Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" How do you react to a playmate that wants exclusivity, or a couples profile or is quite simply too into you? Do you think a playmate asking for exclusivity is too clingy? If one wants a couples profile do you think they are marking their terroritry, making it harder for you to get meets alone or they'll use it to up the chances for meets for themselves? Is there really a place for it on a swingers site? Or does exclusivity simply mean a relationship to you? " This can be an absolute minefield with so many factors contributing to a decision. How long have you known the playmate? Are the feelings reciprocated? Are you ready for things to get a bit more serious? Is your playmate jealous because you can get meets and they can't. It takes a lot of confidence to ask someone for exclusivity in this lifestyle. Non meeting couples can still be on Fab, there's plenty of people not looking to meet anyone for lots of different reasons. And if someome has an ulterior motive for wanting to set up a couples profile because they'll perceive it as easier to get meets for themselves - then they're not worth the time of day. How do you feel? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How do you react to a playmate that wants exclusivity, or a couples profile or is quite simply too into you?" Very interesting situations, all of which are different. Wanting exclusivity is possibly the antithesis of what fab is all about. To achieve that, you would both want to leave fab and just be together. That's a conventional relationship. A couples profile is a different dynamic. I would view that as meeting other couples or singles together, for threesomes, foursome, and moresomes. Nice idea. I'm guessing you would both share a comfort, security and enjoyment with each other to be as a couple, but again that wouldn't have to be an exclusive couple. It could be two FB or FWB embracing swinging. The "too into you" one is a paradox. Can you be "too into" someone? I don't think you can, but what you can have is an unequal expectations as a result. Experience tells me such situations can be handled emphatically and with respect for each other. It's down to communication, and understanding each others position. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sod that! I live with my fwb but he was told at the start that I would be seeing other people and I didn't want a couples profile, even though we play as a couple. Everyone we know that has started a couples profile, either in a full on relationship or not, has ended, so didn't want the curse of the couples profile... It's worked pretty well for both of us for over 4 years now... I won't be exclusive with anyone again. " The curse of the couples profile. Like having a story in Hello magazine. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How do you react to a playmate that wants exclusivity, or a couples profile or is quite simply too into you? Very interesting situations, all of which are different. Wanting exclusivity is possibly the antithesis of what fab is all about. To achieve that, you would both want to leave fab and just be together. That's a conventional relationship. A couples profile is a different dynamic. I would view that as meeting other couples or singles together, for threesomes, foursome, and moresomes. Nice idea. I'm guessing you would both share a comfort, security and enjoyment with each other to be as a couple, but again that wouldn't have to be an exclusive couple. It could be two FB or FWB embracing swinging. The "too into you" one is a paradox. Can you be "too into" someone? I don't think you can, but what you can have is an unequal expectations as a result. Experience tells me such situations can be handled emphatically and with respect for each other. It's down to communication, and understanding each others position." Well put - although I'd argue that you can have both exclusivity and maintain a swinging lifestyle if you swing together as part of that lifestyle - guess it all comes down to the individual dynamic and agreement as to what "exclusive" means | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well put - although I'd argue that you can have both exclusivity and maintain a swinging lifestyle if you swing together as part of that lifestyle - guess it all comes down to the individual dynamic and agreement as to what "exclusive" means " Unless you come up with a new definition of exclusive, you can't, which is why it's the antithesis of swinging. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It wouldn't bother me really but it's not like I get inundated with offers." Juat AN offer would be nice!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It wouldn't bother me really but it's not like I get inundated with offers. Juat AN offer would be nice!! " Fingers crossed for you buddy. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't personally want exclusive, to me it doesn't fit. In the past I've had all that I listed in my post and see them as red flags so to speak. Mainly because when asked to be exclusive I knew he wasn't though he kept claiming he was and so on. I was just curious to see people's responses and see if they would see them as red flags too. " Yes I would. I'd run a mile tbh! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't personally want exclusive, to me it doesn't fit. In the past I've had all that I listed in my post and see them as red flags so to speak. Mainly because when asked to be exclusive I knew he wasn't though he kept claiming he was and so on. I was just curious to see people's responses and see if they would see them as red flags too. " Surely that would depend on other aspects of the person's behaviour? Or do you think having a discussion about being exclusive is a red flag of it's own? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well put - although I'd argue that you can have both exclusivity and maintain a swinging lifestyle if you swing together as part of that lifestyle - guess it all comes down to the individual dynamic and agreement as to what "exclusive" means Unless you come up with a new definition of exclusive, you can't, which is why it's the antithesis of swinging." No new definition required - perhaps individual interpretation does come into play though - a couple can be exclusive to each other emotionally, yet still swing with others together without any emotions becoming involved with the third party/ies - in fact I'd suggest that's precisely what the majority of committed couples that are here are doing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No new definition required - perhaps individual interpretation does come into play though - a couple can be exclusive to each other emotionally, yet still swing with others together without any emotions becoming involved with the third party/ies - in fact I'd suggest that's precisely what the majority of committed couples that are here are doing." Now you're moving the goalposts. If a lady I met from here suggested becoming exclusive, with her, by definition that is to exclude and not admit all others. Entertaining other people doesn't mean your exclusive, just because you are both consenting. To be truly exclusive, the fab adventure ends. At least that's how I would define things. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No new definition required - perhaps individual interpretation does come into play though - a couple can be exclusive to each other emotionally, yet still swing with others together without any emotions becoming involved with the third party/ies - in fact I'd suggest that's precisely what the majority of committed couples that are here are doing. Now you're moving the goalposts. If a lady I met from here suggested becoming exclusive, with her, by definition that is to exclude and not admit all others. Entertaining other people doesn't mean your exclusive, just because you are both consenting. To be truly exclusive, the fab adventure ends. At least that's how I would define things." And that last sentence is the key here - and we're possibly wandering into the world of semantics - yes by it's strictest definition "exclusivity" means forsaking all others - but as I've shown it can also come down to individual dynamics and interpretation, as well as exclusivity on different levels (e.g. emotionally exclusive but not physically) - all I'm saying is it's not quite as black and white | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And that last sentence is the key here - and we're possibly wandering into the world of semantics - yes by it's strictest definition "exclusivity" means forsaking all others - but as I've shown it can also come down to individual dynamics and interpretation, as well as exclusivity on different levels (e.g. emotionally exclusive but not physically) - all I'm saying is it's not quite as black and white " No, not semantics, understanding. I fully understand what you are trying to describe. The problem with your description is that it doesn't fit with the definition of exclusive. It's a lot of things, but not exclusive. More limited, more boundaries, but not exclusive. If my FWB came to me and said, "Oi, Friday, we're exclusive from now on!" that would mean different things to me than "Oi, Friday, fire up the MPV, we're a swinging couple!" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"EAS - emotional attachment syndrome. This can occur when one person in a FB/FWB dynamic is too into/eager with their partner, leading to potentially disastrous circumstances. Regular playmates are fun, are easy and take less work to find, but everyone needs to be upfront and honest about what they want. If the balance is too one sided, then I would either walk away or have the chat and see if their behaviour altered." That’s interesting - I hadn’t heard of EAS | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are too many delicious sweets in this shop to choose from, therefore I wouldn’t wish to go the exclusive route. I quite enjoy trying the different flavours! Apart from the fact it inevitably creates jealousy in those less open to ‘sharing’ I’m quite happy to go the FwB route but that’s a different ball game all together. Exclusive usually means a degree of understanding on both sides but often one or other will become clingy and territorial - not an ideal way to work together " This | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sod that! I live with my fwb but he was told at the start that I would be seeing other people and I didn't want a couples profile, even though we play as a couple. Everyone we know that has started a couples profile, either in a full on relationship or not, has ended, so didn't want the curse of the couples profile... It's worked pretty well for both of us for over 4 years now... I won't be exclusive with anyone again. The curse of the couples profile. Like having a story in Hello magazine. " Haha I don't read magazines but is that a thing too? Lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |