FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Ban young marriage

Jump to newest
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Some charities want marriages for young banned...

Any happily ever after here who met young ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oeBeansMan
over a year ago

Derby

Define young

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I met my husband when I was 17 got married at 19 and was married for 28 years before he passed away would have been 33 years this year so I stick my thumb up to all those who don't approve. There are as many older people married who do not last or do well so it's all dependant of circumstance and behaviours

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *om and JennieCouple
over a year ago

Chams or Socials

I have friends who married at 18 & are still together now at 45.

J x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think it's a ridiculous idea, you cant go restricting people's freedom, as long as they're legally old enough then leave them to it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

This is all over the news..

I don't make this stuff up

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I met my husband when I was 17 got married at 19 and was married for 28 years before he passed away would have been 33 years this year so I stick my thumb up to all those who don't approve. There are as many older people married who do not last or do well so it's all dependant of circumstance and behaviours "

i wouldn’t say 19 is too young

but in scotland you can legally marry at 16, you are not even old enough to drink at your wedding reception, highly unlikely to get a mortgage and even find it difficult to get a private lease i would imagine so where are you starting married life , there are even movies that are deemed too old for you to see, not old enough to drive etc

personally i think if it has been decided you are too young for all these other elements of “adult” life , then yeah its probably also too young to be getting married

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

lets ban everything, wrap us all in bubblewrap, problem solved

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This is all over the news..

I don't make this stuff up "

House!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"This is all over the news..

I don't make this stuff up

House!"

Jeans in disguise ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aomilatteCouple
over a year ago

Midlands

Married 31 years here (fab ages, can't change...sssh )

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I met my husband when I was 17 got married at 19 and was married for 28 years before he passed away would have been 33 years this year so I stick my thumb up to all those who don't approve. There are as many older people married who do not last or do well so it's all dependant of circumstance and behaviours

i wouldn’t say 19 is too young

but in scotland you can legally marry at 16, you are not even old enough to drink at your wedding reception, highly unlikely to get a mortgage and even find it difficult to get a private lease i would imagine so where are you starting married life , there are even movies that are deemed too old for you to see, not old enough to drive etc

personally i think if it has been decided you are too young for all these other elements of “adult” life , then yeah its probably also too young to be getting married

"

You can marry in England at 16 with parent/guardian consent but I do think for the very reasons you have outlined thats too young.

I think 18 is perfectly acceptable.

I have friends who married at 18 and 19 and are still together 41 years later. I know people who have married in their 40's and divorced 2 years later.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rMrs84Couple
over a year ago

Doncaster

Would need more definition we married at 23 were at 13 years now and going strong.

That said I’m sure there’s merit to some prevention but I’m not sure that’s the states responsibility

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Charities are saying...too young

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This is all over the news..

I don't make this stuff up

House!"

Wake up people!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral

Bettr for children to be born in wedlock I think

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts

How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Bettr for children to be born in wedlock I think"

Only if its happy wedlock.

I'd much rather have 2 loving and stable parents who aren't married than 2 who are but very unhappily and unstable.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young "

Its about under 18's.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch

The story - it appears to based around those you need parental consent for

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"Bettr for children to be born in wedlock I think

Only if its happy wedlock.

I'd much rather have 2 loving and stable parents who aren't married than 2 who are but very unhappily and unstable."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young

Its about under 18's.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp"

Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

I do wonder

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young

Its about under 18's.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp

Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young. "

Agreed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

the flip side and hypocritical part of this i think is the law says you are an adult in terms of

- marriage at 16

- treated as an adult for crime i think also at 16 or maybe 18

- driving at 17

- drinking at 18

but hey , you don’t qualify for a living wage yet because you are still a child , and if you need help being housed don’t even think of trying to live on your own - too young to expect your own space and privacy til you are 25

they should pick an age they deem people to be adults and apply it consistently

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

My mum got married at 17

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch


"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young

Its about under 18's.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp

Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young. "

Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"the flip side and hypocritical part of this i think is the law says you are an adult in terms of

- marriage at 16

- treated as an adult for crime i think also at 16 or maybe 18

- driving at 17

- drinking at 18

but hey , you don’t qualify for a living wage yet because you are still a child , and if you need help being housed don’t even think of trying to live on your own - too young to expect your own space and privacy til you are 25

they should pick an age they deem people to be adults and apply it consistently"

Totally agree with this.

