FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

£250000 would you take it?

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Question

When you turned 18 a man from the government turns up to give you £250000 in cash to do what ever you want with....the catch is...on your 65th birthday a person arrives to inject you to make you painlessly die

Would you take the 1/4 of a million pounds?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *carlet_woman_xxWoman
over a year ago

somewhere

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nope. Not a chance, I'd prefer to live a lot longer and earn whatever money I can.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otSoPoshWoman
over a year ago

In a ball gown because that's how we roll in N. Devon

When I was 18 I would have

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acob SpenserMan
over a year ago

Leeds

Yeah I'd set my family and friends up and make sure there ok with world where living in be a just sacrifice

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ilverSwordMan
over a year ago

Belfast-ish

18 year old me would take the money. Apparently I'm wiser now, I'd need mo moneeee

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ex HolesMan
over a year ago

Up North

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luebellRacerCouple
over a year ago

Shropshire

Not a chance my grandma was still rock climbing, skiing and lifting weights at 65!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would of at 18

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What does he look like?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No. Money doesn’t make you happy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If I was clairvoyant and knew for certain the world was going to end in 7 days time then maybe

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dam1971Man
over a year ago

Bedford

Hell yes, probably for a tenner

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

The question is designed to make you think what you could have achieved with that money backing you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

I'm 65 this year. From my current perspective no.

When I was 18 I couldn't imagine EVER being 40 let alone 65. I can't say how I would have answered for sure but I can't guarantee I would have turned it down

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hell no

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's a difficult one, but probably yes.

Lack of money (mostly due to long term disability) has held me back my entire life. There is so much I wanted to do that I probably will never get to experience. So part of me thinks... yeah, if I could go back, take the money, I'd have an awesome time and with my health issues I'd be lucky to make it much past 65 anyway so it's kind of win-win in that regard.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I'm 65 this year. From my current perspective no.

When I was 18 I couldn't imagine EVER being 40 let alone 65. I can't say how I would have answered for sure but I can't guarantee I would have turned it down"

Thats the fun of the question

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would 100%. 250k is a good benchmark to start something big. 47 years to make and live the life you want. Some people dont make 250k in there lifetime.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The question is designed to make you think what you could have achieved with that money backing you"

No because I couldn't live happily knowing that day is coming and everything i have done will be for nothing

But I can see where your coming from

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Dont forget...no guarantee you would live to 65

Also you could plan a big party on your 65th death day

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

When I was 18 I would have grabbed that. Definitely, absolutely no question. I didn't see me making it much past 30 at that age and I'd have been laughing, literally laughing, at anyone who refused to take the cash.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

I don't think there are many 18 year olds equipped to make that decision. I wouldn't take that money now to be told the date of my death.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Dont forget that money might be worth more depending when you were 18....how much for a nice house in 1992?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ikesEmBigMan
over a year ago

Herts

With inflation?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yeah I'd set my family and friends up and make sure there ok with world where living in be a just sacrifice "

At 18 , I'd have probably just paid my dig money a bit in advance for a change and had a bloody good time with the rest

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

When I was 18 I would have definitely taken the money. I also have a disability that limits many aspects of my life. I'll never be able to work full time, for example. 250k would have made life much more manageable and I wouldn't have had to claim PIP or UC to top up my low income. I'd be independent and self-sufficient, which would feel amazing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *----BJ Queen-----Woman
over a year ago

Yelverton

I'd take it - I've never planned to live that long anyway.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hunky GentMan
over a year ago

Maldon and Peterborough

I would take it, but knowing me I'll have somebody it on a Lamborghini and wrapped it round a tree.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"Yeah I'd set my family and friends up and make sure there ok with world where living in be a just sacrifice

At 18 , I'd have probably just paid my dig money a bit in advance for a change and had a bloody good time with the rest "

I would probably have spent quite a lot on cigarettes, vodka and clothes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dam1971Man
over a year ago

Bedford


"Yeah I'd set my family and friends up and make sure there ok with world where living in be a just sacrifice

At 18 , I'd have probably just paid my dig money a bit in advance for a change and had a bloody good time with the rest

I would probably have spent quite a lot on cigarettes, vodka and clothes. "

And waste the rest?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"Yeah I'd set my family and friends up and make sure there ok with world where living in be a just sacrifice

At 18 , I'd have probably just paid my dig money a bit in advance for a change and had a bloody good time with the rest

I would probably have spent quite a lot on cigarettes, vodka and clothes.

And waste the rest? "

, yeah. I was 18 in 1974, imagine how far that much money would have gone. My rent at college was £8 a week. I think cigarettes were less than 50p a pack

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eoeclipseWoman
over a year ago

glasgow


"It's a difficult one, but probably yes.

Lack of money (mostly due to long term disability) has held me back my entire life. There is so much I wanted to do that I probably will never get to experience. So part of me thinks... yeah, if I could go back, take the money, I'd have an awesome time and with my health issues I'd be lucky to make it much past 65 anyway so it's kind of win-win in that regard. "

I was thinking the exact same, live a life full of experiences & die at 65 (which is old age as life expectancy isn't much higher than that) or live like I so now which is 95% of the time at home without it being a lock down & live older than 65! Nah I'll take option 1.

who really wants to be that live long that your fragile & can't do stuff for yourself & you need to be fed & wiped like a baby...no thank you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amie HantsWoman
over a year ago

Atlantis

Yes I hold have, and would have had a brilliant time

Now I wouldn’t, but 18 year old me wouldn’t have given it a second thought and would have been penniless by the time she was 18.5

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

That amount when I was 18 would be the equivalent today of 1.5 mil..

250k in 1977 would be a truly life changing amount so my 18 yr old self then may have said yes..

But my Mum bless her would have I am confident have talked me out of it..

Cheers Mum..xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isspurplechesterWoman
over a year ago

Chester

I wouldn’t accept, purely because I’m a stubborn ass who likes to graft for her money

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I wouldn’t accept, purely because I’m a stubborn ass who likes to graft for her money "

Love that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uxom redCouple
over a year ago

Shrewsbury

At 18 I would have done.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ad NannaWoman
over a year ago

East London

No, because I already had a child by then.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *UGGYBEAR2015Man
over a year ago

BRIDPORT

At 18 I would have jumped at the offer.

Not because it would have been a huge amount of money that I could blow on shit.

More because at that time in my life I had the opportunity to invest in my future business. I made the investment but it cost me dear, running 3 mortgages with interest rates topping out at 13 to 14%.

With that capital I could have made the investment and funded future growth from profit rather than paying of borrowing.

At 18, 65 is an eternity away and there is no guarantee you’d make it that far anyway. The previous 2 generations of males in my family haven’t made it past 65.

Life isn’t about how long you live, it’s how you live that time you’ve got.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uriousscouserWoman
over a year ago

Wirral

At 18 I wouldn't have thought twice about it. £250k wasn't a huge amount in 1992 but I'd have still taken it!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I wouldn’t take the money as I would want to live as long a life as possible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

TAke the money and move away - the man won’t find you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Damm yes, I'd have bought Bitcoin.. didn't exist then though I don't think

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

Absolutely not

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andyfloss2000Woman
over a year ago

ashford

Yes I would! I would now have a year and half left but hopefully I would have been wise with it x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
over a year ago

Hastings

Yes would have taken it and lived a different life.

I'd still take it now as would love to know my end date live hard play harder and just cash up at the right time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm 41 and I'd take the deal now

I very much doubt I'll be here at 65

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *carlet_woman_xxWoman
over a year ago

somewhere


"I'm 41 and I'd take the deal now

I very much doubt I'll be here at 65 "

I thought the same at your age. I'm still here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By * and M lookingCouple
over a year ago

Worcester

No, but would still have the injection at 65.

We should all retire at 50 have 15 good years then off to permasleep.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eoeclipseWoman
over a year ago

glasgow


"No, because I already had a child by then. "

That's another reason why I would, could have given him so much more & an easier life

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes take money.

I'd commission a steel suit top to toe to arrive in 64 yrs 360days.

Boom ...money and survived...no injection

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ustforfun49Man
over a year ago

chesterfield

This would make a great film

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ustforfun49Man
over a year ago

chesterfield


"Question

When you turned 18 a man from the government turns up to give you £250000 in cash to do what ever you want with....the catch is...on your 65th birthday a person arrives to inject you to make you painlessly die

Would you take the 1/4 of a million pounds?"

This would make a great film

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm 41 and I'd take the deal now

I very much doubt I'll be here at 65

I thought the same at your age. I'm still here "

I have a strange outlook on what the future holds.

But we'll leave it at that for now.

I may speak of it another time

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There's no way I'd have said no to this at 18. Even now, I don't think it would have been a terrible choice for that age, although I'm so much more aware of my own mortality these days so I wouldn't take it now.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ookie an creamCouple
over a year ago

Fife


"No. Money doesn’t make you happy "

No but the things you can do with money can lol

And yes i (male) would take it plus no guarantee you would make it to 65 any way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *.D.I.D.A.SMan
over a year ago

London/Essex... ish... Romford to be exact

Dunno if I could live my life in a sane way knowing my card is marked already. I'd probably not see my grandkids get married. I'd know that I wouldn't be growing old together with a loved one. I probably wouldn't use the money wisely anyway and end up with a bunch of hookers off their faces on my sofa, develop a habit and own a Ferrari which I have trouble parking each time I go to Tesco where I realise there's no room for the shopping either.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *partharmonyCouple
over a year ago

Ruislip

No.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Not a chance.

I have kids, i might end up with grandkids. You cannot put a price on time

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *luebell888Woman
over a year ago

Glasgowish

Yes i would. Life is a gamble and you may die at 20 or 30. By 65 i would have led a good life.x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ockosaurusMan
over a year ago

Warwick

At 18 I would have as I was really suffering from depression and wanted to die

Didn't think I'd make it this long tbh, so I'd have just blown all the money on good times first.

Though if I did that, I almost definitely wouldn't have lasted till the injection.

(that's all in the past now btw)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itzhallMan
over a year ago

birchington

Yep

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *olid as rockMan
over a year ago

Sheffield

I'd definitely choose you over a 18 year old anytime... especially them killer curves of yours and that legs of yours wrapped around my body x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nliveneTV/TS
over a year ago

Selby

no

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

In 2002 Michael Carroll won £9,736,131 at the age of 19.

By 2013 he was broke, divorced and homeless.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asmeenTV/TS
over a year ago

STOKE ON TRENT

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *owithflow321Man
over a year ago

Molesey

Absolutely yes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

40 year old me would take it, 18 year old me wouldn't.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orksRockerMan
over a year ago

Bradford


"Not a chance my grandma was still rock climbing, skiing and lifting weights at 65! "

Think I've seen her on a Wooah Bodyform advert....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hrista BellendWoman
over a year ago

surrounded by twinkly lights

No at 18 the world was my oyster I could be whoever I wanted to be

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Question

When you turned 18 a man from the government turns up to give you £250000 in cash to do what ever you want with....the catch is...on your 65th birthday a person arrives to inject you to make you painlessly die

Would you take the 1/4 of a million pounds?"

That's 8 years of salary. No.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lint-EverhardMan
over a year ago

Perpignan and cap

Definitely not! I'd give ten times that for one day with my grand children (if I had any).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No. Easy come easy go at that age 250k wouldnt last long, your less likely to graft and appreciate money.

You cant put a rice on life.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No. Easy come easy go at that age 250k wouldnt last long, your less likely to graft and appreciate money.

You cant put a price on life. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asilyled1Man
over a year ago

ogmore valley

Hell no! I want to see my son for as long as possible,hopefully with grandkids. And then when I’m really old it’ll be his turn to wipe all the piss and shit up!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Can honestly say no

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No. Money doesn’t make you happy "

Neither does sitting in an auld folks home

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It would have been a yes at 18 for me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No amount of money would've persuaded me to say yes.

Money can't buy love respect and happiness, without those money is meaningless.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No. Money doesn’t make you happy "

This is utter nonsense.

Have you ever been poor?

Money makes you comfortable which contributes to happiness in a BIG way.

At 18 I would have taken the money

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agneto.Man
over a year ago

Bham

If it was a ridiculous amount of money then maybe but not for that sum.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No amount of money would've persuaded me to say yes.

Money can't buy love respect and happiness, without those money is meaningless."

Having no money doesn't mean you will have a loving respectful meaningful life either

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No amount of money would've persuaded me to say yes.

Money can't buy love respect and happiness, without those money is meaningless.

Having no money doesn't mean you will have a loving respectful meaningful life either "

exactly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No. Money doesn’t make you happy

This is utter nonsense.

Have you ever been poor?

Money makes you comfortable which contributes to happiness in a BIG way.

At 18 I would have taken the money

"

This absolutely. I grew up below the poverty line and due to my disability, and after having been divorced, I'm there again. I'm fairly content with life: I'm housed, have food, lovely relationships etc, but 250k would have made life much less stressful. I would agree that money doesn't buy happiness, but there is a cut off somewhere. Below a certain amount the stress of trying to make ends meet can cause significant anxiety.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Question

When you turned 18 a man from the government turns up to give you £250000 in cash to do what ever you want with....the catch is...on your 65th birthday a person arrives to inject you to make you painlessly die

Would you take the 1/4 of a million pounds?

That's 8 years of salary. No. "

For you maybe, but for others it's more than 15 years of salary.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No. Money doesn’t make you happy

This is utter nonsense.

Have you ever been poor?

Money makes you comfortable which contributes to happiness in a BIG way.

At 18 I would have taken the money

This absolutely. I grew up below the poverty line and due to my disability, and after having been divorced, I'm there again. I'm fairly content with life: I'm housed, have food, lovely relationships etc, but 250k would have made life much less stressful. I would agree that money doesn't buy happiness, but there is a cut off somewhere. Below a certain amount the stress of trying to make ends meet can cause significant anxiety. "

I think people that make whimsical statements like money doesn't buy happiness have never been below the poverty line and don't understand x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

No, those repeats of The Sweeney on ITV4 won't watch themselves.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ultry SuccubusTV/TS
over a year ago

London

Yes I potentially will.

65 is not a bad bargain.

I expect myself to go between 55 to 70 (excluding trauma/accidents).

However, getting 250k at the age of 18 might change/spoil me .. hmm..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ultry SuccubusTV/TS
over a year ago

London


"No. Money doesn’t make you happy

This is utter nonsense.

Have you ever been poor?

Money makes you comfortable which contributes to happiness in a BIG way.

At 18 I would have taken the money

"

Money also can be used for a lot of good things and open up more options to things in life eg education, healthcare etc.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm not sure 18yr old me would of managed well with that amount. Being put to sleep at 65 seems fairly reasonable hypothetically of course for the purpose of this thread.

I agree money certainly doesn't make a person happy, but being in a stable financial situation is far far less stressful, so won't be a contributing to anxiety etc.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross

When I was 18 yes.

Today ? No ......

quarter of a million is no big deal these days

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ympho6969Woman
over a year ago

glasgow

Yes. 65 is a good age. A lot sont make it that far. Whos to say i would?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tephTV67TV/TS
over a year ago

Cheshire

At 18 I joined up for a lot less and willing to give my life to my country. I now realise how naive I was.

So that idiot probably would and have spent it all by now. The older idiot would certainly weigh up his current options a bit more

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"Yes. 65 is a good age. A lot sont make it that far. Whos to say i would?"

Its a good age until you get there. I'm 66 and very active. The thought of passing away now is unthinkable.

When I was 18 I thought 25 or 30 was ancient.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oh no, not a chance. I want to spend as much time with my partner and daughter and future family as possible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes then move and leave no forwarding address!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch


"Question

When you turned 18 a man from the government turns up to give you £250000 in cash to do what ever you want with....the catch is...on your 65th birthday a person arrives to inject you to make you painlessly die

Would you take the 1/4 of a million pounds?"

Absolutely not

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Question

When you turned 18 a man from the government turns up to give you £250000 in cash to do what ever you want with....the catch is...on your 65th birthday a person arrives to inject you to make you painlessly die

Would you take the 1/4 of a million pounds?"

2 damn right i might not make it that long anyway

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It would have to be a much higher number than that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Ring WraithMan
over a year ago

Bradford


"When I was 18 I would have"

I would have at 18 too, now at 61 i think it would have had to be a lot more money than that.

Having said that, if I knew he was coming he would have to find me first !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
over a year ago

Hastings


"No, but would still have the injection at 65.

