Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I met my husband when I was 17 got married at 19 and was married for 28 years before he passed away would have been 33 years this year so I stick my thumb up to all those who don't approve. There are as many older people married who do not last or do well so it's all dependant of circumstance and behaviours " i wouldn’t say 19 is too young but in scotland you can legally marry at 16, you are not even old enough to drink at your wedding reception, highly unlikely to get a mortgage and even find it difficult to get a private lease i would imagine so where are you starting married life , there are even movies that are deemed too old for you to see, not old enough to drive etc personally i think if it has been decided you are too young for all these other elements of “adult” life , then yeah its probably also too young to be getting married | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is all over the news.. I don't make this stuff up " House! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is all over the news.. I don't make this stuff up House!" Jeans in disguise ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I met my husband when I was 17 got married at 19 and was married for 28 years before he passed away would have been 33 years this year so I stick my thumb up to all those who don't approve. There are as many older people married who do not last or do well so it's all dependant of circumstance and behaviours i wouldn’t say 19 is too young but in scotland you can legally marry at 16, you are not even old enough to drink at your wedding reception, highly unlikely to get a mortgage and even find it difficult to get a private lease i would imagine so where are you starting married life , there are even movies that are deemed too old for you to see, not old enough to drive etc personally i think if it has been decided you are too young for all these other elements of “adult” life , then yeah its probably also too young to be getting married " You can marry in England at 16 with parent/guardian consent but I do think for the very reasons you have outlined thats too young. I think 18 is perfectly acceptable. I have friends who married at 18 and 19 and are still together 41 years later. I know people who have married in their 40's and divorced 2 years later. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is all over the news.. I don't make this stuff up House!" Wake up people! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bettr for children to be born in wedlock I think" Only if its happy wedlock. I'd much rather have 2 loving and stable parents who aren't married than 2 who are but very unhappily and unstable. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young " Its about under 18's. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bettr for children to be born in wedlock I think Only if its happy wedlock. I'd much rather have 2 loving and stable parents who aren't married than 2 who are but very unhappily and unstable." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young Its about under 18's. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp" Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young Its about under 18's. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young. " Agreed. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young Its about under 18's. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young. " Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the flip side and hypocritical part of this i think is the law says you are an adult in terms of - marriage at 16 - treated as an adult for crime i think also at 16 or maybe 18 - driving at 17 - drinking at 18 but hey , you don’t qualify for a living wage yet because you are still a child , and if you need help being housed don’t even think of trying to live on your own - too young to expect your own space and privacy til you are 25 they should pick an age they deem people to be adults and apply it consistently" Totally agree with this. Treated as an adult for crime is 17 well it is in England. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young Its about under 18's. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young. Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then. " Oh yes forgot they changed the school leaving age. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young Its about under 18's. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young. Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then. " I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do wonder " You might wonder, but you appear to not actually think. Seems like a very reasonable starting point. Safeguarding young people from being cocered onto marriage at 16 and 17. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I settled down at 18, got married at 20/21 (ex was nearly 10 years older). I thought it'd be OK as I'd always been 'mature' in my head, and genuinely thought I'd found the one. we lasted about 7 years married before it went bad, and another 2ish before we finally split. although looking back I was mature, decent job etc when I got married, the growing up you do between probably 20/25 can completely change your outlook. we grew apart, it grew sour, and now I am where I am. would I do it again? not at that age, I think there is a lot to be said for taking time, exploring the world a bit (I feel I missed out on a lot of that) and becoming a bit more 'worldly wise' before making that marriage commitment. does that mean it isn't right for everyone? absolutely not. each situation is different." That doesn't relate to the news article. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young Its about under 18's. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young. Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then. I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too." Driving maybe. Child prices I don’t agree with most teenagers are huge so things like theme parks they are getting the full access, whereas the younger, height restricted aren’t, as one example. Justice system get area for me, some kids are very mature and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences of it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why? What is the benefit of banning it? If they can't get married they will just continue as they are, link their finances, move in together, have a kid, etc, but they'll just not be married. It will not change anything for them, and them being married makes absolutely no difference to anyone else. It just sounds like imposing restrictions and control on others for the sake of it." Didn't read the article? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young Its about under 18's. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young. Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then. I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too. Driving maybe. Child prices I don’t agree with most teenagers are huge so things like theme parks they are getting the full access, whereas the younger, height restricted aren’t, as one example. Justice system get area for me, some kids are very mature and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences of it " It's not about their size it's about the fact they earn hardly anything if anything at all and are legally financially the responsibility of their parents until 18 as is a 16 year old. Also what is the difference in size between the average 15 year old and the average 17 year old? The height thing is normally to do with weather you are allowed on the ride rather than the price you pay. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young Its about under 18's. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young. Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then. I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too. Driving maybe. Child prices I don’t agree with most teenagers are huge so things like theme parks they are getting the full access, whereas the younger, height restricted aren’t, as one example. Justice system get area for me, some kids are very mature and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences of it It's not about their size it's about the fact they earn hardly anything if anything at all and are legally financially the responsibility of their parents until 18 as is a 16 year old. Also what is the difference in size between the average 15 year old and the average 17 year old? The height thing is normally to do with weather you are allowed on the ride rather than the price you pay." How did we get from forced child marriages to Alton Towers discounts!? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young Its about under 18's. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young. Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then. I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too. Driving maybe. Child prices I don’t agree with most teenagers are huge so things like theme parks they are getting the full access, whereas the younger, height restricted aren’t, as one example. Justice system get area for me, some kids are very mature and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences of it It's not about their size it's about the fact they earn hardly anything if anything at all and are legally financially the responsibility of their parents until 18 as is a 16 year old. Also what is the difference in size between the average 15 year old and the average 17 year old? The height thing is normally to do with weather you are allowed on the ride rather than the price you pay." It depends where go some places charge 12+ as adults, hence the size reference. It’s right they aren’t earning and are the parents responsibility until 18, as a parent I accept that and aware the prices I have to pay. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young Its about under 18's. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young. Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then. I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too. Driving maybe. Child prices I don’t agree with most teenagers are huge so things like theme parks they are getting the full access, whereas the younger, height restricted aren’t, as one example. Justice system get area for me, some kids are very mature and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences of it It's not about their size it's about the fact they earn hardly anything if anything at all and are legally financially the responsibility of their parents until 18 as is a 16 year old. Also what is the difference in size between the average 15 year old and the average 17 year old? The height thing is normally to do with weather you are allowed on the ride rather than the price you pay. It depends where go some places charge 12+ as adults, hence the size reference. It’s right they aren’t earning and are the parents responsibility until 18, as a parent I accept that and aware the prices I have to pay. " Firstly the thread isn't about forced marriage it is about young marriage and secondly it is completely relevant to the discussion regarding what is allowed what age. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young Its about under 18's. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young. Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then. I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too. Driving maybe. Child prices I don’t agree with most teenagers are huge so things like theme parks they are getting the full access, whereas the younger, height restricted aren’t, as one example. Justice system get area for me, some kids are very mature and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences of it It's not about their size it's about the fact they earn hardly anything if anything at all and are legally financially the responsibility of their parents until 18 as is a 16 year old. Also what is the difference in size between the average 15 year old and the average 17 year old? The height thing is normally to do with weather you are allowed on the ride rather than the price you pay. It depends where go some places charge 12+ as adults, hence the size reference. It’s right they aren’t earning and are the parents responsibility until 18, as a parent I accept that and aware the prices I have to pay. " I agree that its very inconsistent, that's why I think an age when you are "an adult" needs to e defined and And everything be at that age whether it be 16 17 or 18 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong " So 4 years past what the issue actually is. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why? What is the benefit of banning it? If they can't get married they will just continue as they are, link their finances, move in together, have a kid, etc, but they'll just not be married. It will not change anything for them, and them being married makes absolutely no difference to anyone else. It just sounds like imposing restrictions and control on others for the sake of it. Didn't read the article? " I just have, as it wasn't linked to in Tom's original post. Yeah, OK that's a bit different and is much younger than I thought Tom was meaning. I personally think the above stands if the two are in love and are adults, but these are child marriages which have never sat well with me. Child marriage should not be allowed, as they can be so easily manipulated. Let them wait till they are legally adults and able to take full control over their lives, then there will be less chance of them being controlled. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong So 4 years past what the issue actually is. " I think you need to read the thread title and stop picking peoples post apart because they haven't read an article that wasn't mentioned until several posts in. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong So 4 years past what the issue actually is. " But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context. Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How young are we talking? I think 16 is definitely too young Its about under 18's. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56982309.amp Yes should be banned in my opinion. Under 18 is too young. Agree you are not deemed an adult until 18, can’t vote, can’t drink and nowadays can’t leave school before then. I also think other things should be 18 for example driving licence and being treated as an adult in the Justice system and I also think child prices should be till 18 too. Driving maybe. Child prices I don’t agree with most teenagers are huge so things like theme parks they are getting the full access, whereas the younger, height restricted aren’t, as one example. Justice system get area for me, some kids are very mature and know exactly what they are doing and the consequences of it It's not about their size it's about the fact they earn hardly anything if anything at all and are legally financially the responsibility of their parents until 18 as is a 16 year old. Also what is the difference in size between the average 15 year old and the average 17 year old? The height thing is normally to do with weather you are allowed on the ride rather than the price you pay. It depends where go some places charge 12+ as adults, hence the size reference. It’s right they aren’t earning and are the parents responsibility until 18, as a parent I accept that and aware the prices I have to pay. Firstly the thread isn't about forced marriage it is about young marriage and secondly it is completely relevant to the discussion regarding what is allowed what age. " The story that Tom started the discussion about is in fact about force’s marriages. It specifically mentions 16 year old girls being married off to much older men, who they have never met. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong So 4 years past what the issue actually is. But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context. Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later." So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation. " Not really, as no one has been manipulated. Everyone still has the same opinions as they did originally, just about a different subject. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation. " I rather like Tom's style of posting. Being deliberately over-simplistic I feel widens the debate. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation. I rather like Tom's style of posting. Being deliberately over-simplistic I feel widens the debate." Yes, the point is being discussed. Even if it took a while to address the actual topic. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation. I rather like Tom's style of posting. Being deliberately over-simplistic I feel widens the debate." Widens it into something that doesn't exist? Pfft. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong So 4 years past what the issue actually is. But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context. Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later. So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context. " Everyone is worth a response! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation. I rather like Tom's style of posting. Being deliberately over-simplistic I feel widens the debate. Yes, the point is being discussed. Even if it took a while to address the actual topic." Just googling the thread title takes you straight to the relevant stories. I always do that with Tom's threads | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation. I rather like Tom's style of posting. Being deliberately over-simplistic I feel widens the debate. Widens it into something that doesn't exist? Pfft. " Everything exists, it's just up to the individual to interpret its relevance. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation. I rather like Tom's style of posting. Being deliberately over-simplistic I feel widens the debate. Yes, the point is being discussed. Even if it took a while to address the actual topic. Just googling the thread title takes you straight to the relevant stories. I always do that with Tom's threads " The clue is when he says “I don’t make this stuff up, it’s all over the news” | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's so interesting how Tom posts some uninformed nonsense and as soon as some actual meaningful context is provided, it's clear that it was grossly twisted to annoy people. A delightful little snapshot of social media manipulation. " or Tom posted something linked to (but not accurately referencing) something in the news that has sparked conversation and insight from a variety of people's personal experience around a host of related topics. I haven't seen much annoyance on the thread to be fair, and have been interested to learn about other people's perspective (even the ones I may not agree with). people who wanted to talk about the actual article have also been able to throughout the thread. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong So 4 years past what the issue actually is. But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context. Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later. So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context. " No. This isn't Prime Ministers Question Time, it's a silly little post on FAB. No opinions have changed and no one has been harmed. All that happened is people answered the wrong question. It's really not a big deal. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong So 4 years past what the issue actually is. But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context. Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later. So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context. No. This isn't Prime Ministers Question Time, it's a silly little post on FAB. No opinions have changed and no one has been harmed. All that happened is people answered the wrong question. It's really not a big deal. " It is if your the one being forced up the aisle! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong So 4 years past what the issue actually is. But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context. Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later. So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context. No. This isn't Prime Ministers Question Time, it's a silly little post on FAB. No opinions have changed and no one has been harmed. All that happened is people answered the wrong question. It's really not a big deal. It is if your the one being forced up the aisle!" I was obviously on about people answering the wrong question, not children being married off. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong So 4 years past what the issue actually is. But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context. Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later. So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context. No. This isn't Prime Ministers Question Time, it's a silly little post on FAB. No opinions have changed and no one has been harmed. All that happened is people answered the wrong question. It's really not a big deal. It is if your the one being forced up the aisle! I was obviously on about people answering the wrong question, not children being married off. " I know, I was being facetious. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong So 4 years past what the issue actually is. But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context. Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later. So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context. No. This isn't Prime Ministers Question Time, it's a silly little post on FAB. No opinions have changed and no one has been harmed. All that happened is people answered the wrong question. It's really not a big deal. It is if your the one being forced up the aisle! I was obviously on about people answering the wrong question, not children being married off. I know, I was being facetious. " Ah, fair enough. Sometimes hard to tell how things are meant when they are typed. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My guy and me were met at an age of 22 x he was the first guy who took my virginity and we are still going strong So 4 years past what the issue actually is. But relevant to Tom's post as it was missing the context. Not everyone read the article as it wasn't linked to until quite a bit later. So shouldn't people be actually stopping to work out what he's waffling on about before presuming he's worth responding to? I don't see ignorance as a defence here. I went looking and found the BBC article by myself easily. Others should be doing that too, or asking for context. No. This isn't Prime Ministers Question Time, it's a silly little post on FAB. No opinions have changed and no one has been harmed. All that happened is people answered the wrong question. It's really not a big deal. It is if your the one being forced up the aisle! I was obviously on about people answering the wrong question, not children being married off. I know, I was being facetious. Ah, fair enough. Sometimes hard to tell how things are meant when they are typed. " Tis very true. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why? What is the benefit of banning it? If they can't get married they will just continue as they are, link their finances, move in together, have a kid, etc, but they'll just not be married. It will not change anything for them, and them being married makes absolutely no difference to anyone else. It just sounds like imposing restrictions and control on others for the sake of it." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"lets ban everything, wrap us all in bubblewrap, problem solved" Can i join you both in the bubblewrap | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ban marriage all together. What was once a ceremony of love is now just paper work that makes breaking up difficult. It’s basically a take half my shit contract " If people take a moment to justify the idea of wanting the government to formally sanction your live for someone else it's pretty messed up TBF. Wanting your invisible sky man to approve makes sense if that's your thing. But the government that controls and taxes you? It's pretty ridiculous in concept. Still, I've done it twice... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ban marriage all together. What was once a ceremony of love is now just paper work that makes breaking up difficult. It’s basically a take half my shit contract " Is it not half of our shit??x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ban marriage all together. What was once a ceremony of love is now just paper work that makes breaking up difficult. It’s basically a take half my shit contract Is it not half of our shit??x" only after the contract is signed | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ban marriage all together. What was once a ceremony of love is now just paper work that makes breaking up difficult. It’s basically a take half my shit contract Is it not half of our shit??x" No. It's they take the good half and you keep the shitty half! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |