FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Is it double standards when...

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

A females profile says anyone with dick pics as a profile pic that messages me will be blocked, when her profile pic is of her pussy?

Hmmmm

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If she had a dick yes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What someone has on their profile and what they’re looking for on here can be different.

A man can have numerous dick pics and say he’s not interested in pussy pics.

It’s his choice

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex

It is kind of, in my opinion.

Don't do as I do, do as I say.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's not double standards because you're not obligated to message them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No because women are the backbone of Fab and as such are Godesses!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex


"No because women are the backbone of Fab and as such are Godesses! "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layful HarlequinMan
over a year ago

iver heath

Well I personally prefer The latter myself

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rincess peachWoman
over a year ago

shits creek

I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.

So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.

There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...

Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"

On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo. They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.

The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.

So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.

There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...

Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"

On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo. They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.

The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages. "

I love your terminology haha.

But can you explain why a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo has more thought behind a spunk drizzled disembodied banjo?

Just pondering your thoughts

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andyfloss2000Woman
over a year ago

ashford

Think I have a wide range of pics in public gallery think when there is just dick picks and nothing else find it confusing x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rincess peachWoman
over a year ago

shits creek


"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.

So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.

There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...

Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"

On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo. They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.

The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages.

I love your terminology haha.

But can you explain why a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo has more thought behind a spunk drizzled disembodied banjo?

Just pondering your thoughts "

Read it again beaut, I said the chuff ones aren't like that for the most part.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.

So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.

There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...

Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"

On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo. They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.

The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages. "

With that in mind, may I ask which language mine is speaking? Worth keeping or hiding away again?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rincess peachWoman
over a year ago

shits creek


"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.

So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.

There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...

Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"

On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo. They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.

The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages.

I love your terminology haha.

But can you explain why a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo has more thought behind a spunk drizzled disembodied banjo?

Just pondering your thoughts

Read it again beaut, I said the chuff ones aren't like that for the most part. "

I read it again again actually and didn't really explain well

I meant most fanjo photos aren't disembodied foofs, most are thought out as in...

On a made bed with clean sheets, maybe some flowers or other decorative items, or perhaps a nod to whatever kink they may have. The underwear even if not covering said chuff has been selected rather than whatever they threw on that morn.

Ya with me?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm guessing because men don't dislike them as much as women dislike dick pics

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yeah. I think it’s a bit double standardish

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rincess peachWoman
over a year ago

shits creek


"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.

So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.

There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...

Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"

On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo. They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.

The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages.

With that in mind, may I ask which language mine is speaking? Worth keeping or hiding away again?"

See yours, yours is one that I say, 'yes maaaate' THAT is how to take a pic containing a penis. You can see care has been taken, it has feeling and a 'moment attached to it, rather than a flop it out and snap

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don’t think it is. I think it would be if they had a dick pic as a profile pic or they stated no vagina pics as a profile pic

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hav02Man
over a year ago

Glasgow/London

[Removed by poster at 08/09/20 16:58:33]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hav02Man
over a year ago

Glasgow/London

Let's change it from

Tits out Tuesday

To

Dicks-out-Tuesday?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No she is just observing her own filters. If you choose not to accept mail from ladies with pussy shots then that would in turn be your filter. I tend to have less initial filters so I can in turn learn more about the person than by making snap judgements.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackformore100Man
over a year ago

Tin town


"A females profile says anyone with dick pics as a profile pic that messages me will be blocked, when her profile pic is of her pussy?

Hmmmm "

Yes it is. It's not the only double standard either. But what ya gonna do?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uge G RectionMan
over a year ago

where I like to be... down south


"No she is just observing her own filters. If you choose not to accept mail from ladies with pussy shots then that would in turn be your filter. I tend to have less initial filters so I can in turn learn more about the person than by making snap judgements. "

You mean to say you actually have women message you? Where did you learn this wizardry?!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"A females profile says anyone with dick pics as a profile pic that messages me will be blocked, when her profile pic is of her pussy?

Hmmmm "

To be fair, I’ve never seen a profile say that and then they’ve had a close up of their quim as an avatar.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emini ManMan
over a year ago

There and to the left a bit

I don't think it's double standards as such - people are entitled to have whatever they want associated with their profile whether that be what they display themselves, or what they ask not to be sent to them.

I think a lot of the time when ladies request no cock pics they do so because they've been sent so many and most of them "whip it out and snap a pic of it" close ups that really don't do a great deal for either recipient or sender.

It all kind of ties in with the volume of messages women get compared to men, and the number of men who think sending an unsolicited cock pic is ok, compared to the number of women who do the same in reverse.

I don't think "double standards" is the right phrase though

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layful HarlequinMan
over a year ago

iver heath

Well I’m not posting a dick pic mine looks like a slug wearing a bowler hat.....!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rambuie100Man
over a year ago

essex/suffolk border


"No because women are the backbone of Fab and as such are Godesses! "

There soo many goddess on here too.

Nice curves

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oggoneMan
over a year ago

Derry


"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.

So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.

There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...

Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"

On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a . They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.

The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages. "


"spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo"

I read that in Nigella Lawson's voice.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.

So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.

There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...

Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"

On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a . They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.

The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages.

spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo

I read that in Nigella Lawson's voice.

"

Haha so did I now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondCougarWoman
over a year ago

Norfuck! / Lincolnshire

I don’t! I value my integrity!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *edeWoman
over a year ago

the abyss


"Well I’m not posting a dick pic mine looks like a slug wearing a bowler hat.....! "

That imagery nearly had me spitting my tea out - but that would be wasteful so can't have that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layful HarlequinMan
over a year ago

iver heath


"Well I’m not posting a dick pic mine looks like a slug wearing a bowler hat.....!

That imagery nearly had me spitting my tea out - but that would be wasteful so can't have that "

No no always swallow please

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *edeWoman
over a year ago

the abyss


"Well I’m not posting a dick pic mine looks like a slug wearing a bowler hat.....!

That imagery nearly had me spitting my tea out - but that would be wasteful so can't have that

No no always swallow please "

Obviously

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layful HarlequinMan
over a year ago

iver heath


"Well I’m not posting a dick pic mine looks like a slug wearing a bowler hat.....!

That imagery nearly had me spitting my tea out - but that would be wasteful so can't have that

No no always swallow please

Obviously "

Lol were you been all my life ??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondCougarWoman
over a year ago

Norfuck! / Lincolnshire


"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.

So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.

There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...

Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"

On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo. They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.

The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages. "

Absolutely spot on Peach

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don’t! I value my integrity!"

I don’t either DC and never will.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oncupiscence73Woman
over a year ago

South

I would say yes ... cock shots for me are a total no no but my photos aren’t explicit either it’s what I like - tease rather than sleaze (until I know you of course)

But at someone else said it’s all about context an artt photo in which someone happens to be nude is erotic ...... genitals in all their glory spread or erect over a toilet just all kinds on no.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ljamMan
over a year ago

Edinburgh

Not a double standard unless they say "no genital pics" or something similar.

It really shouldn't have to be said, but a dick is very different to a pussy in many, many ways.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top