We should all retire at 50 have 15 good years then off to permasleep. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nabelle21Woman
over a year ago

B38


"It would have to be a much higher number than that "

Initially I thought nah but...for a larger amount I may.

Mot sure how much it would take

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It would have to be a much higher number than that

Initially I thought nah but...for a larger amount I may.

Mot sure how much it would take"

If you take average wage as 25k then that's only 10 years you would have 47 years to cover so it would need to be at least 1.25 million

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osco78Man
over a year ago

Sheffield

Based on the amount of men in my family that die at 55, I'd take it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
over a year ago

Hastings


"Question

When you turned 18 a man from the government turns up to give you £250000 in cash to do what ever you want with....the catch is...on your 65th birthday a person arrives to inject you to make you painlessly die

Would you take the 1/4 of a million pounds?

That's 8 years of salary. No. "

True but at 18 I could purchased 4 houses with that sort of money.

Don't know how much you where earning I was on less then 2k a year started at 16 on £27.50 a week so was more like 125 years salary.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes I would take the money. Hopefully i would either be already dead or i would definitely be keeping out the road of the guy who was to inject me. Take the money and run lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 14/01/21 22:56:31]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No chance!!! I don't trust anything the government says!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otPrinceHarryMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

I'd keep 50k held back to have an ex-special forces bodyguard watch me on the week I turn 65.

That or I'd find some convuluted piece of legalese explaining that I measure my age in Neptune years.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
over a year ago

Hastings

Is it just me or is the painlessly die an added pluss and knowing when. Like others have said live and work to 50 then play for 15 years then go to check out. Even get to say good by to people the day before.

Can I pass on the money and book my jab for 70 Now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *etite_delightWoman
over a year ago

BunnyLand

my 15yrs self decided life after 40 would be meaningless and I better die after I hit 40. 1 month left to my 40 now and I’m so nervous if karma took that wish seriously

With this in mind yes, my 18yrs old self would definitely took it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aCaiMan
over a year ago

Telford

With 250k I’d be dead before 65

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uriousscouserWoman
over a year ago

Wirral


"It would have to be a much higher number than that "

It would today, but when I was 18 I'd have probably agreed for less!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The question is designed to make you think what you could have achieved with that money backing you

No because I couldn't live happily knowing that day is coming and everything i have done will be for nothing

But I can see where your coming from "

but death at 65 or 85 that day is still always coming , why is everything for nothing?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 14/01/21 23:25:15]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

im 34 and would take it now, quit my job and if the rona would kindly f off id go travel the world til it was spent then just get on with the rest of my life making the most of what i could til injection time

i understand why some people think time is more precious, but for me this last year if anything has taught me that nothing but empty time is worthless ... i don’t want the kids, so no grandkids to wait for, i don’t even know if i will meet someone to grow old with (already used up over half that 65 years and its not happened yet), for me its about what makes me happy in the now as i have no idea what tomorrow holds... i would much rather have less time full of enjoyable experiences than an indefinite length of time that feels pretty empty

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ymFit_FunMan
over a year ago

Dudley

100% yes lol. I'd rather live a short but better quality life, than a longer but average one. After 65 you're past your peak anyway, live your best life while you're younger. At 18 that money could do so much...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *adame 2SwordsWoman
over a year ago

Victoria, London

Sounds a bit like Logan's Run.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"100% yes lol. I'd rather live a short but better quality life, than a longer but average one. After 65 you're past your peak anyway, live your best life while you're younger. At 18 that money could do so much... "

Exactly. You could buy one million Freddos. What else is needed?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

At 18 even being 30 seems a lifetime away. I wouldn’t want my life to end at 65, not when you see people in their 80’s still having a good life. I wanna be with my daughter as long as possible. But I dunno what 18 year old me would’ve done, I was even more stupid back then.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *2000ManMan
over a year ago

Worthing


"When I was 18 I would have"

This, at 18, being 65 seemed a million years away.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"It would have to be a much higher number than that

Initially I thought nah but...for a larger amount I may.

Mot sure how much it would take

If you take average wage as 25k then that's only 10 years you would have 47 years to cover so it would need to be at least 1.25 million "

The money is not a wage....its a lump sum...you can still work

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top