Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If it takes 6 weeks to process, and assuming you qualify for it on day 1, why is back dating it not fair? I don’t work in a Councils Revs & Bens department so cannot comment on why it takes so long, only that I believe it should be easier and result in less stress for those that do need to claim." Yes. I also think so that it should be alot easier for them to get it, the way the system is designed makes it more complicated than it needs to be. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[Universal Credit Removed by Government at 01/03/21 11:06:09]" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If it takes 6 weeks to process, and assuming you qualify for it on day 1, why is back dating it not fair? I don’t work in a Councils Revs & Bens department so cannot comment on why it takes so long, only that I believe it should be easier and result in less stress for those that do need to claim." It's nothing to do with it being 6 weeks to process. All other benefits take about 2 weeks so the reason with universal credit that they make it 6 weeks is because they said that it's fairer for people that work. So because you would normally have to wait a month before you get paid so that's why they are trying to do it that way so yes I do think it's very unfair because it leaves people without money unnecessarily. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes it takes time to process but you can apply for an advance payment if needed. No system is perfect." Yes but its far from perfect. 63% of universal credit claimants are in rent arrears, average for other benefits is 39%. I can't copy the link but its on the citizens advice website. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s paid to ‘mimic’ having a job as your 1st pay check isn’t paid in advance. ... and quite rightly as no one should be in a better position for not working. To counter that an advance is easily accessible and is to be paid back over time. The reality is on far too many occasions that advance is squandered on frivolity by people who can’t manage money..... which is the bigger issue if you get into the nuts and bolts of it. Of course no system is perfect and you will always find examples of extreme consequences... but the 6 week delay in Universal credit is there for a reason and there is a way for people to mitigate it (the advance)... if people fritter that advance away in new phones and PlayStations that isn’t the fault of Universal Credit. " It's not there for any reason other than for people to be judgmental and assume that people are squandering money which seems to be what you are suggesting. You have absolutely no idea of people's Situations and are not sure who's buying an xbox or a playstation with the £600 advance that a family of 3 gets to last 6 week. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was made redundant just before they did the furlough scheme and due to the timing , I had to wait 11 weeks before getting any benifit. This has left me with almost 3 months rent arrears. on the 9th week, I was forced to get a UC loan which means I dont get full payments until 2 months time. I am NOT a happy bunny I can tell ya " Exactly And this is the reality but people want to believe that it is the individual's fault for squandering money and that the advanced payments are easy to get hold of but what they forget is it's a tiny amount that has to be paid back at a large monthly installment. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s paid to ‘mimic’ having a job as your 1st pay check isn’t paid in advance. ... and quite rightly as no one should be in a better position for not working. To counter that an advance is easily accessible and is to be paid back over time. The reality is on far too many occasions that advance is squandered on frivolity by people who can’t manage money..... which is the bigger issue if you get into the nuts and bolts of it. Of course no system is perfect and you will always find examples of extreme consequences... but the 6 week delay in Universal credit is there for a reason and there is a way for people to mitigate it (the advance)... if people fritter that advance away in new phones and PlayStations that isn’t the fault of Universal Credit. It's not there for any reason other than for people to be judgmental and assume that people are squandering money which seems to be what you are suggesting. You have absolutely no idea of people's Situations and are not sure who's buying an xbox or a playstation with the £600 advance that a family of 3 gets to last 6 week. " I’m pretty sure when UC was designed they reason for 6 weeks wasn’t so people can be judgmental... what an utterly ludicrous comment!! You have no idea who I am, what I do or what I know... so to say I gave ‘no idea’ is at best guess work from you. Now back to my original point... Enough (of course not all) do mismanage the money they are given and that is the true problem . There is a lack of knowledge re money management and a lack of consequence for mismanagement of money. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s paid to ‘mimic’ having a job as your 1st pay check isn’t paid in advance. ... and quite rightly as no one should be in a better position for not working. To counter that an advance is easily accessible and is to be paid back over time. The reality is on far too many occasions that advance is squandered on frivolity by people who can’t manage money..... which is the bigger issue if you get into the nuts and bolts of it. Of course no system is perfect and you will always find examples of extreme consequences... but the 6 week delay in Universal credit is there for a reason and there is a way for people to mitigate it (the advance)... if people fritter that advance away in new phones and PlayStations that isn’t the fault of Universal Credit. It's not there for any reason other than for people to be judgmental and assume that people are squandering money which seems to be what you are suggesting. You have absolutely no idea of people's Situations and are not sure who's buying an xbox or a playstation with the £600 advance that a family of 3 gets to last 6 week. I’m pretty sure when UC was designed they reason for 6 weeks wasn’t so people can be judgmental... what an utterly ludicrous comment!! You have no idea who I am, what I do or what I know... so to say I gave ‘no idea’ is at best guess work from you. Now back to my original point... Enough (of course not all) do mismanage the money they are given and that is the true problem . There is a lack of knowledge re money management and a lack of consequence for mismanagement of money. " You are aware the only people that wait 6 weeks are people that are new to the benefit system right? Anyone who is transferring over from a new benifit waits 3 weeks but in reality one week as the benefits they already receive is paid in 2 weeks arrears. So you seem to be suggesting that the majority of people who receive UC Don't how to manage their money and bearing in mind 69% of all benefit claimants also work. So I stand by my comment that I think you are just being judgmental and suggesting people squander the advance payment on new mobile phones and yes that is judgmental. Also I don't know what you mean by lack of consequences for mismanagement of money because people are losing their homes I would say that's a fairly large consequence. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s paid to ‘mimic’ having a job as your 1st pay check isn’t paid in advance. ... and quite rightly as no one should be in a better position for not working. To counter that an advance is easily accessible and is to be paid back over time. The reality is on far too many occasions that advance is squandered on frivolity by people who can’t manage money..... which is the bigger issue if you get into the nuts and bolts of it. Of course no system is perfect and you will always find examples of extreme consequences... but the 6 week delay in Universal credit is there for a reason and there is a way for people to mitigate it (the advance)... if people fritter that advance away in new phones and PlayStations that isn’t the fault of Universal Credit. " Are you aware that everything is now done online and the new phone that to you may be squandering money may in fact be the cheapest way for someone to meet all their weekly obligations to be able to continue receiving benefits? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s paid to ‘mimic’ having a job as your 1st pay check isn’t paid in advance. ... and quite rightly as no one should be in a better position for not working. To counter that an advance is easily accessible and is to be paid back over time. The reality is on far too many occasions that advance is squandered on frivolity by people who can’t manage money..... which is the bigger issue if you get into the nuts and bolts of it. Of course no system is perfect and you will always find examples of extreme consequences... but the 6 week delay in Universal credit is there for a reason and there is a way for people to mitigate it (the advance)... if people fritter that advance away in new phones and PlayStations that isn’t the fault of Universal Credit. Are you aware that everything is now done online and the new phone that to you may be squandering money may in fact be the cheapest way for someone to meet all their weekly obligations to be able to continue receiving benefits? " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s paid to ‘mimic’ having a job as your 1st pay check isn’t paid in advance. ... and quite rightly as no one should be in a better position for not working. To counter that an advance is easily accessible and is to be paid back over time. The reality is on far too many occasions that advance is squandered on frivolity by people who can’t manage money..... which is the bigger issue if you get into the nuts and bolts of it. Of course no system is perfect and you will always find examples of extreme consequences... but the 6 week delay in Universal credit is there for a reason and there is a way for people to mitigate it (the advance)... if people fritter that advance away in new phones and PlayStations that isn’t the fault of Universal Credit. Are you aware that everything is now done online and the new phone that to you may be squandering money may in fact be the cheapest way for someone to meet all their weekly obligations to be able to continue receiving benefits? " Absolutely aware of that. Ability to access the internet is required... not to have the latest iPhone 12....but herein again lies the true problem. Rather than actually looking at what’s needed people are automatically defaulting to defending behaviours. Do people need smart phones in the modern world... yes they do. But if doesn’t HAVE to be the latest model... you can access your obligations to claim benefits on a fairly cheap, unfashionable smart phone or you can use the free local libraries...... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s paid to ‘mimic’ having a job as your 1st pay check isn’t paid in advance. ... and quite rightly as no one should be in a better position for not working. To counter that an advance is easily accessible and is to be paid back over time. The reality is on far too many occasions that advance is squandered on frivolity by people who can’t manage money..... which is the bigger issue if you get into the nuts and bolts of it. Of course no system is perfect and you will always find examples of extreme consequences... but the 6 week delay in Universal credit is there for a reason and there is a way for people to mitigate it (the advance)... if people fritter that advance away in new phones and PlayStations that isn’t the fault of Universal Credit. It's not there for any reason other than for people to be judgmental and assume that people are squandering money which seems to be what you are suggesting. You have absolutely no idea of people's Situations and are not sure who's buying an xbox or a playstation with the £600 advance that a family of 3 gets to last 6 week. I’m pretty sure when UC was designed they reason for 6 weeks wasn’t so people can be judgmental... what an utterly ludicrous comment!! You have no idea who I am, what I do or what I know... so to say I gave ‘no idea’ is at best guess work from you. Now back to my original point... Enough (of course not all) do mismanage the money they are given and that is the true problem . There is a lack of knowledge re money management and a lack of consequence for mismanagement of money. " There will always be a small minority like this. The press love to use them to pull down the rest of the hardworking folk who just want to keep their rent up to date and feed and clothe their families, when times are hard. You know, those that have paid into the system for years, who only turn to the govt for help in extreme circumstances, and those who work their fingers to the bone and still cant make ends meet. I am disgusted at the casual callousness dished out by you, and will continue to hold my head up high. I dont have xboxes, designer clothes, the most up to date phones. I work, I rent privately, and when I need help, I will ask for it. Waiting for 6 weeks is ridiculous in the days when money can be sent and received instantaneously. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s paid to ‘mimic’ having a job as your 1st pay check isn’t paid in advance. ... and quite rightly as no one should be in a better position for not working. To counter that an advance is easily accessible and is to be paid back over time. The reality is on far too many occasions that advance is squandered on frivolity by people who can’t manage money..... which is the bigger issue if you get into the nuts and bolts of it. Of course no system is perfect and you will always find examples of extreme consequences... but the 6 week delay in Universal credit is there for a reason and there is a way for people to mitigate it (the advance)... if people fritter that advance away in new phones and PlayStations that isn’t the fault of Universal Credit. Are you aware that everything is now done online and the new phone that to you may be squandering money may in fact be the cheapest way for someone to meet all their weekly obligations to be able to continue receiving benefits? Absolutely aware of that. Ability to access the internet is required... not to have the latest iPhone 12....but herein again lies the true problem. Rather than actually looking at what’s needed people are automatically defaulting to defending behaviours. Do people need smart phones in the modern world... yes they do. But if doesn’t HAVE to be the latest model... you can access your obligations to claim benefits on a fairly cheap, unfashionable smart phone or you can use the free local libraries......" If you genuinely believe that people who get an advanced payment are buying the latest mobile phone with that advance payment you clearly don't know what you were talking about. And when was the last time a library was open? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was watching an interesting program about it of how many can wait for 6 weeks and more and as a result they cant pay the rent in time, why does it take time, is it down to administration or is it "poorly designed" algorithm? Cos many get backdated which isnt fare in my opinion." It seems crazy and unfair to people in genuine need. But I guess they have to be quite thorough otherwise people will just take the piss and con the system. If imagine that for every ten genuine claimants there's probably 1 fraud. Maybe I'm just cynical. But it doesn't help those in genuine need and who need it straight away. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My phone is a year and a half old (to me) and was bought 2nd hand. Due to having to pay off the emergency loan and having money taken away to pay rent arrears (arrears coming from not having any money what so ever for 11 weeks) means I get just short of £200 a month to live on. I can assure you "us benefit scroungers who scrounge off the government" and "squander our benefit money" is bollox and very fucking offensive. ohhh and yes I do have to pay for my phone and internet out of that £200 or I wouldn't be able to a) look for work, b) actually sign on every two weeks and c) come on here and complain about it " I was on it year before last and after everything paid rent/council tax/utilities and internet I had £70 a month for food and anything else x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Open the subject up. Even though we have instant payments and online banking. Why does it still take 3 days to clear a cheque? It's not admin systems, it'll be to do with earning interest I'm guessing." No. The rent for each size of property is set by central government, so the local authority can only pay that as a maximum. So if your rent is higher, tough. For example, there is a shortfall if I was on housing benefit (I am not, but have in the past) because my landlord charges more than the government thinks it should be. Of course I could live somewhere cheaper, but the crime rates go up then! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Open the subject up. Even though we have instant payments and online banking. Why does it still take 3 days to clear a cheque? It's not admin systems, it'll be to do with earning interest I'm guessing. No. The rent for each size of property is set by central government, so the local authority can only pay that as a maximum. So if your rent is higher, tough. For example, there is a shortfall if I was on housing benefit (I am not, but have in the past) because my landlord charges more than the government thinks it should be. Of course I could live somewhere cheaper, but the crime rates go up then!" That's the situation I'm in. Rent is £795 and max rent UC will pay is £600 ish. Added to the rent part of UC is job seekers allowance but rolled into the total UC payment. Plus when I applied for UC originally, I had savings in a business account that they said should be taken into account and closed my original claim down. Which was incorrect as buisness accounts, should not come into any UC calculations.....So I had to start the process of applying all over again....So not at all pleased they handled my claim....But never the less very grateful. Otherwise I would have been on the streets long ago. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Open the subject up. Even though we have instant payments and online banking. Why does it still take 3 days to clear a cheque? It's not admin systems, it'll be to do with earning interest I'm guessing. No. The rent for each size of property is set by central government, so the local authority can only pay that as a maximum. So if your rent is higher, tough. For example, there is a shortfall if I was on housing benefit (I am not, but have in the past) because my landlord charges more than the government thinks it should be. Of course I could live somewhere cheaper, but the crime rates go up then! That's the situation I'm in. Rent is £795 and max rent UC will pay is £600 ish. Added to the rent part of UC is job seekers allowance but rolled into the total UC payment. Plus when I applied for UC originally, I had savings in a business account that they said should be taken into account and closed my original claim down. Which was incorrect as buisness accounts, should not come into any UC calculations.....So I had to start the process of applying all over again....So not at all pleased they handled my claim....But never the less very grateful. Otherwise I would have been on the streets long ago. " Have you applied to the your local council for a discretionary housing payment. The clue is in the name, it is discretionary but they can pay the shortfall if you are struggling. Look on your local council site for dhp | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually each local authority sets its own housing rates. What you pay for a 1 bedroom property in one area will be different to that in another. So depending on where you live your housing benefit portion could be different" Very true in Southampton for example the local housing rate is £136 per week. In the London Borough of Redbridge its £207.12 a week. However the average one bed flat in Southampton is £127 a week and in Redbridge its £287. So somebody living in London for example has a massive shortfall to make up so it's not as easy as a lot of people say on universal credits. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Open the subject up. Even though we have instant payments and online banking. Why does it still take 3 days to clear a cheque? It's not admin systems, it'll be to do with earning interest I'm guessing. No. The rent for each size of property is set by central government, so the local authority can only pay that as a maximum. So if your rent is higher, tough. For example, there is a shortfall if I was on housing benefit (I am not, but have in the past) because my landlord charges more than the government thinks it should be. Of course I could live somewhere cheaper, but the crime rates go up then! That's the situation I'm in. Rent is £795 and max rent UC will pay is £600 ish. Added to the rent part of UC is job seekers allowance but rolled into the total UC payment. Plus when I applied for UC originally, I had savings in a business account that they said should be taken into account and closed my original claim down. Which was incorrect as buisness accounts, should not come into any UC calculations.....So I had to start the process of applying all over again....So not at all pleased they handled my claim....But never the less very grateful. Otherwise I would have been on the streets long ago. Have you applied to the your local council for a discretionary housing payment. The clue is in the name, it is discretionary but they can pay the shortfall if you are struggling. Look on your local council site for dhp " Thats only in very limited circumstances though isn't it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually each local authority sets its own housing rates. What you pay for a 1 bedroom property in one area will be different to that in another. So depending on where you live your housing benefit portion could be different Very true in Southampton for example the local housing rate is £136 per week. In the London Borough of Redbridge its £207.12 a week. However the average one bed flat in Southampton is £127 a week and in Redbridge its £287. So somebody living in London for example has a massive shortfall to make up so it's not as easy as a lot of people say on universal credits. " Sorry I should have said those rates are based on a one bedroom flat. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Open the subject up. Even though we have instant payments and online banking. Why does it still take 3 days to clear a cheque? It's not admin systems, it'll be to do with earning interest I'm guessing. No. The rent for each size of property is set by central government, so the local authority can only pay that as a maximum. So if your rent is higher, tough. For example, there is a shortfall if I was on housing benefit (I am not, but have in the past) because my landlord charges more than the government thinks it should be. Of course I could live somewhere cheaper, but the crime rates go up then! That's the situation I'm in. Rent is £795 and max rent UC will pay is £600 ish. Added to the rent part of UC is job seekers allowance but rolled into the total UC payment. Plus when I applied for UC originally, I had savings in a business account that they said should be taken into account and closed my original claim down. Which was incorrect as buisness accounts, should not come into any UC calculations.....So I had to start the process of applying all over again....So not at all pleased they handled my claim....But never the less very grateful. Otherwise I would have been on the streets long ago. Have you applied to the your local council for a discretionary housing payment. The clue is in the name, it is discretionary but they can pay the shortfall if you are struggling. Look on your local council site for dhp Thats only in very limited circumstances though isn't it. " Well as I said, the clue is in the name. It’s discretionary snd it’s up to the local council to make their own decisions whether they pay, how much they pay and for how long | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually each local authority sets its own housing rates. What you pay for a 1 bedroom property in one area will be different to that in another. So depending on where you live your housing benefit portion could be different" Not what I was told. Its set by central govt based on Average house prices in that area. Soecifically told that, because I questioned it. More than once! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Open the subject up. Even though we have instant payments and online banking. Why does it still take 3 days to clear a cheque? It's not admin systems, it'll be to do with earning interest I'm guessing. No. The rent for each size of property is set by central government, so the local authority can only pay that as a maximum. So if your rent is higher, tough. For example, there is a shortfall if I was on housing benefit (I am not, but have in the past) because my landlord charges more than the government thinks it should be. Of course I could live somewhere cheaper, but the crime rates go up then! That's the situation I'm in. Rent is £795 and max rent UC will pay is £600 ish. Added to the rent part of UC is job seekers allowance but rolled into the total UC payment. Plus when I applied for UC originally, I had savings in a business account that they said should be taken into account and closed my original claim down. Which was incorrect as buisness accounts, should not come into any UC calculations.....So I had to start the process of applying all over again....So not at all pleased they handled my claim....But never the less very grateful. Otherwise I would have been on the streets long ago. Have you applied to the your local council for a discretionary housing payment. The clue is in the name, it is discretionary but they can pay the shortfall if you are struggling. Look on your local council site for dhp Thats only in very limited circumstances though isn't it. Well as I said, the clue is in the name. It’s discretionary snd it’s up to the local council to make their own decisions whether they pay, how much they pay and for how long " Yes exactly so doesn't exactly give someone any kind of security. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually each local authority sets its own housing rates. What you pay for a 1 bedroom property in one area will be different to that in another. So depending on where you live your housing benefit portion could be different Not what I was told. Its set by central govt based on Average house prices in that area. Soecifically told that, because I questioned it. More than once!" Its not, its set by the local authority. Yes they are meant to base it on average prices but it very much depends on the local authority. In London and the South East for example you would seriously struggle to find a property within the Local housing rate. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have you applied to the your local council for a discretionary housing payment. The clue is in the name, it is discretionary but they can pay the shortfall if you are struggling. Look on your local council site for dhp " Will look into that. Never heard of the discretionary payment before. Many thanks for your help. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd say those who are going to buy a new iphone with their universal credit aren't the ones moaning and are happy to wait 6 weeks. The ones who are complaining are the ones who have bills to pay in 4 weeks times, food to buy for the next 6 weeks, it's a ridiculous system, I'd say it should be 4 weeks maximum. " see here's how I know you know nowt bout actually living on benefit, a new iphone could come from many places including as a gift, 2nd hand, contract or many other methods (UC claimants ain't the ones queueing up outside apple stores for latest releases) and as explained a internet enabled device is essential just to continue claiming UC. Agreed the processing time is far too long, the old system was 2-4 weeks, this one I can presume has delays due to a weak system and also the direct connection to HMRC via PAYE. There are actually a lot more checks than there used to be, especially regarding assets/savings. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd say those who are going to buy a new iphone with their universal credit aren't the ones moaning and are happy to wait 6 weeks. The ones who are complaining are the ones who have bills to pay in 4 weeks times, food to buy for the next 6 weeks, it's a ridiculous system, I'd say it should be 4 weeks maximum. see here's how I know you know nowt bout actually living on benefit, a new iphone could come from many places including as a gift, 2nd hand, contract or many other methods (UC claimants ain't the ones queueing up outside apple stores for latest releases) and as explained a internet enabled device is essential just to continue claiming UC. Agreed the processing time is far too long, the old system was 2-4 weeks, this one I can presume has delays due to a weak system and also the direct connection to HMRC via PAYE. There are actually a lot more checks than there used to be, especially regarding assets/savings." Apart from growing up on benefit and spending at least 2 years at various times of my adult life on benefits but ok. I think you misread my comment anyway. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd say those who are going to buy a new iphone with their universal credit aren't the ones moaning and are happy to wait 6 weeks. The ones who are complaining are the ones who have bills to pay in 4 weeks times, food to buy for the next 6 weeks, it's a ridiculous system, I'd say it should be 4 weeks maximum. see here's how I know you know nowt bout actually living on benefit, a new iphone could come from many places including as a gift, 2nd hand, contract or many other methods (UC claimants ain't the ones queueing up outside apple stores for latest releases) and as explained a internet enabled device is essential just to continue claiming UC. Agreed the processing time is far too long, the old system was 2-4 weeks, this one I can presume has delays due to a weak system and also the direct connection to HMRC via PAYE. There are actually a lot more checks than there used to be, especially regarding assets/savings. Apart from growing up on benefit and spending at least 2 years at various times of my adult life on benefits but ok. I think you misread my comment anyway. " possibly, I have spent quite a bit of time on benefits too & know others who are, so I see the things you mean but I also know how they manage it, its not what people think is what I mean. it not that you just get benefits & can live the life of riley. I totally get how hard it can be moving from full time to UC as I have done that too and I get not assets are liquid, i.e a mortgaged house. it becomes a cash flow issues & debt building (mentioned that some where) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |