FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Vardy v Rooney

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

In the current situation we find ourselves in should the courts be concerned with such matters?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Classy people

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Classy people"

Rich people

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford

Cost Mrs Rooney nearly £23k in costs today

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford

Waste of cash ...

No winners ..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cost Mrs Rooney nearly £23k in costs today "

How many school dinners would that buy???

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amissCouple
over a year ago

chelmsford


"Cost Mrs Rooney nearly £23k in costs today

How many school dinners would that buy??? "

Yeah

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Outrage! This post is misleading... you've wrote it giving a false impression that you may be comparing the two footballers! (There is no obvious comparison)

This has caused me distress and you'll be hearing from my lawyer. Unless you settle or of court. I'll take a cock pic

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Cost Mrs Rooney nearly £23k in costs today

How many school dinners would that buy???

Yeah "

Good point well made!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

When you have little class and too much money , the concept of shame becomes irrelevant.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Outrage! This post is misleading... you've wrote it giving a false impression that you may be comparing the two footballers! (There is no obvious comparison)

This has caused me distress and you'll be hearing from my lawyer. Unless you settle or of court. I'll take a cock pic"

Shall we mediate?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Outrage! This post is misleading... you've wrote it giving a false impression that you may be comparing the two footballers! (There is no obvious comparison)

This has caused me distress and you'll be hearing from my lawyer. Unless you settle or of court. I'll take a cock pic

Shall we mediate?"

What are the charges?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asmeenTV/TS
over a year ago

STOKE ON TRENT

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"When you have little class and too much money , the concept of shame becomes irrelevant."

It’s just appallingly bad taste

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Rooney in his prime was a better footballer than Vardy is now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 20/11/20 23:27:08]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cost Mrs Rooney nearly £23k in costs today

How many school dinners would that buy??? "

22913.50 ÷ 2.30 = 22911.3 school meals.

You were asking for the math right?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Outrage! This post is misleading... you've wrote it giving a false impression that you may be comparing the two footballers! (There is no obvious comparison)

This has caused me distress and you'll be hearing from my lawyer. Unless you settle or of court. I'll take a cock pic

Shall we mediate?

What are the charges? "

That I knowing and willing lead you and the great family of fab that this post was about football and not about two silly people trying and succeeding in taking up tabloid space.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Outrage! This post is misleading... you've wrote it giving a false impression that you may be comparing the two footballers! (There is no obvious comparison)

This has caused me distress and you'll be hearing from my lawyer. Unless you settle or of court. I'll take a cock pic

Shall we mediate?

What are the charges? "

I don't know. I don't care enough to turn up at court. I'll have my people deal with it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Outrage! This post is misleading... you've wrote it giving a false impression that you may be comparing the two footballers! (There is no obvious comparison)

This has caused me distress and you'll be hearing from my lawyer. Unless you settle or of court. I'll take a cock pic

Shall we mediate?

What are the charges?

I don't know. I don't care enough to turn up at court. I'll have my people deal with it. "

Not even for nearly 23,000 school meals?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cost Mrs Rooney nearly £23k in costs today

How many school dinners would that buy???

22913.50 ÷ 2.30 = 22911.3 school meals.

You were asking for the math right?"

That’s a lot of mouths but not very good maths! Thankfully for you it was a rhetorical question.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

You can’t beat a good #wagathachristie hashtag

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By * and M lookingCouple
over a year ago

Worcester

They should have just got Jezza Kyle to pass judgement as they both fit the criteria to be on his old show

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"They should have just got Jezza Kyle to pass judgement as they both fit the criteria to be on his old show "

Never watched the show, what is the criteria?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Cost Mrs Rooney nearly £23k in costs today

How many school dinners would that buy???

22913.50 ÷ 2.30 = 22911.3 school meals.

You were asking for the math right?

That’s a lot of mouths but not very good maths! Thankfully for you it was a rhetorical question. "

Ah 9,962.4 sorry difficult to count on my fingers and masterbate at the same time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In the current situation we find ourselves in should the courts be concerned with such matters?"

Yes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *a LunaWoman
over a year ago

South Wales

Should do the Gladiator Baton Dual.

Cheap as chips and gets rid of tension - job done

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *am4CamWoman
over a year ago

Fairy Land

I reckon it could be sorted out with a suitably adjudicated round of Rock Paper Scissors. I mean really ladies, you both have safe and well provided lives, sensible family relationships. Get the chuff over it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They should have just got Jezza Kyle to pass judgement as they both fit the criteria to be on his old show

Never watched the show, what is the criteria?"

As long as you are thick as shit and have a yearning to be famous, you fill all the criteria.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arlomaleMan
over a year ago

darlington


"Cost Mrs Rooney nearly £23k in costs today

How many school dinners would that buy??? "

loads but it’s not her responsibility to buy school dinners is it really or is this just another bash a rich celeb post

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok"

Is the dispute about bullying?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arlomaleMan
over a year ago

darlington


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?"

from what understand it’s about vardy leaking stories if true it’s a sly thing to do to a mate not sure it’s worthy of going to court but they’ve got the cash it’s up to her

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok"

I'm not a fan of either of them but I totally understand why Colleen set the trap up. Celebs are still human and should be allowed to have privacy.

Unfortunately it looks like she may lose.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eavenNhellCouple
over a year ago

carrbrook stalybridge


"Waste of cash ...

No winners ..

"

except lawyers and barristers

two daft bints arguing in court =£££££ kerching

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?"

That is where it stems from.

Leaking fake stories to ruin or discredit someone yes. Why should she not fight that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arlomaleMan
over a year ago

darlington


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?

That is where it stems from.

Leaking fake stories to ruin or discredit someone yes. Why should she not fight that.

"

seems she has a history of running her gob of to the press didn’t she once slag of Peter Andre as having a tiny penis and was a crap shag ? Seems to me she’s a nasty piece of work

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?

That is where it stems from.

Leaking fake stories to ruin or discredit someone yes. Why should she not fight that.

seems she has a history of running her gob of to the press didn’t she once slag of Peter Andre as having a tiny penis and was a crap shag ? Seems to me she’s a nasty piece of work "

That is a vile thing to do to anyone. How low can someone go?

Ugliness takes many forms

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arlomaleMan
over a year ago

darlington


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?

That is where it stems from.

Leaking fake stories to ruin or discredit someone yes. Why should she not fight that.

seems she has a history of running her gob of to the press didn’t she once slag of Peter Andre as having a tiny penis and was a crap shag ? Seems to me she’s a nasty piece of work

That is a vile thing to do to anyone. How low can someone go?

Ugliness takes many forms"

it certainly is to humiliate him in public like that as I said she seems a nasty piece of work

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By * and M lookingCouple
over a year ago

Worcester


"They should have just got Jezza Kyle to pass judgement as they both fit the criteria to be on his old show

Never watched the show, what is the criteria?"

Watch it on catch up

You will soon get the gist.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?

That is where it stems from.

Leaking fake stories to ruin or discredit someone yes. Why should she not fight that.

"

It seems one was briefing against the other so a trap was laid and the plaintiff appears to have taken offence. My original question of the forum was in times like this should the legal system be concerned with such matters? Surely a courts time could be better spent dealing with more important legal matters?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"They should have just got Jezza Kyle to pass judgement as they both fit the criteria to be on his old show

Never watched the show, what is the criteria?

Watch it on catch up

You will soon get the gist."

Just went on line to view a selection of clips. There is no hope for the country if this show purports to be journalistic TV.

Non of the participants seem to have any teeth.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arlomaleMan
over a year ago

darlington


"They should have just got Jezza Kyle to pass judgement as they both fit the criteria to be on his old show

Never watched the show, what is the criteria?

Watch it on catch up

You will soon get the gist.

Just went on line to view a selection of clips. There is no hope for the country if this show purports to be journalistic TV.

Non of the participants seem to have any teeth."

as someone further up said it’s a modern day freak show they pick the vulnerable in society to make a show I’d rather watch paint dry

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"They should have just got Jezza Kyle to pass judgement as they both fit the criteria to be on his old show

Never watched the show, what is the criteria?

Watch it on catch up

You will soon get the gist.

Just went on line to view a selection of clips. There is no hope for the country if this show purports to be journalistic TV.

Non of the participants seem to have any teeth. as someone further up said it’s a modern day freak show they pick the vulnerable in society to make a show I’d rather watch paint dry "

I suppose it’s the Andy Warhol 15 minutes of fame syndrome.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?

That is where it stems from.

Leaking fake stories to ruin or discredit someone yes. Why should she not fight that.

It seems one was briefing against the other so a trap was laid and the plaintiff appears to have taken offence. My original question of the forum was in times like this should the legal system be concerned with such matters? Surely a courts time could be better spent dealing with more important legal matters?"

Justice should be for everyone.

Is it a waste of everyone's time and energy?.. possibly.. will there be a winner? Probably? Does anyone care outside their egos? Probably not ..

Should they spend their mo ey on free school meals.. ?

Well there is a thought from some that it just makes families ever dependant on the State..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ssex_tomMan
over a year ago

Chelmsford


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok"

Is it bullying if you call out something that is true ? Proving it may be an entirely different matter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uliaChrisCouple
over a year ago

westerham


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?

That is where it stems from.

Leaking fake stories to ruin or discredit someone yes. Why should she not fight that.

It seems one was briefing against the other so a trap was laid and the plaintiff appears to have taken offence. My original question of the forum was in times like this should the legal system be concerned with such matters? Surely a courts time could be better spent dealing with more important legal matters?"

Can’t stand either of them, the whole thing I stupid, but

No is the answer to your question

The courts are supposed to be there for everyone, including Russian Oligarchs and Saudi Princes.

And the legal fees do go to lawyers and paralegals, then that money gets spent in the restaurant or Tesco, or to the local plumber.

You are not worse off because silly people are wasting their own money.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tephTV67TV/TS
over a year ago

Cheshire

Coleen investigation is flawed, just because she narrowed down the field to whom she passed information on, it doesn’t mean Vardy leaked it (apt as it was about a flood). Vardy could have been chatting to a friend in the local shop about it, someone overheard it and they then told the newspapers, or anyone else that Vardy knows.

Also Vardy was pregnant at the time, by exposing her Coleen caused distress to a pregnant woman. She could’ve confronted her in private no reason to air it in public.

Coleen got a lot of credit for her investigatory skills by the media and public at large, but the courts have come to a different conclusion for now.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

They should have just went on

Judge Rinder

or Jerry Springer

but we all know it's all about the money

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensual 2Couple
over a year ago

Blackpool

Somebody should bang their heads together ....and tell em to grow up ..attention seeking FWs with too much

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *2000ManMan
over a year ago

Worthing

Thought this was going to compare the two strikers!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?

That is where it stems from.

Leaking fake stories to ruin or discredit someone yes. Why should she not fight that.

It seems one was briefing against the other so a trap was laid and the plaintiff appears to have taken offence. My original question of the forum was in times like this should the legal system be concerned with such matters? Surely a courts time could be better spent dealing with more important legal matters?

Can’t stand either of them, the whole thing I stupid, but

No is the answer to your question

The courts are supposed to be there for everyone, including Russian Oligarchs and Saudi Princes.

And the legal fees do go to lawyers and paralegals, then that money gets spent in the restaurant or Tesco, or to the local plumber.

You are not worse off because silly people are wasting their own money. "

A friend of mine is fighting a custody battle and has been told that the next hearing won’t be until March 2021 due to lack of court time?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" Seems she has a history of running her gob of to the press didn’t she once slag of Peter Andre as having a tiny penis and was a crap shag ? Seems to me she’s a nasty piece of work "

That's the average wording for one of my Fab meet veris.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uliaChrisCouple
over a year ago

westerham


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?

That is where it stems from.

Leaking fake stories to ruin or discredit someone yes. Why should she not fight that.

It seems one was briefing against the other so a trap was laid and the plaintiff appears to have taken offence. My original question of the forum was in times like this should the legal system be concerned with such matters? Surely a courts time could be better spent dealing with more important legal matters?

Can’t stand either of them, the whole thing I stupid, but

No is the answer to your question

The courts are supposed to be there for everyone, including Russian Oligarchs and Saudi Princes.

And the legal fees do go to lawyers and paralegals, then that money gets spent in the restaurant or Tesco, or to the local plumber.

You are not worse off because silly people are wasting their own money.

A friend of mine is fighting a custody battle and has been told that the next hearing won’t be until March 2021 due to lack of court time?"

I don’t doubt it,

The courts have been utterly shambolic for ages, I remember being selected for jury service a few years ago, about thirty jurors booked time off work, we all arrive at the court house and.... no trials going on. Everyone sent home.

The courts are physically there, but legal aid cuts have decimated proceedings. Lack of court time isn’t caused by Colleen Rooney.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eavenNhellCouple
over a year ago

carrbrook stalybridge

but the courts aren't there as this shower have been quietly closing them and selling the buildings off .the English courts system was in utter chaos well before covid came along go read barrister secrets twitter feed horrendous what they have been doing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ex HolesMan
over a year ago

Up North

He said, she said shite.

It shouldn’t even be news.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uliaChrisCouple
over a year ago

westerham


"but the courts aren't there as this shower have been quietly closing them and selling the buildings off .the English courts system was in utter chaos well before covid came along go read barrister secrets twitter feed horrendous what they have been doing "

I agree about the chaos, but the court building thing doesn’t even matter that much, most court proceedings, including custody battles, could be conducted in a normal room with a maximum capacity of twelve or fifteen people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?

That is where it stems from.

Leaking fake stories to ruin or discredit someone yes. Why should she not fight that.

It seems one was briefing against the other so a trap was laid and the plaintiff appears to have taken offence. My original question of the forum was in times like this should the legal system be concerned with such matters? Surely a courts time could be better spent dealing with more important legal matters?

Can’t stand either of them, the whole thing I stupid, but

No is the answer to your question

The courts are supposed to be there for everyone, including Russian Oligarchs and Saudi Princes.

And the legal fees do go to lawyers and paralegals, then that money gets spent in the restaurant or Tesco, or to the local plumber.

You are not worse off because silly people are wasting their own money.

A friend of mine is fighting a custody battle and has been told that the next hearing won’t be until March 2021 due to lack of court time?"

Are custody hearings held in the same type of courts as libel hearings? Does your friend live in the same area as the Rooney/ Vardy libel hearing?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *a LunaWoman
over a year ago

South Wales


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?

That is where it stems from.

Leaking fake stories to ruin or discredit someone yes. Why should she not fight that.

It seems one was briefing against the other so a trap was laid and the plaintiff appears to have taken offence. My original question of the forum was in times like this should the legal system be concerned with such matters? Surely a courts time could be better spent dealing with more important legal matters?

Can’t stand either of them, the whole thing I stupid, but

No is the answer to your question

The courts are supposed to be there for everyone, including Russian Oligarchs and Saudi Princes.

And the legal fees do go to lawyers and paralegals, then that money gets spent in the restaurant or Tesco, or to the local plumber.

You are not worse off because silly people are wasting their own money.

A friend of mine is fighting a custody battle and has been told that the next hearing won’t be until March 2021 due to lack of court time?

Are custody hearings held in the same type of courts as libel hearings? Does your friend live in the same area as the Rooney/ Vardy libel hearing?"

Family matters are usually dealt with by a Family Court.

Not at the High Court (where I assume a high profile case such as this is being held).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?

That is where it stems from.

Leaking fake stories to ruin or discredit someone yes. Why should she not fight that.

It seems one was briefing against the other so a trap was laid and the plaintiff appears to have taken offence. My original question of the forum was in times like this should the legal system be concerned with such matters? Surely a courts time could be better spent dealing with more important legal matters?

Can’t stand either of them, the whole thing I stupid, but

No is the answer to your question

The courts are supposed to be there for everyone, including Russian Oligarchs and Saudi Princes.

And the legal fees do go to lawyers and paralegals, then that money gets spent in the restaurant or Tesco, or to the local plumber.

You are not worse off because silly people are wasting their own money.

A friend of mine is fighting a custody battle and has been told that the next hearing won’t be until March 2021 due to lack of court time?

Are custody hearings held in the same type of courts as libel hearings? Does your friend live in the same area as the Rooney/ Vardy libel hearing?"

No but as a general principle court time on such drivel could be better used on other matters which just maybe a tad more important?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?

That is where it stems from.

Leaking fake stories to ruin or discredit someone yes. Why should she not fight that.

It seems one was briefing against the other so a trap was laid and the plaintiff appears to have taken offence. My original question of the forum was in times like this should the legal system be concerned with such matters? Surely a courts time could be better spent dealing with more important legal matters?

Can’t stand either of them, the whole thing I stupid, but

No is the answer to your question

The courts are supposed to be there for everyone, including Russian Oligarchs and Saudi Princes.

And the legal fees do go to lawyers and paralegals, then that money gets spent in the restaurant or Tesco, or to the local plumber.

You are not worse off because silly people are wasting their own money.

A friend of mine is fighting a custody battle and has been told that the next hearing won’t be until March 2021 due to lack of court time?

Are custody hearings held in the same type of courts as libel hearings? Does your friend live in the same area as the Rooney/ Vardy libel hearing?

No but as a general principle court time on such drivel could be better used on other matters which just maybe a tad more important?"

Is emotional abuse drivel?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By * and R cple4Couple
over a year ago

swansea

Did she really have to do it on social

Media couldn’t it have been dealt with quietly knowing the trolls would be out in force and knowing she was heavily pregnant.

There both fame hungry and as bad as each other.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So someone takes a stand on bullying and she is villified.

Regardless of money or status bullying is never ok

Is the dispute about bullying?

That is where it stems from.

Leaking fake stories to ruin or discredit someone yes. Why should she not fight that.

It seems one was briefing against the other so a trap was laid and the plaintiff appears to have taken offence. My original question of the forum was in times like this should the legal system be concerned with such matters? Surely a courts time could be better spent dealing with more important legal matters?

Can’t stand either of them, the whole thing I stupid, but

No is the answer to your question

The courts are supposed to be there for everyone, including Russian Oligarchs and Saudi Princes.

And the legal fees do go to lawyers and paralegals, then that money gets spent in the restaurant or Tesco, or to the local plumber.

You are not worse off because silly people are wasting their own money.

A friend of mine is fighting a custody battle and has been told that the next hearing won’t be until March 2021 due to lack of court time?

Are custody hearings held in the same type of courts as libel hearings? Does your friend live in the same area as the Rooney/ Vardy libel hearing?

No but as a general principle court time on such drivel could be better used on other matters which just maybe a tad more important?

Is emotional abuse drivel?"

Having read the proceedings to date in a quality newspaper yesterday yes it’s drivel.

Neither will be emotionally scared by the spat but I dare say one will be out of pocket to an obscene amount of money.

Cases such as this should be the subject of mediation in a small room in Bolton with no press allowed. I doubt the circus would have got this far if it was not in the high court.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top