " Thats not ok! Most are reasonable and this thread has become very unpleasant and a woman bashing thread. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"? To be fair that wasn’t my point. He doesn’t have a living thing inside him which he is potentially putting at risk. To be honest, it wasn't mine either. I was sort of agreeing with your earlier statement that men and women are treated very differently, especially seemingly in this case. I was more concerned with the "it's my body and I'll.do what I want with it" attitude that implies that absolutely no one else matters, whatever the circumstances" In these circumstances I think it absolutely does and I feel quite strongly about it. Even if people don’t agree which is their prerogative. I would have never thought it’s none of my husbands business if I went fucking around when I was carrying his baby and potentially putting it at risk! This place shocks me sometimes. I think I live on a different planet! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"So I had unprotected sex with a lass, I met her and within within an hour off meeting here we slept together,she finds out she's pregnant a while later.....I accept responsibility because clearly we both chose to be stupid and be unprotected......I tell her I will go through all scans and appointments ect....but once the baby's born I want a DNA, all of a sudden I'm apparently calling her a slag ?? I'm now public enemy number 1 ?? any female advice or experience would help? Genuinely not meaning to portray or make her feel like that, I just don't know her history same as she didn't mine lol " Yeah, but my sister needs £10,000 pounds for a life changing operation all of a sudden...... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"?" Don't men do this any way? Seriously though, if that is what he wants and he has considered the risks then fine. In the OP's situation they are not a couple or in a relationship so he is free to do as he wishes as is she. How many posts about pregnant women have we seen on here where women say they are at their horniest when pregnant and multiple men say they find it a turn on to either watch their pregnant partner fuck someone or to fuck a pregnant woman? I'll accept that these situations are often discussed between partners and the decision is probably _ased more around respect for their relationship and morality that encompasses. But as the most _ase argument it is still her body and her choice. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"? To be fair that wasn’t my point. He doesn’t have a living thing inside him which he is potentially putting at risk. To be honest, it wasn't mine either. I was sort of agreeing with your earlier statement that men and women are treated very differently, especially seemingly in this case. I was more concerned with the "it's my body and I'll.do what I want with it" attitude that implies that absolutely no one else matters, whatever the circumstances In these circumstances I think it absolutely does and I feel quite strongly about it. Even if people don’t agree which is their prerogative. I would have never thought it’s none of my husbands business if I went fucking around when I was carrying his baby and potentially putting it at risk! This place shocks me sometimes. I think I live on a different planet!" I think you will find nobody actually said it was none of his business. Just made it clear it is each individuals choice what they do with their body and was way off topic anyway. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Son listen now. Im gonna be honestly brutal and what I'm gonna say will piss loads off. You've been trapped by a slapper. What were you thinking boy! You've gone in there bareback with a complete stranger god knows what damage you've done to yourself or caught. You've no respect for yourself or others playing around like some god damn alleycat. So let's say it's yours. You idiot. Don't think that bitch is Gonna want you around, she's got no attachment to you, all you were was part of her plan and you fell straight in. Soon as she's you for payments your outta there and don't think you can see the kid when you want. she's in charge now of your whole fucking life, she won't call but you miss a payment you'll hear plenty. She will be fucking everyone in town while your paying for her new phone and TV and still not seeing your kid. And let's say she is pregnant but it's not yours. Your still a dick for meeting it in the first place and an even bigger dick for not protecting yourself. Sorry if I'm tough with you boy but the world's a rough tough place and you just made it a whole lot harder. Pull yourself together Get some self respect and behave yourself. " You’re calling her a slapper and a bitch. You don’t know anything about this woman. Is this the acceptable way to refer to a woman on fab? I do hope he’s not paying any attention to your derogatory, offensive comments. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"? To be fair that wasn’t my point. He doesn’t have a living thing inside him which he is potentially putting at risk. To be honest, it wasn't mine either. I was sort of agreeing with your earlier statement that men and women are treated very differently, especially seemingly in this case. I was more concerned with the "it's my body and I'll.do what I want with it" attitude that implies that absolutely no one else matters, whatever the circumstances In these circumstances I think it absolutely does and I feel quite strongly about it. Even if people don’t agree which is their prerogative. I would have never thought it’s none of my husbands business if I went fucking around when I was carrying his baby and potentially putting it at risk! This place shocks me sometimes. I think I live on a different planet! I think you will find nobody actually said it was none of his business. Just made it clear it is each individuals choice what they do with their body and was way off topic anyway. " Which basically means it's none of his business what she does, surely? And I apologize for my earlier comment, which was only intended as a light hearted throwaway line. Genuinely no offense intended | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"? To be fair that wasn’t my point. He doesn’t have a living thing inside him which he is potentially putting at risk. To be honest, it wasn't mine either. I was sort of agreeing with your earlier statement that men and women are treated very differently, especially seemingly in this case. I was more concerned with the "it's my body and I'll.do what I want with it" attitude that implies that absolutely no one else matters, whatever the circumstances In these circumstances I think it absolutely does and I feel quite strongly about it. Even if people don’t agree which is their prerogative. I would have never thought it’s none of my husbands business if I went fucking around when I was carrying his baby and potentially putting it at risk! This place shocks me sometimes. I think I live on a different planet! I think you will find nobody actually said it was none of his business. Just made it clear it is each individuals choice what they do with their body and was way off topic anyway. Which basically means it's none of his business what she does, surely? Exactly. I give up! " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"? To be fair that wasn’t my point. He doesn’t have a living thing inside him which he is potentially putting at risk. To be honest, it wasn't mine either. I was sort of agreeing with your earlier statement that men and women are treated very differently, especially seemingly in this case. I was more concerned with the "it's my body and I'll.do what I want with it" attitude that implies that absolutely no one else matters, whatever the circumstances In these circumstances I think it absolutely does and I feel quite strongly about it. Even if people don’t agree which is their prerogative. I would have never thought it’s none of my husbands business if I went fucking around when I was carrying his baby and potentially putting it at risk! This place shocks me sometimes. I think I live on a different planet! I think you will find nobody actually said it was none of his business. Just made it clear it is each individuals choice what they do with their body and was way off topic anyway. Which basically means it's none of his business what she does, surely? And I apologize for my earlier comment, which was only intended as a light hearted throwaway line. Genuinely no offense intended " Not the same at all. Ultimately you can advise and express concern and say I think this is unacceptable and I don't want you to do this however you can't physically stop someone doing as they choose with their body that is the ultimate crux of the matter. This is why If you don't want to have the responsibility of having a child with a stranger then don't have casual unprotected sex. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... I agree, especially when you think the whole process probably won’t be straight forward, is probably expensive and you’re still not guaranteed gaining what you’ve applied for. Dads are essentially at the mercy of the mum and relying on her reasonableness. Reasonableness? Have the people who drafted this law ever even met a woman before??? Thats not ok! Most are reasonable and this thread has become very unpleasant and a woman bashing thread. " I’m not bashing women, just attempting to highlight the struggle that men would have in securing their parental responsibility, should they wish it - because I think most just think they automatically have these rights. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"? To be fair that wasn’t my point. He doesn’t have a living thing inside him which he is potentially putting at risk. To be honest, it wasn't mine either. I was sort of agreeing with your earlier statement that men and women are treated very differently, especially seemingly in this case. I was more concerned with the "it's my body and I'll.do what I want with it" attitude that implies that absolutely no one else matters, whatever the circumstances In these circumstances I think it absolutely does and I feel quite strongly about it. Even if people don’t agree which is their prerogative. I would have never thought it’s none of my husbands business if I went fucking around when I was carrying his baby and potentially putting it at risk! This place shocks me sometimes. I think I live on a different planet! I think you will find nobody actually said it was none of his business. Just made it clear it is each individuals choice what they do with their body and was way off topic anyway. Which basically means it's none of his business what she does, surely? And I apologize for my earlier comment, which was only intended as a light hearted throwaway line. Genuinely no offense intended Not the same at all. Ultimately you can advise and express concern and say I think this is unacceptable and I don't want you to do this however you can't physically stop someone doing as they choose with their body that is the ultimate crux of the matter. This is why If you don't want to have the responsibility of having a child with a stranger then don't have casual unprotected sex. " Following that logic, why does it need to be restricted to just two strangers? Any couple can each do as they please, right? Regardless of how the other one feels about the situation? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... I agree, especially when you think the whole process probably won’t be straight forward, is probably expensive and you’re still not guaranteed gaining what you’ve applied for. Dads are essentially at the mercy of the mum and relying on her reasonableness. Reasonableness? Have the people who drafted this law ever even met a woman before??? Thats not ok! Most are reasonable and this thread has become very unpleasant and a woman bashing thread. I’m not bashing women, just attempting to highlight the struggle that men would have in securing their parental responsibility, should they wish it - because I think most just think they automatically have these rights. " It wasn't aimed at you it was aimed at the comment regarding have they met a woman. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"? To be fair that wasn’t my point. He doesn’t have a living thing inside him which he is potentially putting at risk. To be honest, it wasn't mine either. I was sort of agreeing with your earlier statement that men and women are treated very differently, especially seemingly in this case. I was more concerned with the "it's my body and I'll.do what I want with it" attitude that implies that absolutely no one else matters, whatever the circumstances In these circumstances I think it absolutely does and I feel quite strongly about it. Even if people don’t agree which is their prerogative. I would have never thought it’s none of my husbands business if I went fucking around when I was carrying his baby and potentially putting it at risk! This place shocks me sometimes. I think I live on a different planet! I think you will find nobody actually said it was none of his business. Just made it clear it is each individuals choice what they do with their body and was way off topic anyway. Which basically means it's none of his business what she does, surely? And I apologize for my earlier comment, which was only intended as a light hearted throwaway line. Genuinely no offense intended Not the same at all. Ultimately you can advise and express concern and say I think this is unacceptable and I don't want you to do this however you can't physically stop someone doing as they choose with their body that is the ultimate crux of the matter. This is why If you don't want to have the responsibility of having a child with a stranger then don't have casual unprotected sex. Following that logic, why does it need to be restricted to just two strangers? Any couple can each do as they please, right? Regardless of how the other one feels about the situation?" Thats not what I said! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"? To be fair that wasn’t my point. He doesn’t have a living thing inside him which he is potentially putting at risk. To be honest, it wasn't mine either. I was sort of agreeing with your earlier statement that men and women are treated very differently, especially seemingly in this case. I was more concerned with the "it's my body and I'll.do what I want with it" attitude that implies that absolutely no one else matters, whatever the circumstances In these circumstances I think it absolutely does and I feel quite strongly about it. Even if people don’t agree which is their prerogative. I would have never thought it’s none of my husbands business if I went fucking around when I was carrying his baby and potentially putting it at risk! This place shocks me sometimes. I think I live on a different planet! I think you will find nobody actually said it was none of his business. Just made it clear it is each individuals choice what they do with their body and was way off topic anyway. Which basically means it's none of his business what she does, surely? And I apologize for my earlier comment, which was only intended as a light hearted throwaway line. Genuinely no offense intended Not the same at all. Ultimately you can advise and express concern and say I think this is unacceptable and I don't want you to do this however you can't physically stop someone doing as they choose with their body that is the ultimate crux of the matter. This is why If you don't want to have the responsibility of having a child with a stranger then don't have casual unprotected sex. Following that logic, why does it need to be restricted to just two strangers? Any couple can each do as they please, right? Regardless of how the other one feels about the situation?" Ultimately, yes. If one wants to have sex with someone else they can because it's their body, their choice. The consequence of that may be the breakdown of the relationship and all the other heartache and financial turmoil that can bring. No one has ever said there are no consequences to consider. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing...." All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"? To be fair that wasn’t my point. He doesn’t have a living thing inside him which he is potentially putting at risk. To be honest, it wasn't mine either. I was sort of agreeing with your earlier statement that men and women are treated very differently, especially seemingly in this case. I was more concerned with the "it's my body and I'll.do what I want with it" attitude that implies that absolutely no one else matters, whatever the circumstances In these circumstances I think it absolutely does and I feel quite strongly about it. Even if people don’t agree which is their prerogative. I would have never thought it’s none of my husbands business if I went fucking around when I was carrying his baby and potentially putting it at risk! This place shocks me sometimes. I think I live on a different planet! I think you will find nobody actually said it was none of his business. Just made it clear it is each individuals choice what they do with their body and was way off topic anyway. Which basically means it's none of his business what she does, surely? And I apologize for my earlier comment, which was only intended as a light hearted throwaway line. Genuinely no offense intended Not the same at all. Ultimately you can advise and express concern and say I think this is unacceptable and I don't want you to do this however you can't physically stop someone doing as they choose with their body that is the ultimate crux of the matter. This is why If you don't want to have the responsibility of having a child with a stranger then don't have casual unprotected sex. Following that logic, why does it need to be restricted to just two strangers? Any couple can each do as they please, right? Regardless of how the other one feels about the situation? That's not what I said! " How isn't it? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If this was a post from a guy saying he forbids/bans his pregnant partner from doing something I'm sure you'd react differently. As said previously, he can express concern, he can discuss options, he can say why he would rather she chose alternative ways of getting pleasure while pregnant but he cannot ultimately stop her doing things. How would it be viewed if it were the other way round and the male partner of a pregnant woman was going round still playing with as many others as possible and saying "It's my body and I can do what I want with it"? To be fair that wasn’t my point. He doesn’t have a living thing inside him which he is potentially putting at risk. To be honest, it wasn't mine either. I was sort of agreeing with your earlier statement that men and women are treated very differently, especially seemingly in this case. I was more concerned with the "it's my body and I'll.do what I want with it" attitude that implies that absolutely no one else matters, whatever the circumstances In these circumstances I think it absolutely does and I feel quite strongly about it. Even if people don’t agree which is their prerogative. I would have never thought it’s none of my husbands business if I went fucking around when I was carrying his baby and potentially putting it at risk! This place shocks me sometimes. I think I live on a different planet! I think you will find nobody actually said it was none of his business. Just made it clear it is each individuals choice what they do with their body and was way off topic anyway. Which basically means it's none of his business what she does, surely? And I apologize for my earlier comment, which was only intended as a light hearted throwaway line. Genuinely no offense intended Not the same at all. Ultimately you can advise and express concern and say I think this is unacceptable and I don't want you to do this however you can't physically stop someone doing as they choose with their body that is the ultimate crux of the matter. This is why If you don't want to have the responsibility of having a child with a stranger then don't have casual unprotected sex. Following that logic, why does it need to be restricted to just two strangers? Any couple can each do as they please, right? Regardless of how the other one feels about the situation? Ultimately, yes. If one wants to have sex with someone else they can because it's their body, their choice. The consequence of that may be the breakdown of the relationship and all the other heartache and financial turmoil that can bring. No one has ever said there are no consequences to consider. " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"the post wasn't asking for advise on how to handle the pregnancy just more to see if I was being a cunt asking for the DNA.. and how to go forward from their " You're definitely not being a cunt, I totally understand why she's upset and you not being a cunt I'm sure you do too, hopefully now you have a level of intimacy between you should mean you can have a frank conversation, I'm sure if she knows you're willing to be there for her, you trust her but for your own peace of mind a DNA test is something you need and no reflection on her she'll come round. Sometimes I wish everybody would read "The Four Agreements" great book, teaches us not to take anything anyone else does personally. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe " Unfortunately not, only automatic if married at the time the child is born or unmarried parents jointly register the child’s birth (the latter is _ased in different dates in each country of the UK) | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe " Only if married or if named on birth certificate. Not automatic for folk in more casual situations. They have to rely on the mum putting them on birth certificate or applying for parental rights themselves. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe Only if married or if named on birth certificate. Not automatic for folk in more casual situations. They have to rely on the mum putting them on birth certificate or applying for parental rights themselves. " Iv just looked this up and thats not the case. The law was changed and the father doesn’t need to be on the birth certificate and he does get rights without have to apply for them. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe Only if married or if named on birth certificate. Not automatic for folk in more casual situations. They have to rely on the mum putting them on birth certificate or applying for parental rights themselves. Iv just looked this up and thats not the case. The law was changed and the father doesn’t need to be on the birth certificate and he does get rights without have to apply for them. " Precisely this ^^^ | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe Only if married or if named on birth certificate. Not automatic for folk in more casual situations. They have to rely on the mum putting them on birth certificate or applying for parental rights themselves. Iv just looked this up and thats not the case. The law was changed and the father doesn’t need to be on the birth certificate and he does get rights without have to apply for them. " Then someone should notify the uk GOV website cos that’s where I got the info | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I disagree with abortions, I don't think being an idiot and not being safe means to loose a life, although if that's what she wanted I'd respect that, at the same time I'm not going to be asking her to do it.... What a lucky child to find out that their parents only met for a quick shag with a stranger. " Lots of pregnancies over the centuries have been made that way by way of one night stands | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe Only if married or if named on birth certificate. Not automatic for folk in more casual situations. They have to rely on the mum putting them on birth certificate or applying for parental rights themselves. Iv just looked this up and thats not the case. The law was changed and the father doesn’t need to be on the birth certificate and he does get rights without have to apply for them. Then someone should notify the uk GOV website cos that’s where I got the info " I quote “ A mother automatically has parental responsibility for her child from birth. A father usually has parental responsibility if he’s either: married to the child’s mother listed on the birth certificate (after a certain date, depending on which part of the UK the child was born in) You can apply for parental responsibility if you do not automatically have it.” | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe Only if married or if named on birth certificate. Not automatic for folk in more casual situations. They have to rely on the mum putting them on birth certificate or applying for parental rights themselves. Iv just looked this up and thats not the case. The law was changed and the father doesn’t need to be on the birth certificate and he does get rights without have to apply for them. " OK I think there is confusion between parental rights and parental responsibility, no if a father is not on the birth certificate he does not have parental responsibility but he does have rights under the law. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe Only if married or if named on birth certificate. Not automatic for folk in more casual situations. They have to rely on the mum putting them on birth certificate or applying for parental rights themselves. Iv just looked this up and thats not the case. The law was changed and the father doesn’t need to be on the birth certificate and he does get rights without have to apply for them. " I’m not sure where you are looking for gov.uk sets it out quite clearly https://www.gov.uk/parental-rights-responsibilities/who-has-parental-responsibility | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe Only if married or if named on birth certificate. Not automatic for folk in more casual situations. They have to rely on the mum putting them on birth certificate or applying for parental rights themselves. Iv just looked this up and thats not the case. The law was changed and the father doesn’t need to be on the birth certificate and he does get rights without have to apply for them. I’m not sure where you are looking for gov.uk sets it out quite clearly https://www.gov.uk/parental-rights-responsibilities/who-has-parental-responsibility" that’s it | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe Only if married or if named on birth certificate. Not automatic for folk in more casual situations. They have to rely on the mum putting them on birth certificate or applying for parental rights themselves. Iv just looked this up and thats not the case. The law was changed and the father doesn’t need to be on the birth certificate and he does get rights without have to apply for them. I’m not sure where you are looking for gov.uk sets it out quite clearly https://www.gov.uk/parental-rights-responsibilities/who-has-parental-responsibility" There is a difference between parental responsibility and having rights under law which is what I am trying to say. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe Only if married or if named on birth certificate. Not automatic for folk in more casual situations. They have to rely on the mum putting them on birth certificate or applying for parental rights themselves. Iv just looked this up and thats not the case. The law was changed and the father doesn’t need to be on the birth certificate and he does get rights without have to apply for them. Then someone should notify the uk GOV website cos that’s where I got the info I quote “ A mother automatically has parental responsibility for her child from birth. A father usually has parental responsibility if he’s either: married to the child’s mother listed on the birth certificate (after a certain date, depending on which part of the UK the child was born in) You can apply for parental responsibility if you do not automatically have it.” " That's why I actually said rights not responsibility ^^^ | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe Only if married or if named on birth certificate. Not automatic for folk in more casual situations. They have to rely on the mum putting them on birth certificate or applying for parental rights themselves. " Exactly this. I know a lot of dads that have been frozen out of their children’s lives because they’re not on the birth certificate and weren’t married. It’s an awful imbalance at times | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe Only if married or if named on birth certificate. Not automatic for folk in more casual situations. They have to rely on the mum putting them on birth certificate or applying for parental rights themselves. Iv just looked this up and thats not the case. The law was changed and the father doesn’t need to be on the birth certificate and he does get rights without have to apply for them. I’m not sure where you are looking for gov.uk sets it out quite clearly https://www.gov.uk/parental-rights-responsibilities/who-has-parental-responsibility There is a difference between parental responsibility and having rights under law which is what I am trying to say. " Rights / responsibilities is the same thing and all comes back to the _ase parental responsibility as mentioned above. The only person who has automatic rights/responsibilities is the birth mother | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"So I had unprotected sex with a lass, I met her and within within an hour off meeting here we slept together,she finds out she's pregnant a while later.....I accept responsibility because clearly we both chose to be stupid and be unprotected......I tell her I will go through all scans and appointments ect....but once the baby's born I want a DNA, all of a sudden I'm apparently calling her a slag ?? I'm now public enemy number 1 ?? any female advice or experience would help? Genuinely not meaning to portray or make her feel like that, I just don't know her history same as she didn't mine lol " She doesnt have to know you are doing the DNA test if you have access to the baby once its born, you can get a swab kit sent to you, swab inside of yours and babys mouth and send them off. We did this with my middle lad first child, although the mother knew, it was done purely because she had admitted to cheating on him 8 times, it came back the baby was his | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Whether we like it or not, under UK law (Children Act 1989) a father does not have parental responsibility for a child until after the child is born. It’s up to the mum to decide whether she will allow the father to accompany her to register the birth and be named on the child’s birth certificate. It’s not legally required that the dad’s details are included on the birth certificate - even if no doubt about who the dad is or for the child to be given the dad’s surname. If dad is not married to the mum and is not named on the birth certificate then he can make a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the mum or apply to court for a Parental Responsibility Order. Even if dad does not have parental responsibility then he will still have certain legal duties towards the child, such as paying child maintenance. The dad cannot avoid paying child maintenance by stating that he did not wish for the mother to continue with the pregnancy or that he would pay if the mother allowed him to have parental responsibility. All very eye opening isn’t it This needs serious updating. Comes across as a very raw deal for the father if the woman wishes to be unreasonable. Small wonder the MGTOW movement keeps growing.... All dads have automatic parental rights since 2002 I believe Only if married or if named on birth certificate. Not automatic for folk in more casual situations. They have to rely on the mum putting them on birth certificate or applying for parental rights themselves. Iv just looked this up and thats not the case. The law was changed and the father doesn’t need to be on the birth certificate and he does get rights without have to apply for them. I’m not sure where you are looking for gov.uk sets it out quite clearly https://www.gov.uk/parental-rights-responsibilities/who-has-parental-responsibility There is a difference between parental responsibility and having rights under law which is what I am trying to say. Rights / responsibilities is the same thing and all comes back to the _ase parental responsibility as mentioned above. The only person who has automatic rights/responsibilities is the birth mother " Its actually not the same in this case. It is not true that a man has no rights under law if he is not on the birth certificate. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
back to top |