FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

limit on male members

Jump to newest
 

By *urious1973 OP   Man
over a year ago

angus

with the amount of messages most woman seem to be getting and men complaining they dont get a reply or even there messages read should they start limiting the amount of male profiles. So youd only be allowed to join once some people deleted a profile for example. Just a thought.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hilloutMan
over a year ago

All over the place! Northwesr, , Southwest

Fab would quickly go broke

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"with the amount of messages most woman seem to be getting and men complaining they dont get a reply or even there messages read should they start limiting the amount of male profiles. So youd only be allowed to join once some people deleted a profile for example. Just a thought. "

So does that mean your happy to delete your account and wait until there is less men about?

The Fab owners want more people on here not less.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodnitegirlWoman
over a year ago

Yorkshire

Like Tesco during lockdown.

One out. One In.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *riar BelisseWoman
over a year ago

Delightful Bliss

No I like variety

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 28/09/20 16:25:37]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

haha have visions of men receiving emails

'Dear Sir.. You applied to join Fab Swingers back in 2000... 20 years later a space has finally become available do you wish to carry on your application?'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uriousKinksterMan
over a year ago

Loughborough


"Like Tesco during lockdown.

One out. One In. "

Sounds like a good night to me that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So a limited stale choice of the same old group of non-profile reading, one liner plus inappropriate pic messaging, angry, insulting, repeat messaging men for the ladies to choose from? Sounds like a dream!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"haha have visions of men receiving emails

'Dear Sir.. You applied to join Fab Swingers back in 2000... 20 years later a space has finally become available do you wish to carry on your application?'

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nah, wouldn't be fair...

Why should one person have to wait around to join whilst there are multiple inactive profiles?

Wouldn't give the site owners any scope to make more money from newbies supporting the site either.

Sorry OP...shitty idea imo.

Lu

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hav02Man
over a year ago

Glasgow/London

Why not just put a daily quota on messaging new contacts?

Just like tinder, can only swipe a certain number per day

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urious1973 OP   Man
over a year ago

angus


"Nah, wouldn't be fair...

Why should one person have to wait around to join whilst there are multiple inactive profiles?

Wouldn't give the site owners any scope to make more money from newbies supporting the site either.

Sorry OP...shitty idea imo.

Lu "

lol it was only a suggestion

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"haha have visions of men receiving emails

'Dear Sir.. You applied to join Fab Swingers back in 2000... 20 years later a space has finally become available do you wish to carry on your application?'

"

Thats a long wait when all they want is a quick tug in the loo while the wife is busy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecadent_DevonMan
over a year ago

Okehampton

I do think single guys should not be allowed to message before they receive a wink or message unless its to another guy Or maybe one week a month where that applies.

But thinking that and the practicality and fairness of that are two different things. People have the option to block messages from single guys and those that complain about getting too many messages or inappropriate messages have the power to resolve that, by being the first to approach.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *etcplCouple
over a year ago

Gapping Fanny

Fab isn't meant to be a replacement for clubs and events, which is what it is currently becoming due to the lockdown.

Limiting any membership would be a poor business decision.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

Nope. Some of us are gangbang sluts

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You'd also end up with even more men pretending to be women/couples just to get on site.

Lu

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"with the amount of messages most woman seem to be getting and men complaining they dont get a reply or even there messages read should they start limiting the amount of male profiles. So youd only be allowed to join once some people deleted a profile for example. Just a thought. "

Not being funny but your not a business owner are you. ? You don't limit the numbers of your best customers.

Add to that there are some extremely fussy women out there ( rightly so ladies ) and if they dont have a huge pool of guys to choose from they might not find a suitable play mate and hence leave the site. Double whammy from the business perspective.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Fuck me, be asking for even pricing at clubs next

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wist my nipplesCouple
over a year ago

North East Scotland, mostly


"Nope. Some of us are gangbang sluts "

2 seconds ahead of my intended witty post about Mrs TMN never wanting to limit the number of male members coming her way. Mr.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Fuck me, be asking for even pricing at clubs next "

Now you have opened a can of worms.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *naswingdressWoman
over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Nope. Some of us are gangbang sluts

2 seconds ahead of my intended witty post about Mrs TMN never wanting to limit the number of male members coming her way. Mr. "

Sister! *Fistbump*

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Fuck me, be asking for even pricing at clubs next

Now you have opened a can of worms. "

I'm a catalyst, start it, step back and enjoy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ebjonnsonMan
over a year ago

Maldon


"Like Tesco during lockdown.

One out. One In.

Sounds like a good night to me that "

Shake it all about

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uriousKinksterMan
over a year ago

Loughborough


"Like Tesco during lockdown.

One out. One In.

Sounds like a good night to me that

Shake it all about "

You do the pokey pokey...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ary Mary not so hairyWoman
over a year ago

Tamworth

Great idea but let them only have 12 months then have their profile suspended for the next 12 months so new guys could join.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heslimoneMan
over a year ago

Deeside

Whoa steady on there folks i think you've smashed the op's idea without due consideration let alone conducting careful trials to see how it might work.

I suggest in the interests of science we approach this clinically, now if you chaps would all just delete your accounts for 1 month I'm prepared to be the initial guinea pig here(i know but i don't mind taking one for the team). I think if we start with just 1 man so as to create a baseline from which we can examine later results it would be the most fair.

I'll be sure to document my findings in detail.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urious1973 OP   Man
over a year ago

angus


"Whoa steady on there folks i think you've smashed the op's idea without due consideration let alone conducting careful trials to see how it might work.

I suggest in the interests of science we approach this clinically, now if you chaps would all just delete your accounts for 1 month I'm prepared to be the initial guinea pig here(i know but i don't mind taking one for the team). I think if we start with just 1 man so as to create a baseline from which we can examine later results it would be the most fair.

I'll be sure to document my findings in detail."

Brilliant

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ily WhiteWoman
over a year ago

?


"I do think single guys should not be allowed to message before they receive a wink or message unless its to another guy Or maybe one week a month where that applies.

But thinking that and the practicality and fairness of that are two different things. People have the option to block messages from single guys and those that complain about getting too many messages or inappropriate messages have the power to resolve that, by being the first to approach. "

Now you're being far too logical and sensible Why would anyone use the tools available to them to make their experience on the site more pleasant? And what would we do without all the threads moaning about how many crappy messages ladies get?

Seriously though, there are a lot of ladies that don't like to make the first move, for whatever reason, and would rather trawl through the copious amounts of drivel on the remote chance of finding a decent message from someone that they fancy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The guys would just join as a female

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *den-Valley-coupleCouple
over a year ago

Cumbria


"with the number of messages most women seem to be getting and men complaining they don't get a reply or even there messages read should they start limiting the number of male profiles. So you'd only be allowed to join once some people deleted a profile for example. Just a thought. "

The lifeblood of fab no way it works without them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No! Very few that appeal to me on what’s already available

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Come on someone has to quote that famous line " its people like them that spoil it for us good guys". Sorry don't know the vomit emoji.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *partharmonyCouple
over a year ago

Ruislip

I don't think that's the solution.

The issue with the overload of messages is more to do with the types of guys messaging and what they say, rather than there just being too many. If the guys who write disrespectful or content less messages could be dissuaded from doing so, that would be good. If you stop guys from joining, you would stop both the good ones and the bad ones. Keeping all the guys on here keeps the good and the bad.

It would make more sense to try to address quality not quantity, not that I am offering a method for doing so.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"with the amount of messages most woman seem to be getting and men complaining they dont get a reply or even there messages read should they start limiting the amount of male profiles. So youd only be allowed to join once some people deleted a profile for example. Just a thought. "

Nooooooooooo! Variety is the spice of life - all the idiot men would be left on here and no new gorgeous fresh meat would be allowed to join.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top