FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

LESBIAN RELATIONSHIPS ONLY EXIST BECAUSE MEN FIND IT A TURN-ON, CLAIMS STUDY

Jump to newest
 

By *ral Extraordinaire OP   Man
over a year ago

Kent

Said in the media ....but i think very true

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/lesbian-relationships-men-turn-same-sex-female-attraction-menelaos-apostolou-cyprus-university-nicosia-a7766606.html

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What the ever living fuck ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *den-Valley-coupleCouple
over a year ago

Cumbria

..People study the Bible does not mean it's true

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Absolute bullshit

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ah, so the study interviewed 1500 people .... all of them heterosexual

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex

I'm on my phone so can't properly cut and paste. Can you give me a brief rundown of this learned article

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acey_RedWoman
over a year ago

Liverpool

Hahahahahahahahaha... hahahahahahhaha oh guys...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lorious hole bs16Man
over a year ago

Bristol


"Said in the media ....but i think very true

..and why do you think this is true?

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/lesbian-relationships-men-turn-same-sex-female-attraction-menelaos-apostolou-cyprus-university-nicosia-a7766606.html"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

Yes of course it's just about guys

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orenzoVonMatterhornMan
over a year ago

Lincoln

Obviously. What other purpose do women have other than to turn guys on?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Obviously. What other purpose do women have other than to turn guys on? "

Dude I said your sandwich would be ready soon. Jesus

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ocusMan
over a year ago

Cambridge

Is this The Onion?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm on my phone so can't properly cut and paste. Can you give me a brief rundown of this learned article "

A new study that attempted to reveal the origins of lesbianism, is claiming that same-sex relationships in women only exist because it turns men on.

Published on Science Direct, the report by Menelaos Apostolou, a male professor at the University of Nicosia in Cyprus comes to the conclusion that lesbian and bisexual attraction all stems from male desire.

So, how many lesbians did they interview to come to this jaw-dropping conclusion?

Well, the study surveyed a derisory 1,509 people and, wait for it, all of them were heterosexual.

“My argument in the paper is this: A considerable proportion of men desire same-sex attractions in women, and this is one possible reason why many women have such attractions,” Apostolou told Pink News.

The study also suggests another possible reason for men being attracted to lesbian or bisexual women, is that if their partner cheats on them, they’re still in with a chance of having children.

“A woman, driven by her sexual desires, may seek sexual contact outside of her long-term intimate relationship,” it writes.

“When this woman has sex with another woman she does not have sex with another man which translates into same-sex contact reducing the risk of cuckoldry.”

The controversial report goes on to suggest that men were more 'sexually excited' by the idea of their partner having a same sex attraction than women were and claims that lesbians are trying to cater to this attraction.

Unsurprisingly, the paper has felt the scorn of Twitter users who were quick to point out that “not a single actual lesbian participated in the study.”

One woman wrote, “Lesbians: I’m a woman who loves women. I’m attracted to women and only women because women are great.

Another added, “All heterosexual couples, not one lesbian in the group.

“May as well do a study on the use of tampons with 500 men as participants.”

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otmale5Man
over a year ago

glasgow

What a lot of rubbish . I’ve got a number of lesbian friends who are partners . They really don’t give a shift what guys think. They are lesbian because they prefer it . Not based in another’s opinion . Lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ent in BlackMan
over a year ago

Silsden

Clearly written by a straight bloke.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *affeine DuskMan
over a year ago

Caerphilly

' the study surveyed a derisory 1,509 people and, wait for it, all of them were heterosexual.'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *9alMan
over a year ago

Bridgend

are they going to say next week that gay male relationships only exist because women get a lot of head aches?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orenzoVonMatterhornMan
over a year ago

Lincoln


"Obviously. What other purpose do women have other than to turn guys on?

Dude I said your sandwich would be ready soon. Jesus "

As long as you suck me off while I eat it then I'll be happy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acey_RedWoman
over a year ago

Liverpool


"Obviously. What other purpose do women have other than to turn guys on?

Dude I said your sandwich would be ready soon. Jesus "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Obviously its true.

Everything us women do is to turn men on otherwise we would have no other purpose.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"are they going to say next week that gay male relationships only exist because women get a lot of head aches? "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acey_RedWoman
over a year ago

Liverpool


"are they going to say next week that gay male relationships only exist because women get a lot of head aches? "

Plenty on fab who think men "resort" to meeting other men as women won't meet them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acey_RedWoman
over a year ago

Liverpool


"Obviously its true.

Everything us women do is to turn men on otherwise we would have no other purpose. "

Even the farting?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lorious hole bs16Man
over a year ago

Bristol


"What a lot of rubbish . I’ve got a number of lesbian friends who are partners . They really don’t give a shift what guys think. They are lesbian because they prefer it . Not based in another’s opinion . Lol "

Interesting..You think it's a preference .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Obviously its true.

Everything us women do is to turn men on otherwise we would have no other purpose.

Even the farting? "

Women dont fart!

Next you Will be suggesting that women are equal to men

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"are they going to say next week that gay male relationships only exist because women get a lot of head aches? "

Don't be daft. Men are for sex. Women are decorative.

So men fuck men because of their great manliness.

Except one of them is the woman because everything is secretly hetero, amirite?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex


"I'm on my phone so can't properly cut and paste. Can you give me a brief rundown of this learned article

A new study that attempted to reveal the origins of lesbianism, is claiming that same-sex relationships in women only exist because it turns men on.

Published on Science Direct, the report by Menelaos Apostolou, a male professor at the University of Nicosia in Cyprus comes to the conclusion that lesbian and bisexual attraction all stems from male desire.

So, how many lesbians did they interview to come to this jaw-dropping conclusion?

Well, the study surveyed a derisory 1,509 people and, wait for it, all of them were heterosexual.

“My argument in the paper is this: A considerable proportion of men desire same-sex attractions in women, and this is one possible reason why many women have such attractions,” Apostolou told Pink News.

The study also suggests another possible reason for men being attracted to lesbian or bisexual women, is that if their partner cheats on them, they’re still in with a chance of having children.

“A woman, driven by her sexual desires, may seek sexual contact outside of her long-term intimate relationship,” it writes.

“When this woman has sex with another woman she does not have sex with another man which translates into same-sex contact reducing the risk of cuckoldry.”

The controversial report goes on to suggest that men were more 'sexually excited' by the idea of their partner having a same sex attraction than women were and claims that lesbians are trying to cater to this attraction.

Unsurprisingly, the paper has felt the scorn of Twitter users who were quick to point out that “not a single actual lesbian participated in the study.”

One woman wrote, “Lesbians: I’m a woman who loves women. I’m attracted to women and only women because women are great.

Another added, “All heterosexual couples, not one lesbian in the group.

“May as well do a study on the use of tampons with 500 men as participants.”"

Thank you.

I do know that a significant minority of women put on girly displays of affection for the benefit of men. I also know that no straight woman will enter a lesbian relationship just because men find it a turn on. That's just weird

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acey_RedWoman
over a year ago

Liverpool


"Obviously its true.

Everything us women do is to turn men on otherwise we would have no other purpose.

Even the farting?

Women dont fart!

Next you Will be suggesting that women are equal to men

"

May have just found out that I'm really a man

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You men just can’t stand something not being about you, huh?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acey_RedWoman
over a year ago

Liverpool


"are they going to say next week that gay male relationships only exist because women get a lot of head aches?

Don't be daft. Men are for sex. Women are decorative.

So men fuck men because of their great manliness.

Except one of them is the woman because everything is secretly hetero, amirite?"

Totally

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"

I do know that a significant minority of women put on girly displays of affection for the benefit of men. I also know that no straight woman will enter a lesbian relationship just because men find it a turn on. That's just weird "

I think that was the whole heteexible thing that existed for about a second. Katy Perry I Kissed A Girl etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

Hetero flexible. Ffs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *affeine DuskMan
over a year ago

Caerphilly


"

I do know that a significant minority of women put on girly displays of affection for the benefit of men. I also know that no straight woman will enter a lesbian relationship just because men find it a turn on. That's just weird

I think that was the whole hetero.flexible thing that existed for about a second. Katy Perry I Kissed A Girl etc"

...just gonna fix that because that laughing face is too funny in context

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ntrepid ExplorersCouple
over a year ago

Birmingham


"Hetero flexible. Ffs"

I blew a guy and I liked it

The taste of his "Cherry Chapstick"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Hetero flexible. Ffs

I blew a guy and I liked it

The taste of his "Cherry Chapstick"

"

Yeah. Watching guys together needs as much attention as watching women together

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rumpyMcFuckNuggetMan
over a year ago

Den of Iniquity


"Hetero flexible. Ffs

I blew a guy and I liked it

The taste of his "Cherry Chapstick"

Yeah. Watching guys together needs as much attention as watching women together "

Agreed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I do know that a significant minority of women put on girly displays of affection for the benefit of men. I also know that no straight woman will enter a lesbian relationship just because men find it a turn on. That's just weird

I think that was the whole heteexible thing that existed for about a second. Katy Perry I Kissed A Girl etc"

I think that's an easily reached conclusion based on a trawl of the fab forums

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"

I do know that a significant minority of women put on girly displays of affection for the benefit of men. I also know that no straight woman will enter a lesbian relationship just because men find it a turn on. That's just weird

I think that was the whole heteexible thing that existed for about a second. Katy Perry I Kissed A Girl etc

I think that's an easily reached conclusion based on a trawl of the fab forums"

I'm sure it does get used that way. It doesn't mean that female same sex attraction is purely or even predominantly performative.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex


"

I do know that a significant minority of women put on girly displays of affection for the benefit of men. I also know that no straight woman will enter a lesbian relationship just because men find it a turn on. That's just weird

I think that was the whole heteexible thing that existed for about a second. Katy Perry I Kissed A Girl etc"

Madonna and Britney Spears did a snogging thing didn't they. I've seen some women putting on a "display" for their partners too. Before I get flamed I know that lots of women are genuinely bi and only do it for themselves etc but some don't

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"

I do know that a significant minority of women put on girly displays of affection for the benefit of men. I also know that no straight woman will enter a lesbian relationship just because men find it a turn on. That's just weird

I think that was the whole heteexible thing that existed for about a second. Katy Perry I Kissed A Girl etc

Madonna and Britney Spears did a snogging thing didn't they. I've seen some women putting on a "display" for their partners too. Before I get flamed I know that lots of women are genuinely bi and only do it for themselves etc but some don't "

About the same time, yes. It was a whole thing. Possibly still is.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex


"

I do know that a significant minority of women put on girly displays of affection for the benefit of men. I also know that no straight woman will enter a lesbian relationship just because men find it a turn on. That's just weird

I think that was the whole heteexible thing that existed for about a second. Katy Perry I Kissed A Girl etc

Madonna and Britney Spears did a snogging thing didn't they. I've seen some women putting on a "display" for their partners too. Before I get flamed I know that lots of women are genuinely bi and only do it for themselves etc but some don't

About the same time, yes. It was a whole thing. Possibly still is."

Who knows. I don't go anywhere nowadays

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *acey_RedWoman
over a year ago

Liverpool


"

I do know that a significant minority of women put on girly displays of affection for the benefit of men. I also know that no straight woman will enter a lesbian relationship just because men find it a turn on. That's just weird

I think that was the whole heteexible thing that existed for about a second. Katy Perry I Kissed A Girl etc

Madonna and Britney Spears did a snogging thing didn't they. I've seen some women putting on a "display" for their partners too. Before I get flamed I know that lots of women are genuinely bi and only do it for themselves etc but some don't "

It's definitely a thing that happens but it's a huge leap to say its the only reason lesbian relationships exist which is such a ludicrous claim that its hilarious .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I do know that a significant minority of women put on girly displays of affection for the benefit of men. I also know that no straight woman will enter a lesbian relationship just because men find it a turn on. That's just weird

I think that was the whole heteexible thing that existed for about a second. Katy Perry I Kissed A Girl etc

Madonna and Britney Spears did a snogging thing didn't they. I've seen some women putting on a "display" for their partners too. Before I get flamed I know that lots of women are genuinely bi and only do it for themselves etc but some don't "

Actually you raise a valid point.

Of course same sex relationships aren't as a consequence of others being turned on, but there's no doubt there's been an upsurge in being trendy to claim a certain sexuality.

How many bicurious people have claimed to be so, as a result of partners expressing their fantasy?

I'm sure the headline was just attention grabbing, but conversely I'm guessing there's less men willing to participate male on male to satisfy female partners? So how did homesexuality start then based on this theory?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

I can see that it becomes more acceptable to consider and accept same sex attraction based on outsiders finding it hot. Not that it exists.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West

That's very kind of lesbians. Not sure I completely agree with the article in question.

I can see maybe that more people are willing to experiment with their sexuality, but that's not a bad thing imo.

Mr KC

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otSoPoshWoman
over a year ago

In a ball gown because that's how we roll in N. Devon


"Said in the media ....but i think very true

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/lesbian-relationships-men-turn-same-sex-female-attraction-menelaos-apostolou-cyprus-university-nicosia-a7766606.html"

Thank fuck that's cleared that up.

I didn't actually read it. Did it explain if men fuck men just to make women happy too?

Sorry if that's been covered.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This guy has since written the epic "Why Men Stay Single? Evidence from Reddit"

We truly are in the age of reason.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittyandtheboyCouple
over a year ago

Back of the bins.

[Removed by poster at 07/10/20 13:57:46]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittyandtheboyCouple
over a year ago

Back of the bins.

Imagine being so threatened by someone else’s sexuality that you have to write an entire academic paper on it!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"This guy has since written the epic "Why Men Stay Single? Evidence from Reddit"

We truly are in the age of reason."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ntrigued32Couple
over a year ago

Nottingham

D.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lamorousBeautyLondonWoman
over a year ago

London

My first question is - who paid for this "study"? Or is the same kind of "study" as the "research" so dilligently done by the "Institute for Studies" by the likes of Daily Mash?

For example, research like this:

https://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/alcohol/eight-pints-hailed-as-wonder-drug-20201005201180

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky_couple2020Couple
over a year ago

North West


"My first question is - who paid for this "study"? Or is the same kind of "study" as the "research" so dilligently done by the "Institute for Studies" by the likes of Daily Mash?

For example, research like this:

https://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/alcohol/eight-pints-hailed-as-wonder-drug-20201005201180

"

Woah! Don't compare the Daily Mash with that trash.

Mr KC

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It’s because pussy tastes so good

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"My first question is - who paid for this "study"? Or is the same kind of "study" as the "research" so dilligently done by the "Institute for Studies" by the likes of Daily Mash?

For example, research like this:

https://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/alcohol/eight-pints-hailed-as-wonder-drug-20201005201180

Woah! Don't compare the Daily Mash with that trash.

Mr KC"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ral Extraordinaire OP   Man
over a year ago

Kent


"It’s because pussy tastes so good "

Haha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ral Extraordinaire OP   Man
over a year ago

Kent

[Removed by poster at 07/10/20 17:16:34]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why settle for a pair of breasts to play with when you can have two

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *offiaCoolWoman
over a year ago

Kidsgrove

DOES RESEARCH SUGGEST MORE PEOPLE BELIEVE RESEARCH IF IT IS IN CAPITAL LETTERS ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend

What's not to love about boobies and pussy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"DOES RESEARCH SUGGEST MORE PEOPLE BELIEVE RESEARCH IF IT IS IN CAPITAL LETTERS ?"

Caps lock is cruise control for cool

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend

I AM A LESBIAN

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *offiaCoolWoman
over a year ago

Kidsgrove


"DOES RESEARCH SUGGEST MORE PEOPLE BELIEVE RESEARCH IF IT IS IN CAPITAL LETTERS ?

Caps lock is cruise control for cool"

Oh, that's me out of the cool corner then

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"DOES RESEARCH SUGGEST MORE PEOPLE BELIEVE RESEARCH IF IT IS IN CAPITAL LETTERS ?

Caps lock is cruise control for cool

Oh, that's me out of the cool corner then "

Me too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *offiaCoolWoman
over a year ago

Kidsgrove


"I AM A LESBIAN "

I don't think this went well when Blake the snake tried it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

most end up at protest rallies

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ral Extraordinaire OP   Man
over a year ago

Kent


"most end up at protest rallies"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I do know that a significant minority of women put on girly displays of affection for the benefit of men. I also know that no straight woman will enter a lesbian relationship just because men find it a turn on. That's just weird

I think that was the whole heteexible thing that existed for about a second. Katy Perry I Kissed A Girl etc

Madonna and Britney Spears did a snogging thing didn't they. I've seen some women putting on a "display" for their partners too. Before I get flamed I know that lots of women are genuinely bi and only do it for themselves etc but some don't

About the same time, yes. It was a whole thing. Possibly still is.

Who knows. I don't go anywhere nowadays "

There was tattoo aswell at the same sort of time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ral Extraordinaire OP   Man
over a year ago

Kent


"Ah, so the study interviewed 1500 people .... all of them heterosexual "

Haha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's got to be satirical.. Is it from the Harold?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Pahahahahaha

Fuzz

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oiluvfunMan
over a year ago

Penrith


"What's not to love about boobies and pussy "

Nail on the head mate

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Said in the media ....but i think very true"

It's balls. You obviously didn't read the article: "Well, the study surveyed a derisory 1,509 people and ... all of them were heterosexual."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sylockeWoman
over a year ago

East Anglia

The article is bullshit.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ral Extraordinaire OP   Man
over a year ago

Kent

I like it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ellothere321Man
over a year ago

Lanlivery

You mean someone published it!!!!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nfin8yWoman
over a year ago

Newcastle-under-Lyme

Just goes to prove that that some research papers aren’t worth wiping your bum on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ud and BryanCouple
over a year ago

Boston, Lincolnshire

We dare anyone to tell our eldest and her girlfriend that!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sylockeWoman
over a year ago

East Anglia

[Removed by poster at 01/10/21 07:53:37]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I have a few friends who are lesbians or where one of them is bi/pan… They just love each other and they don’t do it for others but themselves. Love is love

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uriousscouserWoman
over a year ago

Wirral

This thread has given me such a laugh this morning - thanks to whoever dug it up!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

“Some studies are absolute bollocks” claims study.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend

Gay men are frightened of vaginas

.. fact

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orthern StarsCouple
over a year ago

A town near you perhaps

I do hope people don't get paid to research and write about such studies. Honestly whatever next.

Having said that, I know on here that many women pretend to be bi or take part in bi sex just to please their man. That is very sad.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames

A non-story. Pretty clear that the author is expressing his own opinions / conclusions, proposing his own wild ideas about why men gave certain answers.

And the story has been given air by a newspaper because they knew it would provoke comment.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"A non-story. Pretty clear that the author is expressing his own opinions / conclusions, proposing his own wild ideas about why men gave certain answers.

And the story has been given air by a newspaper because they knew it would provoke comment.

"

It was also a year ago so not sure why it's been dragged up again

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eliWoman
over a year ago

.

It's definitely true on the forums/on Fab.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I do hope people don't get paid to research and write about such studies. Honestly whatever next.

Having said that, I know on here that many women pretend to be bi or take part in bi sex just to please their man. That is very sad."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice."
Gay men don't give a sh*t (laugh) whether I notice them or not..they are off in their own world.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice. Gay men don't give a sh*t (laugh) whether I notice them or not..they are off in their own world."
Or maybe they just camp it up more to be noticed..but that's kind of old school by now.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *asmeenTV/TS
over a year ago

STOKE ON TRENT


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice. Gay men don't give a sh*t (laugh) whether I notice them or not..they are off in their own world.Or maybe they just camp it up more to be noticed..but that's kind of old school by now."
ooh shut that door

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice. Gay men don't give a sh*t (laugh) whether I notice them or not..they are off in their own world.Or maybe they just camp it up more to be noticed..but that's kind of old school by now.ooh shut that door "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isspurplechesterWoman
over a year ago

Chester

Hilarious

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's all about significance in the end and not many can do without it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andyblokeMan
over a year ago

birmingham

thus study hasnt been peer reviewed and thats the key... before its peer reviewed its just a paper from a cypriot prof... boy dont the papers love these stories... the worst was mmr causes autism so dont have the jab!!! bollicks wasnt it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice."

I’m confused. You notice the “lesbian” couple, you notice the expressions on their faces despite not looking at them and keeping “eyes forward”, but you choose not to notice them?

Sounds like you noticed them come despite your best efforts, all very confusing, a confusing “story”.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice."

Non-hetro people are “irrelevant” to you? Not sure I understand that idea. Nobody is “irrelevant” to me, we are all equal.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Said in the media ....but i think very true

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/lesbian-relationships-men-turn-same-sex-female-attraction-menelaos-apostolou-cyprus-university-nicosia-a7766606.html"

What a load of bollocks.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

I’m confused. You notice the “lesbian” couple, you notice the expressions on their faces despite not looking at them and keeping “eyes forward”, but you choose not to notice them?

Sounds like you noticed them come despite your best efforts, all very confusing, a confusing “story”. "
I don't do "stories" do you want the breakdown?

Two single presumed heterosexual women in front of me. They wanted to display to me without my interest (something else)

I then responded to that with eyes front and ignore..that's not my thing)

THAT wasn't appreciated noted flash of non-verbal anger.

Is all that too detailed for you?

Let's go there!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice."

You've not got strabismus, all bog eyed?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The article isn't the best but it seems as though there is at least some misunderstanding of the original study.

I don't think the author is looking at why women have lesbian relationships now, or saying it is to titillate men, but rather how a species that evolved to pass on is genes through heterosexual intercourse also evolved (for some) the desire for female homsexual behavoir.

I've not read the study and have no idea whether or not I agree with it but I'm pretty sure the reporting here is shit.

Mr

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ad NannaWoman
over a year ago

East London


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice."

Every time you walk past them? Are they singling you out on busy London streets or doing it to everyone?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

I’m confused. You notice the “lesbian” couple, you notice the expressions on their faces despite not looking at them and keeping “eyes forward”, but you choose not to notice them?

Sounds like you noticed them come despite your best efforts, all very confusing, a confusing “story”. I don't do "stories" do you want the breakdown?

Two single presumed heterosexual women in front of me. They wanted to display to me without my interest (something else)

I then responded to that with eyes front and ignore..that's not my thing)

THAT wasn't appreciated noted flash of non-verbal anger.

Is all that too detailed for you?

Let's go there!

"
Take note what I said about significance and not many being able to not do without it.

Look at all the responses that guys profiles get on here on how they badly handle rejection.

Some female profiles too.

Is it really so far fetched to notice certain details when walking by others on a small pavement?

Bodies may stiffen, eyes may flash etc etc.

Periphal vision is there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

Every time you walk past them? Are they singling you out on busy London streets or doing it to everyone?"
Who cares?

BUT when I notice the response I know it wasn't done in a vacuum!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The Independent

Pffft not a chance I'd look at that....

Sorry OP

Any other media, news that's covered the topic?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

You've not got strabismus, all bog eyed? "
Speak clearly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm on my phone so can't properly cut and paste. Can you give me a brief rundown of this learned article

A new study that attempted to reveal the origins of lesbianism, is claiming that same-sex relationships in women only exist because it turns men on.

Published on Science Direct, the report by Menelaos Apostolou, a male professor at the University of Nicosia in Cyprus comes to the conclusion that lesbian and bisexual attraction all stems from male desire.

So, how many lesbians did they interview to come to this jaw-dropping conclusion?

Well, the study surveyed a derisory 1,509 people and, wait for it, all of them were heterosexual.

“My argument in the paper is this: A considerable proportion of men desire same-sex attractions in women, and this is one possible reason why many women have such attractions,” Apostolou told Pink News.

The study also suggests another possible reason for men being attracted to lesbian or bisexual women, is that if their partner cheats on them, they’re still in with a chance of having children.

“A woman, driven by her sexual desires, may seek sexual contact outside of her long-term intimate relationship,” it writes.

“When this woman has sex with another woman she does not have sex with another man which translates into same-sex contact reducing the risk of cuckoldry.”

The controversial report goes on to suggest that men were more 'sexually excited' by the idea of their partner having a same sex attraction than women were and claims that lesbians are trying to cater to this attraction.

Unsurprisingly, the paper has felt the scorn of Twitter users who were quick to point out that “not a single actual lesbian participated in the study.”

One woman wrote, “Lesbians: I’m a woman who loves women. I’m attracted to women and only women because women are great.

Another added, “All heterosexual couples, not one lesbian in the group.

“May as well do a study on the use of tampons with 500 men as participants.”"

Ffs....

Ok

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

Every time you walk past them? Are they singling you out on busy London streets or doing it to everyone? Who cares?

BUT when I notice the response I know it wasn't done in a vacuum!"
I stated usually and not every time..if hands were not held it wouldn't have appeared significant.

That also in daylight not possibly insecure (understandable) nightime.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

Every time you walk past them? Are they singling you out on busy London streets or doing it to everyone? Who cares?

BUT when I notice the response I know it wasn't done in a vacuum! I stated usually and not every time..if hands were not held it wouldn't have appeared significant.

That also in daylight not possibly insecure (understandable) nightime."

The same thing happens (can happen) with male/female couples.

The displays of intimacy around others to as it were show their sphere of influence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

I’m confused. You notice the “lesbian” couple, you notice the expressions on their faces despite not looking at them and keeping “eyes forward”, but you choose not to notice them?

Sounds like you noticed them come despite your best efforts, all very confusing, a confusing “story”. I don't do "stories" do you want the breakdown?

Two single presumed heterosexual women in front of me. They wanted to display to me without my interest (something else)

I then responded to that with eyes front and ignore..that's not my thing)

THAT wasn't appreciated noted flash of non-verbal anger.

Is all that too detailed for you?

Let's go there!

Take note what I said about significance and not many being able to not do without it.

Look at all the responses that guys profiles get on here on how they badly handle rejection.

Some female profiles too.

Is it really so far fetched to notice certain details when walking by others on a small pavement?

Bodies may stiffen, eyes may flash etc etc.

Periphal vision is there."
This doesn't happen around me with your traditional butch looking lesbian but with the types that blend in..maybe they are bi?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

I’m confused. You notice the “lesbian” couple, you notice the expressions on their faces despite not looking at them and keeping “eyes forward”, but you choose not to notice them?

Sounds like you noticed them come despite your best efforts, all very confusing, a confusing “story”. I don't do "stories" do you want the breakdown?

Two single presumed heterosexual women in front of me. They wanted to display to me without my interest (something else)

I then responded to that with eyes front and ignore..that's not my thing)

THAT wasn't appreciated noted flash of non-verbal anger.

Is all that too detailed for you?

Let's go there!

Take note what I said about significance and not many being able to not do without it.

Look at all the responses that guys profiles get on here on how they badly handle rejection.

Some female profiles too.

Is it really so far fetched to notice certain details when walking by others on a small pavement?

Bodies may stiffen, eyes may flash etc etc.

Periphal vision is there. This doesn't happen around me with your traditional butch looking lesbian but with the types that blend in..maybe they are bi?"

You seemed to take in alot of detail for someone who was eyes front and not interested

Were you staring at them before this all happened and they felt they had to make things obvious for you?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

I’m confused. You notice the “lesbian” couple, you notice the expressions on their faces despite not looking at them and keeping “eyes forward”, but you choose not to notice them?

Sounds like you noticed them come despite your best efforts, all very confusing, a confusing “story”. I don't do "stories" do you want the breakdown?

Two single presumed heterosexual women in front of me. They wanted to display to me without my interest (something else)

I then responded to that with eyes front and ignore..that's not my thing)

THAT wasn't appreciated noted flash of non-verbal anger.

Is all that too detailed for you?

Let's go there!

Take note what I said about significance and not many being able to not do without it.

Look at all the responses that guys profiles get on here on how they badly handle rejection.

Some female profiles too.

Is it really so far fetched to notice certain details when walking by others on a small pavement?

Bodies may stiffen, eyes may flash etc etc.

Periphal vision is there. This doesn't happen around me with your traditional butch looking lesbian but with the types that blend in..maybe they are bi?

You seemed to take in alot of detail for someone who was eyes front and not interested

Were you staring at them before this all happened and they felt they had to make things obvious for you? "
That's very funny! No, my eyes were not like this or even this more this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ad NannaWoman
over a year ago

East London


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

Every time you walk past them? Are they singling you out on busy London streets or doing it to everyone? Who cares?

BUT when I notice the response I know it wasn't done in a vacuum!"

What are you talking about? What's a vacuum got to do with it, and what response?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *jorkishMan
over a year ago

Seaforth

What rubbish

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aptainhornpipeMan
over a year ago

manchester

Arbitrary statement is true says study with absolutely no hidden agenda

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

Every time you walk past them? Are they singling you out on busy London streets or doing it to everyone? Who cares?

BUT when I notice the response I know it wasn't done in a vacuum!

What are you talking about? What's a vacuum got to do with it, and what response?"
We ALL walk past others many times in a day..you may be more disconnected and drive..when I cycle I am more disconnected to.

In spite of the big city idea of everyone shuffling about their business,

there is still a need for significance and that can manifest itself in many ways.

Do you understand that?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

Every time you walk past them? Are they singling you out on busy London streets or doing it to everyone? Who cares?

BUT when I notice the response I know it wasn't done in a vacuum!

What are you talking about? What's a vacuum got to do with it, and what response? We ALL walk past others many times in a day..you may be more disconnected and drive..when I cycle I am more disconnected to.

In spite of the big city idea of everyone shuffling about their business,

there is still a need for significance and that can manifest itself in many ways.

Do you understand that?

"
..too..etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

Every time you walk past them? Are they singling you out on busy London streets or doing it to everyone? Who cares?

BUT when I notice the response I know it wasn't done in a vacuum!

What are you talking about? What's a vacuum got to do with it, and what response?"
Have you been keeping up with the wider discussion here? (quite a few comments back)

@ we are not alone.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *umourCouple
over a year ago

Rushden


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice."

I think someone doesn't like that two girls are in a relationship! Two less girls for this "Adonis". They see him and are so upset that he doesn't look at them that they flash "non verbal anger"?

Hey fella, you really have to believe that they don't give a shit about you. Their conversation is between them and you have no idea what it is about. So any looks could be in response to what was being said.

But like others have said, eyes front would not give you a clear view of what or why they were doing anything. Peripheral is just that! It is not as clear as straight ahead vision and is for avoiding danger from the side.

You also said "usually". That implies that you notice a lot of same sex female relationships. Perhaps that is the key! Perhaps you are known for looking at girls together and they look at you with distaste. You know, that whole "Oh, here comes that pervert again" thing.

And for all your trying to look clever answers, you just come across as someone with an axe to grind!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

I’m confused. You notice the “lesbian” couple, you notice the expressions on their faces despite not looking at them and keeping “eyes forward”, but you choose not to notice them?

Sounds like you noticed them come despite your best efforts, all very confusing, a confusing “story”. I don't do "stories" do you want the breakdown?

Two single presumed heterosexual women in front of me. They wanted to display to me without my interest (something else)

I then responded to that with eyes front and ignore..that's not my thing)

THAT wasn't appreciated noted flash of non-verbal anger.

Is all that too detailed for you?

Let's go there!

"

“I’ll tell you a story” has low turned into “I don’t do stories”. Again, I am finding this confusing.

And I can’t follow your latest post, I really don’t understand what you are saying, or what happened.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *immyinreadingMan
over a year ago

henley on thames


"What rubbish"

Journalist finds bullshit report and gives it oxygen to true to boost attention for himself

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

I think someone doesn't like that two girls are in a relationship! Two less girls for this "Adonis". They see him and are so upset that he doesn't look at them that they flash "non verbal anger"?

Hey fella, you really have to believe that they don't give a shit about you. Their conversation is between them and you have no idea what it is about. So any looks could be in response to what was being said.

But like others have said, eyes front would not give you a clear view of what or why they were doing anything. Peripheral is just that! It is not as clear as straight ahead vision and is for avoiding danger from the side.

You also said "usually". That implies that you notice a lot of same sex female relationships. Perhaps that is the key! Perhaps you are known for looking at girls together and they look at you with distaste. You know, that whole "Oh, here comes that pervert again" thing.

And for all your trying to look clever answers, you just come across as someone with an axe to grind! "
What because I'm not into two girls together I have an axe to grind and I'm an adonis.

If I choose to ignore that because that's my response so what.

I know what I see and you weren't there.

Even M/F couples display a similar behaviour at times I call it showing their sphere of influence and you probably think THAT doesn't happen.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

I think someone doesn't like that two girls are in a relationship! Two less girls for this "Adonis". They see him and are so upset that he doesn't look at them that they flash "non verbal anger"?

Hey fella, you really have to believe that they don't give a shit about you. Their conversation is between them and you have no idea what it is about. So any looks could be in response to what was being said.

But like others have said, eyes front would not give you a clear view of what or why they were doing anything. Peripheral is just that! It is not as clear as straight ahead vision and is for avoiding danger from the side.

You also said "usually". That implies that you notice a lot of same sex female relationships. Perhaps that is the key! Perhaps you are known for looking at girls together and they look at you with distaste. You know, that whole "Oh, here comes that pervert again" thing.

And for all your trying to look clever answers, you just come across as someone with an axe to grind! What because I'm not into two girls together I have an axe to grind and I'm an adonis.

If I choose to ignore that because that's my response so what.

I know what I see and you weren't there.

Even M/F couples display a similar behaviour at times I call it showing their sphere of influence and you probably think THAT doesn't happen. "
If complete strangers were to say "Here comes that pervert again" to a complete stranger I would find that strange.

Wouldn't you?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll tell you a story.

When I walk past 'lesbian' couples who usually hold hands just before I approach (I'm say 15 yards in front on a clear day) I notice the anger on a certain face when I eyes front and don't see them.

I'm heterosexual and they are irrelevant to me.

Is THAT a problem?

Surely I can choose who I notice.

I think someone doesn't like that two girls are in a relationship! Two less girls for this "Adonis". They see him and are so upset that he doesn't look at them that they flash "non verbal anger"?

Hey fella, you really have to believe that they don't give a shit about you. Their conversation is between them and you have no idea what it is about. So any looks could be in response to what was being said.

But like others have said, eyes front would not give you a clear view of what or why they were doing anything. Peripheral is just that! It is not as clear as straight ahead vision and is for avoiding danger from the side.

You also said "usually". That implies that you notice a lot of same sex female relationships. Perhaps that is the key! Perhaps you are known for looking at girls together and they look at you with distaste. You know, that whole "Oh, here comes that pervert again" thing.

And for all your trying to look clever answers, you just come across as someone with an axe to grind! What because I'm not into two girls together I have an axe to grind and I'm an adonis.

If I choose to ignore that because that's my response so what.

I know what I see and you weren't there.

Even M/F couples display a similar behaviour at times I call it showing their sphere of influence and you probably think THAT doesn't happen. "
It's not like they were talking do you really think I would call it like that if they were (or even looking at each other)

It happens too often for me not to notice..and whereas of course potentially I may not have the reason right..I just see it as others looking for significance.

You automatically presume they wouldn't look from it from me..because I as you put it (laugh) am an Adonis!

That's enough from me on this.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *umourCouple
over a year ago

Rushden

For someone not looking "Eyes front" you certainly noticed a lot!

I never said YOU were an Adonis, the implication was the YOU think you are! It is coming through loud and clear from your posts that you feel threatened by females who are in a loving relationship with another female. And really, to think they are angry with you for not noticing? Just get over yourself and stop being a jerk!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top