Treated as an adult for crime is 17 well it is in England.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts

[Removed by poster at 04/05/21 22:43:02]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ora the explorerWoman
over a year ago

Paradise, Herts


"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young

Its about under 18's.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp

Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young.

Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then. "

Oh yes forgot they changed the school leaving age.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young

Its about under 18's.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp

Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young.

Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then. "

I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ntrepid ExplorersCouple
over a year ago

Birmingham


"I do wonder "

You might wonder, but you appear to not actually think.

Seems like a very reasonable starting point. Safeguarding young people from being cocered onto marriage at 16 and 17.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I settled down at 18, got married at 20/21 (ex was nearly 10 years older).

I thought it'd be OK as I'd always been 'mature' in my head, and genuinely thought I'd found the one. we lasted about 7 years married before it went bad, and another 2ish before we finally split.

although looking back I was mature, decent job etc when I got married, the growing up you do between probably 20/25 can completely change your outlook. we grew apart, it grew sour, and now I am where I am.

would I do it again? not at that age, I think there is a lot to be said for taking time, exploring the world a bit (I feel I missed out on a lot of that) and becoming a bit more 'worldly wise' before making that marriage commitment.

does that mean it isn't right for everyone? absolutely not. each situation is different.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ntrepid ExplorersCouple
over a year ago

Birmingham


"I settled down at 18, got married at 20/21 (ex was nearly 10 years older).

I thought it'd be OK as I'd always been 'mature' in my head, and genuinely thought I'd found the one. we lasted about 7 years married before it went bad, and another 2ish before we finally split.

although looking back I was mature, decent job etc when I got married, the growing up you do between probably 20/25 can completely change your outlook. we grew apart, it grew sour, and now I am where I am.

would I do it again? not at that age, I think there is a lot to be said for taking time, exploring the world a bit (I feel I missed out on a lot of that) and becoming a bit more 'worldly wise' before making that marriage commitment.

does that mean it isn't right for everyone? absolutely not. each situation is different."

That doesn't relate to the news article.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch


"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young

Its about under 18's.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp

Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young.

Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then.

I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too."

Driving maybe. Child prices I don’t agree with most teenagers are huge so things like theme parks they are getting the full access, whereas the younger, height restricted aren’t, as one example. Justice system get area for me, some kids are very mature and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences of it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick

Why? What is the benefit of banning it?

If they can't get married they will just continue as they are, link their finances, move in together, have a kid, etc, but they'll just not be married.

It will not change anything for them, and them being married makes absolutely no difference to anyone else.

It just sounds like imposing restrictions and control on others for the sake of it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ntrepid ExplorersCouple
over a year ago

Birmingham


"Why? What is the benefit of banning it?

If they can't get married they will just continue as they are, link their finances, move in together, have a kid, etc, but they'll just not be married.

It will not change anything for them, and them being married makes absolutely no difference to anyone else.

It just sounds like imposing restrictions and control on others for the sake of it."

Didn't read the article?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young

Its about under 18's.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp

Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young.

Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then.

I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too.

Driving maybe. Child prices I don’t agree with most teenagers are huge so things like theme parks they are getting the full access, whereas the younger, height restricted aren’t, as one example. Justice system get area for me, some kids are very mature and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences of it "

It's not about their size it's about the fact they earn hardly anything if anything at all and are legally financially the responsibility of their parents until 18 as is a 16 year old.

Also what is the difference in size between the average 15 year old and the average 17 year old?

The height thing is normally to do with weather you are allowed on the ride rather than the price you pay.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall

It’s the under 18’s that are being married off in forced marriages that the article identifies as problematic.

I don’t think it’s aimed so much at the love struck teenagers eloping to Gretna green.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ntrepid ExplorersCouple
over a year ago

Birmingham


"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young

Its about under 18's.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp

Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young.

Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then.

I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too.

Driving maybe. Child prices I don’t agree with most teenagers are huge so things like theme parks they are getting the full access, whereas the younger, height restricted aren’t, as one example. Justice system get area for me, some kids are very mature and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences of it

It's not about their size it's about the fact they earn hardly anything if anything at all and are legally financially the responsibility of their parents until 18 as is a 16 year old.

Also what is the difference in size between the average 15 year old and the average 17 year old?

The height thing is normally to do with weather you are allowed on the ride rather than the price you pay."

How did we get from forced child marriages to Alton Towers discounts!?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman
over a year ago

On a mooch


"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young

Its about under 18's.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp

Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young.

Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then.

I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too.

Driving maybe. Child prices I don’t agree with most teenagers are huge so things like theme parks they are getting the full access, whereas the younger, height restricted aren’t, as one example. Justice system get area for me, some kids are very mature and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences of it

It's not about their size it's about the fact they earn hardly anything if anything at all and are legally financially the responsibility of their parents until 18 as is a 16 year old.

Also what is the difference in size between the average 15 year old and the average 17 year old?

The height thing is normally to do with weather you are allowed on the ride rather than the price you pay."

It depends where go some places charge 12+ as adults, hence the size reference.

It’s right they aren’t earning and are the parents responsibility until 18, as a parent I accept that and aware the prices I have to pay.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 04/05/21 23:02:57]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young

Its about under 18's.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp

Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young.

Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then.

I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too.

Driving maybe. Child prices I don’t agree with most teenagers are huge so things like theme parks they are getting the full access, whereas the younger, height restricted aren’t, as one example. Justice system get area for me, some kids are very mature and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences of it

It's not about their size it's about the fact they earn hardly anything if anything at all and are legally financially the responsibility of their parents until 18 as is a 16 year old.

Also what is the difference in size between the average 15 year old and the average 17 year old?

The height thing is normally to do with weather you are allowed on the ride rather than the price you pay.

It depends where go some places charge 12+ as adults, hence the size reference.

It’s right they aren’t earning and are the parents responsibility until 18, as a parent I accept that and aware the prices I have to pay. "

Firstly the thread isn't about forced marriage it is about young marriage and secondly it is completely relevant to the discussion regarding what is allowed what age.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittyndCouple
over a year ago

Oldham/Birmingham

My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young

Its about under 18's.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp

Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young.

Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then.

I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too.

Driving maybe. Child prices I don’t agree with most teenagers are huge so things like theme parks they are getting the full access, whereas the younger, height restricted aren’t, as one example. Justice system get area for me, some kids are very mature and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences of it

It's not about their size it's about the fact they earn hardly anything if anything at all and are legally financially the responsibility of their parents until 18 as is a 16 year old.

Also what is the difference in size between the average 15 year old and the average 17 year old?

The height thing is normally to do with weather you are allowed on the ride rather than the price you pay.

It depends where go some places charge 12+ as adults, hence the size reference.

It’s right they aren’t earning and are the parents responsibility until 18, as a parent I accept that and aware the prices I have to pay. "

I agree that its very inconsistent, that's why I think an age when you are "an adult" needs to e defined and And everything be at that age whether it be 16 17 or 18

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andyfloss2000Woman
over a year ago

ashford

Was married to first husband at 16 and we were together for 16 years x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick

[Removed by poster at 04/05/21 23:06:34]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucka39Man
over a year ago

Newcastle

Well since they have increased the age limit for the lottery alcohol smoking wouldn't it be sensible to just let people enjoy something and as you say all over the news not heard anything myself

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ntrepid ExplorersCouple
over a year ago

Birmingham


"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong "

So 4 years past what the issue actually is.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick


"Why? What is the benefit of banning it?

If they can't get married they will just continue as they are, link their finances, move in together, have a kid, etc, but they'll just not be married.

It will not change anything for them, and them being married makes absolutely no difference to anyone else.

It just sounds like imposing restrictions and control on others for the sake of it.

Didn't read the article? "

I just have, as it wasn't linked to in Tom's original post.

Yeah, OK that's a bit different and is much younger than I thought Tom was meaning.

I personally think the above stands if the two are in love and are adults, but these are child marriages which have never sat well with me.

Child marriage should not be allowed, as they can be so easily manipulated.

Let them wait till they are legally adults and able to take full control over their lives, then there will be less chance of them being controlled.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yet another cultural minefield.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong

So 4 years past what the issue actually is. "

I think you need to read the thread title and stop picking peoples post apart because they haven't read an article that wasn't mentioned until several posts in.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ntrepid ExplorersCouple
over a year ago

Birmingham

It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick


"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong

So 4 years past what the issue actually is. "

But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context.

Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young

Its about under 18's.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp

Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young.

Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then.

I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too.

Driving maybe. Child prices I don’t agree with most teenagers are huge so things like theme parks they are getting the full access, whereas the younger, height restricted aren’t, as one example. Justice system get area for me, some kids are very mature and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences of it

It's not about their size it's about the fact they earn hardly anything if anything at all and are legally financially the responsibility of their parents until 18 as is a 16 year old.

Also what is the difference in size between the average 15 year old and the average 17 year old?

The height thing is normally to do with weather you are allowed on the ride rather than the price you pay.

It depends where go some places charge 12+ as adults, hence the size reference.

It’s right they aren’t earning and are the parents responsibility until 18, as a parent I accept that and aware the prices I have to pay.

Firstly the thread isn't about forced marriage it is about young marriage and secondly it is completely relevant to the discussion regarding what is allowed what age. "

The story that Tom started the discussion about is in fact about force’s marriages.

It specifically mentions 16 year old girls being married off to much older men, who they have never met.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ntrepid ExplorersCouple
over a year ago

Birmingham


"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong

So 4 years past what the issue actually is.

But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context.

Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later."

So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick


"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation. "

Not really, as no one has been manipulated.

Everyone still has the same opinions as they did originally, just about a different subject.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation. "

I rather like Tom's style of posting. Being deliberately over-simplistic I feel widens the debate.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation.

I rather like Tom's style of posting. Being deliberately over-simplistic I feel widens the debate."

Yes, the point is being discussed. Even if it took a while to address the actual topic.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ntrepid ExplorersCouple
over a year ago

Birmingham


"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation.

I rather like Tom's style of posting. Being deliberately over-simplistic I feel widens the debate."

Widens it into something that doesn't exist? Pfft.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong

So 4 years past what the issue actually is.

But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context.

Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later.

So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context. "

Everyone is worth a response!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation.

I rather like Tom's style of posting. Being deliberately over-simplistic I feel widens the debate.

Yes, the point is being discussed. Even if it took a while to address the actual topic."

Just googling the thread title takes you straight to the relevant stories. I always do that with Tom's threads

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation.

I rather like Tom's style of posting. Being deliberately over-simplistic I feel widens the debate.

Widens it into something that doesn't exist? Pfft. "

Everything exists, it's just up to the individual to interpret its relevance.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation.

I rather like Tom's style of posting. Being deliberately over-simplistic I feel widens the debate.

Yes, the point is being discussed. Even if it took a while to address the actual topic.

Just googling the thread title takes you straight to the relevant stories. I always do that with Tom's threads "

The clue is when he says “I don’t make this stuff up, it’s all over the news”

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation. "

or Tom posted something linked to (but not accurately referencing) something in the news that has sparked conversation and insight from a variety of people's personal experience around a host of related topics. I haven't seen much annoyance on the thread to be fair, and have been interested to learn about other people's perspective (even the ones I may not agree with). people who wanted to talk about the actual article have also been able to throughout the thread.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornucopiaMan
over a year ago

Bexley

Marriage is normally encouraged by the establishment because it is a money-spinner

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Anyway going back to the main point of this post I genuinely do believe that 16 is too young and I think the law needs to be 18 regardless of parent's consent.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick


"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong

So 4 years past what the issue actually is.

But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context.

Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later.

So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context. "

No.

This isn't Prime Ministers Question Time, it's a silly little post on FAB.

No opinions have changed and no one has been harmed.

All that happened is people answered the wrong question.

It's really not a big deal.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong

So 4 years past what the issue actually is.

But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context.

Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later.

So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context.

No.

This isn't Prime Ministers Question Time, it's a silly little post on FAB.

No opinions have changed and no one has been harmed.

All that happened is people answered the wrong question.

It's really not a big deal. "

It is if your the one being forced up the aisle!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick


"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong

So 4 years past what the issue actually is.

But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context.

Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later.

So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context.

No.

This isn't Prime Ministers Question Time, it's a silly little post on FAB.

No opinions have changed and no one has been harmed.

All that happened is people answered the wrong question.

It's really not a big deal.

It is if your the one being forced up the aisle!"

I was obviously on about people answering the wrong question, not children being married off.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong

So 4 years past what the issue actually is.

But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context.

Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later.

So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context.

No.

This isn't Prime Ministers Question Time, it's a silly little post on FAB.

No opinions have changed and no one has been harmed.

All that happened is people answered the wrong question.

It's really not a big deal.

It is if your the one being forced up the aisle!

I was obviously on about people answering the wrong question, not children being married off. "

I know, I was being facetious.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick


"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong

So 4 years past what the issue actually is.

But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context.

Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later.

So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context.

No.

This isn't Prime Ministers Question Time, it's a silly little post on FAB.

No opinions have changed and no one has been harmed.

All that happened is people answered the wrong question.

It's really not a big deal.

It is if your the one being forced up the aisle!

I was obviously on about people answering the wrong question, not children being married off.

I know, I was being facetious. "

Ah, fair enough. Sometimes hard to tell how things are meant when they are typed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icolerobbieCouple
over a year ago

walsall


"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong

So 4 years past what the issue actually is.

But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context.

Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later.

So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context.

No.

This isn't Prime Ministers Question Time, it's a silly little post on FAB.

No opinions have changed and no one has been harmed.

All that happened is people answered the wrong question.

It's really not a big deal.

It is if your the one being forced up the aisle!

I was obviously on about people answering the wrong question, not children being married off.

I know, I was being facetious.

Ah, fair enough. Sometimes hard to tell how things are meant when they are typed. "

Tis very true.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why? What is the benefit of banning it?

If they can't get married they will just continue as they are, link their finances, move in together, have a kid, etc, but they'll just not be married.

It will not change anything for them, and them being married makes absolutely no difference to anyone else.

It just sounds like imposing restrictions and control on others for the sake of it."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nliveneTV/TS
over a year ago

Selby


"lets ban everything, wrap us all in bubblewrap, problem solved"

Can i join you both in the bubblewrap

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *annaBeStrongMan
over a year ago

wokingham

Ban marriage all together. What was once a ceremony of love is now just paper work that makes breaking up difficult.

It’s basically a take half my shit contract

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ntrepid ExplorersCouple
over a year ago

Birmingham


"Ban marriage all together. What was once a ceremony of love is now just paper work that makes breaking up difficult.

It’s basically a take half my shit contract "

If people take a moment to justify the idea of wanting the government to formally sanction your live for someone else it's pretty messed up TBF.

Wanting your invisible sky man to approve makes sense if that's your thing. But the government that controls and taxes you? It's pretty ridiculous in concept.

Still, I've done it twice...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andyfloss2000Woman
over a year ago

ashford


"Ban marriage all together. What was once a ceremony of love is now just paper work that makes breaking up difficult.

It’s basically a take half my shit contract "

Is it not half of our shit??x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Ban marriage all together. What was once a ceremony of love is now just paper work that makes breaking up difficult.

It’s basically a take half my shit contract

Is it not half of our shit??x"

only after the contract is signed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I got married at 20 having met my husband a few years before. No regrets. We have a strong and happy marriage and a good life. I've had sex with countless more people since being married than before, so nothing lost there either. Very happy xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ornucopiaMan
over a year ago

Bexley


"Ban marriage all together. What was once a ceremony of love is now just paper work that makes breaking up difficult.

It’s basically a take half my shit contract

Is it not half of our shit??x"

No. It's they take the good half and you keep the shitty half!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top