FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

For one million pounds...(part two!)

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

If you could press a button and receive a million pounds, but one stranger would die, would you press the button? And if so, how many times?

New rule; the only people that have a chance of dying if you press the button, are others who have already pressed the button.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Gosh that million pounds has to be spent quickly.

It is now like a game of Russian Roulette.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eliWoman
over a year ago

.

Minus the new rules - the OP is the plot of a film, that's what I was referencing. And nah, I'm not a button presser. I'm too saintly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

80 times

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Minus the new rules - the OP is the plot of a film, that's what I was referencing. And nah, I'm not a button presser. I'm too saintly. "

Ooooh! What film?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Gosh that million pounds has to be spent quickly.

It is now like a game of Russian Roulette."

Like bareback sex

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Gosh that million pounds has to be spent quickly.

It is now like a game of Russian Roulette.

Like bareback sex"

How do you spend bareback sex?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't know, can we get someone in to make it needlessly complicated and suck all the fun out of the concept?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensuallover1000Man
over a year ago

Somewhere In The Ether…

This reminds me of the infamous Milgram experiments....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *itty9899Man
over a year ago

Craggy Island


"If you could press a button and receive a million pounds, but one stranger would die, would you press the button? And if so, how many times?

New rule; the only people that have a chance of dying if you press the button, are others who have already pressed the button. "

I would keep pressing it till I was the last one.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'll just sit back and let the world destroy itself with greed then enjoy the peace and quiet with all the dead folks belongings like ferraris and Lamborghinis.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'll just sit back and let the world destroy itself with greed then enjoy the peace and quiet with all the dead folks belongings like ferraris and Lamborghinis."

Good thinking

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch


"I'll just sit back and let the world destroy itself with greed then enjoy the peace and quiet with all the dead folks belongings like ferraris and Lamborghinis."

Clever

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If you could press a button and receive a million pounds, but one stranger would die, would you press the button? And if so, how many times?

New rule; the only people that have a chance of dying if you press the button, are others who have already pressed the button. "

Not brave enough to press the button, but I would persuade someone I knew who would split the million with me to

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"This reminds me of the infamous Milgram experiments.... "

?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecky and justCouple
over a year ago

Godalming

I’ve been pressing...

Where’s my money..?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I’ve been pressing...

Where’s my money..?

"

Everyone’s dead!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *riar BelisseWoman
over a year ago

Delightful Bliss

Nope

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecky and justCouple
over a year ago

Godalming


"I’ve been pressing...

Where’s my money..?

Everyone’s dead! "

Yay..! I win..!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *litterbabeWoman
over a year ago

hiding from cock pics.

Now I couldn't do it if a stranger would die.

If they 100-percent had committed heinous crimes against other humans or animals then I would have to debate with myself.

Otherwise I just couldn't, I wouldn't get any pleasure from the money only sadness and guilt.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm starting to think OP works for the psych department at the University of Sydney.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I'm starting to think OP works for the psych department at the University of Sydney..... "

Yep. You caught me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wingin CatMan
over a year ago

London

An infinite number of times, to get rid of all those others pressing the button for the same thing.

I hate greedy people.......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"An infinite number of times, to get rid of all those others pressing the button for the same thing.

I hate greedy people....... "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecretlivesCouple
over a year ago

FABWatch HQ

New rule: Although making the death of another murderer more appealing, however you slice it they would end up killing themselves. Even if you start with a non button pressing pool of murderers, we have established that Fab users are more likely to flick the button like the nipple on their favourite (or imagined) FB. Beating the button whilst they beat their meat. Minimum kill = 1, max kill = how long their *other* wrist can hold out.

Its a Darwin Awards special.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"New rule: Although making the death of another murderer more appealing, however you slice it they would end up killing themselves. Even if you start with a non button pressing pool of murderers, we have established that Fab users are more likely to flick the button like the nipple on their favourite (or imagined) FB. Beating the button whilst they beat their meat. Minimum kill = 1, max kill = how long their *other* wrist can hold out.

Its a Darwin Awards special.

"

Nope. Make your own thread if you wanna add your own rules.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecretlivesCouple
over a year ago

FABWatch HQ


"New rule: Although making the death of another murderer more appealing, however you slice it they would end up killing themselves. Even if you start with a non button pressing pool of murderers, we have established that Fab users are more likely to flick the button like the nipple on their favourite (or imagined) FB. Beating the button whilst they beat their meat. Minimum kill = 1, max kill = how long their *other* wrist can hold out.

Its a Darwin Awards special.

Nope. Make your own thread if you wanna add your own rules. "

Ahem.. Not a new rule. I was commenting on what YOUR new rule does. It would mean you killed the previous person. Aside from the fact that the first person wouldnt kill anyone (unless themselves) the second person would always kill the first. Press more than once they have to kill themselves (they are the also a 'previous' button presser)...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"New rule: Although making the death of another murderer more appealing, however you slice it they would end up killing themselves. Even if you start with a non button pressing pool of murderers, we have established that Fab users are more likely to flick the button like the nipple on their favourite (or imagined) FB. Beating the button whilst they beat their meat. Minimum kill = 1, max kill = how long their *other* wrist can hold out.

Its a Darwin Awards special.

Nope. Make your own thread if you wanna add your own rules.

Ahem.. Not a new rule. I was commenting on what YOUR new rule does. It would mean you killed the previous person. Aside from the fact that the first person wouldnt kill anyone (unless themselves) the second person would always kill the first. Press more than once they have to kill themselves (they are the also a 'previous' button presser)..."

Eventually aye

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *agneto.Man
over a year ago

Bham


"If you could press a button and receive a million pounds, but one stranger would die, would you press the button? And if so, how many times?

New rule; the only people that have a chance of dying if you press the button, are others who have already pressed the button. "

Then no. Because after I press the button someone else will press the button and I'll be dead, so the money won't be of any use.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top