Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What about if the cock is wearing a poncho and sombrero and is looking mysterious, what then ? " Mysterious cock.....hahaha! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But cock pics on message number 1. Really? I know this is fab, and I expect to see exactly that plus more whilst browsing the site. But there’s something about having it forced upon me in message that just turns me right off. This comes to mind because I deliberately avoid profiles in the specific area I work in (for obvious reasons), and I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox. He clearly doesn’t know it’s me, and it’ll be a simple block and go, but I’m not going to be able to look him in the eye now when next in work. What about pussy or tits in a first message can that be equally off putting ? " If it’s attached to a face of someone I have to see regularly then I’d say probably yes. That hasn’t happened (yet). | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What about if the cock is wearing a poncho and sombrero and is looking mysterious, what then ? " Haha this got me! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But cock pics on message number 1. Really? I know this is fab, and I expect to see exactly that plus more whilst browsing the site. But there’s something about having it forced upon me in message that just turns me right off. This comes to mind because I deliberately avoid profiles in the specific area I work in (for obvious reasons), and I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox. He clearly doesn’t know it’s me, and it’ll be a simple block and go, but I’m not going to be able to look him in the eye now when next in work. What about pussy or tits in a first message can that be equally off putting ? If it’s attached to a face of someone I have to see regularly then I’d say probably yes. That hasn’t happened (yet). " Happened to me a few times this week, same person, same pic in succession and I'm like what at least send a different 1 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Look him in the eye. I find cock pics in a first message the same as flashing on a dark path. It's deliberate and unsolicited. And vile. If I had a gaping fanny pic on my profile I'd be less offended as like attracts like. " Thank you! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But cock pics on message number 1. Really? I know this is fab, and I expect to see exactly that plus more whilst browsing the site. But there’s something about having it forced upon me in message that just turns me right off. This comes to mind because I deliberately avoid profiles in the specific area I work in (for obvious reasons), and I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox. He clearly doesn’t know it’s me, and it’ll be a simple block and go, but I’m not going to be able to look him in the eye now when next in work. " Curious to your job now, do we need to block him also? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cock photos in general are a total turn off - I don’t respond to men with cock pics on pfp, in public folders or in first message. Surprising how many men can’t read and send them anyway. I’m hoping they can’t read as to read don’t send and send them makes me question what they’d do uninvited in person. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But cock pics on message number 1. Really? I know this is fab, and I expect to see exactly that plus more whilst browsing the site. But there’s something about having it forced upon me in message that just turns me right off. This comes to mind because I deliberately avoid profiles in the specific area I work in (for obvious reasons), and I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox. He clearly doesn’t know it’s me, and it’ll be a simple block and go, but I’m not going to be able to look him in the eye now when next in work. What about pussy or tits in a first message can that be equally off putting ? " Yes | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Read between lines guys....she wants pics of our cocks. Challenge accepted" Or be forward | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But cock pics on message number 1. Really? I know this is fab, and I expect to see exactly that plus more whilst browsing the site. But there’s something about having it forced upon me in message that just turns me right off. This comes to mind because I deliberately avoid profiles in the specific area I work in (for obvious reasons), and I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox. He clearly doesn’t know it’s me, and it’ll be a simple block and go, but I’m not going to be able to look him in the eye now when next in work. " I hear you even when it states on the profile no cock pic in the first msg! I wouldn't dream of sending nudes in the first msg x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think unsolicited is the big point here. If you haven't asked for them, people shouldn't send them. When our filters allowed single guys, we asked for face and cock pic in first message. Amazing the number of guys who couldn't get that right when the vast number send them to everyone who didn't ask! " Exactly that. I have a mere 3 sentences on my profile and even they get ignored 90% of the time. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. " Nice passive-aggressive remark there. I won’t apologise for not being a swinging veteran FYI is a difference between being “fragile” and being selective. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. " I think the difference is, I love seeing a penis, god I love them, but when I choose to, not when someone else does! It’s about consent, I hate opening a message to be confronted with a dick pic, and I personally ignore profiles that have them on there. It’s down to personal choice rather than fragility. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. " Swingers just fuck anything that offers, that's why certain people get offended when someone says no. Swingers have a lot to answer for. They should get down the library and look in the dictionary for what 'consent' means. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Nice passive-aggressive remark there. I won’t apologise for not being a swinging veteran FYI is a difference between being “fragile” and being selective. " Why not just block and you choose who to respond to. That way you Ben be very selective? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Nice passive-aggressive remark there. I won’t apologise for not being a swinging veteran FYI is a difference between being “fragile” and being selective. " I've been attending swingers clubs most of my adult life so I have to laugh at being called "not a proper swinger" because I don't like random people's willy pictures in my inbox . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But cock pics on message number 1. Really? I know this is fab, and I expect to see exactly that plus more whilst browsing the site. But there’s something about having it forced upon me in message that just turns me right off. This comes to mind because I deliberately avoid profiles in the specific area I work in (for obvious reasons), and I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox. He clearly doesn’t know it’s me, and it’ll be a simple block and go, but I’m not going to be able to look him in the eye now when next in work. " I love your comment "I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox" it sounds like an "are you being served" 70's type innuendo | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Nice passive-aggressive remark there. I won’t apologise for not being a swinging veteran FYI is a difference between being “fragile” and being selective. Why not just block and you choose who to respond to. That way you Ben be very selective? " If you bothered to read the entirety of my original post you’d see that’s exactly what I did. What I’m doing now is having a discussion with fellow people of Fab about their personal preferences, without trying to undermine others based of their years (or lack thereof) of experience | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Nice passive-aggressive remark there. I won’t apologise for not being a swinging veteran FYI is a difference between being “fragile” and being selective. I've been attending swingers clubs most of my adult life so I have to laugh at being called "not a proper swinger" because I don't like random people's willy pictures in my inbox . " That sounds like a euphemism | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Nice passive-aggressive remark there. I won’t apologise for not being a swinging veteran FYI is a difference between being “fragile” and being selective. Why not just block and you choose who to respond to. That way you Ben be very selective? If you bothered to read the entirety of my original post you’d see that’s exactly what I did. What I’m doing now is having a discussion with fellow people of Fab about their personal preferences, without trying to undermine others based of their years (or lack thereof) of experience " Well I was taking part in that discussion, but as my opinion doesn’t suit your narrative, you are trying to pick a fight. Have a great day, I’m out. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Swingers just fuck anything that offers, that's why certain people get offended when someone says no. Swingers have a lot to answer for. They should get down the library and look in the dictionary for what 'consent' means. " Haha the "genuine swinger" debate... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Swingers just fuck anything that offers, that's why certain people get offended when someone says no. Swingers have a lot to answer for. They should get down the library and look in the dictionary for what 'consent' means. " Are you saying swingers are r”pists? Wow | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But cock pics on message number 1. Really? I know this is fab, and I expect to see exactly that plus more whilst browsing the site. But there’s something about having it forced upon me in message that just turns me right off. This comes to mind because I deliberately avoid profiles in the specific area I work in (for obvious reasons), and I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox. He clearly doesn’t know it’s me, and it’ll be a simple block and go, but I’m not going to be able to look him in the eye now when next in work. " I had to check how long you’d been on the site when I read this It’s Fab users doing what Fab users do | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Nice passive-aggressive remark there. I won’t apologise for not being a swinging veteran FYI is a difference between being “fragile” and being selective. Why not just block and you choose who to respond to. That way you Ben be very selective? If you bothered to read the entirety of my original post you’d see that’s exactly what I did. What I’m doing now is having a discussion with fellow people of Fab about their personal preferences, without trying to undermine others based of their years (or lack thereof) of experience Well I was taking part in that discussion, but as my opinion doesn’t suit your narrative, you are trying to pick a fight. Have a great day, I’m out." When you return please don’t forget to bring your copy of “Swinging for Dummies” to throw at all of us novices | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Swingers just fuck anything that offers, that's why certain people get offended when someone says no. Swingers have a lot to answer for. They should get down the library and look in the dictionary for what 'consent' means. Haha the "genuine swinger" debate..." Are we playing fab bingo? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Nice passive-aggressive remark there. I won’t apologise for not being a swinging veteran FYI is a difference between being “fragile” and being selective. Why not just block and you choose who to respond to. That way you Ben be very selective? If you bothered to read the entirety of my original post you’d see that’s exactly what I did. What I’m doing now is having a discussion with fellow people of Fab about their personal preferences, without trying to undermine others based of their years (or lack thereof) of experience " Whereas if you had searched “cock pics” via the forum search facility you would see numerous threads discussing this point (and they are the ones with “cock pics” in the title, there are numerous from the last week on the same subject that have different titles). It is (in my experience after being off and on this site for 10+ yrs) an almost daily occurrence and to be honest, a little “oh great a man bashing thread again”. The site provides message filters, you are the one that chooses the messages you get. “Yesterday I was clever, so I wanted to change the world. Today I am wise, so I am changing myself.” Rumi | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" What about pussy or tits in a first message can that be equally off putting ? " Zorro??? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Swingers just fuck anything that offers, that's why certain people get offended when someone says no. Swingers have a lot to answer for. They should get down the library and look in the dictionary for what 'consent' means. Are you saying swingers are r”pists? Wow" Obviously not. The thread is about cock pics in an inbox and consent being ignored when sending them. Put the pineapple down. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Nice passive-aggressive remark there. I won’t apologise for not being a swinging veteran FYI is a difference between being “fragile” and being selective. Why not just block and you choose who to respond to. That way you Ben be very selective? If you bothered to read the entirety of my original post you’d see that’s exactly what I did. What I’m doing now is having a discussion with fellow people of Fab about their personal preferences, without trying to undermine others based of their years (or lack thereof) of experience Whereas if you had searched “cock pics” via the forum search facility you would see numerous threads discussing this point (and they are the ones with “cock pics” in the title, there are numerous from the last week on the same subject that have different titles). It is (in my experience after being off and on this site for 10+ yrs) an almost daily occurrence and to be honest, a little “oh great a man bashing thread again”. The site provides message filters, you are the one that chooses the messages you get. “Yesterday I was clever, so I wanted to change the world. Today I am wise, so I am changing myself.” Rumi" Credit where credit’s due, I’d never performed a ‘forum search’ before. Genuine thanks for that little bit of intel | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Nice passive-aggressive remark there. I won’t apologise for not being a swinging veteran FYI is a difference between being “fragile” and being selective. Why not just block and you choose who to respond to. That way you Ben be very selective? If you bothered to read the entirety of my original post you’d see that’s exactly what I did. What I’m doing now is having a discussion with fellow people of Fab about their personal preferences, without trying to undermine others based of their years (or lack thereof) of experience Well I was taking part in that discussion, but as my opinion doesn’t suit your narrative, you are trying to pick a fight. Have a great day, I’m out. When you return please don’t forget to bring your copy of “Swinging for Dummies” to throw at all of us novices " Ahh, that’s cute. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But cock pics on message number 1. Really? I know this is fab, and I expect to see exactly that plus more whilst browsing the site. But there’s something about having it forced upon me in message that just turns me right off. This comes to mind because I deliberately avoid profiles in the specific area I work in (for obvious reasons), and I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox. He clearly doesn’t know it’s me, and it’ll be a simple block and go, but I’m not going to be able to look him in the eye now when next in work. " So, I'm confused I get the bit about no cock pics What I don't get is how you avoid profiles 'in the specific area you work for' Do you mean that if someone messages you that you might be interested in, your message back is 'what do you do for a job?' | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Nice passive-aggressive remark there. I won’t apologise for not being a swinging veteran FYI is a difference between being “fragile” and being selective. " Hahaha exactly this!!! I really don’t want to see random cocks just because their owner thinks I should and tbh the fact that you think it’s due to fragility is a bit | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But cock pics on message number 1. Really? I know this is fab, and I expect to see exactly that plus more whilst browsing the site. But there’s something about having it forced upon me in message that just turns me right off. This comes to mind because I deliberately avoid profiles in the specific area I work in (for obvious reasons), and I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox. He clearly doesn’t know it’s me, and it’ll be a simple block and go, but I’m not going to be able to look him in the eye now when next in work. So, I'm confused I get the bit about no cock pics What I don't get is how you avoid profiles 'in the specific area you work for' Do you mean that if someone messages you that you might be interested in, your message back is 'what do you do for a job?' " They meant geographical area where they work | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Swingers just fuck anything that offers, that's why certain people get offended when someone says no. Swingers have a lot to answer for. They should get down the library and look in the dictionary for what 'consent' means. Are you saying swingers are r”pists? Wow" If someone specifically states no cock photos and someone insists on sending one regardless of the wants of the recipient then that would lead me to believe that they are equally as selfish, demanding and well forceful in person. You were the person that decided swingers don’t care who forces what on anyone. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What about if the cock is wearing a poncho and sombrero and is looking mysterious, what then ? " Senor El Cockio | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have cock pics on show so never send any attached to a message " Your profile pic does it for you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But cock pics on message number 1. Really? I know this is fab, and I expect to see exactly that plus more whilst browsing the site. But there’s something about having it forced upon me in message that just turns me right off. This comes to mind because I deliberately avoid profiles in the specific area I work in (for obvious reasons), and I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox. He clearly doesn’t know it’s me, and it’ll be a simple block and go, but I’m not going to be able to look him in the eye now when next in work. " Just a thought here... what if this guy actually knows that it is you? Maybe he’s trying to tell you he’s available!! Just a thought... you do look pretty darn hot though!