FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Ryan giggs

Jump to newest
 

By *arlomale OP   Man
over a year ago

darlington

So it appears he’s been a naughty boy again but should his name be made public until he’s been found guilty or not guilty my view is he shouldn’t be named until the verdict

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If it is a domestic matter, let them sort it out between them, in the courts, or out

Of course, that won't be the case

He'll be hung out to dry to fill pages in papers and gossip mags

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't think that anyone should be named until proven guilty,mud sticks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ungscotsman26Man
over a year ago

Glasgow


"I don't think that anyone should be named until proven guilty,mud sticks"

Agreed. However his reputation proceeds him.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend

I agree that RYAN GIGGS shouldn't have his name mentioned before RYAN GIGGS is brought to trial

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don't think that anyone should be named until proven guilty,mud sticks

Agreed. However his reputation proceeds him. "

Yes that is true

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By * and R cple4Couple
over a year ago

swansea

No one should be named until they are found guilty.Will be interesting to see if he gets hounded by the press like Caroline Flack did something tells me he probably won’t.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Who's he 'tearing apart' this time?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *aseMan
over a year ago

Gourock

Who gives a feck,lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top