FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Simple maths = obvious problem

Jump to newest
 

By *nlyIfItsWorthIt OP   Man
over a year ago

Newcastle

66,400,000

÷

25,000

= 2,656

2,656

÷

365

= 7.28!

Anyone else see the obvious problem?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dam1971Man
over a year ago

Bedford


"66,400,000

÷

25,000

= 2,656

2,656

÷

365

= 7.28!

Anyone else see the obvious problem?"

I don’t know what the factorial of 7.28 is, I thought you could only do it on whole numbers?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lex46TV/TS
over a year ago

Near Wells

Something to do with the population, and something will happen to 7.28 people every day,die of the Crona Virus????

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nlyIfItsWorthIt OP   Man
over a year ago

Newcastle


"66,400,000

÷

25,000

= 2,656

2,656

÷

365

= 7.28!

Anyone else see the obvious problem?

I don’t know what the factorial of 7.28 is, I thought you could only do it on whole numbers? "

Sorry - the ! Represents the shock in the number 7.28 (I didn't think about that lol)

Do you see what's wrong with the number 7.28?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nlyIfItsWorthIt OP   Man
over a year ago

Newcastle


"Something to do with the population, and something will happen to 7.28 people every day,die of the Crona Virus???? "

Good guess - close but not right

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Number of years to test the entire population. Quite a long time!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"66,400,000

÷

25,000

= 2,656

2,656

÷

365

= 7.28!

Anyone else see the obvious problem?"

66,400,000 - I'm assuming that's the population of Great Britain?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nlyIfItsWorthIt OP   Man
over a year ago

Newcastle


"Number of years to test the entire population. Quite a long time!"

And we have a winner!

Very quiet press is quiet

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nlyIfItsWorthIt OP   Man
over a year ago

Newcastle


"66,400,000

÷

25,000

= 2,656

2,656

÷

365

= 7.28!

Anyone else see the obvious problem?

66,400,000 - I'm assuming that's the population of Great Britain? "

Yes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ed-monkeyCouple
over a year ago

Hailsham

You've worked out the approximate number of years it will take to test the whole population of the UK.

The problem with the number is the assumption that they intend to test the whole population.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *MP3Man
over a year ago

Between Scylla and Charybdis

66.4 million UK population, 25,000 tests per day = 2656 days or 7.28 years to test the entire population?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nlyIfItsWorthIt OP   Man
over a year ago

Newcastle


"66.4 million UK population, 25,000 tests per day = 2656 days or 7.28 years to test the entire population?

"

And that just 1 test per person

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club Stoke

But don't forget that the whole population can test itself.

When you can buy the test online eventually (as rumoured) then yes you can.

No math needed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The test is pointless without the cure

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"The test is pointless without the cure"

It help with identifying who should be properly isolated.

Cal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky_CarpenterMan
over a year ago

Portsmouth


"66,400,000

÷

25,000

= 2,656

2,656

÷

365

= 7.28!

No problem at all with the raw number of tests. The tests are not intended for mass testing the general population. It's intended for diagnosis of suspected cases and then to be used to with contact tracing to limit spread by quickly isolating those infected.

The faster we begin large scale testing and tracing the fewer people we'll have to test overall.....

The problem isn't the total numbers so much as the time already squandered...... a fraction of those tests, done three weeks ago would have saved thousands of lives!

Anyone else see the obvious problem?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yeah

The problem is I can’t do maths

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ineMan
over a year ago

In cave behind a waterfall on a hill


"The test is pointless without the cure

It help with identifying who should be properly isolated.

Cal"

Only at the point the test is taken

Just like STI testing...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nlyIfItsWorthIt OP   Man
over a year ago

Newcastle

1 minute after a negative test you may pick it up, you need testing regularly.

7 years just for 1 test each

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club Stoke


"

7 years just for 1 test each

"

But don't forget that the whole population can test itself.

When you can buy the test online eventually (as rumoured) then it will take only as long as each individual returns the data.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"66,400,000

÷

25,000

= 2,656

2,656

÷

365

= 7.28!

Anyone else see the obvious problem?"

Yea 7.29 % death rate or not even on the scale compared to the 66 million

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
over a year ago

couple, us we him her.


"66,400,000

÷

25,000

= 2,656

2,656

÷

365

= 7.28!

Anyone else see the obvious problem?

Yea 7.29 % death rate or not even on the scale compared to the 66 million "

Op you assume that 66.4 million people will still be alive to be tested in 7 year's.

Try taking 10% off that number where will we be at then.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecadent_DevonMan
over a year ago

Okehampton

What is the point of testing everyone? Front line services I can understand. But if I am tested today and don’t have it. Go out to the shop come back. Do I have it now or should I be tested?

If I do have it, but don’t present symptoms I should stay in (like we have all been told to do) so now I know. Yay! My life didn’t change.

If I do have it and am already presenting symptoms, then chances are I know, if it gets worse then I will need to go to hospital. Again, what would testing do?

Why does the entire country need to be tested?

Confused of Cornwall

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Its been announced they will test 100,000 a day

but thats still 1.8 years

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top