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But cock pics on message number 1. Really? I know this is fab, and I expect to see exactly that plus more whilst browsing the site. But there’s something about having it forced upon me in message that just turns me right off. This comes to mind because I deliberately avoid profiles in the specific area I work in (for obvious reasons), and I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox. He clearly doesn’t know it’s me, and it’ll be a simple block and go, but I’m not going to be able to look him in the eye now when next in work. So, I'm confused I get the bit about no cock pics What I don't get is how you avoid profiles 'in the specific area you work for' Do you mean that if someone messages you that you might be interested in, your message back is 'what do you do for a job?' They meant geographical area where they work " Ah, yes That makes more sense Thank You | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. " Probably those that want to be romanced! If you're looking to be fucked a cock is the thing you're interested in! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But cock pics on message number 1. Really? I know this is fab, and I expect to see exactly that plus more whilst browsing the site. But there’s something about having it forced upon me in message that just turns me right off. This comes to mind because I deliberately avoid profiles in the specific area I work in (for obvious reasons), and I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox. He clearly doesn’t know it’s me, and it’ll be a simple block and go, but I’m not going to be able to look him in the eye now when next in work. So, I'm confused I get the bit about no cock pics What I don't get is how you avoid profiles 'in the specific area you work for' Do you mean that if someone messages you that you might be interested in, your message back is 'what do you do for a job?' " I’m referring to geographical area. Not sector. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Probably those that want to be romanced! If you're looking to be fucked a cock is the thing you're interested in!" Yeah I guess if all you want is a human sex toy nothing else matters. I however you’re looking for someone who has the ability to hold a conversation it’s more than just a cock. Nothing to do with romance just standards my dear. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Probably those that want to be romanced! If you're looking to be fucked a cock is the thing you're interested in! Yeah I guess if all you want is a human sex toy nothing else matters. I however you’re looking for someone who has the ability to hold a conversation it’s more than just a cock. Nothing to do with romance just standards my dear. " Well that was unnecessarily rude! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Probably those that want to be romanced! If you're looking to be fucked a cock is the thing you're interested in! Yeah I guess if all you want is a human sex toy nothing else matters. I however you’re looking for someone who has the ability to hold a conversation it’s more than just a cock. Nothing to do with romance just standards my dear. Well that was unnecessarily rude!" Can never understand why people can’t respect other’s opinions without being rude. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Probably those that want to be romanced! If you're looking to be fucked a cock is the thing you're interested in! Yeah I guess if all you want is a human sex toy nothing else matters. I however you’re looking for someone who has the ability to hold a conversation it’s more than just a cock. Nothing to do with romance just standards my dear. Well that was unnecessarily rude!" You suggested those that don’t think cock is all that mattered want romancing - I was pointing out my opinion as someone who has to see more than a cock before I’ll fuck then. Not rude in the slightest just care about more than just what’s between their legs. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Probably those that want to be romanced! If you're looking to be fucked a cock is the thing you're interested in! Yeah I guess if all you want is a human sex toy nothing else matters. I however you’re looking for someone who has the ability to hold a conversation it’s more than just a cock. Nothing to do with romance just standards my dear. Well that was unnecessarily rude! Can never understand why people can’t respect other’s opinions without being rude." Wasn’t rude just pointing out my opinion as someone who cares about more than just cock. Swinging is about friendship too in my opinion. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. " Now that is hilarious! Swingers, probably more than vanillas, understand the concept and application of consent. It's not about fragility. If anyone makes it clear they have a preference for what they see or receive, others should respect that. Winks, fAbs, dick pics, shit messages, friend requests. All things that people have a view on receiving, that they're entitled to have respected. And that's the crux here, respect. Ignoring someone's preference doesn't make them fragile, it makes you disrespectful. That's the beauty of block/delete. It's says no thanks politely rather than spelling out why. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Probably those that want to be romanced! If you're looking to be fucked a cock is the thing you're interested in! Yeah I guess if all you want is a human sex toy nothing else matters. I however you’re looking for someone who has the ability to hold a conversation it’s more than just a cock. Nothing to do with romance just standards my dear. Well that was unnecessarily rude! You suggested those that don’t think cock is all that mattered want romancing - I was pointing out my opinion as someone who has to see more than a cock before I’ll fuck then. Not rude in the slightest just care about more than just what’s between their legs. " And that's the beauty of swinging. Lots of different preferences, and everyone is entitle to theirs. As long as legal and not causing distress to anyone, we should all crack on with what we like . I'd say the term criteria is more accurate than standards in this case. Standards implies a hierarchy, whereas you just have different requirements than us. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Probably those that want to be romanced! If you're looking to be fucked a cock is the thing you're interested in! Yeah I guess if all you want is a human sex toy nothing else matters. I however you’re looking for someone who has the ability to hold a conversation it’s more than just a cock. Nothing to do with romance just standards my dear. Well that was unnecessarily rude! You suggested those that don’t think cock is all that mattered want romancing - I was pointing out my opinion as someone who has to see more than a cock before I’ll fuck then. Not rude in the slightest just care about more than just what’s between their legs. And that's the beauty of swinging. Lots of different preferences, and everyone is entitle to theirs. As long as legal and not causing distress to anyone, we should all crack on with what we like . I'd say the term criteria is more accurate than standards in this case. Standards implies a hierarchy, whereas you just have different requirements than us. " Ahh yes see your point .... I meant different standards not higher ones but can see how it was interpreted as such. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But cock pics on message number 1. Really? I know this is fab, and I expect to see exactly that plus more whilst browsing the site. But there’s something about having it forced upon me in message that just turns me right off. This comes to mind because I deliberately avoid profiles in the specific area I work in (for obvious reasons), and I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox. He clearly doesn’t know it’s me, and it’ll be a simple block and go, but I’m not going to be able to look him in the eye now when next in work. " Think you were right with your prediction op... It has divided the group. Now what's the score going to be in this afternoons footie? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But cock pics on message number 1. Really? I know this is fab, and I expect to see exactly that plus more whilst browsing the site. But there’s something about having it forced upon me in message that just turns me right off. This comes to mind because I deliberately avoid profiles in the specific area I work in (for obvious reasons), and I’ve recently received the cock of a regular customer in my inbox. He clearly doesn’t know it’s me, and it’ll be a simple block and go, but I’m not going to be able to look him in the eye now when next in work. What about pussy or tits in a first message can that be equally off putting ? " To us, yes definitely!!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Now that is hilarious! Swingers, probably more than vanillas, understand the concept and application of consent. It's not about fragility. If anyone makes it clear they have a preference for what they see or receive, others should respect that. Winks, fAbs, dick pics, shit messages, friend requests. All things that people have a view on receiving, that they're entitled to have respected. And that's the crux here, respect. Ignoring someone's preference doesn't make them fragile, it makes you disrespectful. That's the beauty of block/delete. It's says no thanks politely rather than spelling out why." Expertly put. And while I’m back, just like to add that one would hope that respect would be applied in the forums too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does the message not say there is an attachment? ,if.so.just delete the whole message" Right.... So that’s assuming that the picture is necessarily of dick? I’ve received plenty of mails with PG pictures attached. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When fabswingers was a swingers site, this was never a problem. Now fabswingers is some kind of sex dating site and now many people who don’t identify as swingers are using it. The people who aren’t swingers seem to be a bit more fragile about seeing a penis. Now that is hilarious! Swingers, probably more than vanillas, understand the concept and application of consent. It's not about fragility. If anyone makes it clear they have a preference for what they see or receive, others should respect that. Winks, fAbs, dick pics, shit messages, friend requests. All things that people have a view on receiving, that they're entitled to have respected. And that's the crux here, respect. Ignoring someone's preference doesn't make them fragile, it makes you disrespectful. That's the beauty of block/delete. It's says no thanks politely rather than spelling out why." Agree with you, some people are disrespectful. But being offended by a wink would suggest that they are indeed fragile. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I only ever send pics when asked, they’re on my profile after all, so if they want to view they’re only a click away. Leaves it up to them then" Much appreciated | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think unsolicited is the big point here. If you haven't asked for them, people shouldn't send them. When our filters allowed single guys, we asked for face and cock pic in first message. Amazing the number of guys who couldn't get that right when the vast number send them to everyone who didn't ask! Exactly that. I have a mere 3 sentences on my profile and even they get ignored 90% of the time. " Seems 99.9% of fabs can’t read..... and r those that do try the “I was trying my luck” regardless of profile stating please don’t try your luck it won’t work” Xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How do you know it’s him unless you’ve already seen it in person " Face pic and dick pic in same message. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was told today that only woman of my age prefer not to have cock pics in the first message, young women won't reply unless a picture of a decent cock is attached. " If I can put myself in the bracket of “young women” at 29, I’d say whoever told you that is misinformed | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was told today that only woman of my age prefer not to have cock pics in the first message, young women won't reply unless a picture of a decent cock is attached. If I can put myself in the bracket of “young women” at 29, I’d say whoever told you that is misinformed " He was trying to justify himself, didn't believe him for a second | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |