FabSwingers.com forum: Ratio..

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

What’s your ratio on here?

1 in how many you would speak to?

I must message 1 in every 1000 profiles I look at.

I rarely reply to a first message as I need my woman to be in tight shape (just a preference - don’t lose your shit haha) I have very standards and I am a lot of things put me off.

I feel some men don’t care about this and have a scattergun approach regardless of looks / profile content - must be close t 100% of profiles they look at the message - yucky.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *offiaCoolWoman
over a year ago

Kidsgrove

Some people don't judge people by their photos or first message. Some people seek more than superficial. Luckily this site is full of people to pick and choose individual compatibilities.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Some people don't judge people by their photos or first message. Some people seek more than superficial. Luckily this site is full of people to pick and choose individual compatibilities."

Or people who give false compliments to get a fuck

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"What’s your ratio on here?

1 in how many you would speak to?

I must message 1 in every 1000 profiles I look at.

I rarely reply to a first message as I need my woman to be in tight shape (just a preference - don’t lose your shit haha) I have very standards and I am a lot of things put me off.

I feel some men don’t care about this and have a scattergun approach regardless of looks / profile content - must be close t 100% of profiles they look at the message - yucky."

Just tested this theory. It took all of 10 seconds for you to reply hun x

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *offiaCoolWoman
over a year ago

Kidsgrove

"Some people don't judge people by their photos or first message. Some people seek more than superficial. Luckily this site is full of people to pick and choose individual compatibilities.

Or people who give false compliments to get a fuck

Some of us are articulate enough to communicate beyond compliments.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"What’s your ratio on here?

1 in how many you would speak to?

I must message 1 in every 1000 profiles I look at.

I rarely reply to a first message as I need my woman to be in tight shape (just a preference - don’t lose your shit haha) I have very standards and I am a lot of things put me off.

I feel some men don’t care about this and have a scattergun approach regardless of looks / profile content - must be close t 100% of profiles they look at the message - yucky.

Just tested this theory. It took all of 10 seconds for you to reply hun x"

Would you like to write what I put...you praised my cock.. i replied with a gentle compliment and a no thank you.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *offiaCoolWoman
over a year ago

Kidsgrove

"What’s your ratio on here?

1 in how many you would speak to?

I must message 1 in every 1000 profiles I look at.

I rarely reply to a first message as I need my woman to be in tight shape (just a preference - don’t lose your shit haha) I have very standards and I am a lot of things put me off.

I feel some men don’t care about this and have a scattergun approach regardless of looks / profile content - must be close t 100% of profiles they look at the message - yucky.

Just tested this theory. It took all of 10 seconds for you to reply hun x"

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"What’s your ratio on here?

1 in how many you would speak to?

I must message 1 in every 1000 profiles I look at.

I rarely reply to a first message as I need my woman to be in tight shape (just a preference - don’t lose your shit haha) I have very standards and I am a lot of things put me off.

I feel some men don’t care about this and have a scattergun approach regardless of looks / profile content - must be close t 100% of profiles they look at the message - yucky.

Just tested this theory. It took all of 10 seconds for you to reply hun x"

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

It's too early for this kind of math

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

I said no thanks folks

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"What’s your ratio on here?

1 in how many you would speak to?

I must message 1 in every 1000 profiles I look at.

I rarely reply to a first message as I need my woman to be in tight shape (just a preference - don’t lose your shit haha) I have very standards and I am a lot of things put me off.

I feel some men don’t care about this and have a scattergun approach regardless of looks / profile content - must be close t 100% of profiles they look at the message - yucky.

Just tested this theory. It took all of 10 seconds for you to reply hun x"

Think your taxi has arrived Op!

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

It really hasn’t

I said no thanks. This fantasist fancies making me look bad haha.

Can you screenshot on here and post?

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *etcplCouple
over a year ago

Gapping Fanny

"I said no thanks folks "

But you rarely reply to a first message is what you claimed.

Not that you rarely reply in a positive way to a first message.

Ergo, I don’t care if you said no, you replied to a first message.

You should be clearer if you are going to make statements.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *offiaCoolWoman
over a year ago

Kidsgrove

"It really hasn’t

I said no thanks. This fantasist fancies making me look bad haha.

Can you screenshot on here and post? "

No, private messages are not even supposed to be discussed on the forums.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 27/02/21 09:03:02]

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ersey GirlCouple
over a year ago

Glasgow

We are very fussy also. They have to know the dom/sub dynamics. Don't see it as a bad thing. Don't see the point in meeting someone for the sake of it. I wouldn't bother about what other people do tho. That just comes off as having a shite ego. Just concentrate on yourself

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You replied to us too... not in a good way but you replied. To say you rarely ever reply to first messages. You’re two for two kiddo

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I judge by attitude and attributes, no point in having the body, face or knob if there isn't a lot going on between the ears with the lights on but no one's home

Give me substance over superficial anyday

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"I said no thanks folks "

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"You replied to us too... not in a good way but you replied. To say you rarely ever reply to first messages. You’re two for two kiddo"

I said no thanks not my type haha

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *offiaCoolWoman
over a year ago

Kidsgrove

"I judge by attitude and attributes, no point in having the body, face or knob if there isn't a lot going on between the ears with the lights on but no one's home

Give me substance over superficial anyday"

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes I know, but you still replied! You said you barely ever reply to a message, so far it’s two out of two , which I don’t know about you, but to me that’s 100% of messages so far

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *irtycpl7980Couple
over a year ago

Northumberland

Wow this thread went on the attack very quick!

We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing.

Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use.

The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!!

mind blown lol

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"You replied to us too... not in a good way but you replied. To say you rarely ever reply to first messages. You’re two for two kiddo

I said no thanks not my type haha"

You're not really helping yourself here lol

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I message the people that I think are sexy and that has nothing to do with the way they look. Sexiness is a state of mind not a state of body.

And I don't think the OP needs any help to look bad.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ersey GirlCouple
over a year ago

Glasgow

"Wow this thread went on the attack very quick!

We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing.

Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use.

The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!!

mind blown lol"

You think he's going to chat back and blow his theory out the water Haha

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don’t have a ratio if they profile takes my eyes I send a message if it doesn’t then I don’t

I do send out first message now and then but not much at the moment with the way things are as I not really meeting just now

And chats and stuff can get stale and fizzle out fast but when everything back to normal then I will start first message again

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *irtycpl7980Couple
over a year ago

Northumberland

"Wow this thread went on the attack very quick!

We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing.

Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use.

The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!!

mind blown lol

You think he's going to chat back and blow his theory out the water Haha

We don’t need him to reply to our post, it’s a general response. Unlike others we aren’t trying to catch him out to ‘bring his attitude down a peg or 2’ which seems to be the goal for some ... don’t get it.

In the forums men are always getting slagged off for just saying what they want to get a shag. Here is someone trying to say he wants a bit more to actually want to meet (certainly could have articulated in more gentle nature so some don’t get offended). We don’t feel his overall question has even been addressed yet as most are just wanting to catch him out.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"What’s your ratio on here?

1 in how many you would speak to?

I must message 1 in every 1000 profiles I look at.

I rarely reply to a first message as I need my woman to be in tight shape (just a preference - don’t lose your shit haha) I have very standards and I am a lot of things put me off.

I feel some men don’t care about this and have a scattergun approach regardless of looks / profile content - must be close t 100% of profiles they look at the message - yucky."

Oh god to actually speak to them... I only regularly speak to 2 people on here, not through choice tho. So can’t even put a number on it.

I’d happily talk to more and not even in a meet for sex capacity. I just think women receive a lot of attention so can be selective with who new they let in.

So I’d talk to a lot, but don’t get too, forums can be good for that tho. I’ve spoke with people on here that I can’t DM because I’m under the age limit etc lol

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Wow this thread went on the attack very quick!

We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing.

Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use.

The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!!

mind blown lol

You think he's going to chat back and blow his theory out the water Haha

If the OP didn't bang on about himself and his cock all the time, while calling everyone else a soft cock, he might have had a gentler response.

I doubt that he's particularly bothered by negative posts, are you mate? All publicity...

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend

I don't think mathematical analysis applies ....these are real people out here in fabland ...not a video game

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *emini ManMan
over a year ago

There and to the left a bit

I don't think in terms of "ratios" or "hit rates" and any initial messages whether solicited or not aren't with a view to meeting, but getting to know someone to gauge if they are someone I'd like to meet, and they me of course. In fact I think the fastest I have gone from initial message to discussing meeting has been 3 or 4 weeks.

In almost 5 years of this profile I have sent precisely six completely unsolicited cold messages to profiles I've had no interaction with on the forums.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Wow this thread went on the attack very quick!

We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing.

Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use.

The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!!

mind blown lol

You think he's going to chat back and blow his theory out the water Haha

Yeah I think his wording got hackles up and not his questions.

And to answer the question. I have only sent messages to those I like the sound of on their profile. Pictures are here to show off our best sides so take them with a pinch of salt.

So percentage I'd say about 10% of the profiles I've looked at.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *offiaCoolWoman
over a year ago

Kidsgrove

"I don't think in terms of "ratios" or "hit rates" and any initial messages whether solicited or not aren't with a view to meeting, but getting to know someone to gauge if they are someone I'd like to meet, and they me of course. In fact I think the fastest I have gone from initial message to discussing meeting has been 3 or 4 weeks.

In almost 5 years of this profile I have sent precisely six completely unsolicited cold messages to profiles I've had no interaction with on the forums.

Unsolicited ? You rascal

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Wow this thread went on the attack very quick!

We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing.

Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use.

The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!!

mind blown lol

You think he's going to chat back and blow his theory out the water Haha

Maybe green arrow the Op and you’ll maybe understand why he’s got this response.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Wow this thread went on the attack very quick!

We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing.

Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use.

The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!!

mind blown lol

You think he's going to chat back and blow his theory out the water Haha

Maybe green arrow the Op and you’ll maybe understand why he’s got this response. "

Wooooa I’ve just learned you can do this haha!

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Wow this thread went on the attack very quick!

We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing.

Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use.

The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!!

mind blown lol"

Every thread I create goes that way - guys are jealous of me haha.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I never obsessed about numbers in that particular way. I don't analyse my stats.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *emini ManMan
over a year ago

There and to the left a bit

In almost 5 years of this profile I have sent precisely six completely unsolicited cold messages to profiles I've had no interaction with on the forums.

Unsolicited ? You rascal

I know...the cheek of it

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 27/02/21 10:00:03]

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *acey_RedWoman
over a year ago

Liverpool

Ratio of what?

If like you mention, how many profiles you look at vs how many you talk to then probably quite high as I don't look at many profiles. If it's how many are on here vs how many I talk to then maybe 1 in a few 1000

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *affron40Woman
over a year ago

manchester

I read 0% of messages from blank avatars or willies.

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ex HolesMan
over a year ago

Up North

I answer all 5 messages on average I receive every month

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

This

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Maybe green arrow the Op and you’ll maybe understand why he’s got this response. "

We don't need to look at other threads to answer a question on this thread. This is why there is mayhem on the forum at times because people just won't move on, it ends up looking like a pack mentality attacking one person

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Well that was a nasty thread with posts breaking rules for lots of reasons

Can we please remember, everyone is welcome on the forum, if you don't like what a person has written on one thread there is no need to come onto the next thread to attack that person

If you don't want to answer the OP of a thread or like the person who asked it then maybe go find other threads that you do like.

Abusing people or airing dirty washing on the forum is not allowed ( posts removed )

(thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately