Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Go ahead and make the case in favour of married men playing away." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Go ahead and make the case in favour of married men playing away." I'm not a masochist but perhaps one day. What about married women playing away? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think any can be a bit volatile depending on what mood everyone is in. I’ve seen some pretty innocent threads get turned into slanging matches. I reckon to get the best reaction, just start a thread about hating cake or something " Now there's an idea ... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Go ahead and make the case in favour of married men playing away. I'm not a masochist but perhaps one day. What about married women playing away?" This house proposes it is the entitlement of every married man and benefit of their wives that extra marital relations be considered the norm and not the exception. The floor is yours..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Go ahead and make the case in favour of married men playing away. I'm not a masochist but perhaps one day. What about married women playing away? This house proposes it is the entitlement of every married man and benefit of their wives that extra marital relations be considered the norm and not the exception. The floor is yours....." Homework The problem with this debate is that on one side people would be coming from an emotional position but on the other side would be arguing from a philosophical ethical/moral position. The two sides cannot have a debate on this as generally the emotional side will always view it as 'wrong' while the more dispassionate side may view it as 'wrong' or 'right' but allow for shades of grey. The debate can only really take place between two dispassionate camps arguing 'right' or 'wrong' from a philosophical viewpoint. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have we lost a few this morning " I'm looking at you suspiciously now | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Go ahead and make the case in favour of married men playing away. I'm not a masochist but perhaps one day. What about married women playing away? This house proposes it is the entitlement of every married man and benefit of their wives that extra marital relations be considered the norm and not the exception. The floor is yours..... Homework The problem with this debate is that on one side people would be coming from an emotional position but on the other side would be arguing from a philosophical ethical/moral position. The two sides cannot have a debate on this as generally the emotional side will always view it as 'wrong' while the more dispassionate side may view it as 'wrong' or 'right' but allow for shades of grey. The debate can only really take place between two dispassionate camps arguing 'right' or 'wrong' from a philosophical viewpoint." Careful, sounds like you're inferring that women are less capable of rational debate than men. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Go ahead and make the case in favour of married men playing away. I'm not a masochist but perhaps one day. What about married women playing away? This house proposes it is the entitlement of every married man and benefit of their wives that extra marital relations be considered the norm and not the exception. The floor is yours..... Homework The problem with this debate is that on one side people would be coming from an emotional position but on the other side would be arguing from a philosophical ethical/moral position. The two sides cannot have a debate on this as generally the emotional side will always view it as 'wrong' while the more dispassionate side may view it as 'wrong' or 'right' but allow for shades of grey. The debate can only really take place between two dispassionate camps arguing 'right' or 'wrong' from a philosophical viewpoint. Careful, sounds like you're inferring that women are less capable of rational debate than men." First mine stepped on? But I say people and do not infer sex/gender/race or anything else. If someone else infers I am referring to a specific sex/gender/race then they will be more likely to be arguing from an emotional stand point. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Go ahead and make the case in favour of married men playing away. I'm not a masochist but perhaps one day. What about married women playing away? This house proposes it is the entitlement of every married man and benefit of their wives that extra marital relations be considered the norm and not the exception. The floor is yours..... Homework The problem with this debate is that on one side people would be coming from an emotional position but on the other side would be arguing from a philosophical ethical/moral position. The two sides cannot have a debate on this as generally the emotional side will always view it as 'wrong' while the more dispassionate side may view it as 'wrong' or 'right' but allow for shades of grey. The debate can only really take place between two dispassionate camps arguing 'right' or 'wrong' from a philosophical viewpoint. Careful, sounds like you're inferring that women are less capable of rational debate than men. First mine stepped on? But I say people and do not infer sex/gender/race or anything else. If someone else infers I am referring to a specific sex/gender/race then they will be more likely to be arguing from an emotional stand point." I think to make make this debate fairer, women would have to argue in favour and be opposed by men. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Go ahead and make the case in favour of married men playing away. I'm not a masochist but perhaps one day. What about married women playing away? This house proposes it is the entitlement of every married man and benefit of their wives that extra marital relations be considered the norm and not the exception. The floor is yours..... Homework The problem with this debate is that on one side people would be coming from an emotional position but on the other side would be arguing from a philosophical ethical/moral position. The two sides cannot have a debate on this as generally the emotional side will always view it as 'wrong' while the more dispassionate side may view it as 'wrong' or 'right' but allow for shades of grey. The debate can only really take place between two dispassionate camps arguing 'right' or 'wrong' from a philosophical viewpoint. Careful, sounds like you're inferring that women are less capable of rational debate than men. First mine stepped on? But I say people and do not infer sex/gender/race or anything else. If someone else infers I am referring to a specific sex/gender/race then they will be more likely to be arguing from an emotional stand point. I think to make make this debate fairer, women would have to argue in favour and be opposed by men." Yes, that would make it interesting | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |