FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Whatsup with whatsapp

Jump to newest
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Some policemen have been sacked for having a secret Whatsapp group and sharing material that the bosses disapproved of. Should they be sacked or allowed to have a private life

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hePolyMathMan
over a year ago

Walton on Thames

Depends what's being shared. If it's work related then it's justified. If they were just swapping chit chat, memes and/or being dirty then it's not justified imho.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford


"Depends what's being shared. If it's work related then it's justified. If they were just swapping chit chat, memes and/or being dirty then it's not justified imho. "

This

What was the nature of the material, Tom?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oom_4_1_MhoreCouple
over a year ago

Newport

Think it was on issued police opines as well

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

Half a story Tom still at it I see.... This place never changes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford


"Half a story Tom still at it I see.... This place never changes "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

The answer to your question is in your first sentence. The words "secret" and "disapproved" being key

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"Depends what's being shared. If it's work related then it's justified. If they were just swapping chit chat, memes and/or being dirty then it's not justified imho.

They not saying but it's in the Essex Chronicle

This

What was the nature of the material, Tom?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Better half a story then no story at all..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

[Removed by poster at 28/11/20 14:50:32]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford


"Depends what's being shared. If it's work related then it's justified. If they were just swapping chit chat, memes and/or being dirty then it's not justified imho.

They not saying but it's in the Essex Chronicle

This

What was the nature of the material, Tom?"

Aah, bit difficult to say then really..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I can understand why a secret WhatsApp group is not allowed amongst colleagues. Incase they share confidential stuff they shouldn't

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Yes. More to this than meets the eye. We will never know

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erry bull1Man
over a year ago

doncaster

Do the police have to sign the official secrets act when enlisted, the same as I did when I joined the army , if so then by law nothing can be discussed on social media etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *edangel_2013Woman
over a year ago

southend


"Better half a story then no story at all.. "

Sounds like a S*n reporters motto.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Do the police have to sign the official secrets act when enlisted, the same as I did when I joined the army , if so then by law nothing can be discussed on social media etc "

That was my thinking, but if not the secrets act, there will be something they sign to this affect

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West

Six police workers have been suspended following claims "offensive" material was posted to each other in a WhatsApp group.

The two officers and four staff from Essex Police are said to belonged to a private group on the encrypted service.

An internal disciplinary investigation was launched to look into talks among the six colleagues which allegedly breached conduct rules.

Essex Police declined to discuss the nature of the messages exchanged in the WhatsApp group but experts have indicated for all six to be suspended they must have been 'offensive and unpleasant'.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"Six police workers have been suspended following claims "offensive" material was posted to each other in a WhatsApp group.

The two officers and four staff from Essex Police are said to belonged to a private group on the encrypted service.

An internal disciplinary investigation was launched to look into talks among the six colleagues which allegedly breached conduct rules.

Essex Police declined to discuss the nature of the messages exchanged in the WhatsApp group but experts have indicated for all six to be suspended they must have been 'offensive and unpleasant'."

Who are these so called experts. More to this story..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Six police workers have been suspended following claims "offensive" material was posted to each other in a WhatsApp group.

The two officers and four staff from Essex Police are said to belonged to a private group on the encrypted service.

An internal disciplinary investigation was launched to look into talks among the six colleagues which allegedly breached conduct rules.

Essex Police declined to discuss the nature of the messages exchanged in the WhatsApp group but experts have indicated for all six to be suspended they must have been 'offensive and unpleasant'.

Who are these so called experts. More to this story.."

"I think the British people have had enough of listening to experts" one of the defining quotes of recent times.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illy_the_tvTV/TS
over a year ago

hoorn, Netherlands


"Better half a story then no story at all.. "

Thats not true at all, misinformation and half stories are far worse and more dangerous than no information.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

How do people actually become an expert .

Is it a bit labelling yoursf professional in a profile...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Yes. More to this than meets the eye. We will never know"

Do we need to know?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emini ManMan
over a year ago

There and to the left a bit

Nothing more to this story than the *full* report rather than a forum thread with half the facts and designed to make it look like something that it isn't.

Numerous media outlets reporting the story if you Google "WhatsApp Police Suspended Essex" - most of them reporting the *facts* that a hearing earlier this week found two officers guilty of sharing "discriminatory and derogatory" material and therefore were dismissed from the force on a charge of "gross misconduct"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-essex-55074184

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

And another drama, half-cocked, thread bites the dust

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irty desireWoman
over a year ago

newcatle

If they have broken employees rules then there is nothing to discuss!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If he is a policeman then he is expected to uphold the highest of standards in public duty.

Same reason you cannot be a member of groups that racially aggravate or political groups while serving.

To be honest he is a bit stupid to be involved in something that puts his career at risk and maybe not in the public's interest to have someone like him upholding the law

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"Nothing more to this story than the *full* report rather than a forum thread with half the facts and designed to make it look like something that it isn't.

Numerous media outlets reporting the story if you Google "WhatsApp Police Suspended Essex" - most of them reporting the *facts* that a hearing earlier this week found two officers guilty of sharing "discriminatory and derogatory" material and therefore were dismissed from the force on a charge of "gross misconduct"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-essex-55074184"

I pasted a direct quote from the story above. The same info in this post. But facts don't get in the way of a good conspiracy theory, eh?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Yes I agree.. they should be sacked

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"Yes. More to this than meets the eye. We will never know

Do we need to know? "

No, not really.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emini ManMan
over a year ago

There and to the left a bit


"Yes I agree.. they should be sacked "

Yet you started the thread with the bare bones of the story and asked the question whether they should be sacked and then went on to say there was "more to it than meets the eye"?

Actually there isn't - from the full reported facts, rather than half the story, it's plain to see there's nothing more to it than employees having broken a disciplinary code and having lost their jobs after being given a fair hearing at which they were found guilty.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irenGuy70Man
over a year ago

Cirencester

They bought the tickets, they knew what they were getting into, I say let 'em crash.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I dislike inappropriate creep and control of private lives away from work. That said, it's wise to only share with colleagues what is permitted. Hope it doesn't affect their careers inappropriately.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"Yes I agree.. they should be sacked

Yet you started the thread with the bare bones of the story and asked the question whether they should be sacked and then went on to say there was "more to it than meets the eye"?

Actually there isn't - from the full reported facts, rather than half the story, it's plain to see there's nothing more to it than employees having broken a disciplinary code and having lost their jobs after being given a fair hearing at which they were found guilty."

I agree.. well said and reasoned

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iddle ManMan
over a year ago

Walsall

Well of they broke the rules sharing confidential stuff then yes, should be sacked. If it was just a group of work colleagues sharing random chit chat and the usually stuff that does the rounds then no. Everyone needs a private life.

I'm sure a lot of people would disapprove, (even Im shocked) at some of the stuff I get sent on Whats app

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Best not to be inappropiate if it's a works phone. I wonder if anybody has been caught using fab on a works phone?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irty desireWoman
over a year ago

newcatle


"Best not to be inappropiate if it's a works phone. I wonder if anybody has been caught using fab on a works phone?"

More fool them if they have

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agneto.Man
over a year ago

Bham

They have a professional code of conduct. Things like that contravene it.

Hence no face pics here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

I agree.. supposedly it's an encrypted site. Not sure if it can be that secure...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irty desireWoman
over a year ago

newcatle


"I agree.. supposedly it's an encrypted site. Not sure if it can be that secure... "

How do you know someone didn’t showed someone?? Nowt to do with it being encrypted

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"I agree.. supposedly it's an encrypted site. Not sure if it can be that secure...

How do you know someone didn’t showed someone?? Nowt to do with it being encrypted "

Could be.. I saw a programme were professional gangs were using top end encryption to dodge the law

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I agree.. supposedly it's an encrypted site. Not sure if it can be that secure... "

WhatsApp and secure in the same sentence ha ha lol they owned buy Facebook and have the same expolits

But use back door exploits are a thing off the past when

Everyone so willing to hand over ever bit off information on them anyway to some random they don’t even know

The new method off attack is to create a quriky little app like facechangd and have millions download in the process give some full access to ur life

Always check permission a app wants before had

Ie there no reason a pic app should have access to ur location service if they want that red flag should be rased to why a pic app wants that data

There no reason for a game to want permission to admin level change on ur phone

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Well I only phone and text mostly. Use a few apps but when I was at school there were no computers or mobile phones. I remember queing up at the local red telephone box. Very few telephones in houses...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Well I only phone and text mostly. Use a few apps but when I was at school there were no computers or mobile phones. I remember queing up at the local red telephone box. Very few telephones in houses..."

I get that I just saying how the new attack method are being done illegally hack someone is a thing off the past

When everyone so willing to hand over everything about them selfs legally

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Well I only phone and text mostly. Use a few apps but when I was at school there were no computers or mobile phones. I remember queing up at the local red telephone box. Very few telephones in houses..."

For instance ur friend sends you a pic off what they look like at say 70 or say ur in ur 60 the app can make you look 20

And you think ooo that’s cool I going to try that

So you do

The app then mines all ur data while it’s installed ie pics texts phone numbers whare you stay bank account stuff and what not

In that apps tc that you had to accept that no one read 200 odd pages off bs

Will have it that they were legally allowed to mine all ur data and then sell that data to who ever they like and the person or people they sell it to can legally do what ever they like with it

Millions off people have all ready falling victim to it

There was a big uproar in 2018 about this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

People breaching the rules of their employers should be investigated and the appropriate sanctions should follow if they're found to be in breach, as appears to be happening.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tom OP   Man
over a year ago

Chelmsford

I agree it's a minefield and espey for us older folk..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Better half a story then no story at all..

Sounds like a S*n reporters motto."

Half a story is just a rumour..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"I agree it's a minefield and espey for us older folk..

"

How so?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top